* [PATCH] ath11k: avoid inappropriate data lock
@ 2019-06-26 9:02 Karthikeyan Periyasamy
2019-06-27 11:14 ` Kalle Valo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Karthikeyan Periyasamy @ 2019-06-26 9:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ath11k; +Cc: Karthikeyan Periyasamy
peer data should protected by the ath11k_base data_lock not
by the ath11k data_lock. so lock the ath11k_base data_lock
before accessing ath11k_peer_find().
Signed-off-by: Karthikeyan Periyasamy <periyasa@codeaurora.org>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mac.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mac.c
index 1a4a333..f30b2df 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mac.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mac.c
@@ -2095,6 +2095,7 @@ static int ath11k_clear_peer_keys(struct ath11k_vif *arvif,
const u8 *addr)
{
struct ath11k *ar = arvif->ar;
+ struct ath11k_base *ab = ar->ab;
struct ath11k_peer *peer;
int first_errno = 0;
int ret;
@@ -2103,9 +2104,9 @@ static int ath11k_clear_peer_keys(struct ath11k_vif *arvif,
lockdep_assert_held(&ar->conf_mutex);
- spin_lock_bh(&ar->data_lock);
- peer = ath11k_peer_find(ar->ab, arvif->vdev_id, addr);
- spin_unlock_bh(&ar->data_lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&ab->data_lock);
+ peer = ath11k_peer_find(ab, arvif->vdev_id, addr);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&ab->data_lock);
if (!peer)
return -ENOENT;
@@ -2121,12 +2122,12 @@ static int ath11k_clear_peer_keys(struct ath11k_vif *arvif,
first_errno = ret;
if (ret < 0)
- ath11k_warn(ar->ab, "failed to remove peer key %d: %d\n",
+ ath11k_warn(ab, "failed to remove peer key %d: %d\n",
i, ret);
- spin_lock_bh(&ar->data_lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&ab->data_lock);
peer->keys[i] = NULL;
- spin_unlock_bh(&ar->data_lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&ab->data_lock);
}
return first_errno;
@@ -2137,6 +2138,7 @@ static int ath11k_mac_op_set_key(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, enum set_key_cmd cmd,
struct ieee80211_key_conf *key)
{
struct ath11k *ar = hw->priv;
+ struct ath11k_base *ab = ar->ab;
struct ath11k_vif *arvif = ath11k_vif_to_arvif(vif);
struct ath11k_peer *peer;
const u8 *peer_addr;
@@ -2167,13 +2169,13 @@ static int ath11k_mac_op_set_key(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, enum set_key_cmd cmd,
/* the peer should not disappear in mid-way (unless FW goes awry) since
* we already hold conf_mutex. we just make sure its there now.
*/
- spin_lock_bh(&ar->data_lock);
- peer = ath11k_peer_find(ar->ab, arvif->vdev_id, peer_addr);
- spin_unlock_bh(&ar->data_lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&ab->data_lock);
+ peer = ath11k_peer_find(ab, arvif->vdev_id, peer_addr);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&ab->data_lock);
if (!peer) {
if (cmd == SET_KEY) {
- ath11k_warn(ar->ab, "cannot install key for non-existent peer %pM\n",
+ ath11k_warn(ab, "cannot install key for non-existent peer %pM\n",
peer_addr);
ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
goto exit;
@@ -2192,20 +2194,20 @@ static int ath11k_mac_op_set_key(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, enum set_key_cmd cmd,
ret = ath11k_install_key(arvif, key, cmd, peer_addr, flags);
if (ret) {
- ath11k_warn(ar->ab, "ath11k_install_key failed (%d)\n", ret);
+ ath11k_warn(ab, "ath11k_install_key failed (%d)\n", ret);
goto exit;
}
- spin_lock_bh(&ar->data_lock);
- peer = ath11k_peer_find(ar->ab, arvif->vdev_id, peer_addr);
+ spin_lock_bh(&ab->data_lock);
+ peer = ath11k_peer_find(ab, arvif->vdev_id, peer_addr);
if (peer && cmd == SET_KEY)
peer->keys[key->keyidx] = key;
else if (peer && cmd == DISABLE_KEY)
peer->keys[key->keyidx] = NULL;
else if (!peer)
/* impossible unless FW goes crazy */
- ath11k_warn(ar->ab, "peer %pM disappeared!\n", peer_addr);
- spin_unlock_bh(&ar->data_lock);
+ ath11k_warn(ab, "peer %pM disappeared!\n", peer_addr);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&ab->data_lock);
exit:
mutex_unlock(&ar->conf_mutex);
@@ -2669,21 +2671,25 @@ static void ath11k_mac_op_sta_rc_update(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
struct ath11k_peer *peer;
u32 bw, smps;
- spin_lock_bh(&ar->data_lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&ar->ab->data_lock);
peer = ath11k_peer_find(ar->ab, arvif->vdev_id, sta->addr);
if (!peer) {
- spin_unlock_bh(&ar->data_lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&ar->ab->data_lock);
ath11k_warn(ar->ab, "mac sta rc update failed to find peer %pM on vdev %i\n",
sta->addr, arvif->vdev_id);
return;
}
+ spin_unlock_bh(&ar->ab->data_lock);
+
ath11k_dbg(ar->ab, ATH11K_DBG_MAC,
"mac sta rc update for %pM changed %08x bw %d nss %d smps %d\n",
sta->addr, changed, sta->bandwidth, sta->rx_nss,
sta->smps_mode);
+ spin_lock_bh(&ar->data_lock);
+
if (changed & IEEE80211_RC_BW_CHANGED) {
bw = WMI_PEER_CHWIDTH_20MHZ;
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
ath11k mailing list
ath11k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath11k
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-06-27 11:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-06-26 9:02 [PATCH] ath11k: avoid inappropriate data lock Karthikeyan Periyasamy
2019-06-27 11:14 ` Kalle Valo
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.