From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Aleix Roca Nonell <kernelrocks@gmail.com>
Cc: "Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, "Jason Cooper" <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Document RTD129x
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2019 20:10:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190707201059.0e86dc71@why> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190707132246.GB13340@arks.localdomain>
On Sun, 7 Jul 2019 15:22:46 +0200
Aleix Roca Nonell <kernelrocks@gmail.com> wrote:
> Add binding for Realtek RTD129x interrupt controller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aleix Roca Nonell <kernelrocks@gmail.com>
> ---
> .../realtek,rtd129x-intc.txt | 24 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/realtek,rtd129x-intc.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/realtek,rtd129x-intc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/realtek,rtd129x-intc.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..3ebb7c02afe5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/realtek,rtd129x-intc.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
> +Realtek RTD129x IRQ Interrupt Controller
> +=======================================
> +
> +Required properties:
> +
> +- compatible : Should be one of the following:
> + - "realtek,rtd129x-intc-misc"
> + - "realtek,rtd129x-intc-iso"
What does 'iso' mean in this context?
> +- reg : Specifies the address of the ISR, IER and Unmask
> + register in couples of "address length".
Are these registers actually interleaved with other stuff? What else it
in between?
> +- interrupts : Specifies the interrupt line which is mux'ed.
> +- interrupt-controller : Presence indicates the node as interrupt controller.
> +- #interrupt-cells : Shall be 1. See common bindings in interrupt.txt.
So I guess this is level only, with an unspecified polarity? No edge
interrupts?
> +
> +
> +Example:
> +
> + interrupt-controller@98007000 {
> + compatible = "realtek,rtd129x-iso-irq-mux";
It'd be good if the the example matched the rest of the documentation.
> + reg = <0x98007000 0x4 0x98007040 0x4 0x98007004 0x4>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 41 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + interrupt-controller;
> + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> + };
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Aleix Roca Nonell <kernelrocks@gmail.com>
Cc: "Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, "Jason Cooper" <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Document RTD129x
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2019 20:10:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190707201059.0e86dc71@why> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190707132246.GB13340@arks.localdomain>
On Sun, 7 Jul 2019 15:22:46 +0200
Aleix Roca Nonell <kernelrocks@gmail.com> wrote:
> Add binding for Realtek RTD129x interrupt controller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aleix Roca Nonell <kernelrocks@gmail.com>
> ---
> .../realtek,rtd129x-intc.txt | 24 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/realtek,rtd129x-intc.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/realtek,rtd129x-intc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/realtek,rtd129x-intc.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..3ebb7c02afe5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/realtek,rtd129x-intc.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
> +Realtek RTD129x IRQ Interrupt Controller
> +=======================================
> +
> +Required properties:
> +
> +- compatible : Should be one of the following:
> + - "realtek,rtd129x-intc-misc"
> + - "realtek,rtd129x-intc-iso"
What does 'iso' mean in this context?
> +- reg : Specifies the address of the ISR, IER and Unmask
> + register in couples of "address length".
Are these registers actually interleaved with other stuff? What else it
in between?
> +- interrupts : Specifies the interrupt line which is mux'ed.
> +- interrupt-controller : Presence indicates the node as interrupt controller.
> +- #interrupt-cells : Shall be 1. See common bindings in interrupt.txt.
So I guess this is level only, with an unspecified polarity? No edge
interrupts?
> +
> +
> +Example:
> +
> + interrupt-controller@98007000 {
> + compatible = "realtek,rtd129x-iso-irq-mux";
It'd be good if the the example matched the rest of the documentation.
> + reg = <0x98007000 0x4 0x98007040 0x4 0x98007004 0x4>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 41 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + interrupt-controller;
> + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> + };
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Aleix Roca Nonell <kernelrocks@gmail.com>
Cc: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Jason Cooper" <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Document RTD129x
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2019 20:10:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190707201059.0e86dc71@why> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190707132246.GB13340@arks.localdomain>
On Sun, 7 Jul 2019 15:22:46 +0200
Aleix Roca Nonell <kernelrocks@gmail.com> wrote:
> Add binding for Realtek RTD129x interrupt controller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aleix Roca Nonell <kernelrocks@gmail.com>
> ---
> .../realtek,rtd129x-intc.txt | 24 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/realtek,rtd129x-intc.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/realtek,rtd129x-intc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/realtek,rtd129x-intc.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..3ebb7c02afe5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/realtek,rtd129x-intc.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
> +Realtek RTD129x IRQ Interrupt Controller
> +=======================================
> +
> +Required properties:
> +
> +- compatible : Should be one of the following:
> + - "realtek,rtd129x-intc-misc"
> + - "realtek,rtd129x-intc-iso"
What does 'iso' mean in this context?
> +- reg : Specifies the address of the ISR, IER and Unmask
> + register in couples of "address length".
Are these registers actually interleaved with other stuff? What else it
in between?
> +- interrupts : Specifies the interrupt line which is mux'ed.
> +- interrupt-controller : Presence indicates the node as interrupt controller.
> +- #interrupt-cells : Shall be 1. See common bindings in interrupt.txt.
So I guess this is level only, with an unspecified polarity? No edge
interrupts?
> +
> +
> +Example:
> +
> + interrupt-controller@98007000 {
> + compatible = "realtek,rtd129x-iso-irq-mux";
It'd be good if the the example matched the rest of the documentation.
> + reg = <0x98007000 0x4 0x98007040 0x4 0x98007004 0x4>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 41 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + interrupt-controller;
> + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> + };
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-07 19:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-07 13:22 [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Document RTD129x Aleix Roca Nonell
2019-07-07 13:22 ` Aleix Roca Nonell
2019-07-07 13:22 ` Aleix Roca Nonell
2019-07-07 19:10 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2019-07-07 19:10 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-07-07 19:10 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-07-24 16:21 ` Rob Herring
2019-07-24 16:21 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190707201059.0e86dc71@why \
--to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=kernelrocks@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.