From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
syzbot+370a6b0f11867bf13515@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] perf/hw_breakpoint: Fix breakpoint overcommit issue
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 17:34:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190710153406.GA18838@lenoir> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190710140421.GP3402@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 04:04:21PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 03:48:19PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> >
> > Syzbot has found a breakpoint overcommit issue:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/000000000000639f6a0584d11b82@google.com/
> >
> > It took me a long time to find out what the actual root problem was. Also
> > its reproducer only worked on a few month old kernel but it didn't feel like
> > the issue was actually solved.
> >
> > I eventually cooked a reproducer that works with latest upstream, see in
> > the end of this message.
> >
> > The fix is just a few liner but implies to shut down the context swapping
> > optimization for contexts containing breakpoints.
> >
> > Also I feel like uprobes may be concerned as well as it seems to make use
> > of event.hw->target after pmu::init().
>
> Can't we simply swizzle event.hw->target along too?
You mean remove it? But it's still needed by breakpoint code during all the event
lifecycle (init, destroy and anytime in-between).
I wish we could use event->ctx->task instead but on pmu::init() there is no ctx yet (we could pass
the task in parameter though) and on event->destroy() it's TASK_TOMBSTONE and retrieving the task
at that time would be non trivial.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-10 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-09 13:48 [PATCH 0/2] perf/hw_breakpoint: Fix breakpoint overcommit issue Frederic Weisbecker
2019-07-09 13:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf: Allow a pmu to pin context Frederic Weisbecker
2019-07-09 13:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf/hw_breakpoints: Pin perf contexts of breakpoints Frederic Weisbecker
2019-07-10 14:04 ` [PATCH 0/2] perf/hw_breakpoint: Fix breakpoint overcommit issue Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-10 15:34 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2019-07-11 10:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-15 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-16 13:42 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2019-07-16 13:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190710153406.GA18838@lenoir \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=syzbot+370a6b0f11867bf13515@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.