All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: x86 - clang / objtool status
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 13:58:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190718205839.GA40219@archlinux-threadripper> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1907182223560.1785@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>

Hi Thomas,

I can't comment on the objtool stuff as it is a bit outside of my area
of expertise (probably going to be my next major learning project) but I
can comment on the other errors.

On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 10:40:09PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>  Build fails with:
> 
>   clang-10: error: unknown argument: '-mpreferred-stack-boundary=4'
>   make[5]: *** [linux/scripts/Makefile.build:279: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn20/dcn20_resource.o] Error 1

Arnd sent a patch for this which has been picked up:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CADnq5_Mm=Fj4AkFtuo+W_295q8r6DY3Sumo7gTG-McUYY=CeVg@mail.gmail.com/

> 3) allmodconfig:
>  Build fails with:
> 
>   ERROR: "__compiletime_assert_2801" [drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwlwifi.ko] undefined!
>   ERROR: "__compiletime_assert_2446" [drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwlwifi.ko] undefined!
>   ERROR: "__compiletime_assert_2452" [drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwlwifi.ko] undefined!
>   ERROR: "__compiletime_assert_2790" [drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwlwifi.ko] undefined!

Being tracked here:
https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/580

It is a clang bug but has a kernel side fix. Nick sent one but it sounds
like Intel has another one pending:

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190712001708.170259-1-ndesaulniers@google.com/

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/da053a97d771eff0ad8db37e644108ed2fad25a3.camel@coelho.fi/

>  This also emits a boatload of warnings like this:
> 
>   linux/fs/nfs/dir.c:451:34: warning: variable 'wq' is uninitialized when used within its own initialization
>       [-Wuninitialized]
>         DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_ONSTACK(wq);
>                                         ^~
>   linux/include/linux/wait.h:74:63: note: expanded from macro 'DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_ONSTACK'
>         struct wait_queue_head name = __WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_INIT_ONSTACK(name)
>                                ~~~~                                  ^~~~
>   linux/include/linux/wait.h:72:33: note: expanded from macro '__WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_INIT_ONSTACK'
>         ({ init_waitqueue_head(&name); name; })

Being tracked here:
https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/499

Has a kernel workaround patch posted but it should be fixed in clang:

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190703081119.209976-1-arnd@arndb.de/

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42604

Thanks for continuing to test it and keeping us posted on the issues!
Nathan

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-18 20:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-18 20:40 x86 - clang / objtool status Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-18 20:58 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2019-07-19  6:39   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-19  7:00     ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-19  7:03     ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-07-24 16:57     ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-07-18 22:42 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-07-19  6:44   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-19 11:37 ` Sedat Dilek
2019-07-19 13:48   ` Sedat Dilek
2019-07-22 15:40     ` Sedat Dilek
2019-07-25  6:17       ` Sedat Dilek
2019-07-24  2:43 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-07-24  7:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-24 12:37     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-07-24 12:55     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-07-24 13:35       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-24 14:05         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-07-24 14:10         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-24 16:48           ` [PATCH] objtool: Improve UACCESS coverage Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-24 16:54             ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-07-24 16:55             ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-07-24 18:30             ` Sedat Dilek
2019-07-24 18:32               ` Sedat Dilek
2019-07-24 16:52   ` x86 - clang / objtool status Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-24 17:22   ` Nick Desaulniers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190718205839.GA40219@archlinux-threadripper \
    --to=natechancellor@gmail.com \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.