From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Subject: Re: x86 - clang / objtool status
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 18:52:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190724165248.GD31381@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190724023946.yxsz5im22fz4zxrn@treble>
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 09:43:24PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 10:40:09PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.o: warning: objtool: .altinstr_replacement+0x86: redundant UACCESS disable
>
> Looking at this one, I think I agree with objtool.
>
> PeterZ, Linus, I know y'all discussed this code a few months ago.
>
> __copy_from_user() already does a CLAC in its error path. So isn't the
> user_access_end() redundant for the __copy_from_user() error path?
>
> Untested fix:
Run this past i915 people, but with the objtool patch I just posted it
reproduces with GCC and this patch makes it go away.
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> index 5fae0e50aad0..41dab9ea33cd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> @@ -1628,6 +1628,7 @@ static int check_relocations(const struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 *entry)
>
> static int eb_copy_relocations(const struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
> {
> + struct drm_i915_gem_relocation_entry *relocs;
> const unsigned int count = eb->buffer_count;
> unsigned int i;
> int err;
> @@ -1635,7 +1636,6 @@ static int eb_copy_relocations(const struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
> for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> const unsigned int nreloc = eb->exec[i].relocation_count;
> struct drm_i915_gem_relocation_entry __user *urelocs;
> - struct drm_i915_gem_relocation_entry *relocs;
> unsigned long size;
> unsigned long copied;
>
> @@ -1663,14 +1663,8 @@ static int eb_copy_relocations(const struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
>
> if (__copy_from_user((char *)relocs + copied,
> (char __user *)urelocs + copied,
> - len)) {
> -end_user:
> - user_access_end();
> -end:
> - kvfree(relocs);
> - err = -EFAULT;
> - goto err;
> - }
> + len))
> + goto end;
>
> copied += len;
> } while (copied < size);
> @@ -1699,10 +1693,14 @@ static int eb_copy_relocations(const struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
>
> return 0;
>
> +end_user:
> + user_access_end();
> +end:
> + kvfree(relocs);
> + err = -EFAULT;
> err:
> while (i--) {
> - struct drm_i915_gem_relocation_entry *relocs =
> - u64_to_ptr(typeof(*relocs), eb->exec[i].relocs_ptr);
> + relocs = u64_to_ptr(typeof(*relocs), eb->exec[i].relocs_ptr);
> if (eb->exec[i].relocation_count)
> kvfree(relocs);
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-24 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-18 20:40 x86 - clang / objtool status Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-18 20:58 ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-07-19 6:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-19 7:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-19 7:03 ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-07-24 16:57 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-07-18 22:42 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-07-19 6:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-19 11:37 ` Sedat Dilek
2019-07-19 13:48 ` Sedat Dilek
2019-07-22 15:40 ` Sedat Dilek
2019-07-25 6:17 ` Sedat Dilek
2019-07-24 2:43 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-07-24 7:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-24 12:37 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-07-24 12:55 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-07-24 13:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-24 14:05 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-07-24 14:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-24 16:48 ` [PATCH] objtool: Improve UACCESS coverage Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-24 16:54 ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-07-24 16:55 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-07-24 18:30 ` Sedat Dilek
2019-07-24 18:32 ` Sedat Dilek
2019-07-24 16:52 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-07-24 17:22 ` x86 - clang / objtool status Nick Desaulniers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190724165248.GD31381@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=natechancellor@gmail.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.