* [PATCH v2] dma-mapping: Use dma_get_mask in dma_addressing_limited
@ 2019-07-22 16:51 ` Eric Auger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Eric Auger @ 2019-07-22 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: eric.auger.pro, eric.auger, hch, m.szyprowski, robin.murphy, mst,
jasowang, virtualization, iommu, linux-kernel
We currently have cases where the dma_addressing_limited() gets
called with dma_mask unset. This causes a NULL pointer dereference.
Use dma_get_mask() accessor to prevent the crash.
Fixes: b866455423e0 ("dma-mapping: add a dma_addressing_limited helper")
Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
---
v1 -> v2:
- was [PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: Protect dma_addressing_limited
against NULL dma_mask
- Use dma_get_mask
---
include/linux/dma-mapping.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
index e11b115dd0e4..f7d1eea32c78 100644
--- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
+++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
@@ -689,8 +689,8 @@ static inline int dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
*/
static inline bool dma_addressing_limited(struct device *dev)
{
- return min_not_zero(*dev->dma_mask, dev->bus_dma_mask) <
- dma_get_required_mask(dev);
+ return min_not_zero(dma_get_mask(dev), dev->bus_dma_mask) <
+ dma_get_required_mask(dev);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SETUP_DMA_OPS
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2] dma-mapping: Use dma_get_mask in dma_addressing_limited
@ 2019-07-22 16:51 ` Eric Auger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Eric Auger @ 2019-07-22 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: eric.auger.pro, eric.auger, hch, m.szyprowski, robin.murphy, mst,
jasowang, virtualization, iommu, linux-kernel
We currently have cases where the dma_addressing_limited() gets
called with dma_mask unset. This causes a NULL pointer dereference.
Use dma_get_mask() accessor to prevent the crash.
Fixes: b866455423e0 ("dma-mapping: add a dma_addressing_limited helper")
Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
---
v1 -> v2:
- was [PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: Protect dma_addressing_limited
against NULL dma_mask
- Use dma_get_mask
---
include/linux/dma-mapping.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
index e11b115dd0e4..f7d1eea32c78 100644
--- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
+++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
@@ -689,8 +689,8 @@ static inline int dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
*/
static inline bool dma_addressing_limited(struct device *dev)
{
- return min_not_zero(*dev->dma_mask, dev->bus_dma_mask) <
- dma_get_required_mask(dev);
+ return min_not_zero(dma_get_mask(dev), dev->bus_dma_mask) <
+ dma_get_required_mask(dev);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SETUP_DMA_OPS
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] dma-mapping: Use dma_get_mask in dma_addressing_limited
2019-07-22 16:51 ` Eric Auger
(?)
@ 2019-07-22 16:56 ` Auger Eric
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Auger Eric @ 2019-07-22 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: eric.auger.pro, hch, m.szyprowski, robin.murphy, mst, jasowang,
virtualization, iommu, linux-kernel
Hi Christoph,
On 7/22/19 6:51 PM, Eric Auger wrote:
> We currently have cases where the dma_addressing_limited() gets
> called with dma_mask unset. This causes a NULL pointer dereference.
>
> Use dma_get_mask() accessor to prevent the crash.
>
> Fixes: b866455423e0 ("dma-mapping: add a dma_addressing_limited helper")
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
As a follow-up of my last email, here is a patch featuring
dma_get_mask(). But you don't have the WARN_ON_ONCE anymore, pointing
out suspect users.
Feel free to pick up your preferred approach
Thanks
Eric
>
> ---
>
> v1 -> v2:
> - was [PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: Protect dma_addressing_limited
> against NULL dma_mask
> - Use dma_get_mask
> ---
> include/linux/dma-mapping.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> index e11b115dd0e4..f7d1eea32c78 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> @@ -689,8 +689,8 @@ static inline int dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
> */
> static inline bool dma_addressing_limited(struct device *dev)
> {
> - return min_not_zero(*dev->dma_mask, dev->bus_dma_mask) <
> - dma_get_required_mask(dev);
> + return min_not_zero(dma_get_mask(dev), dev->bus_dma_mask) <
> + dma_get_required_mask(dev);
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SETUP_DMA_OPS
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] dma-mapping: Use dma_get_mask in dma_addressing_limited
2019-07-22 16:51 ` Eric Auger
@ 2019-07-22 16:56 ` Auger Eric
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Auger Eric @ 2019-07-22 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: eric.auger.pro, hch, m.szyprowski, robin.murphy, mst, jasowang,
virtualization, iommu, linux-kernel
Hi Christoph,
On 7/22/19 6:51 PM, Eric Auger wrote:
> We currently have cases where the dma_addressing_limited() gets
> called with dma_mask unset. This causes a NULL pointer dereference.
>
> Use dma_get_mask() accessor to prevent the crash.
>
> Fixes: b866455423e0 ("dma-mapping: add a dma_addressing_limited helper")
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
As a follow-up of my last email, here is a patch featuring
dma_get_mask(). But you don't have the WARN_ON_ONCE anymore, pointing
out suspect users.
Feel free to pick up your preferred approach
Thanks
Eric
>
> ---
>
> v1 -> v2:
> - was [PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: Protect dma_addressing_limited
> against NULL dma_mask
> - Use dma_get_mask
> ---
> include/linux/dma-mapping.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> index e11b115dd0e4..f7d1eea32c78 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> @@ -689,8 +689,8 @@ static inline int dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
> */
> static inline bool dma_addressing_limited(struct device *dev)
> {
> - return min_not_zero(*dev->dma_mask, dev->bus_dma_mask) <
> - dma_get_required_mask(dev);
> + return min_not_zero(dma_get_mask(dev), dev->bus_dma_mask) <
> + dma_get_required_mask(dev);
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SETUP_DMA_OPS
>
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] dma-mapping: Use dma_get_mask in dma_addressing_limited
@ 2019-07-22 16:56 ` Auger Eric
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Auger Eric @ 2019-07-22 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: eric.auger.pro, hch, m.szyprowski, robin.murphy, mst, jasowang,
virtualization, iommu, linux-kernel
Hi Christoph,
On 7/22/19 6:51 PM, Eric Auger wrote:
> We currently have cases where the dma_addressing_limited() gets
> called with dma_mask unset. This causes a NULL pointer dereference.
>
> Use dma_get_mask() accessor to prevent the crash.
>
> Fixes: b866455423e0 ("dma-mapping: add a dma_addressing_limited helper")
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
As a follow-up of my last email, here is a patch featuring
dma_get_mask(). But you don't have the WARN_ON_ONCE anymore, pointing
out suspect users.
Feel free to pick up your preferred approach
Thanks
Eric
>
> ---
>
> v1 -> v2:
> - was [PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: Protect dma_addressing_limited
> against NULL dma_mask
> - Use dma_get_mask
> ---
> include/linux/dma-mapping.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> index e11b115dd0e4..f7d1eea32c78 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> @@ -689,8 +689,8 @@ static inline int dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
> */
> static inline bool dma_addressing_limited(struct device *dev)
> {
> - return min_not_zero(*dev->dma_mask, dev->bus_dma_mask) <
> - dma_get_required_mask(dev);
> + return min_not_zero(dma_get_mask(dev), dev->bus_dma_mask) <
> + dma_get_required_mask(dev);
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SETUP_DMA_OPS
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] dma-mapping: Use dma_get_mask in dma_addressing_limited
2019-07-22 16:56 ` Auger Eric
(?)
@ 2019-07-22 18:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2019-07-22 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Auger Eric
Cc: jasowang, linux-kernel, virtualization, iommu, eric.auger.pro,
robin.murphy, hch
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 06:56:49PM +0200, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
>
> On 7/22/19 6:51 PM, Eric Auger wrote:
> > We currently have cases where the dma_addressing_limited() gets
> > called with dma_mask unset. This causes a NULL pointer dereference.
> >
> > Use dma_get_mask() accessor to prevent the crash.
> >
> > Fixes: b866455423e0 ("dma-mapping: add a dma_addressing_limited helper")
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
>
> As a follow-up of my last email, here is a patch featuring
> dma_get_mask(). But you don't have the WARN_ON_ONCE anymore, pointing
> out suspect users.
OTOH these users then simply become okay so no need for WARN_ON_ONCE
then :)
> Feel free to pick up your preferred approach
>
> Thanks
>
> Eric
> >
> > ---
> >
> > v1 -> v2:
> > - was [PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: Protect dma_addressing_limited
> > against NULL dma_mask
> > - Use dma_get_mask
> > ---
> > include/linux/dma-mapping.h | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> > index e11b115dd0e4..f7d1eea32c78 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> > @@ -689,8 +689,8 @@ static inline int dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
> > */
> > static inline bool dma_addressing_limited(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > - return min_not_zero(*dev->dma_mask, dev->bus_dma_mask) <
> > - dma_get_required_mask(dev);
> > + return min_not_zero(dma_get_mask(dev), dev->bus_dma_mask) <
> > + dma_get_required_mask(dev);
> > }
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SETUP_DMA_OPS
> >
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] dma-mapping: Use dma_get_mask in dma_addressing_limited
@ 2019-07-22 18:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2019-07-22 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Auger Eric
Cc: eric.auger.pro, hch, m.szyprowski, robin.murphy, jasowang,
virtualization, iommu, linux-kernel
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 06:56:49PM +0200, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
>
> On 7/22/19 6:51 PM, Eric Auger wrote:
> > We currently have cases where the dma_addressing_limited() gets
> > called with dma_mask unset. This causes a NULL pointer dereference.
> >
> > Use dma_get_mask() accessor to prevent the crash.
> >
> > Fixes: b866455423e0 ("dma-mapping: add a dma_addressing_limited helper")
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
>
> As a follow-up of my last email, here is a patch featuring
> dma_get_mask(). But you don't have the WARN_ON_ONCE anymore, pointing
> out suspect users.
OTOH these users then simply become okay so no need for WARN_ON_ONCE
then :)
> Feel free to pick up your preferred approach
>
> Thanks
>
> Eric
> >
> > ---
> >
> > v1 -> v2:
> > - was [PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: Protect dma_addressing_limited
> > against NULL dma_mask
> > - Use dma_get_mask
> > ---
> > include/linux/dma-mapping.h | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> > index e11b115dd0e4..f7d1eea32c78 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> > @@ -689,8 +689,8 @@ static inline int dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
> > */
> > static inline bool dma_addressing_limited(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > - return min_not_zero(*dev->dma_mask, dev->bus_dma_mask) <
> > - dma_get_required_mask(dev);
> > + return min_not_zero(dma_get_mask(dev), dev->bus_dma_mask) <
> > + dma_get_required_mask(dev);
> > }
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SETUP_DMA_OPS
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] dma-mapping: Use dma_get_mask in dma_addressing_limited
@ 2019-07-22 18:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2019-07-22 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Auger Eric
Cc: linux-kernel, virtualization, iommu, eric.auger.pro, robin.murphy,
hch, m.szyprowski
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 06:56:49PM +0200, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
>
> On 7/22/19 6:51 PM, Eric Auger wrote:
> > We currently have cases where the dma_addressing_limited() gets
> > called with dma_mask unset. This causes a NULL pointer dereference.
> >
> > Use dma_get_mask() accessor to prevent the crash.
> >
> > Fixes: b866455423e0 ("dma-mapping: add a dma_addressing_limited helper")
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
>
> As a follow-up of my last email, here is a patch featuring
> dma_get_mask(). But you don't have the WARN_ON_ONCE anymore, pointing
> out suspect users.
OTOH these users then simply become okay so no need for WARN_ON_ONCE
then :)
> Feel free to pick up your preferred approach
>
> Thanks
>
> Eric
> >
> > ---
> >
> > v1 -> v2:
> > - was [PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: Protect dma_addressing_limited
> > against NULL dma_mask
> > - Use dma_get_mask
> > ---
> > include/linux/dma-mapping.h | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> > index e11b115dd0e4..f7d1eea32c78 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> > @@ -689,8 +689,8 @@ static inline int dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
> > */
> > static inline bool dma_addressing_limited(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > - return min_not_zero(*dev->dma_mask, dev->bus_dma_mask) <
> > - dma_get_required_mask(dev);
> > + return min_not_zero(dma_get_mask(dev), dev->bus_dma_mask) <
> > + dma_get_required_mask(dev);
> > }
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SETUP_DMA_OPS
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] dma-mapping: Use dma_get_mask in dma_addressing_limited
2019-07-22 16:56 ` Auger Eric
@ 2019-07-23 15:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2019-07-23 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Auger Eric
Cc: mst, jasowang, linux-kernel, virtualization, iommu,
eric.auger.pro, robin.murphy, hch
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 06:56:49PM +0200, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
>
> On 7/22/19 6:51 PM, Eric Auger wrote:
> > We currently have cases where the dma_addressing_limited() gets
> > called with dma_mask unset. This causes a NULL pointer dereference.
> >
> > Use dma_get_mask() accessor to prevent the crash.
> >
> > Fixes: b866455423e0 ("dma-mapping: add a dma_addressing_limited helper")
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
>
> As a follow-up of my last email, here is a patch featuring
> dma_get_mask(). But you don't have the WARN_ON_ONCE anymore, pointing
> out suspect users.
>
> Feel free to pick up your preferred approach
I can take this for now as we are past the merge window.
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] dma-mapping: Use dma_get_mask in dma_addressing_limited
@ 2019-07-23 15:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2019-07-23 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Auger Eric
Cc: eric.auger.pro, hch, m.szyprowski, robin.murphy, mst, jasowang,
virtualization, iommu, linux-kernel
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 06:56:49PM +0200, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
>
> On 7/22/19 6:51 PM, Eric Auger wrote:
> > We currently have cases where the dma_addressing_limited() gets
> > called with dma_mask unset. This causes a NULL pointer dereference.
> >
> > Use dma_get_mask() accessor to prevent the crash.
> >
> > Fixes: b866455423e0 ("dma-mapping: add a dma_addressing_limited helper")
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
>
> As a follow-up of my last email, here is a patch featuring
> dma_get_mask(). But you don't have the WARN_ON_ONCE anymore, pointing
> out suspect users.
>
> Feel free to pick up your preferred approach
I can take this for now as we are past the merge window.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] dma-mapping: Use dma_get_mask in dma_addressing_limited
2019-07-22 16:56 ` Auger Eric
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2019-07-23 15:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2019-07-23 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Auger Eric
Cc: mst, linux-kernel, virtualization, iommu, eric.auger.pro,
robin.murphy, hch, m.szyprowski
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 06:56:49PM +0200, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
>
> On 7/22/19 6:51 PM, Eric Auger wrote:
> > We currently have cases where the dma_addressing_limited() gets
> > called with dma_mask unset. This causes a NULL pointer dereference.
> >
> > Use dma_get_mask() accessor to prevent the crash.
> >
> > Fixes: b866455423e0 ("dma-mapping: add a dma_addressing_limited helper")
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
>
> As a follow-up of my last email, here is a patch featuring
> dma_get_mask(). But you don't have the WARN_ON_ONCE anymore, pointing
> out suspect users.
>
> Feel free to pick up your preferred approach
I can take this for now as we are past the merge window.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] dma-mapping: Use dma_get_mask in dma_addressing_limited
2019-07-22 16:51 ` Eric Auger
@ 2019-07-22 18:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2019-07-22 18:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Auger
Cc: jasowang, linux-kernel, virtualization, iommu, eric.auger.pro,
robin.murphy, hch
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 06:51:49PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
> We currently have cases where the dma_addressing_limited() gets
> called with dma_mask unset. This causes a NULL pointer dereference.
>
> Use dma_get_mask() accessor to prevent the crash.
>
> Fixes: b866455423e0 ("dma-mapping: add a dma_addressing_limited helper")
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
If possible I really prefer this approach: avoids changing all callers
and uses documented interfaces.
> ---
>
> v1 -> v2:
> - was [PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: Protect dma_addressing_limited
> against NULL dma_mask
> - Use dma_get_mask
> ---
> include/linux/dma-mapping.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> index e11b115dd0e4..f7d1eea32c78 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> @@ -689,8 +689,8 @@ static inline int dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
> */
> static inline bool dma_addressing_limited(struct device *dev)
> {
> - return min_not_zero(*dev->dma_mask, dev->bus_dma_mask) <
> - dma_get_required_mask(dev);
> + return min_not_zero(dma_get_mask(dev), dev->bus_dma_mask) <
> + dma_get_required_mask(dev);
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SETUP_DMA_OPS
> --
> 2.20.1
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] dma-mapping: Use dma_get_mask in dma_addressing_limited
@ 2019-07-22 18:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2019-07-22 18:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Auger
Cc: eric.auger.pro, hch, m.szyprowski, robin.murphy, jasowang,
virtualization, iommu, linux-kernel
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 06:51:49PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
> We currently have cases where the dma_addressing_limited() gets
> called with dma_mask unset. This causes a NULL pointer dereference.
>
> Use dma_get_mask() accessor to prevent the crash.
>
> Fixes: b866455423e0 ("dma-mapping: add a dma_addressing_limited helper")
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
If possible I really prefer this approach: avoids changing all callers
and uses documented interfaces.
> ---
>
> v1 -> v2:
> - was [PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: Protect dma_addressing_limited
> against NULL dma_mask
> - Use dma_get_mask
> ---
> include/linux/dma-mapping.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> index e11b115dd0e4..f7d1eea32c78 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> @@ -689,8 +689,8 @@ static inline int dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
> */
> static inline bool dma_addressing_limited(struct device *dev)
> {
> - return min_not_zero(*dev->dma_mask, dev->bus_dma_mask) <
> - dma_get_required_mask(dev);
> + return min_not_zero(dma_get_mask(dev), dev->bus_dma_mask) <
> + dma_get_required_mask(dev);
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SETUP_DMA_OPS
> --
> 2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] dma-mapping: Use dma_get_mask in dma_addressing_limited
2019-07-22 16:51 ` Eric Auger
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2019-07-22 18:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2019-07-22 18:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Auger
Cc: linux-kernel, virtualization, iommu, eric.auger.pro, robin.murphy,
hch, m.szyprowski
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 06:51:49PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
> We currently have cases where the dma_addressing_limited() gets
> called with dma_mask unset. This causes a NULL pointer dereference.
>
> Use dma_get_mask() accessor to prevent the crash.
>
> Fixes: b866455423e0 ("dma-mapping: add a dma_addressing_limited helper")
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
If possible I really prefer this approach: avoids changing all callers
and uses documented interfaces.
> ---
>
> v1 -> v2:
> - was [PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: Protect dma_addressing_limited
> against NULL dma_mask
> - Use dma_get_mask
> ---
> include/linux/dma-mapping.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> index e11b115dd0e4..f7d1eea32c78 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> @@ -689,8 +689,8 @@ static inline int dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
> */
> static inline bool dma_addressing_limited(struct device *dev)
> {
> - return min_not_zero(*dev->dma_mask, dev->bus_dma_mask) <
> - dma_get_required_mask(dev);
> + return min_not_zero(dma_get_mask(dev), dev->bus_dma_mask) <
> + dma_get_required_mask(dev);
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SETUP_DMA_OPS
> --
> 2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] dma-mapping: Use dma_get_mask in dma_addressing_limited
@ 2019-07-22 16:51 Eric Auger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Eric Auger @ 2019-07-22 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: eric.auger.pro, eric.auger, hch, m.szyprowski, robin.murphy, mst,
jasowang, virtualization, iommu, linux-kernel
We currently have cases where the dma_addressing_limited() gets
called with dma_mask unset. This causes a NULL pointer dereference.
Use dma_get_mask() accessor to prevent the crash.
Fixes: b866455423e0 ("dma-mapping: add a dma_addressing_limited helper")
Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
---
v1 -> v2:
- was [PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: Protect dma_addressing_limited
against NULL dma_mask
- Use dma_get_mask
---
include/linux/dma-mapping.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
index e11b115dd0e4..f7d1eea32c78 100644
--- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
+++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
@@ -689,8 +689,8 @@ static inline int dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
*/
static inline bool dma_addressing_limited(struct device *dev)
{
- return min_not_zero(*dev->dma_mask, dev->bus_dma_mask) <
- dma_get_required_mask(dev);
+ return min_not_zero(dma_get_mask(dev), dev->bus_dma_mask) <
+ dma_get_required_mask(dev);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SETUP_DMA_OPS
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-07-23 15:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-07-22 16:51 [PATCH v2] dma-mapping: Use dma_get_mask in dma_addressing_limited Eric Auger
2019-07-22 16:51 ` Eric Auger
2019-07-22 16:56 ` Auger Eric
2019-07-22 16:56 ` Auger Eric
2019-07-22 16:56 ` Auger Eric
2019-07-22 18:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-22 18:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-22 18:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-23 15:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-23 15:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-23 15:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-22 18:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-22 18:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-07-22 18:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-07-22 16:51 Eric Auger
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.