From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>,
PowerPC <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Linux kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/macintosh/smu.c: Mark expected switch fall-through
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 10:07:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201907301005.0661E63CF@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878ssfzjdk.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 12:28:55AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> writes:
> > Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
> >
> > This patch fixes the following warning (Building: powerpc):
> >
> > drivers/macintosh/smu.c: In function 'smu_queue_i2c':
> > drivers/macintosh/smu.c:854:21: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> > cmd->info.devaddr &= 0xfe;
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~
> > drivers/macintosh/smu.c:855:2: note: here
> > case SMU_I2C_TRANSFER_STDSUB:
> > ^~~~
> >
> > Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> > Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
> > Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> > ---
> > drivers/macintosh/smu.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/macintosh/smu.c b/drivers/macintosh/smu.c
> > index 276065c888bc..23f1f41c8602 100644
> > --- a/drivers/macintosh/smu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/macintosh/smu.c
> > @@ -852,6 +852,7 @@ int smu_queue_i2c(struct smu_i2c_cmd *cmd)
> > break;
> > case SMU_I2C_TRANSFER_COMBINED:
> > cmd->info.devaddr &= 0xfe;
> > + /* fall through */
> > case SMU_I2C_TRANSFER_STDSUB:
> > if (cmd->info.sublen > 3)
> > return -EINVAL;
>
> Why do we think it's an expected fall through? I can't really convince
> myself from the surrounding code that it's definitely intentional.
Yeah, good question. Just now when I went looking for who
used SMU_I2C_TRANSFER_COMBINED, I found the only caller in
arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/low_i2c.c and it is clearly using a
fall-through for building the command for "stdsub" and "combined",
so I think that's justification enough:
switch(bus->mode) {
case pmac_i2c_mode_std:
if (subsize != 0)
return -EINVAL;
cmd->info.type = SMU_I2C_TRANSFER_SIMPLE;
break;
case pmac_i2c_mode_stdsub:
case pmac_i2c_mode_combined:
if (subsize > 3 || subsize < 1)
return -EINVAL;
cmd->info.sublen = subsize;
/* that's big-endian only but heh ! */
memcpy(&cmd->info.subaddr, ((char *)&subaddr) + (4 - subsize),
subsize);
if (bus->mode == pmac_i2c_mode_stdsub)
cmd->info.type = SMU_I2C_TRANSFER_STDSUB;
else
cmd->info.type = SMU_I2C_TRANSFER_COMBINED;
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
--
Kees Cook
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
PowerPC <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>,
Linux kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/macintosh/smu.c: Mark expected switch fall-through
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 10:07:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201907301005.0661E63CF@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878ssfzjdk.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 12:28:55AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> writes:
> > Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
> >
> > This patch fixes the following warning (Building: powerpc):
> >
> > drivers/macintosh/smu.c: In function 'smu_queue_i2c':
> > drivers/macintosh/smu.c:854:21: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> > cmd->info.devaddr &= 0xfe;
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~
> > drivers/macintosh/smu.c:855:2: note: here
> > case SMU_I2C_TRANSFER_STDSUB:
> > ^~~~
> >
> > Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> > Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
> > Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> > ---
> > drivers/macintosh/smu.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/macintosh/smu.c b/drivers/macintosh/smu.c
> > index 276065c888bc..23f1f41c8602 100644
> > --- a/drivers/macintosh/smu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/macintosh/smu.c
> > @@ -852,6 +852,7 @@ int smu_queue_i2c(struct smu_i2c_cmd *cmd)
> > break;
> > case SMU_I2C_TRANSFER_COMBINED:
> > cmd->info.devaddr &= 0xfe;
> > + /* fall through */
> > case SMU_I2C_TRANSFER_STDSUB:
> > if (cmd->info.sublen > 3)
> > return -EINVAL;
>
> Why do we think it's an expected fall through? I can't really convince
> myself from the surrounding code that it's definitely intentional.
Yeah, good question. Just now when I went looking for who
used SMU_I2C_TRANSFER_COMBINED, I found the only caller in
arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/low_i2c.c and it is clearly using a
fall-through for building the command for "stdsub" and "combined",
so I think that's justification enough:
switch(bus->mode) {
case pmac_i2c_mode_std:
if (subsize != 0)
return -EINVAL;
cmd->info.type = SMU_I2C_TRANSFER_SIMPLE;
break;
case pmac_i2c_mode_stdsub:
case pmac_i2c_mode_combined:
if (subsize > 3 || subsize < 1)
return -EINVAL;
cmd->info.sublen = subsize;
/* that's big-endian only but heh ! */
memcpy(&cmd->info.subaddr, ((char *)&subaddr) + (4 - subsize),
subsize);
if (bus->mode == pmac_i2c_mode_stdsub)
cmd->info.type = SMU_I2C_TRANSFER_STDSUB;
else
cmd->info.type = SMU_I2C_TRANSFER_COMBINED;
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-30 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-30 4:37 [PATCH] drivers/macintosh/smu.c: Mark expected switch fall-through Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-30 4:37 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-30 4:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-30 4:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-30 14:28 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-07-30 14:28 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-07-30 14:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-30 14:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-30 17:07 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2019-07-30 17:07 ` Kees Cook
2019-07-30 20:37 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2019-07-30 20:37 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2019-07-31 11:46 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-07-31 11:46 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-08-02 2:28 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-08-02 2:28 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201907301005.0661E63CF@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=gustavo@embeddedor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.