All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joonwon Kang <kjw1627@gmail.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: re.emese@gmail.com, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	jinb.park7@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] randstruct: fix a bug in is_pure_ops_struct()
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 01:25:37 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190731162537.GA23152@host> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201907301008.622218EE5@keescook>

On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:11:19AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 12:58:41AM +0900, Joonwon Kang wrote:
> > Before this, there were false negatives in the case where a struct
> > contains other structs which contain only function pointers because
> > of unreachable code in is_pure_ops_struct().
> 
> Ah, very true. Something like:
> 
> struct internal {
> 	void (*callback)(void);
> };
> 
> struct wrapper {
> 	struct internal foo;
> 	void (*other_callback)(void);
> };
> 
> would have not been detected as is_pure_ops_struct()?
> 
> How did you notice this? (Are there cases of this in the kernel?)

When I compiled kernel with allyesconfig, there seemed to be no such cases,
but I found the bug just by code review and test.
However, I would like to slightly modify this patch and add one more patch.
I will send the patch set soon.

> 
> > Signed-off-by: Joonwon Kang <kjw1627@gmail.com>
> 
> Applied; thanks!
> 
> -Kees
> 
> > ---
> >  scripts/gcc-plugins/randomize_layout_plugin.c | 11 +++++------
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/scripts/gcc-plugins/randomize_layout_plugin.c b/scripts/gcc-plugins/randomize_layout_plugin.c
> > index 6d5bbd31db7f..a123282a4fcd 100644
> > --- a/scripts/gcc-plugins/randomize_layout_plugin.c
> > +++ b/scripts/gcc-plugins/randomize_layout_plugin.c
> > @@ -443,13 +443,12 @@ static int is_pure_ops_struct(const_tree node)
> >  		if (node == fieldtype)
> >  			continue;
> >  
> > -		if (!is_fptr(fieldtype))
> > -			return 0;
> > -
> > -		if (code != RECORD_TYPE && code != UNION_TYPE)
> > -			continue;
> > +		if (code == RECORD_TYPE || code == UNION_TYPE) {
> > +			if (!is_pure_ops_struct(fieldtype))
> > +				return 0;
> > +		}
> >  
> > -		if (!is_pure_ops_struct(fieldtype))
> > +		if (!is_fptr(fieldtype))
> >  			return 0;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -- 
> > 2.17.1
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Kees Cook

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joonwon Kang <kjw1627@gmail.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: re.emese@gmail.com, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	jinb.park7@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] randstruct: fix a bug in is_pure_ops_struct()
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 16:25:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190731162537.GA23152@host> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201907301008.622218EE5@keescook>

On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:11:19AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 12:58:41AM +0900, Joonwon Kang wrote:
> > Before this, there were false negatives in the case where a struct
> > contains other structs which contain only function pointers because
> > of unreachable code in is_pure_ops_struct().
> 
> Ah, very true. Something like:
> 
> struct internal {
> 	void (*callback)(void);
> };
> 
> struct wrapper {
> 	struct internal foo;
> 	void (*other_callback)(void);
> };
> 
> would have not been detected as is_pure_ops_struct()?
> 
> How did you notice this? (Are there cases of this in the kernel?)

When I compiled kernel with allyesconfig, there seemed to be no such cases,
but I found the bug just by code review and test.
However, I would like to slightly modify this patch and add one more patch.
I will send the patch set soon.

> 
> > Signed-off-by: Joonwon Kang <kjw1627@gmail.com>
> 
> Applied; thanks!
> 
> -Kees
> 
> > ---
> >  scripts/gcc-plugins/randomize_layout_plugin.c | 11 +++++------
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/scripts/gcc-plugins/randomize_layout_plugin.c b/scripts/gcc-plugins/randomize_layout_plugin.c
> > index 6d5bbd31db7f..a123282a4fcd 100644
> > --- a/scripts/gcc-plugins/randomize_layout_plugin.c
> > +++ b/scripts/gcc-plugins/randomize_layout_plugin.c
> > @@ -443,13 +443,12 @@ static int is_pure_ops_struct(const_tree node)
> >  		if (node = fieldtype)
> >  			continue;
> >  
> > -		if (!is_fptr(fieldtype))
> > -			return 0;
> > -
> > -		if (code != RECORD_TYPE && code != UNION_TYPE)
> > -			continue;
> > +		if (code = RECORD_TYPE || code = UNION_TYPE) {
> > +			if (!is_pure_ops_struct(fieldtype))
> > +				return 0;
> > +		}
> >  
> > -		if (!is_pure_ops_struct(fieldtype))
> > +		if (!is_fptr(fieldtype))
> >  			return 0;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -- 
> > 2.17.1
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Kees Cook

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-31 16:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-27 15:58 [PATCH] randstruct: fix a bug in is_pure_ops_struct() Joonwon Kang
2019-07-27 15:58 ` Joonwon Kang
2019-07-30 17:11 ` Kees Cook
2019-07-30 17:11   ` Kees Cook
2019-07-31 16:25   ` Joonwon Kang [this message]
2019-07-31 16:25     ` Joonwon Kang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190731162537.GA23152@host \
    --to=kjw1627@gmail.com \
    --cc=jinb.park7@gmail.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=re.emese@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.