From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
To: Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@gmail.com>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] mtd: spi-nor: Move m25p80 code in spi-nor.c
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 16:04:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190808160452.1da76beb@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP6Zq1h9Xe9ptGxQpjYwoFaS1sTyd-3EsMTAYwp9e70Cm1czLg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Tomer,
On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 13:05:14 +0300
Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@gmail.com> wrote:
> @@ -688,6 +1003,16 @@ static int spi_nor_erase_sector(struct spi_nor *nor,
> > u32 addr)
> > if (nor->erase)
> > return nor->erase(nor, addr);
> >
> > + if (nor->spimem) {
> > + struct spi_mem_op op =
> > + SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(nor->erase_opcode, 1),
> > + SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(nor->addr_width, addr,
> > 1),
> > + SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DUMMY,
> > + SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DATA);
> > +
> > + return spi_mem_exec_op(nor->spimem, &op);
> > + }
> > +
> >
>
> static int spi_nor_erase_sector(struct spi_nor *nor, u32 addr)
> {
>
> int i;
>
> if (nor->flags & SNOR_F_S3AN_ADDR_DEFAULT)
> addr = spi_nor_s3an_addr_convert(nor, addr);
>
> if (nor->erase)
> return nor->erase(nor, addr);
>
> /*
> * Default implementation, if driver doesn't have a specialized HW
> * control
> */
> for (i = nor->addr_width - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> nor->bouncebuf[i] = addr & 0xff;
> addr >>= 8;
> }
>
> if (nor->spimem) {
> struct spi_mem_op op =
> SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(nor->erase_opcode, 1),
> SPI_MEM_OP_NO_ADDR,
> SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DUMMY,
> SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_OUT(nor->addr_width, nor->bouncebuf, 1));
That's wrong. If you need that, that's probably a spi-mem controller
driver issue. Address cycles should be passed through the
spi_mem_op->addr field, not packed with the data cycles.
>
> return spi_mem_exec_op(nor->spimem, &op);
> }
>
> return nor->write_reg(nor, nor->erase_opcode, nor->bouncebuf,
> nor->addr_width);
> }
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
To: Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@gmail.com>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] mtd: spi-nor: Move m25p80 code in spi-nor.c
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 16:04:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190808160452.1da76beb@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP6Zq1h9Xe9ptGxQpjYwoFaS1sTyd-3EsMTAYwp9e70Cm1czLg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Tomer,
On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 13:05:14 +0300
Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@gmail.com> wrote:
> @@ -688,6 +1003,16 @@ static int spi_nor_erase_sector(struct spi_nor *nor,
> > u32 addr)
> > if (nor->erase)
> > return nor->erase(nor, addr);
> >
> > + if (nor->spimem) {
> > + struct spi_mem_op op =
> > + SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(nor->erase_opcode, 1),
> > + SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(nor->addr_width, addr,
> > 1),
> > + SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DUMMY,
> > + SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DATA);
> > +
> > + return spi_mem_exec_op(nor->spimem, &op);
> > + }
> > +
> >
>
> static int spi_nor_erase_sector(struct spi_nor *nor, u32 addr)
> {
>
> int i;
>
> if (nor->flags & SNOR_F_S3AN_ADDR_DEFAULT)
> addr = spi_nor_s3an_addr_convert(nor, addr);
>
> if (nor->erase)
> return nor->erase(nor, addr);
>
> /*
> * Default implementation, if driver doesn't have a specialized HW
> * control
> */
> for (i = nor->addr_width - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> nor->bouncebuf[i] = addr & 0xff;
> addr >>= 8;
> }
>
> if (nor->spimem) {
> struct spi_mem_op op =
> SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(nor->erase_opcode, 1),
> SPI_MEM_OP_NO_ADDR,
> SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DUMMY,
> SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_OUT(nor->addr_width, nor->bouncebuf, 1));
That's wrong. If you need that, that's probably a spi-mem controller
driver issue. Address cycles should be passed through the
spi_mem_op->addr field, not packed with the data cycles.
>
> return spi_mem_exec_op(nor->spimem, &op);
> }
>
> return nor->write_reg(nor, nor->erase_opcode, nor->bouncebuf,
> nor->addr_width);
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-08 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-06 5:10 [PATCH v5 0/3] Merge m25p80 into spi-nor Vignesh Raghavendra
2019-08-06 5:10 ` Vignesh Raghavendra
2019-08-06 5:10 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] mtd: spi-nor: always use bounce buffer for register read/writes Vignesh Raghavendra
2019-08-06 5:10 ` Vignesh Raghavendra
2019-08-06 5:10 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] mtd: spi-nor: Move m25p80 code in spi-nor.c Vignesh Raghavendra
2019-08-06 5:10 ` Vignesh Raghavendra
[not found] ` <CAP6Zq1h9Xe9ptGxQpjYwoFaS1sTyd-3EsMTAYwp9e70Cm1czLg@mail.gmail.com>
2019-08-08 14:04 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2019-08-08 14:04 ` Boris Brezillon
[not found] ` <CAP6Zq1g6Z=o7FnX4UpZ-dq_9Ui-yv9E5OEJGirK49RqFUPoP_g@mail.gmail.com>
2019-08-08 15:19 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-08-08 15:19 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-08-09 11:47 ` Vignesh Raghavendra
2019-08-09 11:47 ` Vignesh Raghavendra
2019-08-06 5:10 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] mtd: spi-nor: Rework hwcaps selection for the spi-mem case Vignesh Raghavendra
2019-08-06 5:10 ` Vignesh Raghavendra
2019-08-07 5:48 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2019-08-07 5:48 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2019-08-07 5:54 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] Merge m25p80 into spi-nor Tudor.Ambarus
2019-08-07 5:54 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2019-08-12 10:33 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2019-08-12 10:33 ` Tudor.Ambarus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190808160452.1da76beb@collabora.com \
--to=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=bbrezillon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=tmaimon77@gmail.com \
--cc=tudor.ambarus@microchip.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.