All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>,
	will@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64/cache: silence -Woverride-init warnings
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 10:09:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190808170916.GA32668@archlinux-threadripper> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190808103808.GC46901@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>

On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 11:38:08AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 11:29:16PM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> > The commit 155433cb365e ("arm64: cache: Remove support for ASID-tagged
> > VIVT I-caches") introduced some compiation warnings from GCC (and
> > Clang) with -Winitializer-overrides),
> > 
> > arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c:38:26: warning: initialized field
> > overwritten [-Woverride-init]
> > [ICACHE_POLICY_VIPT]  = "VIPT",
> >                         ^~~~~~
> > arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c:38:26: note: (near initialization for
> > 'icache_policy_str[2]')
> > arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c:39:26: warning: initialized field
> > overwritten [-Woverride-init]
> > [ICACHE_POLICY_PIPT]  = "PIPT",
> >                         ^~~~~~
> > arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c:39:26: note: (near initialization for
> > 'icache_policy_str[3]')
> > arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c:40:27: warning: initialized field
> > overwritten [-Woverride-init]
> > [ICACHE_POLICY_VPIPT]  = "VPIPT",
> >                          ^~~~~~~
> > arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c:40:27: note: (near initialization for
> > 'icache_policy_str[0]')
> > 
> > because it initializes icache_policy_str[0 ... 3] twice. Since
> > arm64 developers are keen to keep the style of initializing a static
> > array with a non-zero pattern first, just disable those warnings for
> > both GCC and Clang of this file.
> > 
> > Fixes: 155433cb365e ("arm64: cache: Remove support for ASID-tagged VIVT I-caches")
> > Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
> 
> This is _not_ a fix, and should not require backporting to stable trees.
> 
> What about all the other instances that we have in mainline?
> 
> I really don't think that we need to go down this road; we're just going
> to end up adding this to every file that happens to include a header
> using this scheme...
> 
> Please just turn this off by default for clang.
> 
> If we want to enable this, we need a mechanism to permit overridable
> assignments as we use range initializers for.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mark.
> 

For what it's worth, this is disabled by default for clang in the
kernel:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/scripts/Makefile.extrawarn?h=v5.3-rc3#n69

It only becomes visible with clang at W=1 because that section doesn't
get applied. It becomes visible with GCC at W=1 because of -Wextra.

Cheers,
Nathan

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>,
	will@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64/cache: silence -Woverride-init warnings
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 10:09:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190808170916.GA32668@archlinux-threadripper> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190808103808.GC46901@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>

On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 11:38:08AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 11:29:16PM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> > The commit 155433cb365e ("arm64: cache: Remove support for ASID-tagged
> > VIVT I-caches") introduced some compiation warnings from GCC (and
> > Clang) with -Winitializer-overrides),
> > 
> > arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c:38:26: warning: initialized field
> > overwritten [-Woverride-init]
> > [ICACHE_POLICY_VIPT]  = "VIPT",
> >                         ^~~~~~
> > arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c:38:26: note: (near initialization for
> > 'icache_policy_str[2]')
> > arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c:39:26: warning: initialized field
> > overwritten [-Woverride-init]
> > [ICACHE_POLICY_PIPT]  = "PIPT",
> >                         ^~~~~~
> > arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c:39:26: note: (near initialization for
> > 'icache_policy_str[3]')
> > arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c:40:27: warning: initialized field
> > overwritten [-Woverride-init]
> > [ICACHE_POLICY_VPIPT]  = "VPIPT",
> >                          ^~~~~~~
> > arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c:40:27: note: (near initialization for
> > 'icache_policy_str[0]')
> > 
> > because it initializes icache_policy_str[0 ... 3] twice. Since
> > arm64 developers are keen to keep the style of initializing a static
> > array with a non-zero pattern first, just disable those warnings for
> > both GCC and Clang of this file.
> > 
> > Fixes: 155433cb365e ("arm64: cache: Remove support for ASID-tagged VIVT I-caches")
> > Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
> 
> This is _not_ a fix, and should not require backporting to stable trees.
> 
> What about all the other instances that we have in mainline?
> 
> I really don't think that we need to go down this road; we're just going
> to end up adding this to every file that happens to include a header
> using this scheme...
> 
> Please just turn this off by default for clang.
> 
> If we want to enable this, we need a mechanism to permit overridable
> assignments as we use range initializers for.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mark.
> 

For what it's worth, this is disabled by default for clang in the
kernel:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/scripts/Makefile.extrawarn?h=v5.3-rc3#n69

It only becomes visible with clang at W=1 because that section doesn't
get applied. It becomes visible with GCC at W=1 because of -Wextra.

Cheers,
Nathan

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-08 17:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-08  3:29 [PATCH] arm64/cache: silence -Woverride-init warnings Qian Cai
2019-08-08  3:29 ` Qian Cai
2019-08-08  4:50 ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-08-08  4:50   ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-08-08 10:38 ` Mark Rutland
2019-08-08 10:38   ` Mark Rutland
2019-08-08 17:09   ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2019-08-08 17:09     ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-08-09  8:32     ` Explicitly marking initializer overrides (was "Re: [PATCH] arm64/cache: silence -Woverride-init warnings") Mark Rutland
2019-08-09  8:32       ` Mark Rutland
2019-08-09 11:31       ` Robin Murphy
2019-08-09 11:31         ` Robin Murphy
2019-08-14 17:26       ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-08-14 17:26         ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-08-08 22:18   ` [PATCH] arm64/cache: silence -Woverride-init warnings Qian Cai
2019-08-08 22:18     ` Qian Cai
2019-08-09  8:53     ` Mark Rutland
2019-08-09  8:53       ` Mark Rutland
2019-08-09 22:14       ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-08-09 22:14         ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-08-09  9:04     ` Will Deacon
2019-08-09  9:04       ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190808170916.GA32668@archlinux-threadripper \
    --to=natechancellor@gmail.com \
    --cc=cai@lca.pw \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.