From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
To: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, shuah@kernel.org,
andreyknvl@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_bad_magic
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 17:25:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190813162523.GD10425@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190802170300.20662-7-cristian.marussi@arm.com>
On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 06:02:55PM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> Added a simple fake_sigreturn testcase which builds a ucontext_t
Add
> with a bad magic header and place it onto the stack.
> Expects a SIGSEGV on test PASS.
> This commit also introduces a common utility assembly function to
> invoke a sigreturn using a fake provided sigframe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/Makefile | 2 +-
> .../testing/selftests/arm64/signal/signals.S | 64 +++++++++++++++++++
> .../arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.h | 1 +
> .../arm64/signal/testcases/.gitignore | 1 +
> .../testcases/fake_sigreturn_bad_magic.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/signals.S
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_bad_magic.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/Makefile
> index 8c8d08be4b0d..b3dcf315b5a4 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/Makefile
> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ endif
> # Common test-unit targets to build common-layout test-cases executables
> # Needs secondary expansion to properly include the testcase c-file in pre-reqs
> .SECONDEXPANSION:
> -$(PROGS): test_signals.c test_signals_utils.c testcases/testcases.c $$@.c test_signals.h test_signals_utils.h testcases/testcases.h
> +$(PROGS): test_signals.c test_signals_utils.c testcases/testcases.c signals.S $$@.c test_signals.h test_signals_utils.h testcases/testcases.h
> @if [ ! -d $(khdr_dir) ]; then \
> echo -n "\n!!! WARNING: $(khdr_dir) NOT FOUND."; \
> echo "===> Are you sure Kernel Headers have been installed properly ?\n"; \
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/signals.S b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/signals.S
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..6262b877400b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/signals.S
> @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
> +/*
> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> + * Copyright (C) 2019 ARM Limited
> + */
> +
> +#include <asm/unistd.h>
> +
> +.section ".rodata", "a"
The section name is not usually quoted in .section (though I guess it
works).
> +call_fmt:
> + .asciz "Calling sigreturn with fake sigframe sized:%zd at calculated SP @%08lX\n"
> +
> +.text
> +
> +.globl fake_sigreturn
> +
> +/* fake_sigreturn x0:&sigframe, x1:sigframe_size, x2:alignment_SP */
> +fake_sigreturn:
> + mov x20, x0
> + mov x21, x1
> + mov x22, x2
> + mov x23, sp
> +
> + /* create space on the stack for fake sigframe..."x22"-aligned */
> + mov x0, #0
Why to we move 0 into x0? We clobber x0 again in the next instruction:
> + add x0, x21, x22
> + sub x22, x22, #1
> + bic x0, x0, x22
> + sub x23, x23, x0
Can you explain the logic here? I'm not sure I understand what this is
trying to do exactly.
I notice you further modify this in patch 11 -- see my comments there,
where I also suggest an alternative way of specifying a misaligned frame
that might be simpler.
> +
> + ldr x0, =call_fmt
> + mov x1, x21
> + mov x2, x23
> + bl printf
> +
> + mov sp, x23
> +
> + /* now fill it with the provided content... */
> + mov x0, sp
> + mov x1, x20
> + mov x2, x21
> + bl memcpy
> +
> + /*
> + * Here saving a last minute SP to current->token acts as a marker:
> + * if we got here, we are successfully faking a sigreturn; in other
> + * words we are sure no bad fatal signal has been raised till now
> + * for unrelated reasons, so we should consider the possibl observed
typo: possible (or possibly?)
> + * fatal signal like SEGV coming from Kernel restore_sigframe() and
> + * triggered as expected from our test-case.
> + * For simplicity this assumes that current field 'token' is laid out
> + * as first in struct tdescr
> + */
> + ldr x0, current
> + str x23, [x0]
> + /* SP is already pointing back to the just built fake sigframe here */
> + mov x8, #__NR_rt_sigreturn
> + svc #0
> +
> + /*
> + * Above sigreturn should not return...looping here leads to a timeout
> + * and ensure proper and clean test failure, instead of jumping around
> + * on a potentially corrupted stack.
> + */
> + b .
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.h b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.h
> index ce35be8ebc8e..2a71da7e6695 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.h
> @@ -12,4 +12,5 @@ int test_run(struct tdescr *td);
> void test_result(struct tdescr *td);
>
> bool get_current_context(struct tdescr *td, ucontext_t *dest_uc);
> +int fake_sigreturn(void *sigframe, size_t sz, int alignment);
> #endif
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/.gitignore
> index a48a118b1a1a..0ea6fdc3765c 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/.gitignore
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/.gitignore
> @@ -4,3 +4,4 @@ mangle_pstate_invalid_mode_el1
> mangle_pstate_invalid_mode_el2
> mangle_pstate_invalid_mode_el3
> mangle_pstate_ssbs_regs
> +fake_sigreturn_bad_magic
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_bad_magic.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_bad_magic.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..b4c063e02a7a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_bad_magic.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/* Copyright (C) 2019 ARM Limited */
> +
We should probably also include <signal.h> here, since we're using
siginfo_t etc.
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <ucontext.h>
> +
> +#include "test_signals_utils.h"
> +#include "testcases.h"
> +
> +struct fake_sigframe sf;
> +
> +static int fake_sigreturn_bad_magic_run(struct tdescr *td,
> + siginfo_t *si, ucontext_t *uc)
> +{
> + size_t resv_sz, offset;
> + struct _aarch64_ctx *shead = GET_SF_RESV_HEAD(sf), *head;
> +
> + /* just to fill the ucontext_t with something real */
> + if (!get_current_context(td, &sf.uc))
> + return 1;
> +
> + resv_sz = GET_SF_RESV_SIZE(sf);
> + /*
> + * find the terminator, preserving existing headers
> + * and verify amount of spare room in __reserved area.
> + */
> + head = get_terminator(shead, resv_sz, &offset);
> + /*
> + * try stripping extra_context header when low on space:
> + * we need at least 2*HDR_SZ space ... one for the KSFT_BAD_MAGIC
> + * and the other for the usual terminator.
> + */
> + if (head && resv_sz - offset < HDR_SZ * 2) {
Can we factor out this logic for finding space in the signal frame?
We do pretty much the same thing in all the fake_sigreturn tests...
> + fprintf(stderr, "Low on space:%zd. Discarding extra_context.\n",
> + resv_sz - offset);
> + head = get_header(shead, EXTRA_MAGIC, resv_sz, &offset);
> + }
> + /* just give up and timeout if still not enough space */
Do we actually time out? I don't see where we actually wait, so doesn't
test_run() just fail immediately?
The same applies to all the other fake_sigreturn tests too.
> + if (head && resv_sz - offset >= HDR_SZ) {
Should this be HDR_SZ * 2 again? We need space for the face header and
space to write a terminator after it.
> + fprintf(stderr, "Mangling template header. Spare space:%zd\n",
> + resv_sz - offset);
> + /*
> + * use a well known NON existent bad magic...something
> + * we should pretty sure won't be ever defined in Kernel
> + */
> + head->magic = KSFT_BAD_MAGIC;
> + head->size = HDR_SZ;
> + write_terminator_record(GET_RESV_NEXT_HEAD(head));
> +
> + ASSERT_BAD_CONTEXT(&sf.uc);
> + fake_sigreturn(&sf, sizeof(sf), 16);
> + }
> +
> + return 1;
> +}
[...]
Cheers
---Dave
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
To: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Cc: andreyknvl@google.com, shuah@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_bad_magic
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 17:25:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190813162523.GD10425@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190802170300.20662-7-cristian.marussi@arm.com>
On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 06:02:55PM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> Added a simple fake_sigreturn testcase which builds a ucontext_t
Add
> with a bad magic header and place it onto the stack.
> Expects a SIGSEGV on test PASS.
> This commit also introduces a common utility assembly function to
> invoke a sigreturn using a fake provided sigframe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/Makefile | 2 +-
> .../testing/selftests/arm64/signal/signals.S | 64 +++++++++++++++++++
> .../arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.h | 1 +
> .../arm64/signal/testcases/.gitignore | 1 +
> .../testcases/fake_sigreturn_bad_magic.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/signals.S
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_bad_magic.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/Makefile
> index 8c8d08be4b0d..b3dcf315b5a4 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/Makefile
> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ endif
> # Common test-unit targets to build common-layout test-cases executables
> # Needs secondary expansion to properly include the testcase c-file in pre-reqs
> .SECONDEXPANSION:
> -$(PROGS): test_signals.c test_signals_utils.c testcases/testcases.c $$@.c test_signals.h test_signals_utils.h testcases/testcases.h
> +$(PROGS): test_signals.c test_signals_utils.c testcases/testcases.c signals.S $$@.c test_signals.h test_signals_utils.h testcases/testcases.h
> @if [ ! -d $(khdr_dir) ]; then \
> echo -n "\n!!! WARNING: $(khdr_dir) NOT FOUND."; \
> echo "===> Are you sure Kernel Headers have been installed properly ?\n"; \
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/signals.S b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/signals.S
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..6262b877400b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/signals.S
> @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
> +/*
> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> + * Copyright (C) 2019 ARM Limited
> + */
> +
> +#include <asm/unistd.h>
> +
> +.section ".rodata", "a"
The section name is not usually quoted in .section (though I guess it
works).
> +call_fmt:
> + .asciz "Calling sigreturn with fake sigframe sized:%zd at calculated SP @%08lX\n"
> +
> +.text
> +
> +.globl fake_sigreturn
> +
> +/* fake_sigreturn x0:&sigframe, x1:sigframe_size, x2:alignment_SP */
> +fake_sigreturn:
> + mov x20, x0
> + mov x21, x1
> + mov x22, x2
> + mov x23, sp
> +
> + /* create space on the stack for fake sigframe..."x22"-aligned */
> + mov x0, #0
Why to we move 0 into x0? We clobber x0 again in the next instruction:
> + add x0, x21, x22
> + sub x22, x22, #1
> + bic x0, x0, x22
> + sub x23, x23, x0
Can you explain the logic here? I'm not sure I understand what this is
trying to do exactly.
I notice you further modify this in patch 11 -- see my comments there,
where I also suggest an alternative way of specifying a misaligned frame
that might be simpler.
> +
> + ldr x0, =call_fmt
> + mov x1, x21
> + mov x2, x23
> + bl printf
> +
> + mov sp, x23
> +
> + /* now fill it with the provided content... */
> + mov x0, sp
> + mov x1, x20
> + mov x2, x21
> + bl memcpy
> +
> + /*
> + * Here saving a last minute SP to current->token acts as a marker:
> + * if we got here, we are successfully faking a sigreturn; in other
> + * words we are sure no bad fatal signal has been raised till now
> + * for unrelated reasons, so we should consider the possibl observed
typo: possible (or possibly?)
> + * fatal signal like SEGV coming from Kernel restore_sigframe() and
> + * triggered as expected from our test-case.
> + * For simplicity this assumes that current field 'token' is laid out
> + * as first in struct tdescr
> + */
> + ldr x0, current
> + str x23, [x0]
> + /* SP is already pointing back to the just built fake sigframe here */
> + mov x8, #__NR_rt_sigreturn
> + svc #0
> +
> + /*
> + * Above sigreturn should not return...looping here leads to a timeout
> + * and ensure proper and clean test failure, instead of jumping around
> + * on a potentially corrupted stack.
> + */
> + b .
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.h b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.h
> index ce35be8ebc8e..2a71da7e6695 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.h
> @@ -12,4 +12,5 @@ int test_run(struct tdescr *td);
> void test_result(struct tdescr *td);
>
> bool get_current_context(struct tdescr *td, ucontext_t *dest_uc);
> +int fake_sigreturn(void *sigframe, size_t sz, int alignment);
> #endif
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/.gitignore
> index a48a118b1a1a..0ea6fdc3765c 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/.gitignore
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/.gitignore
> @@ -4,3 +4,4 @@ mangle_pstate_invalid_mode_el1
> mangle_pstate_invalid_mode_el2
> mangle_pstate_invalid_mode_el3
> mangle_pstate_ssbs_regs
> +fake_sigreturn_bad_magic
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_bad_magic.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_bad_magic.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..b4c063e02a7a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_bad_magic.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/* Copyright (C) 2019 ARM Limited */
> +
We should probably also include <signal.h> here, since we're using
siginfo_t etc.
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <ucontext.h>
> +
> +#include "test_signals_utils.h"
> +#include "testcases.h"
> +
> +struct fake_sigframe sf;
> +
> +static int fake_sigreturn_bad_magic_run(struct tdescr *td,
> + siginfo_t *si, ucontext_t *uc)
> +{
> + size_t resv_sz, offset;
> + struct _aarch64_ctx *shead = GET_SF_RESV_HEAD(sf), *head;
> +
> + /* just to fill the ucontext_t with something real */
> + if (!get_current_context(td, &sf.uc))
> + return 1;
> +
> + resv_sz = GET_SF_RESV_SIZE(sf);
> + /*
> + * find the terminator, preserving existing headers
> + * and verify amount of spare room in __reserved area.
> + */
> + head = get_terminator(shead, resv_sz, &offset);
> + /*
> + * try stripping extra_context header when low on space:
> + * we need at least 2*HDR_SZ space ... one for the KSFT_BAD_MAGIC
> + * and the other for the usual terminator.
> + */
> + if (head && resv_sz - offset < HDR_SZ * 2) {
Can we factor out this logic for finding space in the signal frame?
We do pretty much the same thing in all the fake_sigreturn tests...
> + fprintf(stderr, "Low on space:%zd. Discarding extra_context.\n",
> + resv_sz - offset);
> + head = get_header(shead, EXTRA_MAGIC, resv_sz, &offset);
> + }
> + /* just give up and timeout if still not enough space */
Do we actually time out? I don't see where we actually wait, so doesn't
test_run() just fail immediately?
The same applies to all the other fake_sigreturn tests too.
> + if (head && resv_sz - offset >= HDR_SZ) {
Should this be HDR_SZ * 2 again? We need space for the face header and
space to write a terminator after it.
> + fprintf(stderr, "Mangling template header. Spare space:%zd\n",
> + resv_sz - offset);
> + /*
> + * use a well known NON existent bad magic...something
> + * we should pretty sure won't be ever defined in Kernel
> + */
> + head->magic = KSFT_BAD_MAGIC;
> + head->size = HDR_SZ;
> + write_terminator_record(GET_RESV_NEXT_HEAD(head));
> +
> + ASSERT_BAD_CONTEXT(&sf.uc);
> + fake_sigreturn(&sf, sizeof(sf), 16);
> + }
> +
> + return 1;
> +}
[...]
Cheers
---Dave
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-13 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 112+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-02 17:02 [PATCH v3 00/11] Add arm64/signal initial kselftest support Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] kselftest: arm64: introduce new boilerplate code Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:23 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-13 16:23 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-27 12:14 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-27 12:14 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] kselftest: arm64: adds first test and common utils Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-06 15:50 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-06 15:50 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-07 15:42 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-07 15:42 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-09 10:54 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-09 10:54 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-09 11:16 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-09 11:16 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-09 12:20 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-09 12:20 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-09 12:32 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-09 12:32 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-12 12:43 ` Amit Kachhap
2019-08-12 12:43 ` Amit Kachhap
2019-08-13 13:22 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 13:22 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-14 10:22 ` Amit Kachhap
2019-08-14 10:22 ` Amit Kachhap
2019-08-27 14:24 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-27 14:24 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:24 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-13 16:24 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-28 17:34 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-28 17:34 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-09-03 15:34 ` Dave Martin
2019-09-03 15:34 ` Dave Martin
2019-09-03 16:08 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-09-03 16:08 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] kselftest: arm64: mangle_pstate_invalid_daif_bits Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:24 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-13 16:24 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-29 10:19 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-29 10:19 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] kselftest: arm64: mangle_pstate_invalid_mode_el Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:24 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-13 16:24 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-29 11:50 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-29 11:50 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] kselftest: arm64: mangle_pstate_ssbs_regs Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:25 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-13 16:25 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-29 15:35 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-29 15:35 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_bad_magic Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:25 ` Dave Martin [this message]
2019-08-13 16:25 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-30 14:29 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-30 14:29 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-09-04 10:05 ` Dave Martin
2019-09-04 10:05 ` Dave Martin
2019-09-04 10:37 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-09-04 10:37 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-09-04 10:47 ` Dave Martin
2019-09-04 10:47 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_bad_size_for_magic0 Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:25 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-13 16:25 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-30 14:49 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-30 14:49 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_missing_fpsimd Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:26 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-13 16:26 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-30 14:55 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-30 14:55 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:26 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-13 16:26 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-30 15:11 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-30 15:11 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_bad_size Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:26 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-13 16:26 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-30 15:21 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-30 15:21 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:03 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_misaligned_sp Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:03 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-07 16:04 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-07 16:04 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:28 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-13 16:28 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-30 15:22 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-30 15:22 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:27 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-13 16:27 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-30 16:33 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-30 16:33 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:22 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] Add arm64/signal initial kselftest support Dave Martin
2019-08-13 16:22 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-30 16:40 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-30 16:40 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-09-02 10:53 ` Dave Martin
2019-09-02 10:53 ` Dave Martin
2019-09-02 11:30 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-09-02 11:30 ` Cristian Marussi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190813162523.GD10425@arm.com \
--to=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.