From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <lkml@metux.net>
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>,
Linux I2C <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Cooks <acooks@rationali.st>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, platypus-sw@opengear.com,
"Tobin C . Harding" <me@tobin.cc>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Will Wagner <willw@carallon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Enable ACPI-defined peripherals on i2c-piix4 SMBus
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 18:07:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190814160711.GA5816@kunai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01de7b0c-7579-048b-312c-122dddc23c64@metux.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 833 bytes --]
> > Unfortunately not. I only picked up from where Andrew Cooks left, due
> > to me being way too slow to review his patches.
>
> @Andrew: can you tell us more about this ?
Was the info Andrew supplied helpful to you?
>
> > I was able to test the first 2 patches which fix bugs, but
> > not the 3rd one which deals with ACPI devices. There does not seem to
> > be any such device on the 2 test machines I have remotely access to.
>
> Did you already test on apu2/apu3 ?
> If not, maybe you could prepare a queue that I could test.
Maybe I am missing something but can't you just apply these patches on a
recent kernel?
So, the discussion stalled, but I think the series is fine as is? If
someone disagrees, please speak up. I want to apply patch 1 to
for-current soon and the others to for-next, too.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-14 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-02 12:51 [PATCH v5 0/3] Enable ACPI-defined peripherals on i2c-piix4 SMBus Jean Delvare
2019-08-02 12:52 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] i2c: piix4: Fix port selection for AMD Family 16h Model 30h Jean Delvare
2019-08-29 20:19 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-08-02 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] i2c: piix4: Fix probing of reserved ports on " Jean Delvare
2019-08-29 20:20 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-08-02 12:55 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] i2c: piix4: Add ACPI support Jean Delvare
2019-08-29 20:21 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-08-08 9:17 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] Enable ACPI-defined peripherals on i2c-piix4 SMBus Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
2019-08-09 8:33 ` Jean Delvare
2019-08-09 15:53 ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
2019-08-14 16:07 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2019-08-11 3:09 ` Andrew Cooks
2019-08-11 2:52 ` Andrew Cooks
2019-08-19 18:30 ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
2019-08-19 18:53 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-08-20 10:42 ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
2019-08-20 10:53 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-08-28 22:48 ` Andrew Cooks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190814160711.GA5816@kunai \
--to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=acooks@rationali.st \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lkml@metux.net \
--cc=me@tobin.cc \
--cc=platypus-sw@opengear.com \
--cc=willw@carallon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.