From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <lkml@metux.net>
Cc: acooks@rationali.st, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>,
Linux I2C <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
platypus-sw@opengear.com, "Tobin C . Harding" <me@tobin.cc>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Will Wagner <willw@carallon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Enable ACPI-defined peripherals on i2c-piix4 SMBus
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 12:53:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190820105328.GD1007@ninjato> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <82cd0682-91db-6afd-855c-2c2f4b329eda@metux.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 757 bytes --]
> Yes, I'm struggling to find out which devices are connected to the
> smbus, in case there're some already inside the SoC (instead of just
> entirely board specific).
I see.
>
> > but you are okay with Jean's patches? Or is this
> > discussion affecting patch 3? (/me knows not much about ACPI'n'stuff)
>
> I'm fine with them, just wondered whether BIOS needs to add some extra
> support for the probing, that is not already somehow coming w/ aegesa.
Ok, thanks for the heads up.
> Unfortunately, we cannot rely on board vendors to do that right and
> cope w/ old and incomplete firmware. (that's also the reason why I'm
> *not* using acpi gpio entries for the apu2+ board family).
Guess we all have been there :/ Good luck!
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-20 10:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-02 12:51 [PATCH v5 0/3] Enable ACPI-defined peripherals on i2c-piix4 SMBus Jean Delvare
2019-08-02 12:52 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] i2c: piix4: Fix port selection for AMD Family 16h Model 30h Jean Delvare
2019-08-29 20:19 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-08-02 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] i2c: piix4: Fix probing of reserved ports on " Jean Delvare
2019-08-29 20:20 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-08-02 12:55 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] i2c: piix4: Add ACPI support Jean Delvare
2019-08-29 20:21 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-08-08 9:17 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] Enable ACPI-defined peripherals on i2c-piix4 SMBus Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
2019-08-09 8:33 ` Jean Delvare
2019-08-09 15:53 ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
2019-08-14 16:07 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-08-11 3:09 ` Andrew Cooks
2019-08-11 2:52 ` Andrew Cooks
2019-08-19 18:30 ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
2019-08-19 18:53 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-08-20 10:42 ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
2019-08-20 10:53 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2019-08-28 22:48 ` Andrew Cooks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190820105328.GD1007@ninjato \
--to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=acooks@rationali.st \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lkml@metux.net \
--cc=me@tobin.cc \
--cc=platypus-sw@opengear.com \
--cc=willw@carallon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.