[PATCH] rtc: rv3029: Revert my error handling patch to rv3029_eeprom_write()

[Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>]

My error handling "cleanup" was totally wrong.  Both the "err" and "ret"
variables are required.  The "err" variable holds the error codes for
rv3029_eeprom_enter/exit() and the "ret" variable holds the error codes
for if actual write fails.  In my patch if the write failed, the
function probably still returned success.

Reported-by: Tom Evans <tom.evans@motec.com.au>
Fixes: 97f5b0379c38 ("rtc: rv3029: Clean up error handling in rv3029_eeprom_write()")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
---
 drivers/rtc/rtc-rv3029c2.c | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-rv3029c2.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-rv3029c2.c
index 4a0e8ec015cc..4cdf6588e1d9 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-rv3029c2.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-rv3029c2.c
@@ -278,13 +278,13 @@ static int rv3029_eeprom_read(struct device *dev, u8 reg,
 static int rv3029_eeprom_write(struct device *dev, u8 reg,
 			       u8 const buf[], size_t len)
 {
-	int ret;
+	int ret, err;
 	size_t i;
 	u8 tmp;
 
-	ret = rv3029_eeprom_enter(dev);
-	if (ret < 0)
-		return ret;
+	err = rv3029_eeprom_enter(dev);
+	if (err < 0)
+		return err;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < len; i++, reg++) {
 		ret = rv3029_read_regs(dev, reg, &tmp, 1);
@@ -300,11 +300,11 @@ static int rv3029_eeprom_write(struct device *dev, u8 reg,
 			break;
 	}
 
-	ret = rv3029_eeprom_exit(dev);
-	if (ret < 0)
-		return ret;
+	err = rv3029_eeprom_exit(dev);
+	if (err < 0)
+		return err;
 
-	return 0;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static int rv3029_eeprom_update_bits(struct device *dev,
-- 
2.20.1