From: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Torsten Duwe <duwe@suse.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ftrace: introdue ftrace_call_init
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 11:30:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190819191935.406afa82@xhacker.debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190819191622.57050fdf@xhacker.debian>
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 19:16:22 +0800 Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> On some arch, the FTRACE_WITH_REGS is implemented with gcc's
> -fpatchable-function-entry (=2), gcc adds 2 NOPs at the beginning
> of each function, so this makes the MCOUNT_ADDR useless. In ftrace
> common framework, MCOUNT_ADDR is mostly used to "init" the nop, so
> let's introcude ftrace_call_init().
>
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
> ---
> include/linux/ftrace.h | 1 +
> kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/ftrace.h b/include/linux/ftrace.h
> index 8a8cb3c401b2..8175ffb671f0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ftrace.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ftrace.h
> @@ -458,6 +458,7 @@ extern void ftrace_regs_caller(void);
> extern void ftrace_call(void);
> extern void ftrace_regs_call(void);
> extern void mcount_call(void);
> +extern int ftrace_call_init(struct module *mod, struct dyn_ftrace *rec);
>
> void ftrace_modify_all_code(int command);
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> index eca34503f178..9df5a66a6811 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> @@ -2500,7 +2500,11 @@ ftrace_code_disable(struct module *mod, struct dyn_ftrace *rec)
> if (unlikely(ftrace_disabled))
> return 0;
>
> +#ifdef MCOUNT_ADDR
> ret = ftrace_make_nop(mod, rec, MCOUNT_ADDR);
> +#else
> + ret = ftrace_call_init(mod, rec);
> +#endif
If we want to remove MCOUNT_ADDR from all arch, I could cook patches for
this.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Torsten Duwe <duwe@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ftrace: introdue ftrace_call_init
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 11:30:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190819191935.406afa82@xhacker.debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190819191622.57050fdf@xhacker.debian>
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 19:16:22 +0800 Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> On some arch, the FTRACE_WITH_REGS is implemented with gcc's
> -fpatchable-function-entry (=2), gcc adds 2 NOPs at the beginning
> of each function, so this makes the MCOUNT_ADDR useless. In ftrace
> common framework, MCOUNT_ADDR is mostly used to "init" the nop, so
> let's introcude ftrace_call_init().
>
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
> ---
> include/linux/ftrace.h | 1 +
> kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/ftrace.h b/include/linux/ftrace.h
> index 8a8cb3c401b2..8175ffb671f0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ftrace.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ftrace.h
> @@ -458,6 +458,7 @@ extern void ftrace_regs_caller(void);
> extern void ftrace_call(void);
> extern void ftrace_regs_call(void);
> extern void mcount_call(void);
> +extern int ftrace_call_init(struct module *mod, struct dyn_ftrace *rec);
>
> void ftrace_modify_all_code(int command);
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> index eca34503f178..9df5a66a6811 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> @@ -2500,7 +2500,11 @@ ftrace_code_disable(struct module *mod, struct dyn_ftrace *rec)
> if (unlikely(ftrace_disabled))
> return 0;
>
> +#ifdef MCOUNT_ADDR
> ret = ftrace_make_nop(mod, rec, MCOUNT_ADDR);
> +#else
> + ret = ftrace_call_init(mod, rec);
> +#endif
If we want to remove MCOUNT_ADDR from all arch, I could cook patches for
this.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-19 11:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-19 11:26 [PATCH 0/3] arm64: ftrace with regs Jisheng Zhang
2019-08-19 11:26 ` Jisheng Zhang
2019-08-19 11:27 ` [PATCH 1/3] ftrace: introdue ftrace_call_init Jisheng Zhang
2019-08-19 11:27 ` Jisheng Zhang
2019-08-19 11:30 ` Jisheng Zhang [this message]
2019-08-19 11:30 ` Jisheng Zhang
2019-08-20 9:27 ` Miroslav Benes
2019-08-20 9:27 ` Miroslav Benes
2019-08-21 2:12 ` Jisheng Zhang
2019-08-21 2:12 ` Jisheng Zhang
2019-08-26 10:14 ` Jisheng Zhang
2019-08-26 10:14 ` Jisheng Zhang
2019-08-19 11:28 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm64: implement ftrace with regs Jisheng Zhang
2019-08-19 11:28 ` Jisheng Zhang
2019-08-19 11:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64: use -fpatchable-function-entry if available Jisheng Zhang
2019-08-19 11:29 ` Jisheng Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190819191935.406afa82@xhacker.debian \
--to=jisheng.zhang@synaptics.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=duwe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.