From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Cc: "peter.maydell@linaro.org" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"sameo@linux.intel.com" <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
"ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
"shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com" <shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
"eric.auger@redhat.com" <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
"qemu-arm@nongnu.org" <qemu-arm@nongnu.org>,
"sebastien.boeuf@intel.com" <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>,
"lersek@redhat.com" <lersek@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH-for-4.2 v9 01/12] hw/acpi: Make ACPI IO address space configurable
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 14:38:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190829143810.1dc33818@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5FC3163CFD30C246ABAA99954A238FA83F3A2027@lhreml524-mbs.china.huawei.com>
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 11:04:27 +0000
Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com> wrote:
> Hi Igor,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Igor Mammedov [mailto:imammedo@redhat.com]
> > Sent: 29 August 2019 09:45
> > To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> > Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; qemu-arm@nongnu.org;
> > eric.auger@redhat.com; peter.maydell@linaro.org; sameo@linux.intel.com;
> > ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org; Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>;
> > shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com; sebastien.boeuf@intel.com; lersek@redhat.com
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH-for-4.2 v9 01/12] hw/acpi: Make ACPI IO address space
> > configurable
> >
> > On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 08:42:48 +0000
> > Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Linuxarm [mailto:linuxarm-bounces@huawei.com] On Behalf Of
> > Shameer
> > > > Kolothum
> > > > Sent: 13 August 2019 22:05
> > > > To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; qemu-arm@nongnu.org;
> > > > eric.auger@redhat.com; imammedo@redhat.com
> > > > Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org; sameo@linux.intel.com;
> > > > ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org; Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>;
> > > > shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com; sebastien.boeuf@intel.com;
> > lersek@redhat.com
> > > > Subject: [PATCH-for-4.2 v9 01/12] hw/acpi: Make ACPI IO address space
> > > > configurable
> > > >
> > > > This is in preparation for adding support for ARM64 platforms
> > > > where it doesn't use port mapped IO for ACPI IO space. We are
> > > > making changes so that MMIO region can be accommodated
> > > > and board can pass the base address into the aml build function.
> > >
> > > Looks like, this now breaks the "make check" on x86_64 and needs
> > > updating bios-tables-test-allowed-diff.h with DSDT entries. But I am
> > > not sure what changed now compared to v8(and older ones) that makes
> > > it to complain now!.
> >
> > you could see diff of what's changed but running test manually with
> > V=1 env var if you have 'iasl' installed
> >
> > V=1 QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64
> > tests/bios-tables-test
>
> Thanks for that tip and please find below output.
>
> /x86_64/acpi/piix4: Could not access KVM kernel module: No such file or directory
> qemu-system-x86_64: failed to initialize KVM: No such file or directory
> qemu-system-x86_64: Back to tcg accelerator
> acpi-test: Warning! DSDT binary file mismatch. Actual [aml:/tmp/aml-RGE76Z], Expected [aml:tests/data/acpi/pc/DSDT].
> acpi-test: Warning! DSDT mismatch. Actual [asl:/tmp/asl-TAE76Z.dsl, aml:/tmp/aml-RGE76Z], Expected [asl:/tmp/asl-O6B76Z.dsl, aml:tests/data/acpi/pc/DSDT].
>
> diff --git a/tmp/asl-O6B76Z.dsl b/tmp/asl-TAE76Z.dsl
> index 823ff002ec..4de5bd3221 100644
> --- a/tmp/asl-O6B76Z.dsl
> +++ b/tmp/asl-TAE76Z.dsl
> @@ -5,13 +5,13 @@
> *
> * Disassembling to symbolic ASL+ operators
> *
> - * Disassembly of tests/data/acpi/pc/DSDT, Thu Aug 29 10:40:40 2019
> + * Disassembly of /tmp/aml-RGE76Z, Thu Aug 29 10:40:40 2019
> *
> * Original Table Header:
> * Signature "DSDT"
> - * Length 0x0000140B (5131)
> + * Length 0x000017E4 (6116)
> * Revision 0x01 **** 32-bit table (V1), no 64-bit math support
> - * Checksum 0xB1
> + * Checksum 0x8B
> * OEM ID "BOCHS "
> * OEM Table ID "BXPCDSDT"
> * OEM Revision 0x00000001 (1)
> @@ -787,6 +787,206 @@ DefinitionBlock ("", "DSDT", 1, "BOCHS ", "BXPCDSDT", 0x00000001)
> \_SB.CPUS.CSCN ()
> }
>
> + Device (\_SB.PCI0.MHPD)
> + {
> + Name (_HID, "PNP0A06" /* Generic Container Device */) // _HID: Hardware ID
> + Name (_UID, "Memory hotplug resources") // _UID: Unique ID
> + Name (_CRS, Reso
>
> I think what happens is since we are now passing the memhp_io_base directly into the
> build_memory_hotplug_aml() and removed the "static uint16_t memhp_io_base", on
> x86, memory hotplug aml code is always built by default irrespective of whether
> acpi_memory_hotplug_init() is invoked or not.
>
> I could either reintroduce a check in build_memory_hotplug_aml() to make sure
> acpi_memory_hotplug_init() is called, or could do something like below,
fix looks fine to me, see minor comment below
> diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> index 3995f9a40f..17756c2191 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> @@ -1873,9 +1873,12 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
> build_cpus_aml(dsdt, machine, opts, pm->cpu_hp_io_base,
> "\\_SB.PCI0", "\\_GPE._E02");
> }
> - build_memory_hotplug_aml(dsdt, nr_mem, "\\_SB.PCI0",
> - "\\_GPE._E03", AML_SYSTEM_IO,
> - pcms->memhp_io_base);
> +
> + if (acpi_enabled && pcms->acpi_dev && nr_mem) {
double-check call path and see if
acpi_enabled && pcms->acpi_dev
is really necessary
> + build_memory_hotplug_aml(dsdt, nr_mem, "\\_SB.PCI0",
> + "\\_GPE._E03", AML_SYSTEM_IO,
> + pcms->memhp_io_base);
> + }
>
>
> I prefer the latter if there are no other issues with that. Please let me know.
>
> Thanks,
> Shameer
>
> >
> > > Patchew URL:
> > https://patchew.org/QEMU/20190813210539.31164-1-shameerali.kolothum.t
> > hodi@huawei.com/
> > >
> > > ERROR:/tmp/qemu-test/src/tests/bios-tables-test.c:447:test_acpi_asl:
> > assertion failed: (all_tables_match)
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Shameer
> > >
> > > > Also move few MEMORY_* definitions to header so that other memory
> > > > hotplug event signalling mechanisms (eg. Generic Event Device on
> > > > HW-reduced acpi platforms) can use the same from their respective
> > > > event handler code.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Shameer Kolothum
> > <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > v8 --> v9
> > > > -base address is an input into build_memory_hotplug_aml()
> > > > -Removed R-by tags from Igor and Eric for now.
> > > > ---
> > > > hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.c | 29 ++++++++++++++---------------
> > > > hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 4 +++-
> > > > hw/i386/pc.c | 3 +++
> > > > include/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.h | 9 +++++++--
> > > > include/hw/i386/pc.h | 3 +++
> > > > 5 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.c b/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.c
> > > > index 297812d5f7..1734d4b44f 100644
> > > > --- a/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.c
> > > > +++ b/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.c
> > > > @@ -29,12 +29,7 @@
> > > > #define MEMORY_SLOT_PROXIMITY_METHOD "MPXM"
> > > > #define MEMORY_SLOT_EJECT_METHOD "MEJ0"
> > > > #define MEMORY_SLOT_NOTIFY_METHOD "MTFY"
> > > > -#define MEMORY_SLOT_SCAN_METHOD "MSCN"
> > > > #define MEMORY_HOTPLUG_DEVICE "MHPD"
> > > > -#define MEMORY_HOTPLUG_IO_LEN 24
> > > > -#define MEMORY_DEVICES_CONTAINER "\\_SB.MHPC"
> > > > -
> > > > -static uint16_t memhp_io_base;
> > > >
> > > > static ACPIOSTInfo *acpi_memory_device_status(int slot, MemStatus
> > *mdev)
> > > > {
> > > > @@ -209,7 +204,7 @@ static const MemoryRegionOps
> > > > acpi_memory_hotplug_ops = {
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > void acpi_memory_hotplug_init(MemoryRegion *as, Object *owner,
> > > > - MemHotplugState *state, uint16_t
> > > > io_base)
> > > > + MemHotplugState *state, hwaddr
> > > > io_base)
> > > > {
> > > > MachineState *machine = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
> > > >
> > > > @@ -218,12 +213,10 @@ void acpi_memory_hotplug_init(MemoryRegion
> > *as,
> > > > Object *owner,
> > > > return;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > - assert(!memhp_io_base);
> > > > - memhp_io_base = io_base;
> > > > state->devs = g_malloc0(sizeof(*state->devs) * state->dev_count);
> > > > memory_region_init_io(&state->io, owner,
> > &acpi_memory_hotplug_ops,
> > > > state,
> > > > "acpi-mem-hotplug",
> > > > MEMORY_HOTPLUG_IO_LEN);
> > > > - memory_region_add_subregion(as, memhp_io_base, &state->io);
> > > > + memory_region_add_subregion(as, io_base, &state->io);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > /**
> > > > @@ -342,7 +335,8 @@ const VMStateDescription
> > vmstate_memory_hotplug
> > > > = {
> > > >
> > > > void build_memory_hotplug_aml(Aml *table, uint32_t nr_mem,
> > > > const char *res_root,
> > > > - const char *event_handler_method)
> > > > + const char *event_handler_method,
> > > > + AmlRegionSpace rs, hwaddr
> > > > memhp_io_base)
> > > > {
> > > > int i;
> > > > Aml *ifctx;
> > > > @@ -365,14 +359,19 @@ void build_memory_hotplug_aml(Aml *table,
> > > > uint32_t nr_mem,
> > > > aml_name_decl("_UID", aml_string("Memory hotplug
> > > > resources")));
> > > >
> > > > crs = aml_resource_template();
> > > > - aml_append(crs,
> > > > - aml_io(AML_DECODE16, memhp_io_base, memhp_io_base,
> > 0,
> > > > - MEMORY_HOTPLUG_IO_LEN)
> > > > - );
> > > > + if (rs == AML_SYSTEM_IO) {
> > > > + aml_append(crs,
> > > > + aml_io(AML_DECODE16, memhp_io_base,
> > > > memhp_io_base, 0,
> > > > + MEMORY_HOTPLUG_IO_LEN)
> > > > + );
> > > > + } else {
> > > > + aml_append(crs, aml_memory32_fixed(memhp_io_base,
> > > > + MEMORY_HOTPLUG_IO_LEN,
> > > > AML_READ_WRITE));
> > > > + }
> > > > aml_append(mem_ctrl_dev, aml_name_decl("_CRS", crs));
> > > >
> > > > aml_append(mem_ctrl_dev, aml_operation_region(
> > > > - MEMORY_HOTPLUG_IO_REGION, AML_SYSTEM_IO,
> > > > + MEMORY_HOTPLUG_IO_REGION, rs,
> > > > aml_int(memhp_io_base), MEMORY_HOTPLUG_IO_LEN)
> > > > );
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> > > > index f3fdfefcd5..e76d6631ea 100644
> > > > --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> > > > +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> > > > @@ -1871,7 +1871,9 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker
> > *linker,
> > > > build_cpus_aml(dsdt, machine, opts, pm->cpu_hp_io_base,
> > > > "\\_SB.PCI0", "\\_GPE._E02");
> > > > }
> > > > - build_memory_hotplug_aml(dsdt, nr_mem, "\\_SB.PCI0",
> > > > "\\_GPE._E03");
> > > > + build_memory_hotplug_aml(dsdt, nr_mem, "\\_SB.PCI0",
> > > > + "\\_GPE._E03", AML_SYSTEM_IO,
> > > > + pcms->memhp_io_base);
> > > >
> > > > scope = aml_scope("_GPE");
> > > > {
> > > > diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
> > > > index 549c437050..be973cea99 100644
> > > > --- a/hw/i386/pc.c
> > > > +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
> > > > @@ -1936,6 +1936,9 @@ void pc_memory_init(PCMachineState *pcms,
> > > >
> > > > /* Init default IOAPIC address space */
> > > > pcms->ioapic_as = &address_space_memory;
> > > > +
> > > > + /* Init ACPI memory hotplug IO base address */
> > > > + pcms->memhp_io_base = ACPI_MEMORY_HOTPLUG_BASE;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > /*
> > > > diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.h
> > > > b/include/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.h
> > > > index 77c65765d6..dfe9cf3fde 100644
> > > > --- a/include/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.h
> > > > +++ b/include/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.h
> > > > @@ -5,6 +5,10 @@
> > > > #include "hw/acpi/acpi.h"
> > > > #include "hw/acpi/aml-build.h"
> > > >
> > > > +#define MEMORY_SLOT_SCAN_METHOD "MSCN"
> > > > +#define MEMORY_DEVICES_CONTAINER "\\_SB.MHPC"
> > > > +#define MEMORY_HOTPLUG_IO_LEN 24
> > > > +
> > > > /**
> > > > * MemStatus:
> > > > * @is_removing: the memory device in slot has been requested to be
> > > > ejected.
> > > > @@ -29,7 +33,7 @@ typedef struct MemHotplugState {
> > > > } MemHotplugState;
> > > >
> > > > void acpi_memory_hotplug_init(MemoryRegion *as, Object *owner,
> > > > - MemHotplugState *state, uint16_t
> > > > io_base);
> > > > + MemHotplugState *state, hwaddr
> > > > io_base);
> > > >
> > > > void acpi_memory_plug_cb(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
> > MemHotplugState
> > > > *mem_st,
> > > > DeviceState *dev, Error **errp);
> > > > @@ -48,5 +52,6 @@ void acpi_memory_ospm_status(MemHotplugState
> > > > *mem_st, ACPIOSTInfoList ***list);
> > > >
> > > > void build_memory_hotplug_aml(Aml *table, uint32_t nr_mem,
> > > > const char *res_root,
> > > > - const char *event_handler_method);
> > > > + const char *event_handler_method,
> > > > + AmlRegionSpace rs, hwaddr
> > > > memhp_io_base);
> > > > #endif
> > > > diff --git a/include/hw/i386/pc.h b/include/hw/i386/pc.h
> > > > index 859b64c51d..49b47535cf 100644
> > > > --- a/include/hw/i386/pc.h
> > > > +++ b/include/hw/i386/pc.h
> > > > @@ -69,6 +69,9 @@ struct PCMachineState {
> > > > /* Address space used by IOAPIC device. All IOAPIC interrupts
> > > > * will be translated to MSI messages in the address space. */
> > > > AddressSpace *ioapic_as;
> > > > +
> > > > + /* ACPI Memory hotplug IO base address */
> > > > + hwaddr memhp_io_base;
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > #define PC_MACHINE_ACPI_DEVICE_PROP "acpi-device"
> > > > --
> > > > 2.17.1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Linuxarm mailing list
> > > > Linuxarm@huawei.com
> > > > http://hulk.huawei.com/mailman/listinfo/linuxarm
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Cc: "peter.maydell@linaro.org" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"sameo@linux.intel.com" <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
"ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
"shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com" <shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
"eric.auger@redhat.com" <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
"qemu-arm@nongnu.org" <qemu-arm@nongnu.org>,
"sebastien.boeuf@intel.com" <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>,
"lersek@redhat.com" <lersek@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH-for-4.2 v9 01/12] hw/acpi: Make ACPI IO address space configurable
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 14:38:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190829143810.1dc33818@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5FC3163CFD30C246ABAA99954A238FA83F3A2027@lhreml524-mbs.china.huawei.com>
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 11:04:27 +0000
Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com> wrote:
> Hi Igor,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Igor Mammedov [mailto:imammedo@redhat.com]
> > Sent: 29 August 2019 09:45
> > To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> > Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; qemu-arm@nongnu.org;
> > eric.auger@redhat.com; peter.maydell@linaro.org; sameo@linux.intel.com;
> > ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org; Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>;
> > shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com; sebastien.boeuf@intel.com; lersek@redhat.com
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH-for-4.2 v9 01/12] hw/acpi: Make ACPI IO address space
> > configurable
> >
> > On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 08:42:48 +0000
> > Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Linuxarm [mailto:linuxarm-bounces@huawei.com] On Behalf Of
> > Shameer
> > > > Kolothum
> > > > Sent: 13 August 2019 22:05
> > > > To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; qemu-arm@nongnu.org;
> > > > eric.auger@redhat.com; imammedo@redhat.com
> > > > Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org; sameo@linux.intel.com;
> > > > ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org; Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>;
> > > > shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com; sebastien.boeuf@intel.com;
> > lersek@redhat.com
> > > > Subject: [PATCH-for-4.2 v9 01/12] hw/acpi: Make ACPI IO address space
> > > > configurable
> > > >
> > > > This is in preparation for adding support for ARM64 platforms
> > > > where it doesn't use port mapped IO for ACPI IO space. We are
> > > > making changes so that MMIO region can be accommodated
> > > > and board can pass the base address into the aml build function.
> > >
> > > Looks like, this now breaks the "make check" on x86_64 and needs
> > > updating bios-tables-test-allowed-diff.h with DSDT entries. But I am
> > > not sure what changed now compared to v8(and older ones) that makes
> > > it to complain now!.
> >
> > you could see diff of what's changed but running test manually with
> > V=1 env var if you have 'iasl' installed
> >
> > V=1 QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64
> > tests/bios-tables-test
>
> Thanks for that tip and please find below output.
>
> /x86_64/acpi/piix4: Could not access KVM kernel module: No such file or directory
> qemu-system-x86_64: failed to initialize KVM: No such file or directory
> qemu-system-x86_64: Back to tcg accelerator
> acpi-test: Warning! DSDT binary file mismatch. Actual [aml:/tmp/aml-RGE76Z], Expected [aml:tests/data/acpi/pc/DSDT].
> acpi-test: Warning! DSDT mismatch. Actual [asl:/tmp/asl-TAE76Z.dsl, aml:/tmp/aml-RGE76Z], Expected [asl:/tmp/asl-O6B76Z.dsl, aml:tests/data/acpi/pc/DSDT].
>
> diff --git a/tmp/asl-O6B76Z.dsl b/tmp/asl-TAE76Z.dsl
> index 823ff002ec..4de5bd3221 100644
> --- a/tmp/asl-O6B76Z.dsl
> +++ b/tmp/asl-TAE76Z.dsl
> @@ -5,13 +5,13 @@
> *
> * Disassembling to symbolic ASL+ operators
> *
> - * Disassembly of tests/data/acpi/pc/DSDT, Thu Aug 29 10:40:40 2019
> + * Disassembly of /tmp/aml-RGE76Z, Thu Aug 29 10:40:40 2019
> *
> * Original Table Header:
> * Signature "DSDT"
> - * Length 0x0000140B (5131)
> + * Length 0x000017E4 (6116)
> * Revision 0x01 **** 32-bit table (V1), no 64-bit math support
> - * Checksum 0xB1
> + * Checksum 0x8B
> * OEM ID "BOCHS "
> * OEM Table ID "BXPCDSDT"
> * OEM Revision 0x00000001 (1)
> @@ -787,6 +787,206 @@ DefinitionBlock ("", "DSDT", 1, "BOCHS ", "BXPCDSDT", 0x00000001)
> \_SB.CPUS.CSCN ()
> }
>
> + Device (\_SB.PCI0.MHPD)
> + {
> + Name (_HID, "PNP0A06" /* Generic Container Device */) // _HID: Hardware ID
> + Name (_UID, "Memory hotplug resources") // _UID: Unique ID
> + Name (_CRS, Reso
>
> I think what happens is since we are now passing the memhp_io_base directly into the
> build_memory_hotplug_aml() and removed the "static uint16_t memhp_io_base", on
> x86, memory hotplug aml code is always built by default irrespective of whether
> acpi_memory_hotplug_init() is invoked or not.
>
> I could either reintroduce a check in build_memory_hotplug_aml() to make sure
> acpi_memory_hotplug_init() is called, or could do something like below,
fix looks fine to me, see minor comment below
> diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> index 3995f9a40f..17756c2191 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> @@ -1873,9 +1873,12 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
> build_cpus_aml(dsdt, machine, opts, pm->cpu_hp_io_base,
> "\\_SB.PCI0", "\\_GPE._E02");
> }
> - build_memory_hotplug_aml(dsdt, nr_mem, "\\_SB.PCI0",
> - "\\_GPE._E03", AML_SYSTEM_IO,
> - pcms->memhp_io_base);
> +
> + if (acpi_enabled && pcms->acpi_dev && nr_mem) {
double-check call path and see if
acpi_enabled && pcms->acpi_dev
is really necessary
> + build_memory_hotplug_aml(dsdt, nr_mem, "\\_SB.PCI0",
> + "\\_GPE._E03", AML_SYSTEM_IO,
> + pcms->memhp_io_base);
> + }
>
>
> I prefer the latter if there are no other issues with that. Please let me know.
>
> Thanks,
> Shameer
>
> >
> > > Patchew URL:
> > https://patchew.org/QEMU/20190813210539.31164-1-shameerali.kolothum.t
> > hodi@huawei.com/
> > >
> > > ERROR:/tmp/qemu-test/src/tests/bios-tables-test.c:447:test_acpi_asl:
> > assertion failed: (all_tables_match)
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Shameer
> > >
> > > > Also move few MEMORY_* definitions to header so that other memory
> > > > hotplug event signalling mechanisms (eg. Generic Event Device on
> > > > HW-reduced acpi platforms) can use the same from their respective
> > > > event handler code.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Shameer Kolothum
> > <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > v8 --> v9
> > > > -base address is an input into build_memory_hotplug_aml()
> > > > -Removed R-by tags from Igor and Eric for now.
> > > > ---
> > > > hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.c | 29 ++++++++++++++---------------
> > > > hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 4 +++-
> > > > hw/i386/pc.c | 3 +++
> > > > include/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.h | 9 +++++++--
> > > > include/hw/i386/pc.h | 3 +++
> > > > 5 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.c b/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.c
> > > > index 297812d5f7..1734d4b44f 100644
> > > > --- a/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.c
> > > > +++ b/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.c
> > > > @@ -29,12 +29,7 @@
> > > > #define MEMORY_SLOT_PROXIMITY_METHOD "MPXM"
> > > > #define MEMORY_SLOT_EJECT_METHOD "MEJ0"
> > > > #define MEMORY_SLOT_NOTIFY_METHOD "MTFY"
> > > > -#define MEMORY_SLOT_SCAN_METHOD "MSCN"
> > > > #define MEMORY_HOTPLUG_DEVICE "MHPD"
> > > > -#define MEMORY_HOTPLUG_IO_LEN 24
> > > > -#define MEMORY_DEVICES_CONTAINER "\\_SB.MHPC"
> > > > -
> > > > -static uint16_t memhp_io_base;
> > > >
> > > > static ACPIOSTInfo *acpi_memory_device_status(int slot, MemStatus
> > *mdev)
> > > > {
> > > > @@ -209,7 +204,7 @@ static const MemoryRegionOps
> > > > acpi_memory_hotplug_ops = {
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > void acpi_memory_hotplug_init(MemoryRegion *as, Object *owner,
> > > > - MemHotplugState *state, uint16_t
> > > > io_base)
> > > > + MemHotplugState *state, hwaddr
> > > > io_base)
> > > > {
> > > > MachineState *machine = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
> > > >
> > > > @@ -218,12 +213,10 @@ void acpi_memory_hotplug_init(MemoryRegion
> > *as,
> > > > Object *owner,
> > > > return;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > - assert(!memhp_io_base);
> > > > - memhp_io_base = io_base;
> > > > state->devs = g_malloc0(sizeof(*state->devs) * state->dev_count);
> > > > memory_region_init_io(&state->io, owner,
> > &acpi_memory_hotplug_ops,
> > > > state,
> > > > "acpi-mem-hotplug",
> > > > MEMORY_HOTPLUG_IO_LEN);
> > > > - memory_region_add_subregion(as, memhp_io_base, &state->io);
> > > > + memory_region_add_subregion(as, io_base, &state->io);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > /**
> > > > @@ -342,7 +335,8 @@ const VMStateDescription
> > vmstate_memory_hotplug
> > > > = {
> > > >
> > > > void build_memory_hotplug_aml(Aml *table, uint32_t nr_mem,
> > > > const char *res_root,
> > > > - const char *event_handler_method)
> > > > + const char *event_handler_method,
> > > > + AmlRegionSpace rs, hwaddr
> > > > memhp_io_base)
> > > > {
> > > > int i;
> > > > Aml *ifctx;
> > > > @@ -365,14 +359,19 @@ void build_memory_hotplug_aml(Aml *table,
> > > > uint32_t nr_mem,
> > > > aml_name_decl("_UID", aml_string("Memory hotplug
> > > > resources")));
> > > >
> > > > crs = aml_resource_template();
> > > > - aml_append(crs,
> > > > - aml_io(AML_DECODE16, memhp_io_base, memhp_io_base,
> > 0,
> > > > - MEMORY_HOTPLUG_IO_LEN)
> > > > - );
> > > > + if (rs == AML_SYSTEM_IO) {
> > > > + aml_append(crs,
> > > > + aml_io(AML_DECODE16, memhp_io_base,
> > > > memhp_io_base, 0,
> > > > + MEMORY_HOTPLUG_IO_LEN)
> > > > + );
> > > > + } else {
> > > > + aml_append(crs, aml_memory32_fixed(memhp_io_base,
> > > > + MEMORY_HOTPLUG_IO_LEN,
> > > > AML_READ_WRITE));
> > > > + }
> > > > aml_append(mem_ctrl_dev, aml_name_decl("_CRS", crs));
> > > >
> > > > aml_append(mem_ctrl_dev, aml_operation_region(
> > > > - MEMORY_HOTPLUG_IO_REGION, AML_SYSTEM_IO,
> > > > + MEMORY_HOTPLUG_IO_REGION, rs,
> > > > aml_int(memhp_io_base), MEMORY_HOTPLUG_IO_LEN)
> > > > );
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> > > > index f3fdfefcd5..e76d6631ea 100644
> > > > --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> > > > +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> > > > @@ -1871,7 +1871,9 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker
> > *linker,
> > > > build_cpus_aml(dsdt, machine, opts, pm->cpu_hp_io_base,
> > > > "\\_SB.PCI0", "\\_GPE._E02");
> > > > }
> > > > - build_memory_hotplug_aml(dsdt, nr_mem, "\\_SB.PCI0",
> > > > "\\_GPE._E03");
> > > > + build_memory_hotplug_aml(dsdt, nr_mem, "\\_SB.PCI0",
> > > > + "\\_GPE._E03", AML_SYSTEM_IO,
> > > > + pcms->memhp_io_base);
> > > >
> > > > scope = aml_scope("_GPE");
> > > > {
> > > > diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
> > > > index 549c437050..be973cea99 100644
> > > > --- a/hw/i386/pc.c
> > > > +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
> > > > @@ -1936,6 +1936,9 @@ void pc_memory_init(PCMachineState *pcms,
> > > >
> > > > /* Init default IOAPIC address space */
> > > > pcms->ioapic_as = &address_space_memory;
> > > > +
> > > > + /* Init ACPI memory hotplug IO base address */
> > > > + pcms->memhp_io_base = ACPI_MEMORY_HOTPLUG_BASE;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > /*
> > > > diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.h
> > > > b/include/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.h
> > > > index 77c65765d6..dfe9cf3fde 100644
> > > > --- a/include/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.h
> > > > +++ b/include/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.h
> > > > @@ -5,6 +5,10 @@
> > > > #include "hw/acpi/acpi.h"
> > > > #include "hw/acpi/aml-build.h"
> > > >
> > > > +#define MEMORY_SLOT_SCAN_METHOD "MSCN"
> > > > +#define MEMORY_DEVICES_CONTAINER "\\_SB.MHPC"
> > > > +#define MEMORY_HOTPLUG_IO_LEN 24
> > > > +
> > > > /**
> > > > * MemStatus:
> > > > * @is_removing: the memory device in slot has been requested to be
> > > > ejected.
> > > > @@ -29,7 +33,7 @@ typedef struct MemHotplugState {
> > > > } MemHotplugState;
> > > >
> > > > void acpi_memory_hotplug_init(MemoryRegion *as, Object *owner,
> > > > - MemHotplugState *state, uint16_t
> > > > io_base);
> > > > + MemHotplugState *state, hwaddr
> > > > io_base);
> > > >
> > > > void acpi_memory_plug_cb(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
> > MemHotplugState
> > > > *mem_st,
> > > > DeviceState *dev, Error **errp);
> > > > @@ -48,5 +52,6 @@ void acpi_memory_ospm_status(MemHotplugState
> > > > *mem_st, ACPIOSTInfoList ***list);
> > > >
> > > > void build_memory_hotplug_aml(Aml *table, uint32_t nr_mem,
> > > > const char *res_root,
> > > > - const char *event_handler_method);
> > > > + const char *event_handler_method,
> > > > + AmlRegionSpace rs, hwaddr
> > > > memhp_io_base);
> > > > #endif
> > > > diff --git a/include/hw/i386/pc.h b/include/hw/i386/pc.h
> > > > index 859b64c51d..49b47535cf 100644
> > > > --- a/include/hw/i386/pc.h
> > > > +++ b/include/hw/i386/pc.h
> > > > @@ -69,6 +69,9 @@ struct PCMachineState {
> > > > /* Address space used by IOAPIC device. All IOAPIC interrupts
> > > > * will be translated to MSI messages in the address space. */
> > > > AddressSpace *ioapic_as;
> > > > +
> > > > + /* ACPI Memory hotplug IO base address */
> > > > + hwaddr memhp_io_base;
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > #define PC_MACHINE_ACPI_DEVICE_PROP "acpi-device"
> > > > --
> > > > 2.17.1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Linuxarm mailing list
> > > > Linuxarm@huawei.com
> > > > http://hulk.huawei.com/mailman/listinfo/linuxarm
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-29 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-13 21:05 [Qemu-arm] [PATCH-for-4.2 v9 00/12] ARM virt: ACPI memory hotplug support Shameer Kolothum
2019-08-13 21:05 ` [Qemu-devel] " Shameer Kolothum
2019-08-13 21:05 ` [Qemu-arm] [PATCH-for-4.2 v9 01/12] hw/acpi: Make ACPI IO address space configurable Shameer Kolothum
2019-08-13 21:05 ` [Qemu-devel] " Shameer Kolothum
2019-08-15 8:42 ` [Qemu-arm] " Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2019-08-15 8:42 ` [Qemu-devel] " Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2019-08-29 8:45 ` [Qemu-arm] " Igor Mammedov
2019-08-29 8:45 ` [Qemu-devel] " Igor Mammedov
2019-08-29 11:04 ` [Qemu-arm] " Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2019-08-29 11:04 ` [Qemu-devel] " Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2019-08-29 12:38 ` Igor Mammedov [this message]
2019-08-29 12:38 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-08-29 13:45 ` [Qemu-arm] " Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2019-08-29 13:45 ` [Qemu-devel] " Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2019-09-01 11:17 ` [Qemu-arm] " Auger Eric
2019-09-01 11:17 ` [Qemu-devel] " Auger Eric
2019-08-13 21:05 ` [Qemu-arm] [PATCH-for-4.2 v9 02/12] hw/acpi: Do not create memory hotplug method when handler is not defined Shameer Kolothum
2019-08-13 21:05 ` [Qemu-devel] " Shameer Kolothum
2019-08-13 21:05 ` [Qemu-arm] [PATCH-for-4.2 v9 03/12] hw/acpi: Add ACPI Generic Event Device Support Shameer Kolothum
2019-08-13 21:05 ` [Qemu-devel] " Shameer Kolothum
2019-09-01 11:17 ` [Qemu-arm] " Auger Eric
2019-09-01 11:17 ` [Qemu-devel] " Auger Eric
2019-08-13 21:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH-for-4.2 v9 04/12] hw/arm/virt: Add memory hotplug framework Shameer Kolothum
2019-08-13 21:05 ` [Qemu-arm] [PATCH-for-4.2 v9 05/12] hw/arm/virt: Add 4.2 machine type Shameer Kolothum
2019-08-13 21:05 ` [Qemu-devel] " Shameer Kolothum
2019-08-13 21:05 ` [Qemu-arm] [PATCH-for-4.2 v9 06/12] hw/arm/virt: Enable device memory cold/hot plug with ACPI boot Shameer Kolothum
2019-08-13 21:05 ` [Qemu-devel] " Shameer Kolothum
2019-09-01 11:18 ` [Qemu-arm] " Auger Eric
2019-09-01 11:18 ` [Qemu-devel] " Auger Eric
2019-09-01 11:22 ` [Qemu-arm] " Auger Eric
2019-09-01 11:22 ` Auger Eric
2019-09-02 9:34 ` [Qemu-arm] " Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2019-09-02 9:34 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2019-09-02 9:21 ` [Qemu-arm] " Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2019-09-02 9:21 ` [Qemu-devel] " Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2019-09-02 9:32 ` [Qemu-arm] " Auger Eric
2019-09-02 9:32 ` [Qemu-devel] " Auger Eric
2019-08-13 21:05 ` [Qemu-arm] [PATCH-for-4.2 v9 07/12] hw/arm/virt-acpi-build: Add PC-DIMM in SRAT Shameer Kolothum
2019-08-13 21:05 ` [Qemu-devel] " Shameer Kolothum
2019-08-13 21:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH-for-4.2 v9 08/12] hw/arm: Factor out powerdown notifier from GPIO Shameer Kolothum
2019-09-02 7:37 ` [Qemu-arm] " Auger Eric
2019-09-02 7:37 ` [Qemu-devel] " Auger Eric
2019-08-13 21:05 ` [Qemu-arm] [PATCH-for-4.2 v9 09/12] hw/arm: Use GED for system_powerdown event Shameer Kolothum
2019-08-13 21:05 ` [Qemu-devel] " Shameer Kolothum
2019-09-02 7:37 ` [Qemu-arm] " Auger Eric
2019-09-02 7:37 ` [Qemu-devel] " Auger Eric
2019-08-13 21:05 ` [Qemu-arm] [PATCH-for-4.2 v9 10/12] docs/specs: Add ACPI GED documentation Shameer Kolothum
2019-08-13 21:05 ` [Qemu-devel] " Shameer Kolothum
2019-09-01 11:20 ` [Qemu-arm] " Auger Eric
2019-09-01 11:20 ` [Qemu-devel] " Auger Eric
2019-08-13 21:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH-for-4.2 v9 11/12] tests: add dummy ACPI tables for arm/virt board Shameer Kolothum
2019-08-13 21:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH-for-4.2 v9 12/12] tests: Add bios tests to arm/virt Shameer Kolothum
2019-08-14 6:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH-for-4.2 v9 00/12] ARM virt: ACPI memory hotplug support no-reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190829143810.1dc33818@redhat.com \
--to=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sebastien.boeuf@intel.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.