All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
To: Vitor Soares <Vitor.Soares@synopsys.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com, bbrezillon@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] i3c: master: Check if devices have i3c_dev_boardinfo on i3c_master_add_i3c_dev_locked()
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 18:27:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190829182747.3a163b8c@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3e21481ddf53ea58f5899df6ec542b79b8cbcd68.1567071213.git.vitor.soares@synopsys.com>

On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 12:19:33 +0200
Vitor Soares <Vitor.Soares@synopsys.com> wrote:

> The I3C devices described in DT might not be attached to the master which
> doesn't allow to assign a specific dynamic address.

Dynamic address assignment is not the only problem here (see my
comment about missing ->of_node info). I would simply say that
newdev->boardinfo assignment was missing in
i3c_master_add_i3c_dev_locked() which is already a bug by itself.

I would also change the subject to

"i3c: master: Make sure ->boardinfo is initialized in add_i3c_dev_locked()"

> 
> This patch check if a device has i3c_dev_boardinfo and add it to
> i3c_dev_desc structure. In this conditions, the framework will try to
> assign the i3c_dev_boardinfo->init_dyn_addr even if stactic address = 0.

I would get rid of this explanation and add Fixes/Cc-stable tags.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Vitor Soares <vitor.soares@synopsys.com>
> ---
>  drivers/i3c/master.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i3c/master.c b/drivers/i3c/master.c
> index 4d29e1f..85fbda6 100644
> --- a/drivers/i3c/master.c
> +++ b/drivers/i3c/master.c
> @@ -1795,6 +1795,23 @@ i3c_master_search_i3c_dev_duplicate(struct i3c_dev_desc *refdev)
>  	return NULL;
>  }
>  
> +static struct i3c_dev_boardinfo *
> +i3c_master_search_i3c_boardinfo(struct i3c_dev_desc *dev)
> +{
> +	struct i3c_master_controller *master = i3c_dev_get_master(dev);
> +	struct i3c_dev_boardinfo *boardinfo;
> +
> +	if (dev->boardinfo)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(boardinfo, &master->boardinfo.i3c, node) {
> +		if (dev->info.pid == boardinfo->pid)
> +			return boardinfo;
> +	}
> +
> +	return NULL;
> +}

Can we instead have:

static void i3c_master_init_i3c_dev_boardinfo(struct i3c_dev_desc *dev)
{
	struct i3c_master_controller *master = i3c_dev_get_master(dev);

	list_for_each_entry(boardinfo, &master->boardinfo.i3c, node) {
		if (dev->info.pid == boardinfo->pid)
			dev->boardinfo = boardinfo;
	}
}

> +
>  /**
>   * i3c_master_add_i3c_dev_locked() - add an I3C slave to the bus
>   * @master: master used to send frames on the bus
> @@ -1816,6 +1833,7 @@ int i3c_master_add_i3c_dev_locked(struct i3c_master_controller *master,
>  {
>  	struct i3c_device_info info = { .dyn_addr = addr };
>  	struct i3c_dev_desc *newdev, *olddev;
> +	struct i3c_dev_boardinfo *boardinfo;
>  	u8 old_dyn_addr = addr, expected_dyn_addr;
>  	struct i3c_ibi_setup ibireq = { };
>  	bool enable_ibi = false;
> @@ -1875,6 +1893,10 @@ int i3c_master_add_i3c_dev_locked(struct i3c_master_controller *master,
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto err_detach_dev;
>  
> +	boardinfo = i3c_master_search_i3c_boardinfo(newdev);
> +	if (boardinfo)
> +		newdev->boardinfo = boardinfo;
> +

And here:

	i3c_master_init_i3c_dev_boardinfo(newdev);

>  	/*
>  	 * Depending on our previous state, the expected dynamic address might
>  	 * differ:


_______________________________________________
linux-i3c mailing list
linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-i3c

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
To: Vitor Soares <Vitor.Soares@synopsys.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org, bbrezillon@kernel.org,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] i3c: master: Check if devices have i3c_dev_boardinfo on i3c_master_add_i3c_dev_locked()
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 18:27:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190829182747.3a163b8c@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3e21481ddf53ea58f5899df6ec542b79b8cbcd68.1567071213.git.vitor.soares@synopsys.com>

On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 12:19:33 +0200
Vitor Soares <Vitor.Soares@synopsys.com> wrote:

> The I3C devices described in DT might not be attached to the master which
> doesn't allow to assign a specific dynamic address.

Dynamic address assignment is not the only problem here (see my
comment about missing ->of_node info). I would simply say that
newdev->boardinfo assignment was missing in
i3c_master_add_i3c_dev_locked() which is already a bug by itself.

I would also change the subject to

"i3c: master: Make sure ->boardinfo is initialized in add_i3c_dev_locked()"

> 
> This patch check if a device has i3c_dev_boardinfo and add it to
> i3c_dev_desc structure. In this conditions, the framework will try to
> assign the i3c_dev_boardinfo->init_dyn_addr even if stactic address = 0.

I would get rid of this explanation and add Fixes/Cc-stable tags.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Vitor Soares <vitor.soares@synopsys.com>
> ---
>  drivers/i3c/master.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i3c/master.c b/drivers/i3c/master.c
> index 4d29e1f..85fbda6 100644
> --- a/drivers/i3c/master.c
> +++ b/drivers/i3c/master.c
> @@ -1795,6 +1795,23 @@ i3c_master_search_i3c_dev_duplicate(struct i3c_dev_desc *refdev)
>  	return NULL;
>  }
>  
> +static struct i3c_dev_boardinfo *
> +i3c_master_search_i3c_boardinfo(struct i3c_dev_desc *dev)
> +{
> +	struct i3c_master_controller *master = i3c_dev_get_master(dev);
> +	struct i3c_dev_boardinfo *boardinfo;
> +
> +	if (dev->boardinfo)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(boardinfo, &master->boardinfo.i3c, node) {
> +		if (dev->info.pid == boardinfo->pid)
> +			return boardinfo;
> +	}
> +
> +	return NULL;
> +}

Can we instead have:

static void i3c_master_init_i3c_dev_boardinfo(struct i3c_dev_desc *dev)
{
	struct i3c_master_controller *master = i3c_dev_get_master(dev);

	list_for_each_entry(boardinfo, &master->boardinfo.i3c, node) {
		if (dev->info.pid == boardinfo->pid)
			dev->boardinfo = boardinfo;
	}
}

> +
>  /**
>   * i3c_master_add_i3c_dev_locked() - add an I3C slave to the bus
>   * @master: master used to send frames on the bus
> @@ -1816,6 +1833,7 @@ int i3c_master_add_i3c_dev_locked(struct i3c_master_controller *master,
>  {
>  	struct i3c_device_info info = { .dyn_addr = addr };
>  	struct i3c_dev_desc *newdev, *olddev;
> +	struct i3c_dev_boardinfo *boardinfo;
>  	u8 old_dyn_addr = addr, expected_dyn_addr;
>  	struct i3c_ibi_setup ibireq = { };
>  	bool enable_ibi = false;
> @@ -1875,6 +1893,10 @@ int i3c_master_add_i3c_dev_locked(struct i3c_master_controller *master,
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto err_detach_dev;
>  
> +	boardinfo = i3c_master_search_i3c_boardinfo(newdev);
> +	if (boardinfo)
> +		newdev->boardinfo = boardinfo;
> +

And here:

	i3c_master_init_i3c_dev_boardinfo(newdev);

>  	/*
>  	 * Depending on our previous state, the expected dynamic address might
>  	 * differ:

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-08-29 16:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-29 10:19 [PATCH 0/4] i3c: remove device if failed on pre_assign_dyn_addr() Vitor Soares
2019-08-29 10:19 ` Vitor Soares
2019-08-29 10:19 ` [PATCH 1/4] i3c: master: detach and free device if pre_assign_dyn_addr() fails Vitor Soares
2019-08-29 10:19   ` Vitor Soares
2019-08-29 10:41   ` Boris Brezillon
2019-08-29 10:41     ` Boris Brezillon
2019-08-29 13:53     ` Vitor Soares
2019-08-29 13:53       ` Vitor Soares
2019-08-29 14:35       ` Boris Brezillon
2019-08-29 14:35         ` Boris Brezillon
2019-08-29 15:23         ` Vitor Soares
2019-08-29 15:23           ` Vitor Soares
2019-08-29 15:37           ` Boris Brezillon
2019-08-29 15:37             ` Boris Brezillon
2019-08-29 16:23             ` Vitor Soares
2019-08-29 16:23               ` Vitor Soares
2019-08-29 10:19 ` [PATCH 2/4] i3c: master: Check if devices have i3c_dev_boardinfo on i3c_master_add_i3c_dev_locked() Vitor Soares
2019-08-29 10:19   ` Vitor Soares
2019-08-29 10:44   ` Boris Brezillon
2019-08-29 10:44     ` Boris Brezillon
2019-08-29 14:00     ` Vitor Soares
2019-08-29 14:00       ` Vitor Soares
2019-08-29 14:39       ` Boris Brezillon
2019-08-29 14:39         ` Boris Brezillon
2019-08-29 14:39         ` Boris Brezillon
2019-08-29 14:39           ` Boris Brezillon
2019-08-29 15:07           ` Vitor Soares
2019-08-29 15:07             ` Vitor Soares
2019-08-29 15:24             ` Boris Brezillon
2019-08-29 15:24               ` Boris Brezillon
2019-08-29 15:57               ` Vitor Soares
2019-08-29 15:57                 ` Vitor Soares
2019-08-29 16:15                 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-08-29 16:15                   ` Boris Brezillon
2019-08-29 16:33                   ` Vitor Soares
2019-08-29 16:33                     ` Vitor Soares
2019-08-29 16:37                     ` Boris Brezillon
2019-08-29 16:37                       ` Boris Brezillon
2019-08-29 16:27   ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2019-08-29 16:27     ` Boris Brezillon
2019-08-29 10:19 ` [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: i3c: Make 'assigned-address' valid if static address != 0 Vitor Soares
2019-08-29 10:19   ` Vitor Soares
2019-08-29 10:51   ` Boris Brezillon
2019-08-29 10:51     ` Boris Brezillon
2019-08-29 14:06     ` Vitor Soares
2019-08-29 14:06       ` Vitor Soares
2019-08-29 10:19 ` [PATCH 4/4] i3c: master: dw: reattach device on first available location of address table Vitor Soares
2019-08-29 10:19   ` Vitor Soares
2019-08-29 11:15   ` Boris Brezillon
2019-08-29 11:15     ` Boris Brezillon
2019-08-29 14:09     ` Vitor Soares
2019-08-29 14:09       ` Vitor Soares

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190829182747.3a163b8c@collabora.com \
    --to=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
    --cc=Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com \
    --cc=Vitor.Soares@synopsys.com \
    --cc=bbrezillon@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.