Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] erofs: on-disk format should have explicitly assigned numbers

[Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>]

On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 11:36:37AM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> As Christoph claimed [1], on-disk format should have
> explicitly assigned numbers. I have to change it.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829095954.GB20598@infradead.org/
> Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>

...ignore this patchset. I will resend another incremental
patchset to address what Christoph suggested yesterday...

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

> ---
> no change
> 
>  fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h | 18 +++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h b/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h
> index afa7d45ca958..2447ad4d0920 100644
> --- a/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h
> +++ b/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h
> @@ -52,10 +52,10 @@ struct erofs_super_block {
>   * 4~7 - reserved
>   */
>  enum {
> -	EROFS_INODE_FLAT_PLAIN,
> -	EROFS_INODE_FLAT_COMPRESSION_LEGACY,
> -	EROFS_INODE_FLAT_INLINE,
> -	EROFS_INODE_FLAT_COMPRESSION,
> +	EROFS_INODE_FLAT_PLAIN			= 0,
> +	EROFS_INODE_FLAT_COMPRESSION_LEGACY	= 1,
> +	EROFS_INODE_FLAT_INLINE			= 2,
> +	EROFS_INODE_FLAT_COMPRESSION		= 3,
>  	EROFS_INODE_LAYOUT_MAX
>  };
>  
> @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ struct erofs_xattr_entry {
>  
>  /* available compression algorithm types */
>  enum {
> -	Z_EROFS_COMPRESSION_LZ4,
> +	Z_EROFS_COMPRESSION_LZ4	= 0,
>  	Z_EROFS_COMPRESSION_MAX
>  };
>  
> @@ -239,10 +239,10 @@ struct z_erofs_map_header {
>   *                (di_advise could be 0, 1 or 2)
>   */
>  enum {
> -	Z_EROFS_VLE_CLUSTER_TYPE_PLAIN,
> -	Z_EROFS_VLE_CLUSTER_TYPE_HEAD,
> -	Z_EROFS_VLE_CLUSTER_TYPE_NONHEAD,
> -	Z_EROFS_VLE_CLUSTER_TYPE_RESERVED,
> +	Z_EROFS_VLE_CLUSTER_TYPE_PLAIN		= 0,
> +	Z_EROFS_VLE_CLUSTER_TYPE_HEAD		= 1,
> +	Z_EROFS_VLE_CLUSTER_TYPE_NONHEAD	= 2,
> +	Z_EROFS_VLE_CLUSTER_TYPE_RESERVED	= 3,
>  	Z_EROFS_VLE_CLUSTER_TYPE_MAX
>  };
>  
> -- 
> 2.17.1
>