All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>,
	dalias@libc.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
	heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, linuxarm@huawei.com,
	jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, paulus@samba.org, hpa@zytor.com,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, chenhc@lemote.com, will@kernel.org,
	cai@lca.pw, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, mpe@ellerman.id.au, x86@kernel.org,
	rppt@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, dledford@redhat.com,
	mingo@redhat.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, jhogan@kernel.org,
	nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mattst88@gmail.com,
	len.brown@intel.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
	anshuman.khandual@arm.com, bp@alien8.de, luto@kernel.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, n
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] x86: numa: check the node id consistently for x86
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 20:17:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190902181731.GB35858@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190902072542.GN2369@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>


* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:

> Also note that the CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS version of
> cpumask_of_node() already does this (although it wants the below fix).
> 
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> index e6dad600614c..5f49c10201c7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> @@ -861,7 +861,7 @@ void numa_remove_cpu(int cpu)
>   */
>  const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
>  {
> -	if (node >= nr_node_ids) {
> +	if ((unsigned)node >= nr_node_ids) {
>  		printk(KERN_WARNING
>  			"cpumask_of_node(%d): node > nr_node_ids(%u)\n",
>  			node, nr_node_ids);

Nitpicking: please also fix the kernel message to say ">=".

With that:

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Note that:

- arch/arm64/mm/numa.c copied the same sign bug (or unrobustness if we 
  don't want to call it a bug).

- Kudos to the mm/memcontrol.c and kernel/bpf/syscall.c teams for not 
  copying that bug. Booo for none of them fixing the buggy pattern 
  elsewhere in the kernel ;-)

Thanks,

	Ingo

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>,
	dalias@libc.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
	heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, linuxarm@huawei.com,
	jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, paulus@samba.org, hpa@zytor.com,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, chenhc@lemote.com, will@kernel.org,
	cai@lca.pw, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, mpe@ellerman.id.au, x86@kernel.org,
	rppt@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, dledford@redhat.com,
	mingo@redhat.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, jhogan@kernel.org,
	nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mattst88@gmail.com,
	len.brown@intel.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
	anshuman.khandual@arm.com, bp@alien8.de, luto@kernel.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, rth@twiddle.net,
	axboe@kernel.dk, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ralf@linux-mips.org,
	tbogendoerfer@suse.de, paul.burton@mips.com,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
	davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] x86: numa: check the node id consistently for x86
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 20:17:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190902181731.GB35858@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190902072542.GN2369@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>


* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:

> Also note that the CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS version of
> cpumask_of_node() already does this (although it wants the below fix).
> 
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> index e6dad600614c..5f49c10201c7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> @@ -861,7 +861,7 @@ void numa_remove_cpu(int cpu)
>   */
>  const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
>  {
> -	if (node >= nr_node_ids) {
> +	if ((unsigned)node >= nr_node_ids) {
>  		printk(KERN_WARNING
>  			"cpumask_of_node(%d): node > nr_node_ids(%u)\n",
>  			node, nr_node_ids);

Nitpicking: please also fix the kernel message to say ">=".

With that:

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Note that:

- arch/arm64/mm/numa.c copied the same sign bug (or unrobustness if we 
  don't want to call it a bug).

- Kudos to the mm/memcontrol.c and kernel/bpf/syscall.c teams for not 
  copying that bug. Booo for none of them fixing the buggy pattern 
  elsewhere in the kernel ;-)

Thanks,

	Ingo

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>,
	dalias@libc.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
	heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, linuxarm@huawei.com,
	jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, paulus@samba.org, hpa@zytor.com,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, chenhc@lemote.com, will@kernel.org,
	cai@lca.pw, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, mpe@ellerman.id.au, x86@kernel.org,
	rppt@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, dledford@redhat.com,
	mingo@redhat.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, jhogan@kernel.org,
	nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mattst88@gmail.com,
	len.brown@intel.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
	anshuman.khandual@arm.com, bp@alien8.de, luto@kernel.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, rth@twiddle.net,
	axboe@kernel.dk, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ralf@linux-mips.org,
	tbogendoerfer@suse.de, paul.burton@mips.com,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
	davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] x86: numa: check the node id consistently for x86
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2019 18:17:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190902181731.GB35858@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190902072542.GN2369@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>


* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:

> Also note that the CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS version of
> cpumask_of_node() already does this (although it wants the below fix).
> 
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> index e6dad600614c..5f49c10201c7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> @@ -861,7 +861,7 @@ void numa_remove_cpu(int cpu)
>   */
>  const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
>  {
> -	if (node >= nr_node_ids) {
> +	if ((unsigned)node >= nr_node_ids) {
>  		printk(KERN_WARNING
>  			"cpumask_of_node(%d): node > nr_node_ids(%u)\n",
>  			node, nr_node_ids);

Nitpicking: please also fix the kernel message to say ">=".

With that:

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Note that:

- arch/arm64/mm/numa.c copied the same sign bug (or unrobustness if we 
  don't want to call it a bug).

- Kudos to the mm/memcontrol.c and kernel/bpf/syscall.c teams for not 
  copying that bug. Booo for none of them fixing the buggy pattern 
  elsewhere in the kernel ;-)

Thanks,

	Ingo

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: dalias@libc.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
	heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, linuxarm@huawei.com,
	jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, paulus@samba.org, hpa@zytor.com,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, chenhc@lemote.com, will@kernel.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp,
	x86@kernel.org, paul.burton@mips.com, rppt@linux.ibm.com,
	borntraeger@de.ibm.com, dledford@redhat.com, mingo@redhat.com,
	jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, jhogan@kernel.org,
	nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mattst88@gmail.com,
	len.brown@intel.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
	anshuman.khandual@arm.com, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru, cai@lca.pw,
	luto@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, rth@twiddle.net,
	axboe@kernel.dk, robin.murphy@arm.com,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, ralf@linux-mips.org,
	tbogendoerfer@suse.de, Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, bp@alien8.de,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] x86: numa: check the node id consistently for x86
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 20:17:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190902181731.GB35858@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190902072542.GN2369@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>


* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:

> Also note that the CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS version of
> cpumask_of_node() already does this (although it wants the below fix).
> 
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> index e6dad600614c..5f49c10201c7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> @@ -861,7 +861,7 @@ void numa_remove_cpu(int cpu)
>   */
>  const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
>  {
> -	if (node >= nr_node_ids) {
> +	if ((unsigned)node >= nr_node_ids) {
>  		printk(KERN_WARNING
>  			"cpumask_of_node(%d): node > nr_node_ids(%u)\n",
>  			node, nr_node_ids);

Nitpicking: please also fix the kernel message to say ">=".

With that:

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Note that:

- arch/arm64/mm/numa.c copied the same sign bug (or unrobustness if we 
  don't want to call it a bug).

- Kudos to the mm/memcontrol.c and kernel/bpf/syscall.c teams for not 
  copying that bug. Booo for none of them fixing the buggy pattern 
  elsewhere in the kernel ;-)

Thanks,

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-09-02 18:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 164+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-31  5:58 [PATCH v2 0/9] check the node id consistently across different arches Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] arm64: numa: check the node id consistently for arm64 Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] x86: numa: check the node id consistently for x86 Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  8:55   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-31  8:55     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-31  8:55     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-31  8:55     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-31  8:55     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-31 10:09     ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 10:09       ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 10:09       ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 10:09       ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 10:09       ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 10:09       ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 16:12       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-31 16:12         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-31 16:12         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-31 16:12         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-31 16:12         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-01  4:45         ` Something about loongson_llsc_mb 陈华才
     [not found]           ` <2019090410032559707512@loongson.cn>
2019-09-04  9:21             ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-04 10:04               ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-04 12:57               ` Huang Pei
2019-09-02  5:46         ` [PATCH v2 2/9] x86: numa: check the node id consistently for x86 Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02  5:46           ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02  5:46           ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02  5:46           ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02  5:46           ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02  5:46           ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02  7:25           ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-02  7:25             ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-02  7:25             ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-02  7:25             ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-02  7:25             ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-02 12:25             ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 12:25               ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 12:25               ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 12:25               ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 12:25               ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 12:25               ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 12:56               ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-02 12:56                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-02 12:56                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-02 12:56                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-02 18:22                 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-09-02 18:22                   ` Ingo Molnar
2019-09-02 18:22                   ` Ingo Molnar
2019-09-02 18:22                   ` Ingo Molnar
2019-09-02 19:14                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-02 19:14                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-02 19:14                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-02 19:14                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-03  6:19                 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-03  6:19                   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-03  6:19                   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-03  6:19                   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-03  6:19                   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-03  7:11                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-03  7:11                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-03  7:11                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-03  7:11                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-03  8:31                     ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-03  8:31                       ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-03  8:31                       ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-03  8:31                       ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-03  8:31                       ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-03 12:15                     ` Salil Mehta
2019-09-03 12:15                       ` Salil Mehta
2019-09-03 14:28                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-03 14:28                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-02 18:17             ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2019-09-02 18:17               ` Ingo Molnar
2019-09-02 18:17               ` Ingo Molnar
2019-09-02 18:17               ` Ingo Molnar
2019-09-03  7:53               ` [PATCH] x86/mm: Fix cpumask_of_node() error condition Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-03  7:53                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-03  7:53                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-03  7:53                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-31  5:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] alpha: numa: check the node id consistently for alpha Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] powerpc: numa: check the node id consistently for powerpc Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] s390: numa: check the node id consistently for s390 Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02  4:05   ` kbuild test robot
2019-09-02  4:05     ` kbuild test robot
2019-09-02  4:05     ` kbuild test robot
2019-09-02  4:05     ` kbuild test robot
2019-08-31  5:58 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] sh: numa: check the node id consistently for sh Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] sparc64: numa: check the node id consistently for sparc64 Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  6:53   ` David Miller
2019-08-31  6:53     ` David Miller
2019-08-31  6:53     ` David Miller
2019-08-31  6:53     ` David Miller
2019-08-31  6:53     ` David Miller
2019-08-31  8:57     ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  8:57       ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  8:57       ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  8:57       ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  8:57       ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  8:57       ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 20:02       ` David Miller
2019-08-31 20:02         ` David Miller
2019-08-31 20:02         ` David Miller
2019-08-31 20:02         ` David Miller
2019-08-31 20:02         ` David Miller
2019-09-02  6:08         ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02  6:08           ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02  6:08           ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02  6:08           ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02  6:08           ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02  6:08           ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02 15:17           ` David Miller
2019-09-02 15:17             ` David Miller
2019-09-02 15:17             ` David Miller
2019-09-02 15:17             ` David Miller
2019-09-02 15:17             ` David Miller
2019-08-31  5:58 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] mips: numa: check the node id consistently for mips ip27 Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31 15:45   ` Paul Burton
2019-08-31 15:45     ` Paul Burton
2019-08-31 15:45     ` Paul Burton
2019-09-02  6:11     ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02  6:11       ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-09-02  6:11       ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] mips: numa: check the node id consistently for mips loongson64 Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-08-31  5:58   ` Yunsheng Lin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190902181731.GB35858@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=cai@lca.pw \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=chenhc@lemote.com \
    --cc=dalias@libc.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
    --cc=jhogan@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=linyunsheng@huawei.com \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.