From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Anson Huang <anson.huang@nxp.com>
Cc: "mark.rutland@arm.com" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Jacky Bai <ping.bai@nxp.com>,
"shawnguo@kernel.org" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
"s.hauer@pengutronix.de" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>,
"robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
"kernel@pengutronix.de" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com>,
"festevam@gmail.com" <festevam@gmail.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, Jun Li <jun.li@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: imx8mm: Remove incorrect fallback compatible for ocotp
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 11:17:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190911091728.GA10331@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DB3PR0402MB3916E0F566E35DD30275A8E9F5B10@DB3PR0402MB3916.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 09:05:49AM +0000, Anson Huang wrote:
> Hi, Daniel
>
> > On 11/09/2019 16:24, Anson Huang wrote:
> > > Compared to i.MX7D, i.MX8MM has different ocotp layout, so it should
> > > NOT use "fsl,imx7d-ocotp" as ocotp's fallback compatible, remove it.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@nxp.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> > > index 5f9d0da..7c4dcce 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> > > @@ -426,7 +426,7 @@
> > > };
> > >
> > > ocotp: ocotp-ctrl@30350000 {
> > > - compatible = "fsl,imx8mm-ocotp", "fsl,imx7d-
> > ocotp", "syscon";
> > > + compatible = "fsl,imx8mm-ocotp", "syscon";
> > > reg = <0x30350000 0x10000>;
> > > clocks = <&clk IMX8MM_CLK_OCOTP_ROOT>;
> > > /* For nvmem subnodes */
> >
> > Why not fold the two patches?
>
> For i.MX8MM, it just removes the incorrect fallback compatible, for i.MX8MN, it needs
> to replace the incorrect fallback compatible in order to support SoC UID read, so I think
> this should be 2 separate patch?
Oh, yes, there is a subtle difference in the file name :) m|n. I understand
now why you splitted it.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Anson Huang <anson.huang@nxp.com>
Cc: "robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"mark.rutland@arm.com" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"shawnguo@kernel.org" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
"s.hauer@pengutronix.de" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
"kernel@pengutronix.de" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
"festevam@gmail.com" <festevam@gmail.com>,
Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com>,
Jacky Bai <ping.bai@nxp.com>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>, Jun Li <jun.li@nxp.com>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: imx8mm: Remove incorrect fallback compatible for ocotp
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 11:17:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190911091728.GA10331@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DB3PR0402MB3916E0F566E35DD30275A8E9F5B10@DB3PR0402MB3916.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 09:05:49AM +0000, Anson Huang wrote:
> Hi, Daniel
>
> > On 11/09/2019 16:24, Anson Huang wrote:
> > > Compared to i.MX7D, i.MX8MM has different ocotp layout, so it should
> > > NOT use "fsl,imx7d-ocotp" as ocotp's fallback compatible, remove it.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@nxp.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> > > index 5f9d0da..7c4dcce 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> > > @@ -426,7 +426,7 @@
> > > };
> > >
> > > ocotp: ocotp-ctrl@30350000 {
> > > - compatible = "fsl,imx8mm-ocotp", "fsl,imx7d-
> > ocotp", "syscon";
> > > + compatible = "fsl,imx8mm-ocotp", "syscon";
> > > reg = <0x30350000 0x10000>;
> > > clocks = <&clk IMX8MM_CLK_OCOTP_ROOT>;
> > > /* For nvmem subnodes */
> >
> > Why not fold the two patches?
>
> For i.MX8MM, it just removes the incorrect fallback compatible, for i.MX8MN, it needs
> to replace the incorrect fallback compatible in order to support SoC UID read, so I think
> this should be 2 separate patch?
Oh, yes, there is a subtle difference in the file name :) m|n. I understand
now why you splitted it.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-11 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-11 14:24 [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: imx8mm: Remove incorrect fallback compatible for ocotp Anson Huang
2019-09-11 14:24 ` Anson Huang
2019-09-11 9:01 ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-09-11 9:01 ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-09-11 9:05 ` Anson Huang
2019-09-11 9:05 ` Anson Huang
2019-09-11 9:17 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2019-09-11 9:17 ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-09-11 14:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: imx8mn: Use "fsl, imx8mm-ocotp" as ocotp's fallback compatible Anson Huang
2019-09-11 14:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: imx8mn: Use "fsl,imx8mm-ocotp" " Anson Huang
2019-10-06 7:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: imx8mm: Remove incorrect fallback compatible for ocotp Shawn Guo
2019-10-06 7:44 ` Shawn Guo
2019-10-06 7:44 ` Shawn Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190911091728.GA10331@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=anson.huang@nxp.com \
--cc=daniel.baluta@nxp.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=jun.li@nxp.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=leonard.crestez@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=ping.bai@nxp.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.