All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: fix function types in COND_SYSCALL
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 16:15:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190911151545.GD3360@blommer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190910224044.100388-1-samitolvanen@google.com>

On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 03:40:44PM -0700, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> Define a weak function in COND_SYSCALL instead of a weak alias to
> sys_ni_syscall, which has an incompatible type. This fixes indirect
> call mismatches with Control-Flow Integrity (CFI) checking.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>

This looks correct to me, builds fine, and I asume has been tested, so FWIW:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

In looking at this, I came to the conclusion that we can drop the ifdeffery
around our SYSCALL_DEFINE0(), COND_SYSCALL(), and SYS_NI(), which I evidently
cargo-culted from x86 (where the ifdeffery is actually necessary).

I can send a follow up for that.

Thanks,
Mark.

> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h | 15 ++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h
> index 507d0ee6bc69..06d880b3526c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h
> @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
>  #ifndef __ASM_SYSCALL_WRAPPER_H
>  #define __ASM_SYSCALL_WRAPPER_H
>  
> +struct pt_regs;
> +
>  #define SC_ARM64_REGS_TO_ARGS(x, ...)				\
>  	__MAP(x,__SC_ARGS					\
>  	      ,,regs->regs[0],,regs->regs[1],,regs->regs[2]	\
> @@ -35,8 +37,11 @@
>  	ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION(__arm64_compat_sys_##sname, ERRNO);			\
>  	asmlinkage long __arm64_compat_sys_##sname(const struct pt_regs *__unused)
>  
> -#define COND_SYSCALL_COMPAT(name) \
> -	cond_syscall(__arm64_compat_sys_##name);
> +#define COND_SYSCALL_COMPAT(name) 							\
> +	asmlinkage long __weak __arm64_compat_sys_##name(const struct pt_regs *regs)	\
> +	{										\
> +		return sys_ni_syscall();						\
> +	}
>  
>  #define COMPAT_SYS_NI(name) \
>  	SYSCALL_ALIAS(__arm64_compat_sys_##name, sys_ni_posix_timers);
> @@ -70,7 +75,11 @@
>  #endif
>  
>  #ifndef COND_SYSCALL
> -#define COND_SYSCALL(name) cond_syscall(__arm64_sys_##name)
> +#define COND_SYSCALL(name)							\
> +	asmlinkage long __weak __arm64_sys_##name(const struct pt_regs *regs)	\
> +	{									\
> +		return sys_ni_syscall();					\
> +	}
>  #endif
>  
>  #ifndef SYS_NI
> -- 
> 2.23.0.162.g0b9fbb3734-goog
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: fix function types in COND_SYSCALL
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 16:15:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190911151545.GD3360@blommer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190910224044.100388-1-samitolvanen@google.com>

On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 03:40:44PM -0700, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> Define a weak function in COND_SYSCALL instead of a weak alias to
> sys_ni_syscall, which has an incompatible type. This fixes indirect
> call mismatches with Control-Flow Integrity (CFI) checking.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>

This looks correct to me, builds fine, and I asume has been tested, so FWIW:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

In looking at this, I came to the conclusion that we can drop the ifdeffery
around our SYSCALL_DEFINE0(), COND_SYSCALL(), and SYS_NI(), which I evidently
cargo-culted from x86 (where the ifdeffery is actually necessary).

I can send a follow up for that.

Thanks,
Mark.

> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h | 15 ++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h
> index 507d0ee6bc69..06d880b3526c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h
> @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
>  #ifndef __ASM_SYSCALL_WRAPPER_H
>  #define __ASM_SYSCALL_WRAPPER_H
>  
> +struct pt_regs;
> +
>  #define SC_ARM64_REGS_TO_ARGS(x, ...)				\
>  	__MAP(x,__SC_ARGS					\
>  	      ,,regs->regs[0],,regs->regs[1],,regs->regs[2]	\
> @@ -35,8 +37,11 @@
>  	ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION(__arm64_compat_sys_##sname, ERRNO);			\
>  	asmlinkage long __arm64_compat_sys_##sname(const struct pt_regs *__unused)
>  
> -#define COND_SYSCALL_COMPAT(name) \
> -	cond_syscall(__arm64_compat_sys_##name);
> +#define COND_SYSCALL_COMPAT(name) 							\
> +	asmlinkage long __weak __arm64_compat_sys_##name(const struct pt_regs *regs)	\
> +	{										\
> +		return sys_ni_syscall();						\
> +	}
>  
>  #define COMPAT_SYS_NI(name) \
>  	SYSCALL_ALIAS(__arm64_compat_sys_##name, sys_ni_posix_timers);
> @@ -70,7 +75,11 @@
>  #endif
>  
>  #ifndef COND_SYSCALL
> -#define COND_SYSCALL(name) cond_syscall(__arm64_sys_##name)
> +#define COND_SYSCALL(name)							\
> +	asmlinkage long __weak __arm64_sys_##name(const struct pt_regs *regs)	\
> +	{									\
> +		return sys_ni_syscall();					\
> +	}
>  #endif
>  
>  #ifndef SYS_NI
> -- 
> 2.23.0.162.g0b9fbb3734-goog
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-11 15:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-10 22:40 [PATCH] arm64: fix function types in COND_SYSCALL Sami Tolvanen
2019-09-10 22:40 ` Sami Tolvanen
2019-09-11 15:15 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2019-09-11 15:15   ` Mark Rutland
2019-09-12 13:11   ` Will Deacon
2019-09-12 13:11     ` Will Deacon
2019-09-13 11:33     ` Mark Rutland
2019-09-13 11:33       ` Mark Rutland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190911151545.GD3360@blommer \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.