All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] x86: remove memory constraint from "mov" instruction
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 12:08:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190911190840.GG1045@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGG=3QWteHe8zCdXQVQv+42pMO2k4XvAbj_A=ptRUi9E2AwT2w@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 02:19:20PM -0700, Bill Wendling wrote:
> The "mov" instruction to get the error code shouldn't move into a memory
> location. Don't allow the compiler to make this decision. Instead
> specify that only a register is appropriate here.

I'd prefer the changelog to say something like:

  Remove a bogus memory contraint as x86 does not have a generic
  memory-to-memory "mov" instruction.

Saying "shouldn't move into a memory location" makes it sound like there's
an unwanted side effect when the compiler selects memory, though I suppose
you could argue that a build error is an unwanted side effect :-).

Out of curiosity, do any compilers actually generate errors because of
this, or is it simply dead code?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>
> ---
>  lib/x86/desc.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/x86/desc.c b/lib/x86/desc.c
> index 5f37cef..451f504 100644
> --- a/lib/x86/desc.c
> +++ b/lib/x86/desc.c
> @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ unsigned exception_error_code(void)
>  {
>      unsigned short error_code;
> 
> -    asm("mov %%gs:6, %0" : "=rm"(error_code));
> +    asm("mov %%gs:6, %0" : "=r"(error_code));
>      return error_code;
>  }

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-09-11 19:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-09 21:19 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] x86: remove memory constraint from "mov" instruction Bill Wendling
2019-09-10 16:44 ` Jim Mattson
2019-09-11 19:08 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2019-09-11 22:35   ` Bill Wendling
2019-09-12 20:59     ` [PATCH] " Bill Wendling
2019-09-19 21:44       ` Sean Christopherson
2019-09-24 14:02 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] " Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190911190840.GG1045@linux.intel.com \
    --to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=morbo@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.