From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: intel-spi: support chips without software sequencer
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 12:19:20 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190916091920.GS28281@lahna.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e284a2a8-1d4c-2b57-642c-c91f39a5ee99@fortanix.com>
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 09:12:50AM +0000, Jethro Beekman wrote:
> On 2019-09-16 11:11, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 08:41:55PM +0000, Jethro Beekman wrote:
> >> Could someone please review this?
> >>
> >> On 2019-09-04 03:15, Jethro Beekman wrote:
> >>> Some flash controllers don't have a software sequencer. Avoid
> >>> configuring the register addresses for it, and double check
> >>> everywhere that its not accidentally trying to be used.
> >
> > All the supported types in intel_spi_init() set ->sregs so I don't see
> > how we could end up calling functions with that not set properly. Which
> > controller we are talking about here? CNL?
> >
>
> Yes, see 2/2.
OK, thanks. Please mention that in the commit log as well.
The patch itself looks good to me.
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>
Cc: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: intel-spi: support chips without software sequencer
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 12:19:20 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190916091920.GS28281@lahna.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e284a2a8-1d4c-2b57-642c-c91f39a5ee99@fortanix.com>
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 09:12:50AM +0000, Jethro Beekman wrote:
> On 2019-09-16 11:11, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 08:41:55PM +0000, Jethro Beekman wrote:
> >> Could someone please review this?
> >>
> >> On 2019-09-04 03:15, Jethro Beekman wrote:
> >>> Some flash controllers don't have a software sequencer. Avoid
> >>> configuring the register addresses for it, and double check
> >>> everywhere that its not accidentally trying to be used.
> >
> > All the supported types in intel_spi_init() set ->sregs so I don't see
> > how we could end up calling functions with that not set properly. Which
> > controller we are talking about here? CNL?
> >
>
> Yes, see 2/2.
OK, thanks. Please mention that in the commit log as well.
The patch itself looks good to me.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-16 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-04 1:15 [PATCH v2 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: intel-spi: support chips without software sequencer Jethro Beekman
2019-09-04 1:15 ` Jethro Beekman
2019-09-15 20:41 ` Jethro Beekman
2019-09-15 20:41 ` Jethro Beekman
2019-09-16 9:11 ` Mika Westerberg
2019-09-16 9:11 ` Mika Westerberg
2019-09-16 9:12 ` Jethro Beekman
2019-09-16 9:12 ` Jethro Beekman
2019-09-16 9:19 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2019-09-16 9:19 ` Mika Westerberg
2019-09-16 9:22 ` Jethro Beekman
2019-09-16 9:22 ` Jethro Beekman
2019-09-16 9:42 ` Mika Westerberg
2019-09-16 9:42 ` Mika Westerberg
2019-10-23 21:22 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2019-10-23 21:22 ` Tudor.Ambarus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190916091920.GS28281@lahna.fi.intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=jethro@fortanix.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=tudor.ambarus@microchip.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.