All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: 266a9a8b41: WARNING:possible_recursive_locking_detected
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 18:16:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190916171606.GA1131@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wii2apAb9WHCaOt8vnQjk8yXAHnMEC6im0f0YiEF4PwOA@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 476 bytes --]

On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 08:44:05PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 8:04 PM Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps lockref_get_nested(struct lockref *lockref, unsigned int subclass)?
> > With s/spin_lock/spin_lock_nested/ in the body...
> 
> Sure. Under the usual CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC, with the non-debug case
> just turning into a regular lockref_get().
> 
> Sounds fine to me.

Done and force-pushed into vfs.git#fixes

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	"zhengbin (A)" <zhengbin13@huawei.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"zhangyi (F)" <yi.zhang@huawei.com>,
	renxudong1@huawei.com, Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>,
	LKP <lkp@01.org>
Subject: Re: 266a9a8b41: WARNING:possible_recursive_locking_detected
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 18:16:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190916171606.GA1131@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wii2apAb9WHCaOt8vnQjk8yXAHnMEC6im0f0YiEF4PwOA@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 08:44:05PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 8:04 PM Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps lockref_get_nested(struct lockref *lockref, unsigned int subclass)?
> > With s/spin_lock/spin_lock_nested/ in the body...
> 
> Sure. Under the usual CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC, with the non-debug case
> just turning into a regular lockref_get().
> 
> Sounds fine to me.

Done and force-pushed into vfs.git#fixes

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-16 17:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-03 14:44 Possible FS race condition between iterate_dir and d_alloc_parallel zhengbin (A)
2019-09-03 15:40 ` Al Viro
2019-09-03 15:41   ` Al Viro
2019-09-04  6:15     ` zhengbin (A)
2019-09-05 17:47       ` Al Viro
2019-09-06  0:55         ` Jun Li
2019-09-06  2:00           ` Al Viro
2019-09-06  2:32         ` zhengbin (A)
2019-09-09 14:10       ` zhengbin (A)
2019-09-09 14:59         ` Al Viro
2019-09-09 15:10           ` zhengbin (A)
     [not found]             ` <7e32cda5-dc89-719d-9651-cf2bd06ae728@huawei.com>
2019-09-10 21:53               ` Al Viro
2019-09-10 22:17                 ` Al Viro
2019-09-14 16:16                 ` [PATCH] " Al Viro
2019-09-14 16:49                   ` Linus Torvalds
2019-09-14 17:01                     ` Al Viro
2019-09-14 17:15                       ` Linus Torvalds
2019-09-14 20:04                         ` Al Viro
2019-09-14 22:57                           ` Linus Torvalds
2019-09-15  0:50                             ` Al Viro
2019-09-15  1:41                               ` Linus Torvalds
2019-09-15 16:02                                 ` Al Viro
2019-09-15 17:58                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2019-09-21 14:07                                     ` Al Viro
2019-09-21 16:21                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2019-09-21 17:18                                         ` Al Viro
2019-09-21 17:38                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2019-09-24  2:52                                       ` Al Viro
2019-09-24 13:30                                         ` Josef Bacik
2019-09-24 14:51                                           ` Al Viro
2019-09-24 15:01                                             ` Josef Bacik
2019-09-24 15:11                                               ` Al Viro
2019-09-24 15:26                                                 ` Josef Bacik
2019-09-24 16:33                                                   ` Al Viro
     [not found]                                         ` <CAHk-=wiJ1eY7y6r_cFNRPCqD+BJZS7eJeQFO6OrXxRFjDAipsQ@mail.gmail.com>
2019-09-29  5:29                                           ` Al Viro
2019-09-25 11:59                                       ` Amir Goldstein
2019-09-25 12:22                                         ` Al Viro
2019-09-25 12:34                                           ` Amir Goldstein
2019-09-22 21:29                     ` Al Viro
2019-09-23  3:32                       ` zhengbin (A)
2019-09-23  5:08                         ` Al Viro
2019-09-16  2:04                   ` 266a9a8b41: WARNING:possible_recursive_locking_detected kernel test robot
2019-09-16  2:58                     ` Al Viro
2019-09-16  2:58                       ` Al Viro
2019-09-16  3:03                       ` Al Viro
2019-09-16  3:03                         ` Al Viro
2019-09-16  3:44                         ` Linus Torvalds
2019-09-16  3:44                           ` Linus Torvalds
2019-09-16 17:16                           ` Al Viro [this message]
2019-09-16 17:16                             ` Al Viro
2019-09-16 17:29                             ` Al Viro
2019-09-16 17:29                               ` Al Viro
2019-09-17  8:59                               ` Rong Chen
2019-09-17  7:03                             ` zhengbin
2019-09-17 12:01                               ` Al Viro
2019-09-17 12:01                                 ` Al Viro
2019-09-19  3:36                                 ` zhengbin
2019-09-19  3:36                                   ` zhengbin (A)
2019-09-19  3:55                                   ` Al Viro
2019-09-19  3:55                                     ` Al Viro
2019-09-19  4:16                                     ` zhengbin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190916171606.GA1131@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.