From: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v4] f2fs: Fix indefinite loop in f2fs_gc()
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:03:16 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190917053316.GB12730@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <355d24c1-b07c-f8ff-1ab9-3f85653ced60@huawei.com>
Hi Chao,
On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 07:00:32PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Sahitya,
>
> Luckily, I can reproduce this issue with generic/269, and have sent another
> patch for the issue, could you please check that one?
>
Thanks for the fix. The issue could not get reproduced yet, so could not make
much progress on the customer case.
thanks,
> Thanks,
>
> On 2019/8/7 22:06, Chao Yu wrote:
> > On 2019-8-7 21:40, Sahitya Tummala wrote:
> >> Policy - Foreground GC, LFS and greedy GC mode.
> >>
> >> Under this policy, f2fs_gc() loops forever to GC as it doesn't have
> >> enough free segements to proceed and thus it keeps calling gc_more
> >> for the same victim segment. This can happen if the selected victim
> >> segment could not be GC'd due to failed blkaddr validity check i.e.
> >> is_alive() returns false for the blocks set in current validity map.
> >>
> >> Fix this by keeping track of such invalid segments and skip those
> >> segments for selection in get_victim_by_default() to avoid endless
> >> GC loop under such error scenarios. Currently, add this logic under
> >> CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS to be able to root cause the issue in debug
> >> version.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org>
> >> ---
> >> v4: Cover all logic with CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS
> >>
> >> fs/f2fs/gc.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >> fs/f2fs/segment.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> >> fs/f2fs/segment.h | 3 +++
> >> 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> >> index 8974672..cbcacbd 100644
> >> --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> >> @@ -382,6 +382,16 @@ static int get_victim_by_default(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >> nsearched++;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS
> >> + /*
> >> + * skip selecting the invalid segno (that is failed due to block
> >> + * validity check failure during GC) to avoid endless GC loop in
> >> + * such cases.
> >> + */
> >> + if (test_bit(segno, sm->invalid_segmap))
> >> + goto next;
> >> +#endif
> >> +
> >> secno = GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, segno);
> >>
> >> if (sec_usage_check(sbi, secno))
> >> @@ -602,8 +612,15 @@ static bool is_alive(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct f2fs_summary *sum,
> >> {
> >> struct page *node_page;
> >> nid_t nid;
> >> - unsigned int ofs_in_node;
> >> + unsigned int ofs_in_node, segno;
> >> block_t source_blkaddr;
> >> + unsigned long offset;
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS
> >> + struct sit_info *sit_i = SIT_I(sbi);
> >> +#endif
> >> +
> >> + segno = GET_SEGNO(sbi, blkaddr);
> >> + offset = GET_BLKOFF_FROM_SEG0(sbi, blkaddr);
> >>
> >> nid = le32_to_cpu(sum->nid);
> >> ofs_in_node = le16_to_cpu(sum->ofs_in_node);
> >> @@ -627,8 +644,18 @@ static bool is_alive(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct f2fs_summary *sum,
> >> source_blkaddr = datablock_addr(NULL, node_page, ofs_in_node);
> >> f2fs_put_page(node_page, 1);
> >>
> >> - if (source_blkaddr != blkaddr)
> >> + if (source_blkaddr != blkaddr) {
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS
> >
> > unsigned int segno = GET_SEGNO(sbi, blkaddr);
> > unsigned int offset = GET_BLKOFF_FROM_SEG0(sbi, blkaddr);
> >
> > Should be local, otherwise it looks good to me, I think Jaegeuk can help to fix
> > this while merging.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >> + if (unlikely(check_valid_map(sbi, segno, offset))) {
> >> + if (!test_and_set_bit(segno, sit_i->invalid_segmap)) {
> >> + f2fs_err(sbi, "mismatched blkaddr %u (source_blkaddr %u) in seg %u\n",
> >> + blkaddr, source_blkaddr, segno);
> >> + f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1);
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >> +#endif
> >> return false;
> >> + }
> >> return true;
> >> }
> >>
> >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> >> index a661ac3..ee795b1 100644
> >> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> >> @@ -806,6 +806,9 @@ static void __remove_dirty_segment(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, unsigned int segno,
> >> enum dirty_type dirty_type)
> >> {
> >> struct dirty_seglist_info *dirty_i = DIRTY_I(sbi);
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS
> >> + struct sit_info *sit_i = SIT_I(sbi);
> >> +#endif
> >>
> >> if (test_and_clear_bit(segno, dirty_i->dirty_segmap[dirty_type]))
> >> dirty_i->nr_dirty[dirty_type]--;
> >> @@ -817,9 +820,13 @@ static void __remove_dirty_segment(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, unsigned int segno,
> >> if (test_and_clear_bit(segno, dirty_i->dirty_segmap[t]))
> >> dirty_i->nr_dirty[t]--;
> >>
> >> - if (get_valid_blocks(sbi, segno, true) == 0)
> >> + if (get_valid_blocks(sbi, segno, true) == 0) {
> >> clear_bit(GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, segno),
> >> dirty_i->victim_secmap);
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS
> >> + clear_bit(segno, sit_i->invalid_segmap);
> >> +#endif
> >> + }
> >> }
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -4015,6 +4022,10 @@ static int build_sit_info(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >> sit_i->sit_bitmap_mir = kmemdup(src_bitmap, bitmap_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> >> if (!sit_i->sit_bitmap_mir)
> >> return -ENOMEM;
> >> +
> >> + sit_i->invalid_segmap = f2fs_kvzalloc(sbi, bitmap_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> >> + if (!sit_i->invalid_segmap)
> >> + return -ENOMEM;
> >> #endif
> >>
> >> /* init SIT information */
> >> @@ -4517,6 +4528,7 @@ static void destroy_sit_info(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >> kvfree(sit_i->sit_bitmap);
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS
> >> kvfree(sit_i->sit_bitmap_mir);
> >> + kvfree(sit_i->invalid_segmap);
> >> #endif
> >> kvfree(sit_i);
> >> }
> >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.h b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
> >> index b746028..9370d53 100644
> >> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.h
> >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
> >> @@ -229,6 +229,9 @@ struct sit_info {
> >> char *sit_bitmap; /* SIT bitmap pointer */
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS
> >> char *sit_bitmap_mir; /* SIT bitmap mirror */
> >> +
> >> + /* bitmap of segments to be ignored by GC in case of errors */
> >> + unsigned long *invalid_segmap;
> >> #endif
> >> unsigned int bitmap_size; /* SIT bitmap size */
> >>
> >>
> > .
> >
--
--
Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v4] f2fs: Fix indefinite loop in f2fs_gc()
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:03:16 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190917053316.GB12730@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <355d24c1-b07c-f8ff-1ab9-3f85653ced60@huawei.com>
Hi Chao,
On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 07:00:32PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Sahitya,
>
> Luckily, I can reproduce this issue with generic/269, and have sent another
> patch for the issue, could you please check that one?
>
Thanks for the fix. The issue could not get reproduced yet, so could not make
much progress on the customer case.
thanks,
> Thanks,
>
> On 2019/8/7 22:06, Chao Yu wrote:
> > On 2019-8-7 21:40, Sahitya Tummala wrote:
> >> Policy - Foreground GC, LFS and greedy GC mode.
> >>
> >> Under this policy, f2fs_gc() loops forever to GC as it doesn't have
> >> enough free segements to proceed and thus it keeps calling gc_more
> >> for the same victim segment. This can happen if the selected victim
> >> segment could not be GC'd due to failed blkaddr validity check i.e.
> >> is_alive() returns false for the blocks set in current validity map.
> >>
> >> Fix this by keeping track of such invalid segments and skip those
> >> segments for selection in get_victim_by_default() to avoid endless
> >> GC loop under such error scenarios. Currently, add this logic under
> >> CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS to be able to root cause the issue in debug
> >> version.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org>
> >> ---
> >> v4: Cover all logic with CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS
> >>
> >> fs/f2fs/gc.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >> fs/f2fs/segment.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> >> fs/f2fs/segment.h | 3 +++
> >> 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> >> index 8974672..cbcacbd 100644
> >> --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> >> @@ -382,6 +382,16 @@ static int get_victim_by_default(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >> nsearched++;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS
> >> + /*
> >> + * skip selecting the invalid segno (that is failed due to block
> >> + * validity check failure during GC) to avoid endless GC loop in
> >> + * such cases.
> >> + */
> >> + if (test_bit(segno, sm->invalid_segmap))
> >> + goto next;
> >> +#endif
> >> +
> >> secno = GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, segno);
> >>
> >> if (sec_usage_check(sbi, secno))
> >> @@ -602,8 +612,15 @@ static bool is_alive(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct f2fs_summary *sum,
> >> {
> >> struct page *node_page;
> >> nid_t nid;
> >> - unsigned int ofs_in_node;
> >> + unsigned int ofs_in_node, segno;
> >> block_t source_blkaddr;
> >> + unsigned long offset;
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS
> >> + struct sit_info *sit_i = SIT_I(sbi);
> >> +#endif
> >> +
> >> + segno = GET_SEGNO(sbi, blkaddr);
> >> + offset = GET_BLKOFF_FROM_SEG0(sbi, blkaddr);
> >>
> >> nid = le32_to_cpu(sum->nid);
> >> ofs_in_node = le16_to_cpu(sum->ofs_in_node);
> >> @@ -627,8 +644,18 @@ static bool is_alive(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct f2fs_summary *sum,
> >> source_blkaddr = datablock_addr(NULL, node_page, ofs_in_node);
> >> f2fs_put_page(node_page, 1);
> >>
> >> - if (source_blkaddr != blkaddr)
> >> + if (source_blkaddr != blkaddr) {
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS
> >
> > unsigned int segno = GET_SEGNO(sbi, blkaddr);
> > unsigned int offset = GET_BLKOFF_FROM_SEG0(sbi, blkaddr);
> >
> > Should be local, otherwise it looks good to me, I think Jaegeuk can help to fix
> > this while merging.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >> + if (unlikely(check_valid_map(sbi, segno, offset))) {
> >> + if (!test_and_set_bit(segno, sit_i->invalid_segmap)) {
> >> + f2fs_err(sbi, "mismatched blkaddr %u (source_blkaddr %u) in seg %u\n",
> >> + blkaddr, source_blkaddr, segno);
> >> + f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1);
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >> +#endif
> >> return false;
> >> + }
> >> return true;
> >> }
> >>
> >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> >> index a661ac3..ee795b1 100644
> >> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> >> @@ -806,6 +806,9 @@ static void __remove_dirty_segment(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, unsigned int segno,
> >> enum dirty_type dirty_type)
> >> {
> >> struct dirty_seglist_info *dirty_i = DIRTY_I(sbi);
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS
> >> + struct sit_info *sit_i = SIT_I(sbi);
> >> +#endif
> >>
> >> if (test_and_clear_bit(segno, dirty_i->dirty_segmap[dirty_type]))
> >> dirty_i->nr_dirty[dirty_type]--;
> >> @@ -817,9 +820,13 @@ static void __remove_dirty_segment(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, unsigned int segno,
> >> if (test_and_clear_bit(segno, dirty_i->dirty_segmap[t]))
> >> dirty_i->nr_dirty[t]--;
> >>
> >> - if (get_valid_blocks(sbi, segno, true) == 0)
> >> + if (get_valid_blocks(sbi, segno, true) == 0) {
> >> clear_bit(GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, segno),
> >> dirty_i->victim_secmap);
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS
> >> + clear_bit(segno, sit_i->invalid_segmap);
> >> +#endif
> >> + }
> >> }
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -4015,6 +4022,10 @@ static int build_sit_info(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >> sit_i->sit_bitmap_mir = kmemdup(src_bitmap, bitmap_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> >> if (!sit_i->sit_bitmap_mir)
> >> return -ENOMEM;
> >> +
> >> + sit_i->invalid_segmap = f2fs_kvzalloc(sbi, bitmap_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> >> + if (!sit_i->invalid_segmap)
> >> + return -ENOMEM;
> >> #endif
> >>
> >> /* init SIT information */
> >> @@ -4517,6 +4528,7 @@ static void destroy_sit_info(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >> kvfree(sit_i->sit_bitmap);
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS
> >> kvfree(sit_i->sit_bitmap_mir);
> >> + kvfree(sit_i->invalid_segmap);
> >> #endif
> >> kvfree(sit_i);
> >> }
> >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.h b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
> >> index b746028..9370d53 100644
> >> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.h
> >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
> >> @@ -229,6 +229,9 @@ struct sit_info {
> >> char *sit_bitmap; /* SIT bitmap pointer */
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS
> >> char *sit_bitmap_mir; /* SIT bitmap mirror */
> >> +
> >> + /* bitmap of segments to be ignored by GC in case of errors */
> >> + unsigned long *invalid_segmap;
> >> #endif
> >> unsigned int bitmap_size; /* SIT bitmap size */
> >>
> >>
> > .
> >
--
--
Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-17 5:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-07 13:40 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v4] f2fs: Fix indefinite loop in f2fs_gc() Sahitya Tummala
2019-08-07 13:40 ` Sahitya Tummala
2019-08-07 14:06 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2019-08-07 14:06 ` Chao Yu
2019-08-09 15:36 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2019-08-09 15:36 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2019-09-06 11:00 ` Chao Yu
2019-09-06 11:00 ` Chao Yu
2019-09-17 5:33 ` Sahitya Tummala [this message]
2019-09-17 5:33 ` Sahitya Tummala
2019-09-17 6:35 ` Chao Yu
2019-09-17 6:35 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190917053316.GB12730@codeaurora.org \
--to=stummala@codeaurora.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.