All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
	afaerber@suse.de, robh+dt@kernel.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	thomas.liau@actions-semi.com, linux-actions@lists.infradead.org,
	linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] clk: actions: Fix factor clk struct member access
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 13:01:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190917200141.B9313214AF@mail.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190916154546.24982-2-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>

Quoting Manivannan Sadhasivam (2019-09-16 08:45:40)
> Since the helper "owl_factor_helper_round_rate" is shared between factor
> and composite clocks, using the factor clk specific helper function
> like "hw_to_owl_factor" to access its members will create issues when
> called from composite clk specific code. Hence, pass the "factor_hw"
> struct pointer directly instead of fetching it using factor clk specific
> helpers.
> 
> This issue has been observed when a composite clock like "sd0_clk" tried
> to call "owl_factor_helper_round_rate" resulting in pointer dereferencing
> error.
> 
> While we are at it, let's rename the "clk_val_best" function to
> "owl_clk_val_best" since this is an owl SoCs specific helper.
> 
> Fixes: 4bb78fc9744a ("clk: actions: Add factor clock support")
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
> ---

Applied to clk-next


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
To: afaerber@suse.de, robh+dt@kernel.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	thomas.liau@actions-semi.com, linux-actions@lists.infradead.org,
	linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] clk: actions: Fix factor clk struct member access
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 13:01:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190917200141.B9313214AF@mail.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190916154546.24982-2-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>

Quoting Manivannan Sadhasivam (2019-09-16 08:45:40)
> Since the helper "owl_factor_helper_round_rate" is shared between factor
> and composite clocks, using the factor clk specific helper function
> like "hw_to_owl_factor" to access its members will create issues when
> called from composite clk specific code. Hence, pass the "factor_hw"
> struct pointer directly instead of fetching it using factor clk specific
> helpers.
> 
> This issue has been observed when a composite clock like "sd0_clk" tried
> to call "owl_factor_helper_round_rate" resulting in pointer dereferencing
> error.
> 
> While we are at it, let's rename the "clk_val_best" function to
> "owl_clk_val_best" since this is an owl SoCs specific helper.
> 
> Fixes: 4bb78fc9744a ("clk: actions: Add factor clock support")
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
> ---

Applied to clk-next

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
	afaerber@suse.de, robh+dt@kernel.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
	linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-actions@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, thomas.liau@actions-semi.com,
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] clk: actions: Fix factor clk struct member access
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 13:01:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190917200141.B9313214AF@mail.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190916154546.24982-2-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>

Quoting Manivannan Sadhasivam (2019-09-16 08:45:40)
> Since the helper "owl_factor_helper_round_rate" is shared between factor
> and composite clocks, using the factor clk specific helper function
> like "hw_to_owl_factor" to access its members will create issues when
> called from composite clk specific code. Hence, pass the "factor_hw"
> struct pointer directly instead of fetching it using factor clk specific
> helpers.
> 
> This issue has been observed when a composite clock like "sd0_clk" tried
> to call "owl_factor_helper_round_rate" resulting in pointer dereferencing
> error.
> 
> While we are at it, let's rename the "clk_val_best" function to
> "owl_clk_val_best" since this is an owl SoCs specific helper.
> 
> Fixes: 4bb78fc9744a ("clk: actions: Add factor clock support")
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
> ---

Applied to clk-next


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-09-17 20:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-16 15:45 [PATCH v4 0/7] Add SD/MMC driver for Actions Semi S900 SoC Manivannan Sadhasivam
2019-09-16 15:45 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2019-09-16 15:45 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] clk: actions: Fix factor clk struct member access Manivannan Sadhasivam
2019-09-16 15:45   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2019-09-17 16:34   ` Stephen Boyd
2019-09-17 16:34     ` Stephen Boyd
2019-09-17 16:34     ` Stephen Boyd
2019-09-17 16:36     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2019-09-17 16:36       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2019-09-17 20:01   ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2019-09-17 20:01     ` Stephen Boyd
2019-09-17 20:01     ` Stephen Boyd
2019-09-16 15:45 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] dt-bindings: mmc: Add Actions Semi SD/MMC/SDIO controller binding Manivannan Sadhasivam
2019-09-16 15:45   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2019-09-16 18:00   ` Rob Herring
2019-09-16 18:00     ` Rob Herring
2019-09-16 22:57   ` Linus Walleij
2019-09-16 22:57     ` Linus Walleij
2019-10-03 10:01   ` Ulf Hansson
2019-10-03 10:01     ` Ulf Hansson
2019-10-03 10:01     ` Ulf Hansson
2019-09-16 15:45 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] arm64: dts: actions: Add MMC controller support for S900 Manivannan Sadhasivam
2019-09-16 15:45   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2019-10-14 14:44   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2019-10-14 14:44     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2019-10-14 14:44     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2019-09-16 15:45 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] arm64: dts: actions: Add uSD and eMMC support for Bubblegum96 Manivannan Sadhasivam
2019-09-16 15:45   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2019-10-14 14:45   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2019-10-14 14:45     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2019-09-16 15:45 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] mmc: Add Actions Semi Owl SoCs SD/MMC driver Manivannan Sadhasivam
2019-09-16 15:45   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2019-10-03 10:01   ` Ulf Hansson
2019-10-03 10:01     ` Ulf Hansson
2019-09-16 15:45 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Actions Semi SD/MMC driver and binding Manivannan Sadhasivam
2019-09-16 15:45   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2019-10-03 10:01   ` Ulf Hansson
2019-10-03 10:01     ` Ulf Hansson
2019-09-16 15:45 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] arm64: configs: Enable Actions Semi platform in defconfig Manivannan Sadhasivam
2019-09-16 15:45   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2019-10-14 14:46   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2019-10-14 14:46     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2019-10-03 10:01 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] Add SD/MMC driver for Actions Semi S900 SoC Ulf Hansson
2019-10-03 10:01   ` Ulf Hansson
2019-10-03 16:17   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2019-10-03 16:17     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2019-10-03 16:17     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190917200141.B9313214AF@mail.kernel.org \
    --to=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=afaerber@suse.de \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-actions@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.liau@actions-semi.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.