From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Allow disabling of the compat vDSO
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 16:51:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190926155147.GL9689@arrakis.emea.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190926074717.GA26802@iMac.local>
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 08:47:18AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 01:06:50AM +0100, Vincenzo Frascino wrote:
> > On 9/25/19 6:08 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 09:53:16AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > >> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 6:09 AM Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote:
> > >>> - clean up the headers includes; vDSO should not include kernel-only
> > >>> headers that may even contain code patched at run-time
> > >>
> > >> This is a big one; Clang validates the inline asm constraints for
> > >> extended inline assembly, GCC does not for dead code. So Clang chokes
> > >> on the inclusion of arm64 headers using extended inline assembly when
> > >> being compiled for arm-linux-gnueabi.
> > >
> > > Whether clang or gcc, I'd like this fixed anyway. At some point we may
> > > inadvertently rely on some code which is patched at boot time for the
> > > kernel code but not for the vDSO.
> >
> > Do we have any code of this kind in header files?
> >
> > The vDSO library uses only a subset of the headers (mainly Macros) hence all the
> > unused symbols should be compiled out. Is your concern only theoretical or do
> > you have an example on where this could be happening?
>
> At the moment it's rather theoretical.
Actually, it's not. The moment the compat vdso Makefile needs the line
below, we are doing it wrong:
VDSO_CFLAGS += -D__uint128_t='void*'
--
Catalin
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Allow disabling of the compat vDSO
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 16:51:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190926155147.GL9689@arrakis.emea.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190926074717.GA26802@iMac.local>
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 08:47:18AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 01:06:50AM +0100, Vincenzo Frascino wrote:
> > On 9/25/19 6:08 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 09:53:16AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > >> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 6:09 AM Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote:
> > >>> - clean up the headers includes; vDSO should not include kernel-only
> > >>> headers that may even contain code patched at run-time
> > >>
> > >> This is a big one; Clang validates the inline asm constraints for
> > >> extended inline assembly, GCC does not for dead code. So Clang chokes
> > >> on the inclusion of arm64 headers using extended inline assembly when
> > >> being compiled for arm-linux-gnueabi.
> > >
> > > Whether clang or gcc, I'd like this fixed anyway. At some point we may
> > > inadvertently rely on some code which is patched at boot time for the
> > > kernel code but not for the vDSO.
> >
> > Do we have any code of this kind in header files?
> >
> > The vDSO library uses only a subset of the headers (mainly Macros) hence all the
> > unused symbols should be compiled out. Is your concern only theoretical or do
> > you have an example on where this could be happening?
>
> At the moment it's rather theoretical.
Actually, it's not. The moment the compat vdso Makefile needs the line
below, we are doing it wrong:
VDSO_CFLAGS += -D__uint128_t='void*'
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-26 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-25 13:09 [PATCH] arm64: Allow disabling of the compat vDSO Catalin Marinas
2019-09-25 13:09 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-09-25 16:53 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-09-25 16:53 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-09-25 17:08 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-09-25 17:08 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-09-25 17:31 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-09-25 17:31 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-09-25 23:35 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-25 23:35 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 0:06 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 0:06 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-09-26 7:47 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-09-26 7:47 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-09-26 15:51 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2019-09-26 15:51 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-09-26 16:40 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-09-26 16:40 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-09-26 16:38 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-09-26 16:38 ` Nick Desaulniers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190926155147.GL9689@arrakis.emea.arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.