All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Cc: p.zabel@pengutronix.de, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
	thor.thayer@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] ARM: drivers/amba: release the resource to allow for deferred probe
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 13:40:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191002124043.GR25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191002123349.23771-1-dinguyen@kernel.org>

On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 07:33:49AM -0500, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> With commit "79bdcb202a35 ARM: 8906/1: drivers/amba: add reset control to
> amba bus probe", the amba bus driver needs to be deferred probe because the
> reset driver is probed later. However with a deferred probe, the call to
> request_resource() in the driver returns -EBUSY. The reason is the driver
> has not released the resource from the previous probe attempt.
> 
> This patch fixes how we handle the condition of EPROBE_DEFER that is returned
> from getting the reset controls. For this condition, the patch will jump
> to err_release, which will release the resource.
> 
> Fixes: 79bdcb202a35 ("ARM: 8906/1: drivers/amba: add reset control to
> amba bus probe")
> Signed-off-by: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
> ---
> v2: release the resource when of_reset_control_array_get_optional_shared()
>     returns EPROBE_DEFER
> ---
>  drivers/amba/bus.c | 7 +++++--
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/amba/bus.c b/drivers/amba/bus.c
> index f39f075abff9..1109437815eb 100644
> --- a/drivers/amba/bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/amba/bus.c
> @@ -409,9 +409,12 @@ static int amba_device_try_add(struct amba_device *dev, struct resource *parent)
>  		 */
>  		rstc = of_reset_control_array_get_optional_shared(dev->dev.of_node);
>  		if (IS_ERR(rstc)) {
> -			if (PTR_ERR(rstc) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> +			ret = PTR_ERR(rstc);
> +			if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> +				goto err_release;
> +			else
>  				dev_err(&dev->dev, "Can't get amba reset!\n");
> -			return PTR_ERR(rstc);
> +			return ret;

Still a negative.

Remember in the comments to the previous patch I talked about ioremap().

Please read the code that you are modifying and carefully consider what
needs to happen at this site to properly clean up on failure.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
	p.zabel@pengutronix.de, thor.thayer@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] ARM: drivers/amba: release the resource to allow for deferred probe
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 13:40:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191002124043.GR25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191002123349.23771-1-dinguyen@kernel.org>

On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 07:33:49AM -0500, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> With commit "79bdcb202a35 ARM: 8906/1: drivers/amba: add reset control to
> amba bus probe", the amba bus driver needs to be deferred probe because the
> reset driver is probed later. However with a deferred probe, the call to
> request_resource() in the driver returns -EBUSY. The reason is the driver
> has not released the resource from the previous probe attempt.
> 
> This patch fixes how we handle the condition of EPROBE_DEFER that is returned
> from getting the reset controls. For this condition, the patch will jump
> to err_release, which will release the resource.
> 
> Fixes: 79bdcb202a35 ("ARM: 8906/1: drivers/amba: add reset control to
> amba bus probe")
> Signed-off-by: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
> ---
> v2: release the resource when of_reset_control_array_get_optional_shared()
>     returns EPROBE_DEFER
> ---
>  drivers/amba/bus.c | 7 +++++--
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/amba/bus.c b/drivers/amba/bus.c
> index f39f075abff9..1109437815eb 100644
> --- a/drivers/amba/bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/amba/bus.c
> @@ -409,9 +409,12 @@ static int amba_device_try_add(struct amba_device *dev, struct resource *parent)
>  		 */
>  		rstc = of_reset_control_array_get_optional_shared(dev->dev.of_node);
>  		if (IS_ERR(rstc)) {
> -			if (PTR_ERR(rstc) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> +			ret = PTR_ERR(rstc);
> +			if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> +				goto err_release;
> +			else
>  				dev_err(&dev->dev, "Can't get amba reset!\n");
> -			return PTR_ERR(rstc);
> +			return ret;

Still a negative.

Remember in the comments to the previous patch I talked about ioremap().

Please read the code that you are modifying and carefully consider what
needs to happen at this site to properly clean up on failure.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-02 12:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-02 12:33 [PATCHv2] ARM: drivers/amba: release the resource to allow for deferred probe Dinh Nguyen
2019-10-02 12:33 ` Dinh Nguyen
2019-10-02 12:40 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin [this message]
2019-10-02 12:40   ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191002124043.GR25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=dinguyen@kernel.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=thor.thayer@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.