* [RESEND PATCH v5 0/4] add coupled regulators for Exynos5422/5800
@ 2019-08-08 9:02 ` Kamil Konieczny
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Kamil Konieczny @ 2019-08-08 9:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: k.konieczny
Cc: Mark Rutland, Nishanth Menon, linux-samsung-soc, Rob Herring,
linux-arm-kernel, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Stephen Boyd,
Viresh Kumar, linux-pm, linux-kernel, Krzysztof Kozlowski,
Chanwoo Choi, Kyungmin Park, Kukjin Kim, MyungJoo Ham, devicetree,
Marek Szyprowski
Hi,
The main purpose of this patch series is to add coupled regulators for
Exynos5422/5800 to keep constrain on voltage difference between vdd_arm
and vdd_int to be at most 300mV. In exynos-bus instead of using
regulator_set_voltage_tol() with default voltage tolerance it should be
used regulator_set_voltage_triplet() with volatege range, and this is
already present in opp/core.c code, so it can be reused. While at this,
move setting regulators into opp/core.
This patchset was tested on Odroid XU3.
The DTS coupled regulators patch depends on previous patches.
Changes:
v5:
- squashed last patch "remove exynos_bus_passive_target()" into second
- added Acked-by to patch "correct clock enable sequence"
v4:
- removed "opp: core: add regulators enable and disable" from patchset
as it was applied by Viresh Kumar and changed cover letter
- fix patch "devfreq: exynos-bus: correct clock enable sequence" to
correct order of enable/disable
- removed unrelated changes in "devfreq: exynos-bus: convert to use
dev_pm_opp_set_rate()"
- added new patch "devfreq: exynos-bus: remove exynos_bus_passive_target()"
as suggested by Chanwoo Choi
v3:
- added new exynos-bus patch to correct clock and regulator enabling
and disabling sequence as suggested by Chanwoo Choi
- corrected error path in enable and improved commit message in opp/core
- improve comment in devfreq/exynos-bus.c before devfreq_recommended_opp()
- change cover letter as there is new patch
- added note before Signed-off-by in 4th patch
v2:
- improve regulators enable/disable code in opp/core as suggested by
Viresh Kumar
- add new patch for remove unused dt-bindings as suggested by Krzysztof
Kozlowski
Kamil Konieczny (3):
devfreq: exynos-bus: correct clock enable sequence
devfreq: exynos-bus: convert to use dev_pm_opp_set_rate()
dt-bindings: devfreq: exynos-bus: remove unused property
Marek Szyprowski (1):
ARM: dts: exynos: add initial data for coupled regulators for
Exynos5422/5800
.../bindings/devfreq/exynos-bus.txt | 2 -
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 34 ++--
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroid-core.dtsi | 4 +
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts | 4 +
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi | 32 ++--
drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c | 153 +++++-------------
6 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 151 deletions(-)
--
2.22.0
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [RESEND PATCH v5 1/4] devfreq: exynos-bus: correct clock enable sequence
2019-08-08 9:02 ` Kamil Konieczny
@ 2019-08-08 9:02 ` Kamil Konieczny
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Kamil Konieczny @ 2019-08-08 9:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: k.konieczny
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Marek Szyprowski, Chanwoo Choi,
Krzysztof Kozlowski, Kukjin Kim, Kyungmin Park, Mark Rutland,
MyungJoo Ham, Nishanth Menon, Rob Herring, Stephen Boyd,
Viresh Kumar, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel,
linux-pm, linux-samsung-soc
Regulators should be enabled before clocks to avoid h/w hang. This
require change in exynos_bus_probe() to move exynos_bus_parse_of()
after exynos_bus_parent_parse_of() and change in error handling.
Similar change is needed in exynos_bus_exit() where clock should be
disabled before regulators.
Signed-off-by: Kamil Konieczny <k.konieczny@partner.samsung.com>
Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
---
Changes:
v5:
- added Acked-by tag
v4:
- move regulator disable after clock disable
- remove unrelated changes
- add disabling regulators in error path in exynos_bus_probe()
---
drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
index 486cc5b422f1..f34fa26f00d0 100644
--- a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
+++ b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
@@ -194,11 +194,10 @@ static void exynos_bus_exit(struct device *dev)
if (ret < 0)
dev_warn(dev, "failed to disable the devfreq-event devices\n");
- if (bus->regulator)
- regulator_disable(bus->regulator);
-
dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
clk_disable_unprepare(bus->clk);
+ if (bus->regulator)
+ regulator_disable(bus->regulator);
}
/*
@@ -386,6 +385,7 @@ static int exynos_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct exynos_bus *bus;
int ret, max_state;
unsigned long min_freq, max_freq;
+ bool passive = false;
if (!np) {
dev_err(dev, "failed to find devicetree node\n");
@@ -399,27 +399,27 @@ static int exynos_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
bus->dev = &pdev->dev;
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, bus);
- /* Parse the device-tree to get the resource information */
- ret = exynos_bus_parse_of(np, bus);
- if (ret < 0)
- return ret;
-
profile = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*profile), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!profile) {
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- goto err;
- }
+ if (!profile)
+ return -ENOMEM;
node = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "devfreq", 0);
if (node) {
of_node_put(node);
- goto passive;
+ passive = true;
} else {
ret = exynos_bus_parent_parse_of(np, bus);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
}
+ /* Parse the device-tree to get the resource information */
+ ret = exynos_bus_parse_of(np, bus);
if (ret < 0)
- goto err;
+ goto err_reg;
+
+ if (passive)
+ goto passive;
/* Initialize the struct profile and governor data for parent device */
profile->polling_ms = 50;
@@ -510,6 +510,9 @@ static int exynos_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
err:
dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
clk_disable_unprepare(bus->clk);
+err_reg:
+ if (!passive)
+ regulator_disable(bus->regulator);
return ret;
}
--
2.22.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [RESEND PATCH v5 1/4] devfreq: exynos-bus: correct clock enable sequence
@ 2019-08-08 9:02 ` Kamil Konieczny
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Kamil Konieczny @ 2019-08-08 9:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: k.konieczny
Cc: Mark Rutland, Nishanth Menon, linux-samsung-soc, Rob Herring,
linux-arm-kernel, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Stephen Boyd,
Viresh Kumar, linux-pm, linux-kernel, Krzysztof Kozlowski,
Chanwoo Choi, Kyungmin Park, Kukjin Kim, MyungJoo Ham, devicetree,
Marek Szyprowski
Regulators should be enabled before clocks to avoid h/w hang. This
require change in exynos_bus_probe() to move exynos_bus_parse_of()
after exynos_bus_parent_parse_of() and change in error handling.
Similar change is needed in exynos_bus_exit() where clock should be
disabled before regulators.
Signed-off-by: Kamil Konieczny <k.konieczny@partner.samsung.com>
Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
---
Changes:
v5:
- added Acked-by tag
v4:
- move regulator disable after clock disable
- remove unrelated changes
- add disabling regulators in error path in exynos_bus_probe()
---
drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
index 486cc5b422f1..f34fa26f00d0 100644
--- a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
+++ b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
@@ -194,11 +194,10 @@ static void exynos_bus_exit(struct device *dev)
if (ret < 0)
dev_warn(dev, "failed to disable the devfreq-event devices\n");
- if (bus->regulator)
- regulator_disable(bus->regulator);
-
dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
clk_disable_unprepare(bus->clk);
+ if (bus->regulator)
+ regulator_disable(bus->regulator);
}
/*
@@ -386,6 +385,7 @@ static int exynos_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct exynos_bus *bus;
int ret, max_state;
unsigned long min_freq, max_freq;
+ bool passive = false;
if (!np) {
dev_err(dev, "failed to find devicetree node\n");
@@ -399,27 +399,27 @@ static int exynos_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
bus->dev = &pdev->dev;
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, bus);
- /* Parse the device-tree to get the resource information */
- ret = exynos_bus_parse_of(np, bus);
- if (ret < 0)
- return ret;
-
profile = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*profile), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!profile) {
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- goto err;
- }
+ if (!profile)
+ return -ENOMEM;
node = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "devfreq", 0);
if (node) {
of_node_put(node);
- goto passive;
+ passive = true;
} else {
ret = exynos_bus_parent_parse_of(np, bus);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
}
+ /* Parse the device-tree to get the resource information */
+ ret = exynos_bus_parse_of(np, bus);
if (ret < 0)
- goto err;
+ goto err_reg;
+
+ if (passive)
+ goto passive;
/* Initialize the struct profile and governor data for parent device */
profile->polling_ms = 50;
@@ -510,6 +510,9 @@ static int exynos_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
err:
dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
clk_disable_unprepare(bus->clk);
+err_reg:
+ if (!passive)
+ regulator_disable(bus->regulator);
return ret;
}
--
2.22.0
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [RESEND PATCH v5 2/4] devfreq: exynos-bus: convert to use dev_pm_opp_set_rate()
2019-08-08 9:02 ` Kamil Konieczny
@ 2019-08-08 9:02 ` Kamil Konieczny
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Kamil Konieczny @ 2019-08-08 9:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: k.konieczny
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Marek Szyprowski, Chanwoo Choi,
Krzysztof Kozlowski, Kukjin Kim, Kyungmin Park, Mark Rutland,
MyungJoo Ham, Nishanth Menon, Rob Herring, Stephen Boyd,
Viresh Kumar, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel,
linux-pm, linux-samsung-soc
Reuse opp core code for setting bus clock and voltage. As a side
effect this allow usage of coupled regulators feature (required
for boards using Exynos5422/5800 SoCs) because dev_pm_opp_set_rate()
uses regulator_set_voltage_triplet() for setting regulator voltage
while the old code used regulator_set_voltage_tol() with fixed
tolerance. This patch also removes no longer needed parsing of DT
property "exynos,voltage-tolerance" (no Exynos devfreq DT node uses
it). After applying changes both functions exynos_bus_passive_target()
and exynos_bus_target() have the same code, so remove
exynos_bus_passive_target(). In exynos_bus_probe() replace it with
exynos_bus_target.
Signed-off-by: Kamil Konieczny <k.konieczny@partner.samsung.com>
Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
---
Changes:
v5:
- squashed last patch into this one, as suggested by Chanwoo Choi
v4:
- remove unrelated changes, add newline before comment
---
drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c | 130 +++++++----------------------------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 106 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
index f34fa26f00d0..2aeb6cc07960 100644
--- a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
+++ b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
@@ -25,7 +25,6 @@
#include <linux/slab.h>
#define DEFAULT_SATURATION_RATIO 40
-#define DEFAULT_VOLTAGE_TOLERANCE 2
struct exynos_bus {
struct device *dev;
@@ -37,9 +36,8 @@ struct exynos_bus {
unsigned long curr_freq;
- struct regulator *regulator;
+ struct opp_table *opp_table;
struct clk *clk;
- unsigned int voltage_tolerance;
unsigned int ratio;
};
@@ -93,62 +91,29 @@ static int exynos_bus_get_event(struct exynos_bus *bus,
}
/*
- * Must necessary function for devfreq simple-ondemand governor
+ * devfreq function for both simple-ondemand and passive governor
*/
static int exynos_bus_target(struct device *dev, unsigned long *freq, u32 flags)
{
struct exynos_bus *bus = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
struct dev_pm_opp *new_opp;
- unsigned long old_freq, new_freq, new_volt, tol;
int ret = 0;
- /* Get new opp-bus instance according to new bus clock */
+ /* Get correct frequency for bus. */
new_opp = devfreq_recommended_opp(dev, freq, flags);
if (IS_ERR(new_opp)) {
dev_err(dev, "failed to get recommended opp instance\n");
return PTR_ERR(new_opp);
}
- new_freq = dev_pm_opp_get_freq(new_opp);
- new_volt = dev_pm_opp_get_voltage(new_opp);
dev_pm_opp_put(new_opp);
- old_freq = bus->curr_freq;
-
- if (old_freq == new_freq)
- return 0;
- tol = new_volt * bus->voltage_tolerance / 100;
-
/* Change voltage and frequency according to new OPP level */
mutex_lock(&bus->lock);
+ ret = dev_pm_opp_set_rate(dev, *freq);
+ if (!ret)
+ bus->curr_freq = *freq;
- if (old_freq < new_freq) {
- ret = regulator_set_voltage_tol(bus->regulator, new_volt, tol);
- if (ret < 0) {
- dev_err(bus->dev, "failed to set voltage\n");
- goto out;
- }
- }
-
- ret = clk_set_rate(bus->clk, new_freq);
- if (ret < 0) {
- dev_err(dev, "failed to change clock of bus\n");
- clk_set_rate(bus->clk, old_freq);
- goto out;
- }
-
- if (old_freq > new_freq) {
- ret = regulator_set_voltage_tol(bus->regulator, new_volt, tol);
- if (ret < 0) {
- dev_err(bus->dev, "failed to set voltage\n");
- goto out;
- }
- }
- bus->curr_freq = new_freq;
-
- dev_dbg(dev, "Set the frequency of bus (%luHz -> %luHz, %luHz)\n",
- old_freq, new_freq, clk_get_rate(bus->clk));
-out:
mutex_unlock(&bus->lock);
return ret;
@@ -196,54 +161,10 @@ static void exynos_bus_exit(struct device *dev)
dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
clk_disable_unprepare(bus->clk);
- if (bus->regulator)
- regulator_disable(bus->regulator);
-}
-
-/*
- * Must necessary function for devfreq passive governor
- */
-static int exynos_bus_passive_target(struct device *dev, unsigned long *freq,
- u32 flags)
-{
- struct exynos_bus *bus = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
- struct dev_pm_opp *new_opp;
- unsigned long old_freq, new_freq;
- int ret = 0;
-
- /* Get new opp-bus instance according to new bus clock */
- new_opp = devfreq_recommended_opp(dev, freq, flags);
- if (IS_ERR(new_opp)) {
- dev_err(dev, "failed to get recommended opp instance\n");
- return PTR_ERR(new_opp);
- }
-
- new_freq = dev_pm_opp_get_freq(new_opp);
- dev_pm_opp_put(new_opp);
-
- old_freq = bus->curr_freq;
-
- if (old_freq == new_freq)
- return 0;
-
- /* Change the frequency according to new OPP level */
- mutex_lock(&bus->lock);
-
- ret = clk_set_rate(bus->clk, new_freq);
- if (ret < 0) {
- dev_err(dev, "failed to set the clock of bus\n");
- goto out;
+ if (bus->opp_table) {
+ dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(bus->opp_table);
+ bus->opp_table = NULL;
}
-
- *freq = new_freq;
- bus->curr_freq = new_freq;
-
- dev_dbg(dev, "Set the frequency of bus (%luHz -> %luHz, %luHz)\n",
- old_freq, new_freq, clk_get_rate(bus->clk));
-out:
- mutex_unlock(&bus->lock);
-
- return ret;
}
static void exynos_bus_passive_exit(struct device *dev)
@@ -258,21 +179,19 @@ static int exynos_bus_parent_parse_of(struct device_node *np,
struct exynos_bus *bus)
{
struct device *dev = bus->dev;
+ struct opp_table *opp_table;
+ const char *vdd = "vdd";
int i, ret, count, size;
- /* Get the regulator to provide each bus with the power */
- bus->regulator = devm_regulator_get(dev, "vdd");
- if (IS_ERR(bus->regulator)) {
- dev_err(dev, "failed to get VDD regulator\n");
- return PTR_ERR(bus->regulator);
- }
-
- ret = regulator_enable(bus->regulator);
- if (ret < 0) {
- dev_err(dev, "failed to enable VDD regulator\n");
+ opp_table = dev_pm_opp_set_regulators(dev, &vdd, 1);
+ if (IS_ERR(opp_table)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(opp_table);
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to set regulators %d\n", ret);
return ret;
}
+ bus->opp_table = opp_table;
+
/*
* Get the devfreq-event devices to get the current utilization of
* buses. This raw data will be used in devfreq ondemand governor.
@@ -313,14 +232,11 @@ static int exynos_bus_parent_parse_of(struct device_node *np,
if (of_property_read_u32(np, "exynos,saturation-ratio", &bus->ratio))
bus->ratio = DEFAULT_SATURATION_RATIO;
- if (of_property_read_u32(np, "exynos,voltage-tolerance",
- &bus->voltage_tolerance))
- bus->voltage_tolerance = DEFAULT_VOLTAGE_TOLERANCE;
-
return 0;
err_regulator:
- regulator_disable(bus->regulator);
+ dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(bus->opp_table);
+ bus->opp_table = NULL;
return ret;
}
@@ -471,7 +387,7 @@ static int exynos_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto out;
passive:
/* Initialize the struct profile and governor data for passive device */
- profile->target = exynos_bus_passive_target;
+ profile->target = exynos_bus_target;
profile->exit = exynos_bus_passive_exit;
/* Get the instance of parent devfreq device */
@@ -511,8 +427,10 @@ static int exynos_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
clk_disable_unprepare(bus->clk);
err_reg:
- if (!passive)
- regulator_disable(bus->regulator);
+ if (!passive) {
+ dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(bus->opp_table);
+ bus->opp_table = NULL;
+ }
return ret;
}
--
2.22.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [RESEND PATCH v5 2/4] devfreq: exynos-bus: convert to use dev_pm_opp_set_rate()
@ 2019-08-08 9:02 ` Kamil Konieczny
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Kamil Konieczny @ 2019-08-08 9:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: k.konieczny
Cc: Mark Rutland, Nishanth Menon, linux-samsung-soc, Rob Herring,
linux-arm-kernel, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Stephen Boyd,
Viresh Kumar, linux-pm, linux-kernel, Krzysztof Kozlowski,
Chanwoo Choi, Kyungmin Park, Kukjin Kim, MyungJoo Ham, devicetree,
Marek Szyprowski
Reuse opp core code for setting bus clock and voltage. As a side
effect this allow usage of coupled regulators feature (required
for boards using Exynos5422/5800 SoCs) because dev_pm_opp_set_rate()
uses regulator_set_voltage_triplet() for setting regulator voltage
while the old code used regulator_set_voltage_tol() with fixed
tolerance. This patch also removes no longer needed parsing of DT
property "exynos,voltage-tolerance" (no Exynos devfreq DT node uses
it). After applying changes both functions exynos_bus_passive_target()
and exynos_bus_target() have the same code, so remove
exynos_bus_passive_target(). In exynos_bus_probe() replace it with
exynos_bus_target.
Signed-off-by: Kamil Konieczny <k.konieczny@partner.samsung.com>
Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
---
Changes:
v5:
- squashed last patch into this one, as suggested by Chanwoo Choi
v4:
- remove unrelated changes, add newline before comment
---
drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c | 130 +++++++----------------------------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 106 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
index f34fa26f00d0..2aeb6cc07960 100644
--- a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
+++ b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
@@ -25,7 +25,6 @@
#include <linux/slab.h>
#define DEFAULT_SATURATION_RATIO 40
-#define DEFAULT_VOLTAGE_TOLERANCE 2
struct exynos_bus {
struct device *dev;
@@ -37,9 +36,8 @@ struct exynos_bus {
unsigned long curr_freq;
- struct regulator *regulator;
+ struct opp_table *opp_table;
struct clk *clk;
- unsigned int voltage_tolerance;
unsigned int ratio;
};
@@ -93,62 +91,29 @@ static int exynos_bus_get_event(struct exynos_bus *bus,
}
/*
- * Must necessary function for devfreq simple-ondemand governor
+ * devfreq function for both simple-ondemand and passive governor
*/
static int exynos_bus_target(struct device *dev, unsigned long *freq, u32 flags)
{
struct exynos_bus *bus = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
struct dev_pm_opp *new_opp;
- unsigned long old_freq, new_freq, new_volt, tol;
int ret = 0;
- /* Get new opp-bus instance according to new bus clock */
+ /* Get correct frequency for bus. */
new_opp = devfreq_recommended_opp(dev, freq, flags);
if (IS_ERR(new_opp)) {
dev_err(dev, "failed to get recommended opp instance\n");
return PTR_ERR(new_opp);
}
- new_freq = dev_pm_opp_get_freq(new_opp);
- new_volt = dev_pm_opp_get_voltage(new_opp);
dev_pm_opp_put(new_opp);
- old_freq = bus->curr_freq;
-
- if (old_freq == new_freq)
- return 0;
- tol = new_volt * bus->voltage_tolerance / 100;
-
/* Change voltage and frequency according to new OPP level */
mutex_lock(&bus->lock);
+ ret = dev_pm_opp_set_rate(dev, *freq);
+ if (!ret)
+ bus->curr_freq = *freq;
- if (old_freq < new_freq) {
- ret = regulator_set_voltage_tol(bus->regulator, new_volt, tol);
- if (ret < 0) {
- dev_err(bus->dev, "failed to set voltage\n");
- goto out;
- }
- }
-
- ret = clk_set_rate(bus->clk, new_freq);
- if (ret < 0) {
- dev_err(dev, "failed to change clock of bus\n");
- clk_set_rate(bus->clk, old_freq);
- goto out;
- }
-
- if (old_freq > new_freq) {
- ret = regulator_set_voltage_tol(bus->regulator, new_volt, tol);
- if (ret < 0) {
- dev_err(bus->dev, "failed to set voltage\n");
- goto out;
- }
- }
- bus->curr_freq = new_freq;
-
- dev_dbg(dev, "Set the frequency of bus (%luHz -> %luHz, %luHz)\n",
- old_freq, new_freq, clk_get_rate(bus->clk));
-out:
mutex_unlock(&bus->lock);
return ret;
@@ -196,54 +161,10 @@ static void exynos_bus_exit(struct device *dev)
dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
clk_disable_unprepare(bus->clk);
- if (bus->regulator)
- regulator_disable(bus->regulator);
-}
-
-/*
- * Must necessary function for devfreq passive governor
- */
-static int exynos_bus_passive_target(struct device *dev, unsigned long *freq,
- u32 flags)
-{
- struct exynos_bus *bus = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
- struct dev_pm_opp *new_opp;
- unsigned long old_freq, new_freq;
- int ret = 0;
-
- /* Get new opp-bus instance according to new bus clock */
- new_opp = devfreq_recommended_opp(dev, freq, flags);
- if (IS_ERR(new_opp)) {
- dev_err(dev, "failed to get recommended opp instance\n");
- return PTR_ERR(new_opp);
- }
-
- new_freq = dev_pm_opp_get_freq(new_opp);
- dev_pm_opp_put(new_opp);
-
- old_freq = bus->curr_freq;
-
- if (old_freq == new_freq)
- return 0;
-
- /* Change the frequency according to new OPP level */
- mutex_lock(&bus->lock);
-
- ret = clk_set_rate(bus->clk, new_freq);
- if (ret < 0) {
- dev_err(dev, "failed to set the clock of bus\n");
- goto out;
+ if (bus->opp_table) {
+ dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(bus->opp_table);
+ bus->opp_table = NULL;
}
-
- *freq = new_freq;
- bus->curr_freq = new_freq;
-
- dev_dbg(dev, "Set the frequency of bus (%luHz -> %luHz, %luHz)\n",
- old_freq, new_freq, clk_get_rate(bus->clk));
-out:
- mutex_unlock(&bus->lock);
-
- return ret;
}
static void exynos_bus_passive_exit(struct device *dev)
@@ -258,21 +179,19 @@ static int exynos_bus_parent_parse_of(struct device_node *np,
struct exynos_bus *bus)
{
struct device *dev = bus->dev;
+ struct opp_table *opp_table;
+ const char *vdd = "vdd";
int i, ret, count, size;
- /* Get the regulator to provide each bus with the power */
- bus->regulator = devm_regulator_get(dev, "vdd");
- if (IS_ERR(bus->regulator)) {
- dev_err(dev, "failed to get VDD regulator\n");
- return PTR_ERR(bus->regulator);
- }
-
- ret = regulator_enable(bus->regulator);
- if (ret < 0) {
- dev_err(dev, "failed to enable VDD regulator\n");
+ opp_table = dev_pm_opp_set_regulators(dev, &vdd, 1);
+ if (IS_ERR(opp_table)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(opp_table);
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to set regulators %d\n", ret);
return ret;
}
+ bus->opp_table = opp_table;
+
/*
* Get the devfreq-event devices to get the current utilization of
* buses. This raw data will be used in devfreq ondemand governor.
@@ -313,14 +232,11 @@ static int exynos_bus_parent_parse_of(struct device_node *np,
if (of_property_read_u32(np, "exynos,saturation-ratio", &bus->ratio))
bus->ratio = DEFAULT_SATURATION_RATIO;
- if (of_property_read_u32(np, "exynos,voltage-tolerance",
- &bus->voltage_tolerance))
- bus->voltage_tolerance = DEFAULT_VOLTAGE_TOLERANCE;
-
return 0;
err_regulator:
- regulator_disable(bus->regulator);
+ dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(bus->opp_table);
+ bus->opp_table = NULL;
return ret;
}
@@ -471,7 +387,7 @@ static int exynos_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto out;
passive:
/* Initialize the struct profile and governor data for passive device */
- profile->target = exynos_bus_passive_target;
+ profile->target = exynos_bus_target;
profile->exit = exynos_bus_passive_exit;
/* Get the instance of parent devfreq device */
@@ -511,8 +427,10 @@ static int exynos_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
clk_disable_unprepare(bus->clk);
err_reg:
- if (!passive)
- regulator_disable(bus->regulator);
+ if (!passive) {
+ dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(bus->opp_table);
+ bus->opp_table = NULL;
+ }
return ret;
}
--
2.22.0
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [RESEND PATCH v5 3/4] ARM: dts: exynos: add initial data for coupled regulators for Exynos5422/5800
2019-08-08 9:02 ` Kamil Konieczny
@ 2019-08-08 9:02 ` Kamil Konieczny
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Kamil Konieczny @ 2019-08-08 9:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: k.konieczny
Cc: Marek Szyprowski, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Chanwoo Choi,
Krzysztof Kozlowski, Kukjin Kim, Kyungmin Park, Mark Rutland,
MyungJoo Ham, Nishanth Menon, Rob Herring, Stephen Boyd,
Viresh Kumar, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel,
linux-pm, linux-samsung-soc
From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Declare Exynos5422/5800 voltage ranges for opp points for big cpu core and
bus wcore and couple their voltage supllies as vdd_arm and vdd_int should
be in 300mV range.
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
[k.konieczny: add missing patch description]
Signed-off-by: Kamil Konieczny <k.konieczny@partner.samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 34 +++++++++----------
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroid-core.dtsi | 4 +++
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts | 4 +++
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi | 32 ++++++++---------
4 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
index 5fb2326875dc..0cbf74750553 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
@@ -48,62 +48,62 @@
opp-shared;
opp-1800000000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1800000000>;
- opp-microvolt = <1250000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1250000 1250000 1500000>;
clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
};
opp-1700000000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1700000000>;
- opp-microvolt = <1212500>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1212500 1212500 1500000>;
clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
};
opp-1600000000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1600000000>;
- opp-microvolt = <1175000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1175000 1175000 1500000>;
clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
};
opp-1500000000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1500000000>;
- opp-microvolt = <1137500>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1137500 1137500 1500000>;
clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
};
opp-1400000000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1400000000>;
- opp-microvolt = <1112500>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1112500 1112500 1500000>;
clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
};
opp-1300000000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1300000000>;
- opp-microvolt = <1062500>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1062500 1062500 1500000>;
clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
};
opp-1200000000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1200000000>;
- opp-microvolt = <1037500>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1037500 1037500 1500000>;
clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
};
opp-1100000000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1100000000>;
- opp-microvolt = <1012500>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1012500 1012500 1500000>;
clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
};
opp-1000000000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1000000000>;
- opp-microvolt = < 987500>;
+ opp-microvolt = < 987500 987500 1500000>;
clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
};
opp-900000000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <900000000>;
- opp-microvolt = < 962500>;
+ opp-microvolt = < 962500 962500 1500000>;
clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
};
opp-800000000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <800000000>;
- opp-microvolt = < 937500>;
+ opp-microvolt = < 937500 937500 1500000>;
clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
};
opp-700000000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <700000000>;
- opp-microvolt = < 912500>;
+ opp-microvolt = < 912500 912500 1500000>;
clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
};
};
@@ -1100,23 +1100,23 @@
opp00 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <84000000>;
- opp-microvolt = <925000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <925000 925000 1400000>;
};
opp01 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <111000000>;
- opp-microvolt = <950000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <950000 950000 1400000>;
};
opp02 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <222000000>;
- opp-microvolt = <950000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <950000 950000 1400000>;
};
opp03 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <333000000>;
- opp-microvolt = <950000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <950000 950000 1400000>;
};
opp04 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <400000000>;
- opp-microvolt = <987500>;
+ opp-microvolt = <987500 987500 1400000>;
};
};
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroid-core.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroid-core.dtsi
index 25d95de15c9b..65d094256b54 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroid-core.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroid-core.dtsi
@@ -428,6 +428,8 @@
regulator-max-microvolt = <1500000>;
regulator-always-on;
regulator-boot-on;
+ regulator-coupled-with = <&buck3_reg>;
+ regulator-coupled-max-spread = <300000>;
};
buck3_reg: BUCK3 {
@@ -436,6 +438,8 @@
regulator-max-microvolt = <1400000>;
regulator-always-on;
regulator-boot-on;
+ regulator-coupled-with = <&buck2_reg>;
+ regulator-coupled-max-spread = <300000>;
};
buck4_reg: BUCK4 {
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts
index e0f470fe54c8..5c1e965ed7e9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts
@@ -257,6 +257,8 @@
regulator-always-on;
regulator-boot-on;
regulator-ramp-delay = <12500>;
+ regulator-coupled-with = <&buck3_reg>;
+ regulator-coupled-max-spread = <300000>;
regulator-state-mem {
regulator-off-in-suspend;
};
@@ -269,6 +271,8 @@
regulator-always-on;
regulator-boot-on;
regulator-ramp-delay = <12500>;
+ regulator-coupled-with = <&buck2_reg>;
+ regulator-coupled-max-spread = <300000>;
regulator-state-mem {
regulator-off-in-suspend;
};
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi
index 57d3b319fd65..2a74735d161c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi
@@ -22,61 +22,61 @@
&cluster_a15_opp_table {
opp-1700000000 {
- opp-microvolt = <1250000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1250000 1250000 1500000>;
};
opp-1600000000 {
- opp-microvolt = <1250000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1250000 1250000 1500000>;
};
opp-1500000000 {
- opp-microvolt = <1100000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1100000 1100000 1500000>;
};
opp-1400000000 {
- opp-microvolt = <1100000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1100000 1100000 1500000>;
};
opp-1300000000 {
- opp-microvolt = <1100000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1100000 1100000 1500000>;
};
opp-1200000000 {
- opp-microvolt = <1000000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1000000 1000000 1500000>;
};
opp-1100000000 {
- opp-microvolt = <1000000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1000000 1000000 1500000>;
};
opp-1000000000 {
- opp-microvolt = <1000000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1000000 1000000 1500000>;
};
opp-900000000 {
- opp-microvolt = <1000000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1000000 1000000 1500000>;
};
opp-800000000 {
- opp-microvolt = <900000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <900000 900000 1500000>;
};
opp-700000000 {
- opp-microvolt = <900000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <900000 900000 1500000>;
};
opp-600000000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <600000000>;
- opp-microvolt = <900000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <900000 900000 1500000>;
clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
};
opp-500000000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <500000000>;
- opp-microvolt = <900000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <900000 900000 1500000>;
clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
};
opp-400000000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <400000000>;
- opp-microvolt = <900000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <900000 900000 1500000>;
clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
};
opp-300000000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <300000000>;
- opp-microvolt = <900000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <900000 900000 1500000>;
clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
};
opp-200000000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <200000000>;
- opp-microvolt = <900000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <900000 900000 1500000>;
clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
};
};
--
2.22.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [RESEND PATCH v5 3/4] ARM: dts: exynos: add initial data for coupled regulators for Exynos5422/5800
@ 2019-08-08 9:02 ` Kamil Konieczny
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Kamil Konieczny @ 2019-08-08 9:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: k.konieczny
Cc: Mark Rutland, Nishanth Menon, linux-samsung-soc, Rob Herring,
linux-arm-kernel, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Stephen Boyd,
Viresh Kumar, linux-pm, linux-kernel, Krzysztof Kozlowski,
Chanwoo Choi, Kyungmin Park, Kukjin Kim, MyungJoo Ham, devicetree,
Marek Szyprowski
From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Declare Exynos5422/5800 voltage ranges for opp points for big cpu core and
bus wcore and couple their voltage supllies as vdd_arm and vdd_int should
be in 300mV range.
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
[k.konieczny: add missing patch description]
Signed-off-by: Kamil Konieczny <k.konieczny@partner.samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 34 +++++++++----------
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroid-core.dtsi | 4 +++
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts | 4 +++
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi | 32 ++++++++---------
4 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
index 5fb2326875dc..0cbf74750553 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
@@ -48,62 +48,62 @@
opp-shared;
opp-1800000000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1800000000>;
- opp-microvolt = <1250000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1250000 1250000 1500000>;
clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
};
opp-1700000000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1700000000>;
- opp-microvolt = <1212500>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1212500 1212500 1500000>;
clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
};
opp-1600000000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1600000000>;
- opp-microvolt = <1175000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1175000 1175000 1500000>;
clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
};
opp-1500000000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1500000000>;
- opp-microvolt = <1137500>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1137500 1137500 1500000>;
clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
};
opp-1400000000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1400000000>;
- opp-microvolt = <1112500>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1112500 1112500 1500000>;
clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
};
opp-1300000000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1300000000>;
- opp-microvolt = <1062500>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1062500 1062500 1500000>;
clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
};
opp-1200000000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1200000000>;
- opp-microvolt = <1037500>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1037500 1037500 1500000>;
clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
};
opp-1100000000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1100000000>;
- opp-microvolt = <1012500>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1012500 1012500 1500000>;
clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
};
opp-1000000000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1000000000>;
- opp-microvolt = < 987500>;
+ opp-microvolt = < 987500 987500 1500000>;
clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
};
opp-900000000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <900000000>;
- opp-microvolt = < 962500>;
+ opp-microvolt = < 962500 962500 1500000>;
clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
};
opp-800000000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <800000000>;
- opp-microvolt = < 937500>;
+ opp-microvolt = < 937500 937500 1500000>;
clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
};
opp-700000000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <700000000>;
- opp-microvolt = < 912500>;
+ opp-microvolt = < 912500 912500 1500000>;
clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
};
};
@@ -1100,23 +1100,23 @@
opp00 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <84000000>;
- opp-microvolt = <925000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <925000 925000 1400000>;
};
opp01 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <111000000>;
- opp-microvolt = <950000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <950000 950000 1400000>;
};
opp02 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <222000000>;
- opp-microvolt = <950000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <950000 950000 1400000>;
};
opp03 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <333000000>;
- opp-microvolt = <950000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <950000 950000 1400000>;
};
opp04 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <400000000>;
- opp-microvolt = <987500>;
+ opp-microvolt = <987500 987500 1400000>;
};
};
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroid-core.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroid-core.dtsi
index 25d95de15c9b..65d094256b54 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroid-core.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroid-core.dtsi
@@ -428,6 +428,8 @@
regulator-max-microvolt = <1500000>;
regulator-always-on;
regulator-boot-on;
+ regulator-coupled-with = <&buck3_reg>;
+ regulator-coupled-max-spread = <300000>;
};
buck3_reg: BUCK3 {
@@ -436,6 +438,8 @@
regulator-max-microvolt = <1400000>;
regulator-always-on;
regulator-boot-on;
+ regulator-coupled-with = <&buck2_reg>;
+ regulator-coupled-max-spread = <300000>;
};
buck4_reg: BUCK4 {
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts
index e0f470fe54c8..5c1e965ed7e9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts
@@ -257,6 +257,8 @@
regulator-always-on;
regulator-boot-on;
regulator-ramp-delay = <12500>;
+ regulator-coupled-with = <&buck3_reg>;
+ regulator-coupled-max-spread = <300000>;
regulator-state-mem {
regulator-off-in-suspend;
};
@@ -269,6 +271,8 @@
regulator-always-on;
regulator-boot-on;
regulator-ramp-delay = <12500>;
+ regulator-coupled-with = <&buck2_reg>;
+ regulator-coupled-max-spread = <300000>;
regulator-state-mem {
regulator-off-in-suspend;
};
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi
index 57d3b319fd65..2a74735d161c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi
@@ -22,61 +22,61 @@
&cluster_a15_opp_table {
opp-1700000000 {
- opp-microvolt = <1250000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1250000 1250000 1500000>;
};
opp-1600000000 {
- opp-microvolt = <1250000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1250000 1250000 1500000>;
};
opp-1500000000 {
- opp-microvolt = <1100000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1100000 1100000 1500000>;
};
opp-1400000000 {
- opp-microvolt = <1100000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1100000 1100000 1500000>;
};
opp-1300000000 {
- opp-microvolt = <1100000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1100000 1100000 1500000>;
};
opp-1200000000 {
- opp-microvolt = <1000000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1000000 1000000 1500000>;
};
opp-1100000000 {
- opp-microvolt = <1000000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1000000 1000000 1500000>;
};
opp-1000000000 {
- opp-microvolt = <1000000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1000000 1000000 1500000>;
};
opp-900000000 {
- opp-microvolt = <1000000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1000000 1000000 1500000>;
};
opp-800000000 {
- opp-microvolt = <900000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <900000 900000 1500000>;
};
opp-700000000 {
- opp-microvolt = <900000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <900000 900000 1500000>;
};
opp-600000000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <600000000>;
- opp-microvolt = <900000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <900000 900000 1500000>;
clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
};
opp-500000000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <500000000>;
- opp-microvolt = <900000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <900000 900000 1500000>;
clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
};
opp-400000000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <400000000>;
- opp-microvolt = <900000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <900000 900000 1500000>;
clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
};
opp-300000000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <300000000>;
- opp-microvolt = <900000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <900000 900000 1500000>;
clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
};
opp-200000000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <200000000>;
- opp-microvolt = <900000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <900000 900000 1500000>;
clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
};
};
--
2.22.0
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 3/4] ARM: dts: exynos: add initial data for coupled regulators for Exynos5422/5800
2019-08-08 9:02 ` Kamil Konieczny
@ 2019-10-02 14:27 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2019-10-02 14:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kamil Konieczny
Cc: Marek Szyprowski, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Chanwoo Choi,
Kukjin Kim, Kyungmin Park, Mark Rutland, MyungJoo Ham,
Nishanth Menon, Rob Herring, Stephen Boyd, Viresh Kumar,
devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, linux-pm,
linux-samsung-soc
On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 11:02:33AM +0200, Kamil Konieczny wrote:
> From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
>
> Declare Exynos5422/5800 voltage ranges for opp points for big cpu core and
> bus wcore and couple their voltage supllies as vdd_arm and vdd_int should
> be in 300mV range.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> [k.konieczny: add missing patch description]
> Signed-off-by: Kamil Konieczny <k.konieczny@partner.samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
The bindings were acked. Can I pick it up?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 3/4] ARM: dts: exynos: add initial data for coupled regulators for Exynos5422/5800
@ 2019-10-02 14:27 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2019-10-02 14:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kamil Konieczny
Cc: Mark Rutland, Nishanth Menon, linux-samsung-soc, linux-arm-kernel,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Stephen Boyd, Viresh Kumar, linux-pm,
linux-kernel, Rob Herring, Chanwoo Choi, Kyungmin Park,
Kukjin Kim, MyungJoo Ham, devicetree, Marek Szyprowski
On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 11:02:33AM +0200, Kamil Konieczny wrote:
> From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
>
> Declare Exynos5422/5800 voltage ranges for opp points for big cpu core and
> bus wcore and couple their voltage supllies as vdd_arm and vdd_int should
> be in 300mV range.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> [k.konieczny: add missing patch description]
> Signed-off-by: Kamil Konieczny <k.konieczny@partner.samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
The bindings were acked. Can I pick it up?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 3/4] ARM: dts: exynos: add initial data for coupled regulators for Exynos5422/5800
2019-10-02 14:27 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
@ 2019-10-03 10:04 ` Marek Szyprowski
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Marek Szyprowski @ 2019-10-03 10:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski, Kamil Konieczny
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Chanwoo Choi, Kukjin Kim,
Kyungmin Park, Mark Rutland, MyungJoo Ham, Nishanth Menon,
Rob Herring, Stephen Boyd, Viresh Kumar, devicetree,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, linux-pm, linux-samsung-soc
Hi Krzysztof,
On 02.10.2019 16:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 11:02:33AM +0200, Kamil Konieczny wrote:
>> From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
>>
>> Declare Exynos5422/5800 voltage ranges for opp points for big cpu core and
>> bus wcore and couple their voltage supllies as vdd_arm and vdd_int should
>> be in 300mV range.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
>> [k.konieczny: add missing patch description]
>> Signed-off-by: Kamil Konieczny <k.konieczny@partner.samsung.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
> The bindings were acked. Can I pick it up?
All needed fixes have been merged to v5.4-rc1, so it is okay to merge
this patch. However I've checked and it doesn't apply now, so I will
send a rebased version.
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 3/4] ARM: dts: exynos: add initial data for coupled regulators for Exynos5422/5800
@ 2019-10-03 10:04 ` Marek Szyprowski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Marek Szyprowski @ 2019-10-03 10:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski, Kamil Konieczny
Cc: Mark Rutland, Nishanth Menon, linux-samsung-soc,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Stephen Boyd, Viresh Kumar, linux-pm,
linux-kernel, Rob Herring, Chanwoo Choi, Kyungmin Park,
Kukjin Kim, MyungJoo Ham, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel
Hi Krzysztof,
On 02.10.2019 16:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 11:02:33AM +0200, Kamil Konieczny wrote:
>> From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
>>
>> Declare Exynos5422/5800 voltage ranges for opp points for big cpu core and
>> bus wcore and couple their voltage supllies as vdd_arm and vdd_int should
>> be in 300mV range.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
>> [k.konieczny: add missing patch description]
>> Signed-off-by: Kamil Konieczny <k.konieczny@partner.samsung.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
> The bindings were acked. Can I pick it up?
All needed fixes have been merged to v5.4-rc1, so it is okay to merge
this patch. However I've checked and it doesn't apply now, so I will
send a rebased version.
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [RESEND PATCH v5 4/4] dt-bindings: devfreq: exynos-bus: remove unused property
2019-08-08 9:02 ` Kamil Konieczny
@ 2019-08-08 9:02 ` Kamil Konieczny
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Kamil Konieczny @ 2019-08-08 9:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: k.konieczny
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Marek Szyprowski, Chanwoo Choi,
Krzysztof Kozlowski, Kukjin Kim, Kyungmin Park, Mark Rutland,
MyungJoo Ham, Nishanth Menon, Rob Herring, Stephen Boyd,
Viresh Kumar, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel,
linux-pm, linux-samsung-soc
Remove unused DT property "exynos,voltage-tolerance".
Signed-off-by: Kamil Konieczny <k.konieczny@partner.samsung.com>
Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/exynos-bus.txt | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/exynos-bus.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/exynos-bus.txt
index f8e946471a58..e71f752cc18f 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/exynos-bus.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/exynos-bus.txt
@@ -50,8 +50,6 @@ Required properties only for passive bus device:
Optional properties only for parent bus device:
- exynos,saturation-ratio: the percentage value which is used to calibrate
the performance count against total cycle count.
-- exynos,voltage-tolerance: the percentage value for bus voltage tolerance
- which is used to calculate the max voltage.
Detailed correlation between sub-blocks and power line according to Exynos SoC:
- In case of Exynos3250, there are two power line as following:
--
2.22.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [RESEND PATCH v5 4/4] dt-bindings: devfreq: exynos-bus: remove unused property
@ 2019-08-08 9:02 ` Kamil Konieczny
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Kamil Konieczny @ 2019-08-08 9:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: k.konieczny
Cc: Mark Rutland, Nishanth Menon, linux-samsung-soc, Rob Herring,
linux-arm-kernel, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Stephen Boyd,
Viresh Kumar, linux-pm, linux-kernel, Krzysztof Kozlowski,
Chanwoo Choi, Kyungmin Park, Kukjin Kim, MyungJoo Ham, devicetree,
Marek Szyprowski
Remove unused DT property "exynos,voltage-tolerance".
Signed-off-by: Kamil Konieczny <k.konieczny@partner.samsung.com>
Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/exynos-bus.txt | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/exynos-bus.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/exynos-bus.txt
index f8e946471a58..e71f752cc18f 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/exynos-bus.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/exynos-bus.txt
@@ -50,8 +50,6 @@ Required properties only for passive bus device:
Optional properties only for parent bus device:
- exynos,saturation-ratio: the percentage value which is used to calibrate
the performance count against total cycle count.
-- exynos,voltage-tolerance: the percentage value for bus voltage tolerance
- which is used to calculate the max voltage.
Detailed correlation between sub-blocks and power line according to Exynos SoC:
- In case of Exynos3250, there are two power line as following:
--
2.22.0
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 4/4] dt-bindings: devfreq: exynos-bus: remove unused property
2019-08-08 9:02 ` Kamil Konieczny
@ 2019-08-21 20:35 ` Rob Herring
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2019-08-21 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kamil Konieczny
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Marek Szyprowski, Chanwoo Choi,
Krzysztof Kozlowski, Kukjin Kim, Kyungmin Park, Mark Rutland,
MyungJoo Ham, Nishanth Menon, Stephen Boyd, Viresh Kumar,
devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, linux-pm,
linux-samsung-soc
On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 11:02:34AM +0200, Kamil Konieczny wrote:
> Remove unused DT property "exynos,voltage-tolerance".
>
> Signed-off-by: Kamil Konieczny <k.konieczny@partner.samsung.com>
> Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/exynos-bus.txt | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 4/4] dt-bindings: devfreq: exynos-bus: remove unused property
@ 2019-08-21 20:35 ` Rob Herring
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2019-08-21 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kamil Konieczny
Cc: Mark Rutland, Nishanth Menon, linux-samsung-soc, linux-arm-kernel,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Stephen Boyd, Viresh Kumar, linux-pm,
linux-kernel, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Chanwoo Choi, Kyungmin Park,
Kukjin Kim, MyungJoo Ham, devicetree, Marek Szyprowski
On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 11:02:34AM +0200, Kamil Konieczny wrote:
> Remove unused DT property "exynos,voltage-tolerance".
>
> Signed-off-by: Kamil Konieczny <k.konieczny@partner.samsung.com>
> Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/exynos-bus.txt | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 0/4] add coupled regulators for Exynos5422/5800
2019-08-08 9:02 ` Kamil Konieczny
@ 2019-08-22 13:18 ` Kamil Konieczny
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Kamil Konieczny @ 2019-08-22 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: MyungJoo Ham
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Marek Szyprowski, Chanwoo Choi,
Krzysztof Kozlowski, Kukjin Kim, Kyungmin Park, Mark Rutland,
Nishanth Menon, Rob Herring, Stephen Boyd, Viresh Kumar,
devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, linux-pm,
linux-samsung-soc
Dear MyungJoo,
On 08.08.2019 11:02, Kamil Konieczny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The main purpose of this patch series is to add coupled regulators for
> Exynos5422/5800 to keep constrain on voltage difference between vdd_arm
> and vdd_int to be at most 300mV. In exynos-bus instead of using
> regulator_set_voltage_tol() with default voltage tolerance it should be
> used regulator_set_voltage_triplet() with volatege range, and this is
> already present in opp/core.c code, so it can be reused. While at this,
> move setting regulators into opp/core.
>
> This patchset was tested on Odroid XU3.
>
> The DTS coupled regulators patch depends on previous patches.
>
> Changes:
> v5:
> - squashed last patch "remove exynos_bus_passive_target()" into second
> - added Acked-by to patch "correct clock enable sequence"
Could you please merge patches 1/4 and 2/4 for v5.4
(they were already Ack-ed by Chanwoo Choi)?
--
Best regards,
Kamil Konieczny
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
> v4:
> - removed "opp: core: add regulators enable and disable" from patchset
> as it was applied by Viresh Kumar and changed cover letter
> - fix patch "devfreq: exynos-bus: correct clock enable sequence" to
> correct order of enable/disable
> - removed unrelated changes in "devfreq: exynos-bus: convert to use
> dev_pm_opp_set_rate()"
> - added new patch "devfreq: exynos-bus: remove exynos_bus_passive_target()"
> as suggested by Chanwoo Choi
> v3:
> - added new exynos-bus patch to correct clock and regulator enabling
> and disabling sequence as suggested by Chanwoo Choi
> - corrected error path in enable and improved commit message in opp/core
> - improve comment in devfreq/exynos-bus.c before devfreq_recommended_opp()
> - change cover letter as there is new patch
> - added note before Signed-off-by in 4th patch
> v2:
> - improve regulators enable/disable code in opp/core as suggested by
> Viresh Kumar
> - add new patch for remove unused dt-bindings as suggested by Krzysztof
> Kozlowski
>
> Kamil Konieczny (3):
> devfreq: exynos-bus: correct clock enable sequence
> devfreq: exynos-bus: convert to use dev_pm_opp_set_rate()
> dt-bindings: devfreq: exynos-bus: remove unused property
>
> Marek Szyprowski (1):
> ARM: dts: exynos: add initial data for coupled regulators for
> Exynos5422/5800
>
> .../bindings/devfreq/exynos-bus.txt | 2 -
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 34 ++--
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroid-core.dtsi | 4 +
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts | 4 +
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi | 32 ++--
> drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c | 153 +++++-------------
> 6 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 151 deletions(-)
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 0/4] add coupled regulators for Exynos5422/5800
@ 2019-08-22 13:18 ` Kamil Konieczny
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Kamil Konieczny @ 2019-08-22 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: MyungJoo Ham
Cc: Mark Rutland, Nishanth Menon, linux-samsung-soc, Rob Herring,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Stephen Boyd, Viresh Kumar, linux-pm,
linux-kernel, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Chanwoo Choi, Kyungmin Park,
Kukjin Kim, linux-arm-kernel, devicetree, Marek Szyprowski
Dear MyungJoo,
On 08.08.2019 11:02, Kamil Konieczny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The main purpose of this patch series is to add coupled regulators for
> Exynos5422/5800 to keep constrain on voltage difference between vdd_arm
> and vdd_int to be at most 300mV. In exynos-bus instead of using
> regulator_set_voltage_tol() with default voltage tolerance it should be
> used regulator_set_voltage_triplet() with volatege range, and this is
> already present in opp/core.c code, so it can be reused. While at this,
> move setting regulators into opp/core.
>
> This patchset was tested on Odroid XU3.
>
> The DTS coupled regulators patch depends on previous patches.
>
> Changes:
> v5:
> - squashed last patch "remove exynos_bus_passive_target()" into second
> - added Acked-by to patch "correct clock enable sequence"
Could you please merge patches 1/4 and 2/4 for v5.4
(they were already Ack-ed by Chanwoo Choi)?
--
Best regards,
Kamil Konieczny
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
> v4:
> - removed "opp: core: add regulators enable and disable" from patchset
> as it was applied by Viresh Kumar and changed cover letter
> - fix patch "devfreq: exynos-bus: correct clock enable sequence" to
> correct order of enable/disable
> - removed unrelated changes in "devfreq: exynos-bus: convert to use
> dev_pm_opp_set_rate()"
> - added new patch "devfreq: exynos-bus: remove exynos_bus_passive_target()"
> as suggested by Chanwoo Choi
> v3:
> - added new exynos-bus patch to correct clock and regulator enabling
> and disabling sequence as suggested by Chanwoo Choi
> - corrected error path in enable and improved commit message in opp/core
> - improve comment in devfreq/exynos-bus.c before devfreq_recommended_opp()
> - change cover letter as there is new patch
> - added note before Signed-off-by in 4th patch
> v2:
> - improve regulators enable/disable code in opp/core as suggested by
> Viresh Kumar
> - add new patch for remove unused dt-bindings as suggested by Krzysztof
> Kozlowski
>
> Kamil Konieczny (3):
> devfreq: exynos-bus: correct clock enable sequence
> devfreq: exynos-bus: convert to use dev_pm_opp_set_rate()
> dt-bindings: devfreq: exynos-bus: remove unused property
>
> Marek Szyprowski (1):
> ARM: dts: exynos: add initial data for coupled regulators for
> Exynos5422/5800
>
> .../bindings/devfreq/exynos-bus.txt | 2 -
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 34 ++--
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroid-core.dtsi | 4 +
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts | 4 +
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi | 32 ++--
> drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c | 153 +++++-------------
> 6 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 151 deletions(-)
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread