All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: gregkh at linuxfoundation.org (Greg KH)
Subject: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [SYZBOT REPORT] divide error in usbtmc_generic_read
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2019 09:21:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191004072136.GC6371@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9722cdb535b51dbb2846c6214eea4265ce803ce3.camel@gmail.com>

On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 12:28:32PM +0530, Jaskaran Singh wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-10-03 at 21:56 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 01:00:16AM +0530, Jaskaran Singh wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > Following is my analysis of syzbot report:
> > > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=688d05e810900459b03c82fb48dc609edbbf7df9
> > > 
> > > The bug pertains to a divide error. The report's call trace is as
> > > follows:
> > > 
> > >  usbtmc_ioctl_generic_read drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c:1029 [inline]
> > >  usbtmc_ioctl+0x27d/0x2ab0 drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c:2089
> > >  vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:46 [inline]
> > >  file_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:509 [inline]
> > >  do_vfs_ioctl+0xd2d/0x1330 fs/ioctl.c:696
> > >  ksys_ioctl+0x9b/0xc0 fs/ioctl.c:713
> > >  __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:720 [inline]
> > >  __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:718 [inline]
> > >  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x6f/0xb0 fs/ioctl.c:718
> > >  do_syscall_64+0xb7/0x580 arch/x86/entry/common.c:296
> > >  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
> > > 
> > > The file:line where the error occurs is this:
> > > 	drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c:816
> > > 
> > > Line 816 of that file is as follows:
> > > 		if ((max_transfer_size % data->wMaxPacketSize) == 0)
> > > 
> > > Running a 'git blame' on the file in question reveals that the last
> > > modification to line 816 was commit
> > > bb99794a4792068cb4bfd40e99e0f9d8fe7872fa.
> > > The commit adds the USBTMC_IOCTL_READ call for the driver, and thus
> > > the
> > > usbtmc_generic_read function.
> > > 
> > > I was not able to reproduce the error using my native machine and
> > > the
> > > same gcc version used by syzkaller (gcc 9.0.0 20181231). However,
> > > the
> > > error probably occurs because data->wMaxPacketSize is zero.
> > > 
> > > An intuitive fix for this seems to be:
> > > 
> > > -		if ((max_transfer_size % data->wMaxPacketSize) == 0)
> > > +		if (data->wMaxPacketSize &&
> > > +		    (max_transfer_size % data->wMaxPacketSize) == 0)
> > > 
> > > Or perhaps introduce a guard condition above line 816 to raise an
> > > error.
> > 
> > Yes, if wMaxPacketSize is 0, then the code should just return an
> > error.
> > Care to make up a patch for this and submit it to syzbot to see if it
> > solves the problem or not?
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> Hi Greg,
> 
> >From the following thread:
> 
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/syzkaller-bugs/divide$20error%7Csort:date/syzkaller-bugs/RYfg7J46e4c/t2amCUU7DgAJ
> 
> It looks like a patch has already been submitted and a crash does not
> trigger with it. However, it might make sense to add more sanity
> checking. Should I submit the patch?

What more error checking can you add that is not already present with
the patch that was submitted and accepted already upstream?

And why look at a report that is already fixed?  Or is this one not
properly closed as fixed?  If not, can you please mark it as fixed?

thanks,

greg k-h

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org (Greg KH)
Subject: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [SYZBOT REPORT] divide error in usbtmc_generic_read
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2019 09:21:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191004072136.GC6371@kroah.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20191004072136.ATaU1WBtu3Ukg9lwOz8ErT5WOQahML_WzuQwGfReIbI@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9722cdb535b51dbb2846c6214eea4265ce803ce3.camel@gmail.com>

On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 12:28:32PM +0530, Jaskaran Singh wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-10-03 at 21:56 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 01:00:16AM +0530, Jaskaran Singh wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > Following is my analysis of syzbot report:
> > > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=688d05e810900459b03c82fb48dc609edbbf7df9
> > > 
> > > The bug pertains to a divide error. The report's call trace is as
> > > follows:
> > > 
> > >  usbtmc_ioctl_generic_read drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c:1029 [inline]
> > >  usbtmc_ioctl+0x27d/0x2ab0 drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c:2089
> > >  vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:46 [inline]
> > >  file_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:509 [inline]
> > >  do_vfs_ioctl+0xd2d/0x1330 fs/ioctl.c:696
> > >  ksys_ioctl+0x9b/0xc0 fs/ioctl.c:713
> > >  __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:720 [inline]
> > >  __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:718 [inline]
> > >  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x6f/0xb0 fs/ioctl.c:718
> > >  do_syscall_64+0xb7/0x580 arch/x86/entry/common.c:296
> > >  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
> > > 
> > > The file:line where the error occurs is this:
> > > 	drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c:816
> > > 
> > > Line 816 of that file is as follows:
> > > 		if ((max_transfer_size % data->wMaxPacketSize) == 0)
> > > 
> > > Running a 'git blame' on the file in question reveals that the last
> > > modification to line 816 was commit
> > > bb99794a4792068cb4bfd40e99e0f9d8fe7872fa.
> > > The commit adds the USBTMC_IOCTL_READ call for the driver, and thus
> > > the
> > > usbtmc_generic_read function.
> > > 
> > > I was not able to reproduce the error using my native machine and
> > > the
> > > same gcc version used by syzkaller (gcc 9.0.0 20181231). However,
> > > the
> > > error probably occurs because data->wMaxPacketSize is zero.
> > > 
> > > An intuitive fix for this seems to be:
> > > 
> > > -		if ((max_transfer_size % data->wMaxPacketSize) == 0)
> > > +		if (data->wMaxPacketSize &&
> > > +		    (max_transfer_size % data->wMaxPacketSize) == 0)
> > > 
> > > Or perhaps introduce a guard condition above line 816 to raise an
> > > error.
> > 
> > Yes, if wMaxPacketSize is 0, then the code should just return an
> > error.
> > Care to make up a patch for this and submit it to syzbot to see if it
> > solves the problem or not?
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> Hi Greg,
> 
> >From the following thread:
> 
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/syzkaller-bugs/divide$20error%7Csort:date/syzkaller-bugs/RYfg7J46e4c/t2amCUU7DgAJ
> 
> It looks like a patch has already been submitted and a crash does not
> trigger with it. However, it might make sense to add more sanity
> checking. Should I submit the patch?

What more error checking can you add that is not already present with
the patch that was submitted and accepted already upstream?

And why look at a report that is already fixed?  Or is this one not
properly closed as fixed?  If not, can you please mark it as fixed?

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-04  7:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-03 19:30 [Linux-kernel-mentees] [SYZBOT REPORT] divide error in usbtmc_generic_read jaskaransingh7654321
2019-10-03 19:30 ` Jaskaran Singh
2019-10-03 19:56 ` gregkh
2019-10-03 19:56   ` Greg KH
2019-10-04  6:58   ` jaskaransingh7654321
2019-10-04  6:58     ` Jaskaran Singh
2019-10-04  7:21     ` gregkh [this message]
2019-10-04  7:21       ` Greg KH
2019-10-04  7:53       ` jaskaransingh7654321
2019-10-04  7:53         ` Jaskaran Singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191004072136.GC6371@kroah.com \
    --to=unknown@example.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.