From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org>
Cc: ohad@wizery.com, orsonzhai@gmail.com, zhang.lyra@gmail.com,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] hwspinlock: sprd: Use devm_hwspin_lock_register() to register hwlock controller
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2019 21:11:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191005041120.GD5189@tuxbook-pro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e8f1db04571f62298c7a4f72be803b9b9974d12d.1569567749.git.baolin.wang@linaro.org>
On Fri 27 Sep 00:10 PDT 2019, Baolin Wang wrote:
> Use devm_hwspin_lock_register() to register the hwlock controller instead of
> unregistering the hwlock controller explicitly when removing the device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org>
Thanks Baolin, series applied.
Regards,
Bjorn
> ---
> drivers/hwspinlock/sprd_hwspinlock.c | 8 +++-----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/sprd_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/sprd_hwspinlock.c
> index e76c702..44d69db 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwspinlock/sprd_hwspinlock.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/sprd_hwspinlock.c
> @@ -135,8 +135,9 @@ static int sprd_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, sprd_hwlock);
> pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
>
> - ret = hwspin_lock_register(&sprd_hwlock->bank, &pdev->dev,
> - &sprd_hwspinlock_ops, 0, SPRD_HWLOCKS_NUM);
> + ret = devm_hwspin_lock_register(&pdev->dev, &sprd_hwlock->bank,
> + &sprd_hwspinlock_ops, 0,
> + SPRD_HWLOCKS_NUM);
> if (ret) {
> pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> return ret;
> @@ -147,9 +148,6 @@ static int sprd_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> static int sprd_hwspinlock_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> - struct sprd_hwspinlock_dev *sprd_hwlock = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> -
> - hwspin_lock_unregister(&sprd_hwlock->bank);
> pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org>
Cc: ohad@wizery.com, orsonzhai@gmail.com, zhang.lyra@gmail.com,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] hwspinlock: sprd: Use devm_hwspin_lock_register() to register hwlock controller
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2019 21:11:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191005041120.GD5189@tuxbook-pro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e8f1db04571f62298c7a4f72be803b9b9974d12d.1569567749.git.baolin.wang@linaro.org>
On Fri 27 Sep 00:10 PDT 2019, Baolin Wang wrote:
> Use devm_hwspin_lock_register() to register the hwlock controller instead of
> unregistering the hwlock controller explicitly when removing the device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org>
Thanks Baolin, series applied.
Regards,
Bjorn
> ---
> drivers/hwspinlock/sprd_hwspinlock.c | 8 +++-----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/sprd_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/sprd_hwspinlock.c
> index e76c702..44d69db 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwspinlock/sprd_hwspinlock.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/sprd_hwspinlock.c
> @@ -135,8 +135,9 @@ static int sprd_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, sprd_hwlock);
> pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
>
> - ret = hwspin_lock_register(&sprd_hwlock->bank, &pdev->dev,
> - &sprd_hwspinlock_ops, 0, SPRD_HWLOCKS_NUM);
> + ret = devm_hwspin_lock_register(&pdev->dev, &sprd_hwlock->bank,
> + &sprd_hwspinlock_ops, 0,
> + SPRD_HWLOCKS_NUM);
> if (ret) {
> pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> return ret;
> @@ -147,9 +148,6 @@ static int sprd_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> static int sprd_hwspinlock_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> - struct sprd_hwspinlock_dev *sprd_hwlock = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> -
> - hwspin_lock_unregister(&sprd_hwlock->bank);
> pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-05 4:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-27 7:10 [PATCH 0/4] Some optimization for Spreadtrum hwlock controller Baolin Wang
2019-09-27 7:10 ` [PATCH 1/4] hwspinlock: sprd: Change to use devm_platform_ioremap_resource() Baolin Wang
2019-09-27 7:10 ` [PATCH 2/4] hwspinlock: sprd: Check the return value of clk_prepare_enable() Baolin Wang
2019-09-27 7:10 ` [PATCH 3/4] hwspinlock: sprd: Use devm_add_action_or_reset() for calls to clk_disable_unprepare() Baolin Wang
2019-09-27 7:10 ` [PATCH 4/4] hwspinlock: sprd: Use devm_hwspin_lock_register() to register hwlock controller Baolin Wang
2019-10-05 4:11 ` Bjorn Andersson [this message]
2019-10-05 4:11 ` Bjorn Andersson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191005041120.GD5189@tuxbook-pro \
--to=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
--cc=orsonzhai@gmail.com \
--cc=zhang.lyra@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.