From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
bgolaszewski@baylibre.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk, yamada.masahiro@socionext.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
geert@linux-m68k.org, preid@electromag.com.au, lukas@wunner.de,
sean.nyekjaer@prevas.dk, morten.tiljeset@prevas.dk,
William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>,
Mathias Duckeck <m.duckeck@kunbus.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 13/14] gpio: max3191x: Utilize the for_each_set_clump8 macro
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2019 07:26:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201910060744.lgRuOOiw%lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f07b6bb5619ea1365cc58266254a7b5be65a9082.1570299719.git.vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2770 bytes --]
Hi William,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on gpio/for-next]
[cannot apply to v5.4-rc1 next-20191004]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/William-Breathitt-Gray/Introduce-the-for_each_set_clump8-macro/20191006-032112
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-gpio.git for-next
config: ia64-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: ia64-linux-gcc (GCC) 7.4.0
reproduce:
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
GCC_VERSION=7.4.0 make.cross ARCH=ia64
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/gpio/gpio-max3191x.c: In function 'max3191x_get_multiple':
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-max3191x.c:258:31: error: 'offset' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'off_t'?
bitmap_set_value8(bits, in, offset);
^~~~~~
off_t
drivers/gpio/gpio-max3191x.c:258:31: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
vim +258 drivers/gpio/gpio-max3191x.c
231
232 static int max3191x_get_multiple(struct gpio_chip *gpio, unsigned long *mask,
233 unsigned long *bits)
234 {
235 struct max3191x_chip *max3191x = gpiochip_get_data(gpio);
236 const unsigned int wordlen = max3191x_wordlen(max3191x);
237 int ret;
238 unsigned long bit;
239 unsigned long gpio_mask;
240 unsigned long in;
241
242 mutex_lock(&max3191x->lock);
243 ret = max3191x_readout_locked(max3191x);
244 if (ret)
245 goto out_unlock;
246
247 bitmap_zero(bits, gpio->ngpio);
248 for_each_set_clump8(bit, gpio_mask, mask, gpio->ngpio) {
249 unsigned int chipnum = bit / MAX3191X_NGPIO;
250
251 if (max3191x_chip_is_faulting(max3191x, chipnum)) {
252 ret = -EIO;
253 goto out_unlock;
254 }
255
256 in = ((u8 *)max3191x->xfer.rx_buf)[chipnum * wordlen];
257 in &= gpio_mask;
> 258 bitmap_set_value8(bits, in, offset);
259 }
260
261 out_unlock:
262 mutex_unlock(&max3191x->lock);
263 return ret;
264 }
265
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 54933 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
bgolaszewski@baylibre.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk, yamada.masahiro@socionext.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
geert@linux-m68k.org, preid@electromag.com.au, lukas@wunner.de,
sean.nyekjaer@prevas.dk, morten.tiljeset@prevas.dk,
Mathias Duckeck <m.duckeck@kunbus.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 13/14] gpio: max3191x: Utilize the for_each_set_clump8 macro
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2019 07:26:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201910060744.lgRuOOiw%lkp@intel.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20191005232610.s3nh4kVuYJKVqzt2m0jmd7CKThIYETfuBt_DpvuRQsk@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f07b6bb5619ea1365cc58266254a7b5be65a9082.1570299719.git.vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2770 bytes --]
Hi William,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on gpio/for-next]
[cannot apply to v5.4-rc1 next-20191004]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/William-Breathitt-Gray/Introduce-the-for_each_set_clump8-macro/20191006-032112
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-gpio.git for-next
config: ia64-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: ia64-linux-gcc (GCC) 7.4.0
reproduce:
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
GCC_VERSION=7.4.0 make.cross ARCH=ia64
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/gpio/gpio-max3191x.c: In function 'max3191x_get_multiple':
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-max3191x.c:258:31: error: 'offset' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'off_t'?
bitmap_set_value8(bits, in, offset);
^~~~~~
off_t
drivers/gpio/gpio-max3191x.c:258:31: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
vim +258 drivers/gpio/gpio-max3191x.c
231
232 static int max3191x_get_multiple(struct gpio_chip *gpio, unsigned long *mask,
233 unsigned long *bits)
234 {
235 struct max3191x_chip *max3191x = gpiochip_get_data(gpio);
236 const unsigned int wordlen = max3191x_wordlen(max3191x);
237 int ret;
238 unsigned long bit;
239 unsigned long gpio_mask;
240 unsigned long in;
241
242 mutex_lock(&max3191x->lock);
243 ret = max3191x_readout_locked(max3191x);
244 if (ret)
245 goto out_unlock;
246
247 bitmap_zero(bits, gpio->ngpio);
248 for_each_set_clump8(bit, gpio_mask, mask, gpio->ngpio) {
249 unsigned int chipnum = bit / MAX3191X_NGPIO;
250
251 if (max3191x_chip_is_faulting(max3191x, chipnum)) {
252 ret = -EIO;
253 goto out_unlock;
254 }
255
256 in = ((u8 *)max3191x->xfer.rx_buf)[chipnum * wordlen];
257 in &= gpio_mask;
> 258 bitmap_set_value8(bits, in, offset);
259 }
260
261 out_unlock:
262 mutex_unlock(&max3191x->lock);
263 return ret;
264 }
265
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 54933 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
bgolaszewski@baylibre.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk, yamada.masahiro@socionext.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
geert@linux-m68k.org, preid@electromag.com.au, lukas@wunner.de,
sean.nyekjaer@prevas.dk, morten.tiljeset@prevas.dk,
William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>,
Mathias Duckeck <m.duckeck@kunbus.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 13/14] gpio: max3191x: Utilize the for_each_set_clump8 macro
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2019 07:26:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201910060744.lgRuOOiw%lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f07b6bb5619ea1365cc58266254a7b5be65a9082.1570299719.git.vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2770 bytes --]
Hi William,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on gpio/for-next]
[cannot apply to v5.4-rc1 next-20191004]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/William-Breathitt-Gray/Introduce-the-for_each_set_clump8-macro/20191006-032112
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-gpio.git for-next
config: ia64-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: ia64-linux-gcc (GCC) 7.4.0
reproduce:
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
GCC_VERSION=7.4.0 make.cross ARCH=ia64
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/gpio/gpio-max3191x.c: In function 'max3191x_get_multiple':
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-max3191x.c:258:31: error: 'offset' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'off_t'?
bitmap_set_value8(bits, in, offset);
^~~~~~
off_t
drivers/gpio/gpio-max3191x.c:258:31: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
vim +258 drivers/gpio/gpio-max3191x.c
231
232 static int max3191x_get_multiple(struct gpio_chip *gpio, unsigned long *mask,
233 unsigned long *bits)
234 {
235 struct max3191x_chip *max3191x = gpiochip_get_data(gpio);
236 const unsigned int wordlen = max3191x_wordlen(max3191x);
237 int ret;
238 unsigned long bit;
239 unsigned long gpio_mask;
240 unsigned long in;
241
242 mutex_lock(&max3191x->lock);
243 ret = max3191x_readout_locked(max3191x);
244 if (ret)
245 goto out_unlock;
246
247 bitmap_zero(bits, gpio->ngpio);
248 for_each_set_clump8(bit, gpio_mask, mask, gpio->ngpio) {
249 unsigned int chipnum = bit / MAX3191X_NGPIO;
250
251 if (max3191x_chip_is_faulting(max3191x, chipnum)) {
252 ret = -EIO;
253 goto out_unlock;
254 }
255
256 in = ((u8 *)max3191x->xfer.rx_buf)[chipnum * wordlen];
257 in &= gpio_mask;
> 258 bitmap_set_value8(bits, in, offset);
259 }
260
261 out_unlock:
262 mutex_unlock(&max3191x->lock);
263 return ret;
264 }
265
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 54933 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Mathias Duckeck <m.duckeck@kunbus.de>,
preid@electromag.com.au,
William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, yamada.masahiro@socionext.com,
linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
morten.tiljeset@prevas.dk, sean.nyekjaer@prevas.dk,
bgolaszewski@baylibre.com, lukas@wunner.de, geert@linux-m68k.org,
kbuild-all@01.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 13/14] gpio: max3191x: Utilize the for_each_set_clump8 macro
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2019 07:26:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201910060744.lgRuOOiw%lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f07b6bb5619ea1365cc58266254a7b5be65a9082.1570299719.git.vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2770 bytes --]
Hi William,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on gpio/for-next]
[cannot apply to v5.4-rc1 next-20191004]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/William-Breathitt-Gray/Introduce-the-for_each_set_clump8-macro/20191006-032112
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-gpio.git for-next
config: ia64-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: ia64-linux-gcc (GCC) 7.4.0
reproduce:
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
GCC_VERSION=7.4.0 make.cross ARCH=ia64
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/gpio/gpio-max3191x.c: In function 'max3191x_get_multiple':
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-max3191x.c:258:31: error: 'offset' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'off_t'?
bitmap_set_value8(bits, in, offset);
^~~~~~
off_t
drivers/gpio/gpio-max3191x.c:258:31: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
vim +258 drivers/gpio/gpio-max3191x.c
231
232 static int max3191x_get_multiple(struct gpio_chip *gpio, unsigned long *mask,
233 unsigned long *bits)
234 {
235 struct max3191x_chip *max3191x = gpiochip_get_data(gpio);
236 const unsigned int wordlen = max3191x_wordlen(max3191x);
237 int ret;
238 unsigned long bit;
239 unsigned long gpio_mask;
240 unsigned long in;
241
242 mutex_lock(&max3191x->lock);
243 ret = max3191x_readout_locked(max3191x);
244 if (ret)
245 goto out_unlock;
246
247 bitmap_zero(bits, gpio->ngpio);
248 for_each_set_clump8(bit, gpio_mask, mask, gpio->ngpio) {
249 unsigned int chipnum = bit / MAX3191X_NGPIO;
250
251 if (max3191x_chip_is_faulting(max3191x, chipnum)) {
252 ret = -EIO;
253 goto out_unlock;
254 }
255
256 in = ((u8 *)max3191x->xfer.rx_buf)[chipnum * wordlen];
257 in &= gpio_mask;
> 258 bitmap_set_value8(bits, in, offset);
259 }
260
261 out_unlock:
262 mutex_unlock(&max3191x->lock);
263 return ret;
264 }
265
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 54933 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 13/14] gpio: max3191x: Utilize the for_each_set_clump8 macro
Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2019 07:26:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201910060744.lgRuOOiw%lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f07b6bb5619ea1365cc58266254a7b5be65a9082.1570299719.git.vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2843 bytes --]
Hi William,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on gpio/for-next]
[cannot apply to v5.4-rc1 next-20191004]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/William-Breathitt-Gray/Introduce-the-for_each_set_clump8-macro/20191006-032112
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-gpio.git for-next
config: ia64-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: ia64-linux-gcc (GCC) 7.4.0
reproduce:
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
GCC_VERSION=7.4.0 make.cross ARCH=ia64
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/gpio/gpio-max3191x.c: In function 'max3191x_get_multiple':
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-max3191x.c:258:31: error: 'offset' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'off_t'?
bitmap_set_value8(bits, in, offset);
^~~~~~
off_t
drivers/gpio/gpio-max3191x.c:258:31: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
vim +258 drivers/gpio/gpio-max3191x.c
231
232 static int max3191x_get_multiple(struct gpio_chip *gpio, unsigned long *mask,
233 unsigned long *bits)
234 {
235 struct max3191x_chip *max3191x = gpiochip_get_data(gpio);
236 const unsigned int wordlen = max3191x_wordlen(max3191x);
237 int ret;
238 unsigned long bit;
239 unsigned long gpio_mask;
240 unsigned long in;
241
242 mutex_lock(&max3191x->lock);
243 ret = max3191x_readout_locked(max3191x);
244 if (ret)
245 goto out_unlock;
246
247 bitmap_zero(bits, gpio->ngpio);
248 for_each_set_clump8(bit, gpio_mask, mask, gpio->ngpio) {
249 unsigned int chipnum = bit / MAX3191X_NGPIO;
250
251 if (max3191x_chip_is_faulting(max3191x, chipnum)) {
252 ret = -EIO;
253 goto out_unlock;
254 }
255
256 in = ((u8 *)max3191x->xfer.rx_buf)[chipnum * wordlen];
257 in &= gpio_mask;
> 258 bitmap_set_value8(bits, in, offset);
259 }
260
261 out_unlock:
262 mutex_unlock(&max3191x->lock);
263 return ret;
264 }
265
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 54933 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-05 23:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-05 18:36 [PATCH v15 00/14] Introduce the for_each_set_clump8 macro William Breathitt Gray
2019-10-05 18:36 ` William Breathitt Gray
2019-10-05 18:36 ` [PATCH v15 01/14] bitops: " William Breathitt Gray
2019-10-05 18:36 ` William Breathitt Gray
2019-10-09 9:25 ` Linus Walleij
2019-10-09 9:25 ` Linus Walleij
2019-10-05 18:36 ` [PATCH v15 02/14] lib/test_bitmap.c: Add for_each_set_clump8 test cases William Breathitt Gray
2019-10-05 18:36 ` William Breathitt Gray
2019-10-05 18:36 ` [PATCH v15 03/14] gpio: 104-dio-48e: Utilize for_each_set_clump8 macro William Breathitt Gray
2019-10-05 18:36 ` William Breathitt Gray
2019-10-05 18:36 ` [PATCH v15 04/14] gpio: 104-idi-48: " William Breathitt Gray
2019-10-05 18:36 ` William Breathitt Gray
2019-10-05 18:36 ` [PATCH v15 05/14] gpio: gpio-mm: " William Breathitt Gray
2019-10-05 18:36 ` William Breathitt Gray
2019-10-05 18:37 ` [PATCH v15 06/14] gpio: ws16c48: " William Breathitt Gray
2019-10-05 18:37 ` William Breathitt Gray
2019-10-05 18:37 ` [PATCH v15 07/14] gpio: pci-idio-16: " William Breathitt Gray
2019-10-05 18:37 ` William Breathitt Gray
2019-10-05 18:37 ` [PATCH v15 08/14] gpio: pcie-idio-24: " William Breathitt Gray
2019-10-05 18:37 ` William Breathitt Gray
2019-10-05 18:37 ` [PATCH v15 09/14] gpio: uniphier: " William Breathitt Gray
2019-10-05 18:37 ` William Breathitt Gray
2019-10-05 18:37 ` [PATCH v15 10/14] gpio: 74x164: Utilize the " William Breathitt Gray
2019-10-05 18:37 ` William Breathitt Gray
2019-10-05 18:37 ` [PATCH v15 11/14] thermal: intel: intel_soc_dts_iosf: Utilize " William Breathitt Gray
2019-10-05 18:37 ` William Breathitt Gray
2019-10-05 18:37 ` [PATCH v15 12/14] gpio: pisosr: Utilize the " William Breathitt Gray
2019-10-05 18:37 ` William Breathitt Gray
2019-10-05 18:37 ` [PATCH v15 13/14] gpio: max3191x: " William Breathitt Gray
2019-10-05 18:37 ` William Breathitt Gray
2019-10-05 23:26 ` kbuild test robot [this message]
2019-10-05 23:26 ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-05 23:26 ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-05 23:26 ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-05 23:26 ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-06 19:26 ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-06 19:26 ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-06 19:26 ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-06 19:26 ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-06 19:26 ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-05 18:37 ` [PATCH v15 14/14] gpio: pca953x: " William Breathitt Gray
2019-10-05 18:37 ` William Breathitt Gray
2019-10-05 18:46 ` [PATCH v15 00/14] Introduce " William Breathitt Gray
2019-10-05 18:46 ` William Breathitt Gray
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201910060744.lgRuOOiw%lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=m.duckeck@kunbus.de \
--cc=morten.tiljeset@prevas.dk \
--cc=preid@electromag.com.au \
--cc=sean.nyekjaer@prevas.dk \
--cc=vilhelm.gray@gmail.com \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.