From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Mason Yang <masonccyang@mxic.com.tw>
Cc: juliensu@mxic.com.tw, vigneshr@ti.com, bbrezillon@kernel.org,
marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com, richard@nod.at,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, frieder.schrempf@kontron.de,
marek.vasut@gmail.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
computersforpeace@gmail.com, dwmw2@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/3] mtd: rawnand: Add support Macronix power down mode
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 10:45:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191007104501.1b4ed8ed@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1568793387-25199-3-git-send-email-masonccyang@mxic.com.tw>
Hi Mason,
Mason Yang <masonccyang@mxic.com.tw> wrote on Wed, 18 Sep 2019 15:56:26
+0800:
> Macronix AD series support using power down command to
> enter a minimum power consumption state.
>
> MTD default _suspend/_resume function replacement by
> manufacturer postponed initialization.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mason Yang <masonccyang@mxic.com.tw>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_macronix.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_macronix.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_macronix.c
> index 991c636..99a7b2e 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_macronix.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_macronix.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
> #define MXIC_BLOCK_PROTECTION_ALL_LOCK 0x38
> #define MXIC_BLOCK_PROTECTION_ALL_UNLOCK 0x0
>
> +#define NAND_CMD_POWER_DOWN 0xB9
> +
> struct nand_onfi_vendor_macronix {
> u8 reserved;
> u8 reliability_func;
> @@ -78,6 +80,12 @@ static void macronix_nand_onfi_init(struct nand_chip *chip)
> "MX30UF4G28AC",
> };
>
> +static const char * const nand_power_down[] = {
> + "MX30LF1G28AD",
> + "MX30LF2G28AD",
> + "MX30LF4G28AD",
> +};
> +
> static void macronix_nand_fix_broken_get_timings(struct nand_chip *chip)
> {
> unsigned int i;
> @@ -144,8 +152,64 @@ static int mxic_nand_unlock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +int nand_power_down_op(struct nand_chip *chip)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (nand_has_exec_op(chip)) {
> + struct nand_op_instr instrs[] = {
> + NAND_OP_CMD(NAND_CMD_POWER_DOWN, 0),
> + };
> +
> + struct nand_operation op = NAND_OPERATION(chip->cur_cs, instrs);
> +
> + ret = nand_exec_op(chip, &op);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + } else {
> + chip->legacy.cmdfunc(chip, NAND_CMD_POWER_DOWN, -1, -1);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int mxic_nand_suspend(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> +{
> + struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
> +
> + mutex_lock(&chip->lock);
> +
> + nand_select_target(chip, 0);
> + nand_power_down_op(chip);
> + nand_deselect_target(chip);
> +
> + chip->suspend = 1;
> + mutex_unlock(&chip->lock);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void mxic_nand_resume(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> +{
> + struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
> +
> + mutex_lock(&chip->lock);
> + // toggle #CS pin to resume NAND device
C++ style comments are forbidden in code.
> + nand_select_target(chip, 0);
On several NAND controllers there is no way to act on the CS line
without actually writing bytes to the NAND chip. So basically this
is very likely to not work.
> + ndelay(20);
Is this delay known somewhere? Is this purely experimental?
> + nand_deselect_target(chip);
> +
> + if (chip->suspend)
> + chip->suspended = 0;
> + else
> + pr_err("%s call for a chip which is not in suspended state\n",
> + __func__);
> + mutex_unlock(&chip->lock);
> +}
> +
> /*
> - * Macronix AC series support using SET/GET_FEATURES to change
> + * Macronix AC and AD series support using SET/GET_FEATURES to change
> * Block Protection and Unprotection.
> *
> * MTD call-back function replacement by manufacturer postponed
> @@ -163,6 +227,18 @@ static void macronix_nand_post_init(struct nand_chip *chip)
> }
> }
>
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(nand_power_down); i++) {
> + if (!strcmp(nand_power_down[i], chip->parameters.model)) {
> + blockprotected = 1;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (i < ARRAY_SIZE(nand_power_down)) {
> + mtd->_suspend = mxic_nand_suspend;
> + mtd->_resume = mxic_nand_resume;
> + }
> +
> if (blockprotected && chip->parameters.supports_set_get_features) {
> bitmap_set(chip->parameters.set_feature_list,
> ONFI_FEATURE_ADDR_MXIC_PROTECTION, 1);
Thanks,
Miquèl
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Mason Yang <masonccyang@mxic.com.tw>
Cc: richard@nod.at, marek.vasut@gmail.com, dwmw2@infradead.org,
bbrezillon@kernel.org, computersforpeace@gmail.com,
vigneshr@ti.com, marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com,
juliensu@mxic.com.tw, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
frieder.schrempf@kontron.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/3] mtd: rawnand: Add support Macronix power down mode
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 10:45:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191007104501.1b4ed8ed@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1568793387-25199-3-git-send-email-masonccyang@mxic.com.tw>
Hi Mason,
Mason Yang <masonccyang@mxic.com.tw> wrote on Wed, 18 Sep 2019 15:56:26
+0800:
> Macronix AD series support using power down command to
> enter a minimum power consumption state.
>
> MTD default _suspend/_resume function replacement by
> manufacturer postponed initialization.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mason Yang <masonccyang@mxic.com.tw>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_macronix.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_macronix.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_macronix.c
> index 991c636..99a7b2e 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_macronix.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_macronix.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
> #define MXIC_BLOCK_PROTECTION_ALL_LOCK 0x38
> #define MXIC_BLOCK_PROTECTION_ALL_UNLOCK 0x0
>
> +#define NAND_CMD_POWER_DOWN 0xB9
> +
> struct nand_onfi_vendor_macronix {
> u8 reserved;
> u8 reliability_func;
> @@ -78,6 +80,12 @@ static void macronix_nand_onfi_init(struct nand_chip *chip)
> "MX30UF4G28AC",
> };
>
> +static const char * const nand_power_down[] = {
> + "MX30LF1G28AD",
> + "MX30LF2G28AD",
> + "MX30LF4G28AD",
> +};
> +
> static void macronix_nand_fix_broken_get_timings(struct nand_chip *chip)
> {
> unsigned int i;
> @@ -144,8 +152,64 @@ static int mxic_nand_unlock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +int nand_power_down_op(struct nand_chip *chip)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (nand_has_exec_op(chip)) {
> + struct nand_op_instr instrs[] = {
> + NAND_OP_CMD(NAND_CMD_POWER_DOWN, 0),
> + };
> +
> + struct nand_operation op = NAND_OPERATION(chip->cur_cs, instrs);
> +
> + ret = nand_exec_op(chip, &op);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + } else {
> + chip->legacy.cmdfunc(chip, NAND_CMD_POWER_DOWN, -1, -1);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int mxic_nand_suspend(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> +{
> + struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
> +
> + mutex_lock(&chip->lock);
> +
> + nand_select_target(chip, 0);
> + nand_power_down_op(chip);
> + nand_deselect_target(chip);
> +
> + chip->suspend = 1;
> + mutex_unlock(&chip->lock);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void mxic_nand_resume(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> +{
> + struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
> +
> + mutex_lock(&chip->lock);
> + // toggle #CS pin to resume NAND device
C++ style comments are forbidden in code.
> + nand_select_target(chip, 0);
On several NAND controllers there is no way to act on the CS line
without actually writing bytes to the NAND chip. So basically this
is very likely to not work.
> + ndelay(20);
Is this delay known somewhere? Is this purely experimental?
> + nand_deselect_target(chip);
> +
> + if (chip->suspend)
> + chip->suspended = 0;
> + else
> + pr_err("%s call for a chip which is not in suspended state\n",
> + __func__);
> + mutex_unlock(&chip->lock);
> +}
> +
> /*
> - * Macronix AC series support using SET/GET_FEATURES to change
> + * Macronix AC and AD series support using SET/GET_FEATURES to change
> * Block Protection and Unprotection.
> *
> * MTD call-back function replacement by manufacturer postponed
> @@ -163,6 +227,18 @@ static void macronix_nand_post_init(struct nand_chip *chip)
> }
> }
>
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(nand_power_down); i++) {
> + if (!strcmp(nand_power_down[i], chip->parameters.model)) {
> + blockprotected = 1;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (i < ARRAY_SIZE(nand_power_down)) {
> + mtd->_suspend = mxic_nand_suspend;
> + mtd->_resume = mxic_nand_resume;
> + }
> +
> if (blockprotected && chip->parameters.supports_set_get_features) {
> bitmap_set(chip->parameters.set_feature_list,
> ONFI_FEATURE_ADDR_MXIC_PROTECTION, 1);
Thanks,
Miquèl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-07 8:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-18 7:56 [PATCH RFC 1/3] mtd: rawnand: Add support manufacturer postponed initialization Mason Yang
2019-09-18 7:56 ` Mason Yang
2019-09-18 7:56 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] mtd: rawnand: Add support Macronix Block Protection function Mason Yang
2019-09-18 7:56 ` Mason Yang
2019-10-07 8:45 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-10-07 8:45 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-10-07 9:24 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-10-07 9:24 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-10-08 2:33 ` masonccyang
2019-10-08 2:33 ` masonccyang
2019-10-08 15:02 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-10-08 15:02 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-10-15 6:47 ` masonccyang
2019-10-15 6:47 ` masonccyang
[not found] ` <OFB4F10613.467EB346-ON48258494.0020403E-48258494.002550A2@LocalDomain>
2019-10-21 7:23 ` masonccyang
2019-10-21 7:23 ` masonccyang
2019-10-21 7:44 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-10-21 7:44 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-10-21 8:40 ` masonccyang
2019-10-21 8:40 ` masonccyang
2019-10-21 8:56 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-10-21 8:56 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-10-21 9:07 ` masonccyang
2019-10-21 9:07 ` masonccyang
2019-09-18 7:56 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] mtd: rawnand: Add support Macronix power down mode Mason Yang
2019-09-18 7:56 ` Mason Yang
2019-10-07 8:45 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2019-10-07 8:45 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-10-08 2:06 ` masonccyang
2019-10-08 2:06 ` masonccyang
2019-10-08 7:28 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-10-08 7:28 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-10-15 2:33 ` masonccyang
2019-10-15 2:33 ` masonccyang
2019-10-15 7:56 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-10-15 7:56 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-10-16 6:55 ` masonccyang
2019-10-16 6:55 ` masonccyang
2019-10-25 3:11 ` masonccyang
2019-10-25 3:11 ` masonccyang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191007104501.1b4ed8ed@xps13 \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=bbrezillon@kernel.org \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=frieder.schrempf@kontron.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=juliensu@mxic.com.tw \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=masonccyang@mxic.com.tw \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.