From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Hui Song <hui.song_1@nxp.com>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>, Li Yang <leoyang.li@nxp.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] gpio/mpc8xxx: change irq handler from chained to normal
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 17:36:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191009163628.GH25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191009083021.33529-1-hui.song_1@nxp.com>
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 04:30:21PM +0800, Hui Song wrote:
> From: Song Hui <hui.song_1@nxp.com>
>
> More than one gpio controllers can share one interrupt, change the
> driver to request shared irq.
>
> While this will work, it will mess up userspace accounting of the number
> of interrupts per second in tools such as vmstat. The reason is that
> for every GPIO interrupt, /proc/interrupts records the count against GIC
> interrupt 68 or 69, as well as the GPIO itself. So, for every GPIO
> interrupt, the total number of interrupts that the system has seen
> increments by two
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Tudor <Laurentiu.Tudor@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Marginean <alexandru.marginean@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Song Hui <hui.song_1@nxp.com>
> ---
> Changes in v6:
> - change request_irq to devm_request_irq and add commit message.
> Changes in v5:
> - add traverse every bit function.
> Changes in v4:
> - convert 'pr_err' to 'dev_err'.
> Changes in v3:
> - update the patch description.
> Changes in v2:
> - delete the compatible of ls1088a.
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c
> index 16a47de..f0be284 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> #include <linux/irq.h>
> #include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
> #include <linux/bitops.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>
> #define MPC8XXX_GPIO_PINS 32
>
> @@ -127,20 +128,20 @@ static int mpc8xxx_gpio_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset)
> return -ENXIO;
> }
>
> -static void mpc8xxx_gpio_irq_cascade(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +static irqreturn_t mpc8xxx_gpio_irq_cascade(int irq, void *data)
> {
> - struct mpc8xxx_gpio_chip *mpc8xxx_gc = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> - struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> + struct mpc8xxx_gpio_chip *mpc8xxx_gc = data;
> struct gpio_chip *gc = &mpc8xxx_gc->gc;
> unsigned int mask;
This needs to be "unsigned long mask;" for for_each_set_bit() not to
complain.
> + int i;
>
> mask = gc->read_reg(mpc8xxx_gc->regs + GPIO_IER)
> & gc->read_reg(mpc8xxx_gc->regs + GPIO_IMR);
> - if (mask)
> + for_each_set_bit(i, &mask, 32)
> generic_handle_irq(irq_linear_revmap(mpc8xxx_gc->irq,
> - 32 - ffs(mask)));
> - if (chip->irq_eoi)
> - chip->irq_eoi(&desc->irq_data);
> + 31 - i));
> +
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
> static void mpc8xxx_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
> @@ -388,8 +389,8 @@ static int mpc8xxx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> ret = gpiochip_add_data(gc, mpc8xxx_gc);
> if (ret) {
> - pr_err("%pOF: GPIO chip registration failed with status %d\n",
> - np, ret);
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%pOF: GPIO chip registration failed with status %d\n",
> + np, ret);
> goto err;
> }
>
> @@ -409,8 +410,16 @@ static int mpc8xxx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (devtype->gpio_dir_in_init)
> devtype->gpio_dir_in_init(gc);
>
> - irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(mpc8xxx_gc->irqn,
> - mpc8xxx_gpio_irq_cascade, mpc8xxx_gc);
> + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, mpc8xxx_gc->irqn,
> + mpc8xxx_gpio_irq_cascade,
> + IRQF_NO_THREAD | IRQF_SHARED, "gpio-cascade",
> + mpc8xxx_gc);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s: failed to devm_request_irq(%d), ret = %d\n",
> + np->full_name, mpc8xxx_gc->irqn, ret);
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> err:
> iounmap(mpc8xxx_gc->regs);
> --
> 2.9.5
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Hui Song <hui.song_1@nxp.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Li Yang <leoyang.li@nxp.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] gpio/mpc8xxx: change irq handler from chained to normal
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 17:36:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191009163628.GH25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191009083021.33529-1-hui.song_1@nxp.com>
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 04:30:21PM +0800, Hui Song wrote:
> From: Song Hui <hui.song_1@nxp.com>
>
> More than one gpio controllers can share one interrupt, change the
> driver to request shared irq.
>
> While this will work, it will mess up userspace accounting of the number
> of interrupts per second in tools such as vmstat. The reason is that
> for every GPIO interrupt, /proc/interrupts records the count against GIC
> interrupt 68 or 69, as well as the GPIO itself. So, for every GPIO
> interrupt, the total number of interrupts that the system has seen
> increments by two
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Tudor <Laurentiu.Tudor@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Marginean <alexandru.marginean@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Song Hui <hui.song_1@nxp.com>
> ---
> Changes in v6:
> - change request_irq to devm_request_irq and add commit message.
> Changes in v5:
> - add traverse every bit function.
> Changes in v4:
> - convert 'pr_err' to 'dev_err'.
> Changes in v3:
> - update the patch description.
> Changes in v2:
> - delete the compatible of ls1088a.
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c
> index 16a47de..f0be284 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> #include <linux/irq.h>
> #include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
> #include <linux/bitops.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>
> #define MPC8XXX_GPIO_PINS 32
>
> @@ -127,20 +128,20 @@ static int mpc8xxx_gpio_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset)
> return -ENXIO;
> }
>
> -static void mpc8xxx_gpio_irq_cascade(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +static irqreturn_t mpc8xxx_gpio_irq_cascade(int irq, void *data)
> {
> - struct mpc8xxx_gpio_chip *mpc8xxx_gc = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> - struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> + struct mpc8xxx_gpio_chip *mpc8xxx_gc = data;
> struct gpio_chip *gc = &mpc8xxx_gc->gc;
> unsigned int mask;
This needs to be "unsigned long mask;" for for_each_set_bit() not to
complain.
> + int i;
>
> mask = gc->read_reg(mpc8xxx_gc->regs + GPIO_IER)
> & gc->read_reg(mpc8xxx_gc->regs + GPIO_IMR);
> - if (mask)
> + for_each_set_bit(i, &mask, 32)
> generic_handle_irq(irq_linear_revmap(mpc8xxx_gc->irq,
> - 32 - ffs(mask)));
> - if (chip->irq_eoi)
> - chip->irq_eoi(&desc->irq_data);
> + 31 - i));
> +
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
> static void mpc8xxx_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
> @@ -388,8 +389,8 @@ static int mpc8xxx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> ret = gpiochip_add_data(gc, mpc8xxx_gc);
> if (ret) {
> - pr_err("%pOF: GPIO chip registration failed with status %d\n",
> - np, ret);
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%pOF: GPIO chip registration failed with status %d\n",
> + np, ret);
> goto err;
> }
>
> @@ -409,8 +410,16 @@ static int mpc8xxx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (devtype->gpio_dir_in_init)
> devtype->gpio_dir_in_init(gc);
>
> - irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(mpc8xxx_gc->irqn,
> - mpc8xxx_gpio_irq_cascade, mpc8xxx_gc);
> + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, mpc8xxx_gc->irqn,
> + mpc8xxx_gpio_irq_cascade,
> + IRQF_NO_THREAD | IRQF_SHARED, "gpio-cascade",
> + mpc8xxx_gc);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s: failed to devm_request_irq(%d), ret = %d\n",
> + np->full_name, mpc8xxx_gc->irqn, ret);
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> err:
> iounmap(mpc8xxx_gc->regs);
> --
> 2.9.5
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Russell King - ARM Linux admin" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: "Hui Song" <hui.song_1@nxp.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Li Yang <leoyang.li@nxp.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] gpio/mpc8xxx: change irq handler from chained to normal
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 17:36:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191009163628.GH25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
Message-ID: <20191009163629.ghn5_8QwJoZuAhe6k7SSE95P_pzsOhbvHKXFE_dNw50@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191009083021.33529-1-hui.song_1@nxp.com>
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 04:30:21PM +0800, Hui Song wrote:
> From: Song Hui <hui.song_1@nxp.com>
>
> More than one gpio controllers can share one interrupt, change the
> driver to request shared irq.
>
> While this will work, it will mess up userspace accounting of the number
> of interrupts per second in tools such as vmstat. The reason is that
> for every GPIO interrupt, /proc/interrupts records the count against GIC
> interrupt 68 or 69, as well as the GPIO itself. So, for every GPIO
> interrupt, the total number of interrupts that the system has seen
> increments by two
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Tudor <Laurentiu.Tudor@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Marginean <alexandru.marginean@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Song Hui <hui.song_1@nxp.com>
> ---
> Changes in v6:
> - change request_irq to devm_request_irq and add commit message.
> Changes in v5:
> - add traverse every bit function.
> Changes in v4:
> - convert 'pr_err' to 'dev_err'.
> Changes in v3:
> - update the patch description.
> Changes in v2:
> - delete the compatible of ls1088a.
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c
> index 16a47de..f0be284 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> #include <linux/irq.h>
> #include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
> #include <linux/bitops.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>
> #define MPC8XXX_GPIO_PINS 32
>
> @@ -127,20 +128,20 @@ static int mpc8xxx_gpio_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset)
> return -ENXIO;
> }
>
> -static void mpc8xxx_gpio_irq_cascade(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +static irqreturn_t mpc8xxx_gpio_irq_cascade(int irq, void *data)
> {
> - struct mpc8xxx_gpio_chip *mpc8xxx_gc = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> - struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> + struct mpc8xxx_gpio_chip *mpc8xxx_gc = data;
> struct gpio_chip *gc = &mpc8xxx_gc->gc;
> unsigned int mask;
This needs to be "unsigned long mask;" for for_each_set_bit() not to
complain.
> + int i;
>
> mask = gc->read_reg(mpc8xxx_gc->regs + GPIO_IER)
> & gc->read_reg(mpc8xxx_gc->regs + GPIO_IMR);
> - if (mask)
> + for_each_set_bit(i, &mask, 32)
> generic_handle_irq(irq_linear_revmap(mpc8xxx_gc->irq,
> - 32 - ffs(mask)));
> - if (chip->irq_eoi)
> - chip->irq_eoi(&desc->irq_data);
> + 31 - i));
> +
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
> static void mpc8xxx_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
> @@ -388,8 +389,8 @@ static int mpc8xxx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> ret = gpiochip_add_data(gc, mpc8xxx_gc);
> if (ret) {
> - pr_err("%pOF: GPIO chip registration failed with status %d\n",
> - np, ret);
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%pOF: GPIO chip registration failed with status %d\n",
> + np, ret);
> goto err;
> }
>
> @@ -409,8 +410,16 @@ static int mpc8xxx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (devtype->gpio_dir_in_init)
> devtype->gpio_dir_in_init(gc);
>
> - irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(mpc8xxx_gc->irqn,
> - mpc8xxx_gpio_irq_cascade, mpc8xxx_gc);
> + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, mpc8xxx_gc->irqn,
> + mpc8xxx_gpio_irq_cascade,
> + IRQF_NO_THREAD | IRQF_SHARED, "gpio-cascade",
> + mpc8xxx_gc);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s: failed to devm_request_irq(%d), ret = %d\n",
> + np->full_name, mpc8xxx_gc->irqn, ret);
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> err:
> iounmap(mpc8xxx_gc->regs);
> --
> 2.9.5
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
--
RMK's Patch system: https://secure-web.cisco.com/1u1yH5XF9ZOox0jqsrnwRJ5a1pJOcqm5qbE3C2dUsPGkfudVKvva1K0PgdWoYmy5dOufZTE4Kw3f2LTs-6pVT9W22cGj0QQkiNNRrkfe6uH8MOOrD-AduBS4XkwSCUNdo_6YdeDtaUtiXRPvLDnRYwSVPeR_F5CQCaACnsONIYJmNLaiH5Y_9PxzzipIMnS37-DqJROtHtZlI5ZAl5jdkYGMX5FsnN19g-dfYKcTdT-7gYdpEfPLhQMQ0VXSS44FOQUnRRYMzICuYoaLB5PeTOBexrCIKczGqbdpcJ39mGB6J0Nm5wRRx-iWO2ZS-fj91fEQHFQ1hNNaryerh9U3RVXl3hRq1EROcv-jlatz3Kx-JtCh3QJgoiI8GzZRHb0GUsfggvORJPYpKjBduTqY_F3qqu1S9I2FEpZPEaEnUr5fE2rzrTArumzUGVXnHljpv62ZBfc4EC9rRSzYLfpMG5w/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.armlinux.org.uk%2Fdeveloper%2Fpatches%2F
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-09 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-09 8:30 [PATCH v6] gpio/mpc8xxx: change irq handler from chained to normal Hui Song
2019-10-09 8:30 ` Hui Song
2019-10-09 16:33 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2019-10-09 16:33 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2019-10-09 16:33 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2019-10-09 16:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin [this message]
2019-10-09 16:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-10-09 16:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-09-27 3:15 Hui Song
2019-09-27 3:15 ` Hui Song
2019-09-27 4:33 ` kbuild test robot
2019-09-27 4:33 ` kbuild test robot
2019-09-27 4:33 ` kbuild test robot
2019-09-27 4:53 ` kbuild test robot
2019-09-27 4:53 ` kbuild test robot
2019-09-27 4:53 ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-03 10:19 ` Linus Walleij
2019-10-03 10:19 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191009163628.GH25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hui.song_1@nxp.com \
--cc=leoyang.li@nxp.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.