Re: lan78xx and phy_state_machine - Russell King

From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Cc: Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
	Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@gmx.net>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: lan78xx and phy_state_machine
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 23:09:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191015220925.GW25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <524267e6-df8e-d884-aeef-1ed8700e4e58@gmail.com>

On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 09:38:22PM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> On 15.10.2019 00:12, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 10:20:15PM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> >> On 14.10.2019 21:51, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> >>> [add more recipients]
> >>>
> >>> Am 14.10.19 um 21:25 schrieb Daniel Wagner:
> >>>> Moving the phy_prepare_link() up in phy_connect_direct() ensures that
> >>>> phydev->adjust_link is set when the phy_check_link_status() is called.
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> >>>> b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c index 9d2bbb13293e..2a61812bcb0d 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> >>>> @@ -951,11 +951,12 @@ int phy_connect_direct(struct net_device *dev,
> >>>> struct phy_device *phydev, if (!dev) return -EINVAL;
> >>>>
> >>>> +       phy_prepare_link(phydev, handler);
> >>>> +
> >>>>         rc = phy_attach_direct(dev, phydev, phydev->dev_flags, interface);
> >>>>         if (rc)
> >>
> >> If phy_attach_direct() fails we may have to reset phydev->adjust_link to NULL,
> >> as we do in phy_disconnect(). Apart from that change looks good to me.
> > 
> > Sorry, but it doesn't look good to me.
> > 
> > I think there's a deeper question here - why is the phy state machine
> > trying to call the link change function during attach?
> After your comment I had a closer look at the lm78xx driver and few things
> look suspicious:
> 
> - lan78xx_phy_init() (incl. the call to phy_connect_direct()) is called
>   after register_netdev(). This may cause races.

That isn't a problem.  We have lots of network device drivers that do
this - in their open() function.

> - The following is wrong, irq = 0 doesn't mean polling.
>   PHY_POLL is defined as -1. Also in case of irq = 0 phy_interrupt_is_valid()
>   returns true.
> 
> 	/* if phyirq is not set, use polling mode in phylib */
> 	if (dev->domain_data.phyirq > 0)
> 		phydev->irq = dev->domain_data.phyirq;
> 	else
> 		phydev->irq = 0;

Also unlikely to be the cause of this problem.  phy_connect_direct() is
called with an adjust link function, which is set via
phy_prepare_link() in phy_connect_direct(), before interrupts are even
considered.

So, the window for the bug is somewhere before the call to
phy_prepare_link() in phy_connect_direct(), but after
lan78xx_mdio_init().

> - Manually calling genphy_config_aneg() in lan78xx_phy_init() isn't
>   needed, however this should not cause our problem.

Again, way after the point where phydev->adjust_link is non-NULL,
so this can't be it.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel