All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Why do we still disable mke2fs 64bit support?
@ 2019-10-21  9:41 Marco Felsch
  2019-10-21 10:24 ` Adrian Bunk
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marco Felsch @ 2019-10-21  9:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: openembedded-core; +Cc: mfe, kernel

Hi,

during a initial system-setup script the mke2fs tools complains about
the missing 64bit support:

8<----------------------------------------------------------------------
mke2fs 1.44.5 (15-Dec-2018)
64-bit filesystem support is not enabled.  The larger fields afforded by
this feature enable full-strength checksumming. Pass -O 64bit to rectify.
8<----------------------------------------------------------------------

Other build tools e.g. PTXdist or Buildroot don't modify the build-in
config. I know in the early days this feature break something but
shouldn't we (re-)think this decision?

Regards,
  Marco

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Why do we still disable mke2fs 64bit support?
  2019-10-21  9:41 Why do we still disable mke2fs 64bit support? Marco Felsch
@ 2019-10-21 10:24 ` Adrian Bunk
  2019-10-21 11:40   ` Marco Felsch
  2019-10-24 17:45   ` Tom Rini
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Bunk @ 2019-10-21 10:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marco Felsch; +Cc: mfe, kernel, openembedded-core

On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 11:41:49AM +0200, Marco Felsch wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> during a initial system-setup script the mke2fs tools complains about
> the missing 64bit support:
> 
> 8<----------------------------------------------------------------------
> mke2fs 1.44.5 (15-Dec-2018)
> 64-bit filesystem support is not enabled.  The larger fields afforded by
> this feature enable full-strength checksumming. Pass -O 64bit to rectify.
> 8<----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Other build tools e.g. PTXdist or Buildroot don't modify the build-in
> config. I know in the early days this feature break something but
> shouldn't we (re-)think this decision?

Already fixed in zeus:
https://github.com/openembedded/openembedded-core/commit/f5edce401cfb31ebd0200adaba9a201caf7ea705

> Regards,
>   Marco

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Why do we still disable mke2fs 64bit support?
  2019-10-21 10:24 ` Adrian Bunk
@ 2019-10-21 11:40   ` Marco Felsch
  2019-10-24 17:45   ` Tom Rini
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marco Felsch @ 2019-10-21 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Adrian Bunk; +Cc: kernel, openembedded-core

On 19-10-21 13:24, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 11:41:49AM +0200, Marco Felsch wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > during a initial system-setup script the mke2fs tools complains about
> > the missing 64bit support:
> > 
> > 8<----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > mke2fs 1.44.5 (15-Dec-2018)
> > 64-bit filesystem support is not enabled.  The larger fields afforded by
> > this feature enable full-strength checksumming. Pass -O 64bit to rectify.
> > 8<----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > Other build tools e.g. PTXdist or Buildroot don't modify the build-in
> > config. I know in the early days this feature break something but
> > shouldn't we (re-)think this decision?
> 
> Already fixed in zeus:
> https://github.com/openembedded/openembedded-core/commit/f5edce401cfb31ebd0200adaba9a201caf7ea705

Thanks for the link.

Regards,
  Marco 

> > Regards,
> >   Marco
> 
> cu
> Adrian
> 
> -- 
> 
>        "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
>         of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
>        "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
>                                        Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
> 
> 

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Why do we still disable mke2fs 64bit support?
  2019-10-21 10:24 ` Adrian Bunk
  2019-10-21 11:40   ` Marco Felsch
@ 2019-10-24 17:45   ` Tom Rini
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2019-10-24 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Adrian Bunk; +Cc: mfe, kernel, openembedded-core

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1272 bytes --]

On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 01:24:40PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 11:41:49AM +0200, Marco Felsch wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > during a initial system-setup script the mke2fs tools complains about
> > the missing 64bit support:
> > 
> > 8<----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > mke2fs 1.44.5 (15-Dec-2018)
> > 64-bit filesystem support is not enabled.  The larger fields afforded by
> > this feature enable full-strength checksumming. Pass -O 64bit to rectify.
> > 8<----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > Other build tools e.g. PTXdist or Buildroot don't modify the build-in
> > config. I know in the early days this feature break something but
> > shouldn't we (re-)think this decision?
> 
> Already fixed in zeus:
> https://github.com/openembedded/openembedded-core/commit/f5edce401cfb31ebd0200adaba9a201caf7ea705

I suppose as this point we just hope that there's not going to be still
more boards found in the wild where U-Boot is old enough to silently
corrupt on write or fail to find things on read.

And with my cranky U-Boot hat on, is there another new on-by-default
feature that'll prevent writing (or worse, reading) ext4 again?

-- 
Tom

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 849 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-10-24 17:45 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-10-21  9:41 Why do we still disable mke2fs 64bit support? Marco Felsch
2019-10-21 10:24 ` Adrian Bunk
2019-10-21 11:40   ` Marco Felsch
2019-10-24 17:45   ` Tom Rini

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.