All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org
Cc: "David (ChunMing) Zhou"
	<David1.Zhou-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied-cv59FeDIM0c@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org,
	"Nicolas Waisman" <nico-0AWUsSXRRvXQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel-/w4YWyX8dFk@public.gmane.org>,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>,
	"Will Deacon" <will-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/radeon: Handle workqueue allocation failure
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 12:04:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191025110450.10474-1-will@kernel.org> (raw)

In the highly unlikely event that we fail to allocate the "radeon-crtc"
workqueue, we should bail cleanly rather than blindly march on with a
NULL pointer installed for the 'flip_queue' field of the 'radeon_crtc'
structure.

This was reported previously by Nicolas, but I don't think his fix was
correct:

Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: "David (ChunMing) Zhou" <David1.Zhou@amd.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Reported-by: Nicolas Waisman <nico@semmle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CADJ_3a8WFrs5NouXNqS5WYe7rebFP+_A5CheeqAyD_p7DFJJcg@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---

Compile-tested only.

 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c | 10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c
index e81b01f8db90..3e4ef1380fca 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c
@@ -672,17 +672,25 @@ static void radeon_crtc_init(struct drm_device *dev, int index)
 {
 	struct radeon_device *rdev = dev->dev_private;
 	struct radeon_crtc *radeon_crtc;
+	struct workqueue_struct *wq;
 	int i;
 
 	radeon_crtc = kzalloc(sizeof(struct radeon_crtc) + (RADEONFB_CONN_LIMIT * sizeof(struct drm_connector *)), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (radeon_crtc == NULL)
 		return;
 
+	wq = alloc_workqueue("radeon-crtc", WQ_HIGHPRI, 0);
+	if (unlikely(!wq)) {
+		kfree(radeon_crtc);
+		return;
+	}
+
 	drm_crtc_init(dev, &radeon_crtc->base, &radeon_crtc_funcs);
 
 	drm_mode_crtc_set_gamma_size(&radeon_crtc->base, 256);
 	radeon_crtc->crtc_id = index;
-	radeon_crtc->flip_queue = alloc_workqueue("radeon-crtc", WQ_HIGHPRI, 0);
+	radeon_crtc->flip_queue = wq;
+
 	rdev->mode_info.crtcs[index] = radeon_crtc;
 
 	if (rdev->family >= CHIP_BONAIRE) {
-- 
2.24.0.rc0.303.g954a862665-goog

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "David (ChunMing) Zhou" <David1.Zhou@amd.com>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Nicolas Waisman" <nico@semmle.com>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/radeon: Handle workqueue allocation failure
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 12:04:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191025110450.10474-1-will@kernel.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20191025110450.msr5zOMrkkIyVRoRI9WJcZUFHFv3GJWHHB49E2uSq2A@z> (raw)

In the highly unlikely event that we fail to allocate the "radeon-crtc"
workqueue, we should bail cleanly rather than blindly march on with a
NULL pointer installed for the 'flip_queue' field of the 'radeon_crtc'
structure.

This was reported previously by Nicolas, but I don't think his fix was
correct:

Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: "David (ChunMing) Zhou" <David1.Zhou@amd.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Reported-by: Nicolas Waisman <nico@semmle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CADJ_3a8WFrs5NouXNqS5WYe7rebFP+_A5CheeqAyD_p7DFJJcg@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---

Compile-tested only.

 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c | 10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c
index e81b01f8db90..3e4ef1380fca 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c
@@ -672,17 +672,25 @@ static void radeon_crtc_init(struct drm_device *dev, int index)
 {
 	struct radeon_device *rdev = dev->dev_private;
 	struct radeon_crtc *radeon_crtc;
+	struct workqueue_struct *wq;
 	int i;
 
 	radeon_crtc = kzalloc(sizeof(struct radeon_crtc) + (RADEONFB_CONN_LIMIT * sizeof(struct drm_connector *)), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (radeon_crtc == NULL)
 		return;
 
+	wq = alloc_workqueue("radeon-crtc", WQ_HIGHPRI, 0);
+	if (unlikely(!wq)) {
+		kfree(radeon_crtc);
+		return;
+	}
+
 	drm_crtc_init(dev, &radeon_crtc->base, &radeon_crtc_funcs);
 
 	drm_mode_crtc_set_gamma_size(&radeon_crtc->base, 256);
 	radeon_crtc->crtc_id = index;
-	radeon_crtc->flip_queue = alloc_workqueue("radeon-crtc", WQ_HIGHPRI, 0);
+	radeon_crtc->flip_queue = wq;
+
 	rdev->mode_info.crtcs[index] = radeon_crtc;
 
 	if (rdev->family >= CHIP_BONAIRE) {
-- 
2.24.0.rc0.303.g954a862665-goog

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Nicolas Waisman" <nico@semmle.com>,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/radeon: Handle workqueue allocation failure
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 12:04:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191025110450.10474-1-will@kernel.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20191025110450.Zv8wNngameJt4ogN1GJdJ7wPO_rcr7vHnt5xIMfTvqw@z> (raw)

In the highly unlikely event that we fail to allocate the "radeon-crtc"
workqueue, we should bail cleanly rather than blindly march on with a
NULL pointer installed for the 'flip_queue' field of the 'radeon_crtc'
structure.

This was reported previously by Nicolas, but I don't think his fix was
correct:

Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: "David (ChunMing) Zhou" <David1.Zhou@amd.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Reported-by: Nicolas Waisman <nico@semmle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CADJ_3a8WFrs5NouXNqS5WYe7rebFP+_A5CheeqAyD_p7DFJJcg@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---

Compile-tested only.

 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c | 10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c
index e81b01f8db90..3e4ef1380fca 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c
@@ -672,17 +672,25 @@ static void radeon_crtc_init(struct drm_device *dev, int index)
 {
 	struct radeon_device *rdev = dev->dev_private;
 	struct radeon_crtc *radeon_crtc;
+	struct workqueue_struct *wq;
 	int i;
 
 	radeon_crtc = kzalloc(sizeof(struct radeon_crtc) + (RADEONFB_CONN_LIMIT * sizeof(struct drm_connector *)), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (radeon_crtc == NULL)
 		return;
 
+	wq = alloc_workqueue("radeon-crtc", WQ_HIGHPRI, 0);
+	if (unlikely(!wq)) {
+		kfree(radeon_crtc);
+		return;
+	}
+
 	drm_crtc_init(dev, &radeon_crtc->base, &radeon_crtc_funcs);
 
 	drm_mode_crtc_set_gamma_size(&radeon_crtc->base, 256);
 	radeon_crtc->crtc_id = index;
-	radeon_crtc->flip_queue = alloc_workqueue("radeon-crtc", WQ_HIGHPRI, 0);
+	radeon_crtc->flip_queue = wq;
+
 	rdev->mode_info.crtcs[index] = radeon_crtc;
 
 	if (rdev->family >= CHIP_BONAIRE) {
-- 
2.24.0.rc0.303.g954a862665-goog

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"David (ChunMing) Zhou" <David1.Zhou@amd.com>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	"Nicolas Waisman" <nico@semmle.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/radeon: Handle workqueue allocation failure
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 12:04:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191025110450.10474-1-will@kernel.org> (raw)

In the highly unlikely event that we fail to allocate the "radeon-crtc"
workqueue, we should bail cleanly rather than blindly march on with a
NULL pointer installed for the 'flip_queue' field of the 'radeon_crtc'
structure.

This was reported previously by Nicolas, but I don't think his fix was
correct:

Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: "David (ChunMing) Zhou" <David1.Zhou@amd.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Reported-by: Nicolas Waisman <nico@semmle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CADJ_3a8WFrs5NouXNqS5WYe7rebFP+_A5CheeqAyD_p7DFJJcg@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---

Compile-tested only.

 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c | 10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c
index e81b01f8db90..3e4ef1380fca 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c
@@ -672,17 +672,25 @@ static void radeon_crtc_init(struct drm_device *dev, int index)
 {
 	struct radeon_device *rdev = dev->dev_private;
 	struct radeon_crtc *radeon_crtc;
+	struct workqueue_struct *wq;
 	int i;
 
 	radeon_crtc = kzalloc(sizeof(struct radeon_crtc) + (RADEONFB_CONN_LIMIT * sizeof(struct drm_connector *)), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (radeon_crtc == NULL)
 		return;
 
+	wq = alloc_workqueue("radeon-crtc", WQ_HIGHPRI, 0);
+	if (unlikely(!wq)) {
+		kfree(radeon_crtc);
+		return;
+	}
+
 	drm_crtc_init(dev, &radeon_crtc->base, &radeon_crtc_funcs);
 
 	drm_mode_crtc_set_gamma_size(&radeon_crtc->base, 256);
 	radeon_crtc->crtc_id = index;
-	radeon_crtc->flip_queue = alloc_workqueue("radeon-crtc", WQ_HIGHPRI, 0);
+	radeon_crtc->flip_queue = wq;
+
 	rdev->mode_info.crtcs[index] = radeon_crtc;
 
 	if (rdev->family >= CHIP_BONAIRE) {
-- 
2.24.0.rc0.303.g954a862665-goog


             reply	other threads:[~2019-10-25 11:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-25 11:04 Will Deacon [this message]
2019-10-25 11:04 ` [PATCH] drm/radeon: Handle workqueue allocation failure Will Deacon
2019-10-25 11:04 ` Will Deacon
2019-10-25 11:04 ` Will Deacon
2019-10-25 16:06 ` Michel Dänzer
2019-10-25 16:06   ` Michel Dänzer
2019-10-25 16:06   ` Michel Dänzer
2019-10-25 16:18   ` Will Deacon
2019-10-25 16:18     ` Will Deacon
2019-10-25 16:18     ` Will Deacon
2019-10-25 16:20     ` Michel Dänzer
2019-10-25 16:20       ` Michel Dänzer
2019-10-25 16:20       ` Michel Dänzer
2019-10-31 16:54       ` Will Deacon
2019-10-31 16:54         ` Will Deacon
2019-10-31 16:54         ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191025110450.10474-1-will@kernel.org \
    --to=will-dgejt+ai2ygdnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=David1.Zhou-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=airlied-cv59FeDIM0c@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=alexander.deucher-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=christian.koenig-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=daniel-/w4YWyX8dFk@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=nico-0AWUsSXRRvXQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.