* [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests/blt: add some kthreads into the mix
@ 2019-10-25 11:24 ` Matthew Auld
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Auld @ 2019-10-25 11:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
We can be more aggressive in our testing by launching a number of
kthreads, where each is submitting its own copy or fill batches on a set
of random sized objects. Also since the underlying fill and copy batches
can be pre-empted mid-batch(for particularly large objects), throw in a
random mixture of ctx priorities per thread to make pre-emption a
possibility.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
.../i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_object_blt.c | 144 +++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 121 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_object_blt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_object_blt.c
index 9ec55b3a3815..41e0bd6a175c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_object_blt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_object_blt.c
@@ -7,34 +7,53 @@
#include "i915_selftest.h"
+#include "gem/i915_gem_context.h"
#include "selftests/igt_flush_test.h"
+#include "selftests/i915_random.h"
#include "selftests/mock_drm.h"
#include "huge_gem_object.h"
#include "mock_context.h"
-static int igt_fill_blt(void *arg)
+struct igt_thread_arg {
+ struct drm_i915_private *i915;
+ struct rnd_state *prng;
+};
+
+static int igt_fill_blt_thread(void *arg)
{
- struct drm_i915_private *i915 = arg;
- struct intel_context *ce = i915->engine[BCS0]->kernel_context;
+ struct igt_thread_arg *thread = arg;
+ struct drm_i915_private *i915 = thread->i915;
+ struct rnd_state *prng = thread->prng;
struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
- struct rnd_state prng;
+ struct i915_gem_context *ctx;
+ struct intel_context *ce;
+ struct drm_file *file;
+ unsigned int prio;
IGT_TIMEOUT(end);
- u32 *vaddr;
- int err = 0;
+ int err;
+
+ file = mock_file(i915);
+ if (IS_ERR(file))
+ return PTR_ERR(file);
+
+ ctx = live_context(i915, file);
+ if (IS_ERR(ctx)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(ctx);
+ goto out_file;
+ }
- prandom_seed_state(&prng, i915_selftest.random_seed);
+ prio = prandom_u32_state(prng) % I915_PRIORITY_MAX;
+ ctx->sched.priority = I915_USER_PRIORITY(prio);
- /*
- * XXX: needs some threads to scale all these tests, also maybe throw
- * in submission from higher priority context to see if we are
- * preempted for very large objects...
- */
+ ce = i915_gem_context_get_engine(ctx, BCS0);
+ GEM_BUG_ON(IS_ERR(ce));
do {
const u32 max_block_size = S16_MAX * PAGE_SIZE;
- u32 sz = min_t(u64, ce->vm->total >> 4, prandom_u32_state(&prng));
+ u32 sz = min_t(u64, ce->vm->total >> 4, prandom_u32_state(prng));
u32 phys_sz = sz % (max_block_size + 1);
- u32 val = prandom_u32_state(&prng);
+ u32 val = prandom_u32_state(prng);
+ u32 *vaddr;
u32 i;
sz = round_up(sz, PAGE_SIZE);
@@ -98,26 +117,47 @@ static int igt_fill_blt(void *arg)
if (err == -ENOMEM)
err = 0;
+ intel_context_put(ce);
+out_file:
+ mock_file_free(i915, file);
return err;
}
-static int igt_copy_blt(void *arg)
+static int igt_copy_blt_thread(void *arg)
{
- struct drm_i915_private *i915 = arg;
- struct intel_context *ce = i915->engine[BCS0]->kernel_context;
+ struct igt_thread_arg *thread = arg;
+ struct drm_i915_private *i915 = thread->i915;
+ struct rnd_state *prng = thread->prng;
struct drm_i915_gem_object *src, *dst;
- struct rnd_state prng;
+ struct i915_gem_context *ctx;
+ struct intel_context *ce;
+ struct drm_file *file;
+ unsigned int prio;
IGT_TIMEOUT(end);
- u32 *vaddr;
- int err = 0;
+ int err;
+
+ file = mock_file(i915);
+ if (IS_ERR(file))
+ return PTR_ERR(file);
+
+ ctx = live_context(i915, file);
+ if (IS_ERR(ctx)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(ctx);
+ goto out_file;
+ }
- prandom_seed_state(&prng, i915_selftest.random_seed);
+ prio = prandom_u32_state(prng) % I915_PRIORITY_MAX;
+ ctx->sched.priority = I915_USER_PRIORITY(prio);
+
+ ce = i915_gem_context_get_engine(ctx, BCS0);
+ GEM_BUG_ON(IS_ERR(ce));
do {
const u32 max_block_size = S16_MAX * PAGE_SIZE;
- u32 sz = min_t(u64, ce->vm->total >> 4, prandom_u32_state(&prng));
+ u32 sz = min_t(u64, ce->vm->total >> 4, prandom_u32_state(prng));
u32 phys_sz = sz % (max_block_size + 1);
- u32 val = prandom_u32_state(&prng);
+ u32 val = prandom_u32_state(prng);
+ u32 *vaddr;
u32 i;
sz = round_up(sz, PAGE_SIZE);
@@ -201,9 +241,67 @@ static int igt_copy_blt(void *arg)
if (err == -ENOMEM)
err = 0;
+ intel_context_put(ce);
+out_file:
+ mock_file_free(i915, file);
+ return err;
+}
+
+static int igt_threaded_blt(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
+ int (*blt_fn)(void *arg))
+{
+
+ I915_RND_STATE(prng);
+ struct igt_thread_arg thread = { i915, &prng, };
+ struct task_struct **tsk;
+ unsigned int n_cpus;
+ unsigned int i;
+ int err = 0;
+
+ n_cpus = num_online_cpus() + 1;
+
+ tsk = kzalloc(n_cpus * sizeof(struct task_struct *), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!tsk)
+ return 0;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < n_cpus; ++i) {
+ tsk[i] = kthread_run(blt_fn, &thread, "igt/blt-%d", i);
+ if (IS_ERR(tsk[i])) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(tsk[i]);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ get_task_struct(tsk[i]);
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < n_cpus; ++i) {
+ int status;
+
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(tsk[i]))
+ continue;
+
+ status = kthread_stop(tsk[i]);
+ if (status && !err)
+ err = status;
+
+ put_task_struct(tsk[i]);
+ }
+
+ kfree(tsk);
+
return err;
}
+static int igt_fill_blt(void *arg)
+{
+ return igt_threaded_blt(arg, igt_fill_blt_thread);
+}
+
+static int igt_copy_blt(void *arg)
+{
+ return igt_threaded_blt(arg, igt_copy_blt_thread);
+}
+
int i915_gem_object_blt_live_selftests(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
{
static const struct i915_subtest tests[] = {
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests/blt: add some kthreads into the mix
@ 2019-10-25 11:24 ` Matthew Auld
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Auld @ 2019-10-25 11:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
We can be more aggressive in our testing by launching a number of
kthreads, where each is submitting its own copy or fill batches on a set
of random sized objects. Also since the underlying fill and copy batches
can be pre-empted mid-batch(for particularly large objects), throw in a
random mixture of ctx priorities per thread to make pre-emption a
possibility.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
.../i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_object_blt.c | 144 +++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 121 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_object_blt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_object_blt.c
index 9ec55b3a3815..41e0bd6a175c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_object_blt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_object_blt.c
@@ -7,34 +7,53 @@
#include "i915_selftest.h"
+#include "gem/i915_gem_context.h"
#include "selftests/igt_flush_test.h"
+#include "selftests/i915_random.h"
#include "selftests/mock_drm.h"
#include "huge_gem_object.h"
#include "mock_context.h"
-static int igt_fill_blt(void *arg)
+struct igt_thread_arg {
+ struct drm_i915_private *i915;
+ struct rnd_state *prng;
+};
+
+static int igt_fill_blt_thread(void *arg)
{
- struct drm_i915_private *i915 = arg;
- struct intel_context *ce = i915->engine[BCS0]->kernel_context;
+ struct igt_thread_arg *thread = arg;
+ struct drm_i915_private *i915 = thread->i915;
+ struct rnd_state *prng = thread->prng;
struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
- struct rnd_state prng;
+ struct i915_gem_context *ctx;
+ struct intel_context *ce;
+ struct drm_file *file;
+ unsigned int prio;
IGT_TIMEOUT(end);
- u32 *vaddr;
- int err = 0;
+ int err;
+
+ file = mock_file(i915);
+ if (IS_ERR(file))
+ return PTR_ERR(file);
+
+ ctx = live_context(i915, file);
+ if (IS_ERR(ctx)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(ctx);
+ goto out_file;
+ }
- prandom_seed_state(&prng, i915_selftest.random_seed);
+ prio = prandom_u32_state(prng) % I915_PRIORITY_MAX;
+ ctx->sched.priority = I915_USER_PRIORITY(prio);
- /*
- * XXX: needs some threads to scale all these tests, also maybe throw
- * in submission from higher priority context to see if we are
- * preempted for very large objects...
- */
+ ce = i915_gem_context_get_engine(ctx, BCS0);
+ GEM_BUG_ON(IS_ERR(ce));
do {
const u32 max_block_size = S16_MAX * PAGE_SIZE;
- u32 sz = min_t(u64, ce->vm->total >> 4, prandom_u32_state(&prng));
+ u32 sz = min_t(u64, ce->vm->total >> 4, prandom_u32_state(prng));
u32 phys_sz = sz % (max_block_size + 1);
- u32 val = prandom_u32_state(&prng);
+ u32 val = prandom_u32_state(prng);
+ u32 *vaddr;
u32 i;
sz = round_up(sz, PAGE_SIZE);
@@ -98,26 +117,47 @@ static int igt_fill_blt(void *arg)
if (err == -ENOMEM)
err = 0;
+ intel_context_put(ce);
+out_file:
+ mock_file_free(i915, file);
return err;
}
-static int igt_copy_blt(void *arg)
+static int igt_copy_blt_thread(void *arg)
{
- struct drm_i915_private *i915 = arg;
- struct intel_context *ce = i915->engine[BCS0]->kernel_context;
+ struct igt_thread_arg *thread = arg;
+ struct drm_i915_private *i915 = thread->i915;
+ struct rnd_state *prng = thread->prng;
struct drm_i915_gem_object *src, *dst;
- struct rnd_state prng;
+ struct i915_gem_context *ctx;
+ struct intel_context *ce;
+ struct drm_file *file;
+ unsigned int prio;
IGT_TIMEOUT(end);
- u32 *vaddr;
- int err = 0;
+ int err;
+
+ file = mock_file(i915);
+ if (IS_ERR(file))
+ return PTR_ERR(file);
+
+ ctx = live_context(i915, file);
+ if (IS_ERR(ctx)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(ctx);
+ goto out_file;
+ }
- prandom_seed_state(&prng, i915_selftest.random_seed);
+ prio = prandom_u32_state(prng) % I915_PRIORITY_MAX;
+ ctx->sched.priority = I915_USER_PRIORITY(prio);
+
+ ce = i915_gem_context_get_engine(ctx, BCS0);
+ GEM_BUG_ON(IS_ERR(ce));
do {
const u32 max_block_size = S16_MAX * PAGE_SIZE;
- u32 sz = min_t(u64, ce->vm->total >> 4, prandom_u32_state(&prng));
+ u32 sz = min_t(u64, ce->vm->total >> 4, prandom_u32_state(prng));
u32 phys_sz = sz % (max_block_size + 1);
- u32 val = prandom_u32_state(&prng);
+ u32 val = prandom_u32_state(prng);
+ u32 *vaddr;
u32 i;
sz = round_up(sz, PAGE_SIZE);
@@ -201,9 +241,67 @@ static int igt_copy_blt(void *arg)
if (err == -ENOMEM)
err = 0;
+ intel_context_put(ce);
+out_file:
+ mock_file_free(i915, file);
+ return err;
+}
+
+static int igt_threaded_blt(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
+ int (*blt_fn)(void *arg))
+{
+
+ I915_RND_STATE(prng);
+ struct igt_thread_arg thread = { i915, &prng, };
+ struct task_struct **tsk;
+ unsigned int n_cpus;
+ unsigned int i;
+ int err = 0;
+
+ n_cpus = num_online_cpus() + 1;
+
+ tsk = kzalloc(n_cpus * sizeof(struct task_struct *), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!tsk)
+ return 0;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < n_cpus; ++i) {
+ tsk[i] = kthread_run(blt_fn, &thread, "igt/blt-%d", i);
+ if (IS_ERR(tsk[i])) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(tsk[i]);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ get_task_struct(tsk[i]);
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < n_cpus; ++i) {
+ int status;
+
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(tsk[i]))
+ continue;
+
+ status = kthread_stop(tsk[i]);
+ if (status && !err)
+ err = status;
+
+ put_task_struct(tsk[i]);
+ }
+
+ kfree(tsk);
+
return err;
}
+static int igt_fill_blt(void *arg)
+{
+ return igt_threaded_blt(arg, igt_fill_blt_thread);
+}
+
+static int igt_copy_blt(void *arg)
+{
+ return igt_threaded_blt(arg, igt_copy_blt_thread);
+}
+
int i915_gem_object_blt_live_selftests(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
{
static const struct i915_subtest tests[] = {
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests/blt: add some kthreads into the mix
@ 2019-10-25 11:36 ` Chris Wilson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2019-10-25 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matthew Auld, intel-gfx
Quoting Matthew Auld (2019-10-25 12:24:42)
> We can be more aggressive in our testing by launching a number of
> kthreads, where each is submitting its own copy or fill batches on a set
> of random sized objects. Also since the underlying fill and copy batches
> can be pre-empted mid-batch(for particularly large objects), throw in a
> random mixture of ctx priorities per thread to make pre-emption a
> possibility.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> .../i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_object_blt.c | 144 +++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 121 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_object_blt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_object_blt.c
> index 9ec55b3a3815..41e0bd6a175c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_object_blt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_object_blt.c
> @@ -7,34 +7,53 @@
>
> #include "i915_selftest.h"
>
> +#include "gem/i915_gem_context.h"
> #include "selftests/igt_flush_test.h"
> +#include "selftests/i915_random.h"
> #include "selftests/mock_drm.h"
> #include "huge_gem_object.h"
> #include "mock_context.h"
>
> -static int igt_fill_blt(void *arg)
> +struct igt_thread_arg {
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915;
> + struct rnd_state *prng;
> +};
> +
> +static int igt_fill_blt_thread(void *arg)
> {
> - struct drm_i915_private *i915 = arg;
> - struct intel_context *ce = i915->engine[BCS0]->kernel_context;
> + struct igt_thread_arg *thread = arg;
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = thread->i915;
> + struct rnd_state *prng = thread->prng;
> struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
> - struct rnd_state prng;
> + struct i915_gem_context *ctx;
> + struct intel_context *ce;
> + struct drm_file *file;
> + unsigned int prio;
> IGT_TIMEOUT(end);
> - u32 *vaddr;
> - int err = 0;
> + int err;
> +
> + file = mock_file(i915);
> + if (IS_ERR(file))
> + return PTR_ERR(file);
> +
> + ctx = live_context(i915, file);
> + if (IS_ERR(ctx)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(ctx);
> + goto out_file;
> + }
>
> - prandom_seed_state(&prng, i915_selftest.random_seed);
> + prio = prandom_u32_state(prng) % I915_PRIORITY_MAX;
> + ctx->sched.priority = I915_USER_PRIORITY(prio);
>
> - /*
> - * XXX: needs some threads to scale all these tests, also maybe throw
> - * in submission from higher priority context to see if we are
> - * preempted for very large objects...
> - */
> + ce = i915_gem_context_get_engine(ctx, BCS0);
> + GEM_BUG_ON(IS_ERR(ce));
>
> do {
> const u32 max_block_size = S16_MAX * PAGE_SIZE;
> - u32 sz = min_t(u64, ce->vm->total >> 4, prandom_u32_state(&prng));
> + u32 sz = min_t(u64, ce->vm->total >> 4, prandom_u32_state(prng));
> u32 phys_sz = sz % (max_block_size + 1);
> - u32 val = prandom_u32_state(&prng);
> + u32 val = prandom_u32_state(prng);
> + u32 *vaddr;
> u32 i;
>
> sz = round_up(sz, PAGE_SIZE);
> @@ -98,26 +117,47 @@ static int igt_fill_blt(void *arg)
> if (err == -ENOMEM)
> err = 0;
>
> + intel_context_put(ce);
> +out_file:
> + mock_file_free(i915, file);
> return err;
> }
>
> -static int igt_copy_blt(void *arg)
> +static int igt_copy_blt_thread(void *arg)
> {
> - struct drm_i915_private *i915 = arg;
> - struct intel_context *ce = i915->engine[BCS0]->kernel_context;
> + struct igt_thread_arg *thread = arg;
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = thread->i915;
> + struct rnd_state *prng = thread->prng;
> struct drm_i915_gem_object *src, *dst;
> - struct rnd_state prng;
> + struct i915_gem_context *ctx;
> + struct intel_context *ce;
> + struct drm_file *file;
> + unsigned int prio;
> IGT_TIMEOUT(end);
> - u32 *vaddr;
> - int err = 0;
> + int err;
> +
> + file = mock_file(i915);
> + if (IS_ERR(file))
> + return PTR_ERR(file);
> +
> + ctx = live_context(i915, file);
> + if (IS_ERR(ctx)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(ctx);
> + goto out_file;
> + }
>
> - prandom_seed_state(&prng, i915_selftest.random_seed);
> + prio = prandom_u32_state(prng) % I915_PRIORITY_MAX;
prio = i915_prandom_u32_max_state(prng, I915_PRIORITY_MAX);
Usual prng dilemma of high bits being more random than low bits, and it
avoids the divide. (Nice trick to remember :)
> + ctx->sched.priority = I915_USER_PRIORITY(prio);
> +
> + ce = i915_gem_context_get_engine(ctx, BCS0);
> + GEM_BUG_ON(IS_ERR(ce));
>
> do {
> const u32 max_block_size = S16_MAX * PAGE_SIZE;
> - u32 sz = min_t(u64, ce->vm->total >> 4, prandom_u32_state(&prng));
> + u32 sz = min_t(u64, ce->vm->total >> 4, prandom_u32_state(prng));
> u32 phys_sz = sz % (max_block_size + 1);
> - u32 val = prandom_u32_state(&prng);
> + u32 val = prandom_u32_state(prng);
> + u32 *vaddr;
> u32 i;
>
> sz = round_up(sz, PAGE_SIZE);
> @@ -201,9 +241,67 @@ static int igt_copy_blt(void *arg)
> if (err == -ENOMEM)
> err = 0;
>
> + intel_context_put(ce);
> +out_file:
> + mock_file_free(i915, file);
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +static int igt_threaded_blt(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> + int (*blt_fn)(void *arg))
> +{
> +
> + I915_RND_STATE(prng);
> + struct igt_thread_arg thread = { i915, &prng, };
Each thread is using the same prng state then?
Bah. It's not thread safe so would lead to non-deterministic
behaviour. At least it's not every thread using the exact same sequence.
thread = kmalloc_array(n_cpus, sizeof(*thread), GFP_KERNEL);
for(...) {
thread[i]->prng = I915_RND_STATE_INITIALIZER(prandom_u32_state(&prng));
I suspect we may end up pretifying that as I expect we'll do more and
more parallelised smoketesting.
> + struct task_struct **tsk;
> + unsigned int n_cpus;
> + unsigned int i;
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + n_cpus = num_online_cpus() + 1;
> +
> + tsk = kzalloc(n_cpus * sizeof(struct task_struct *), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!tsk)
> + return 0;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < n_cpus; ++i) {
> + tsk[i] = kthread_run(blt_fn, &thread, "igt/blt-%d", i);
> + if (IS_ERR(tsk[i])) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(tsk[i]);
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + get_task_struct(tsk[i]);
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < n_cpus; ++i) {
> + int status;
> +
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(tsk[i]))
> + continue;
> +
> + status = kthread_stop(tsk[i]);
> + if (status && !err)
> + err = status;
Looks good.
> + put_task_struct(tsk[i]);
> + }
> +
I think per-thread deterministic "random" behaviour is critical. But
that's the only drawback spotted, so with that resolved one way or
another,
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests/blt: add some kthreads into the mix
@ 2019-10-25 11:36 ` Chris Wilson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2019-10-25 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matthew Auld, intel-gfx
Quoting Matthew Auld (2019-10-25 12:24:42)
> We can be more aggressive in our testing by launching a number of
> kthreads, where each is submitting its own copy or fill batches on a set
> of random sized objects. Also since the underlying fill and copy batches
> can be pre-empted mid-batch(for particularly large objects), throw in a
> random mixture of ctx priorities per thread to make pre-emption a
> possibility.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> .../i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_object_blt.c | 144 +++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 121 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_object_blt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_object_blt.c
> index 9ec55b3a3815..41e0bd6a175c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_object_blt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_object_blt.c
> @@ -7,34 +7,53 @@
>
> #include "i915_selftest.h"
>
> +#include "gem/i915_gem_context.h"
> #include "selftests/igt_flush_test.h"
> +#include "selftests/i915_random.h"
> #include "selftests/mock_drm.h"
> #include "huge_gem_object.h"
> #include "mock_context.h"
>
> -static int igt_fill_blt(void *arg)
> +struct igt_thread_arg {
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915;
> + struct rnd_state *prng;
> +};
> +
> +static int igt_fill_blt_thread(void *arg)
> {
> - struct drm_i915_private *i915 = arg;
> - struct intel_context *ce = i915->engine[BCS0]->kernel_context;
> + struct igt_thread_arg *thread = arg;
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = thread->i915;
> + struct rnd_state *prng = thread->prng;
> struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
> - struct rnd_state prng;
> + struct i915_gem_context *ctx;
> + struct intel_context *ce;
> + struct drm_file *file;
> + unsigned int prio;
> IGT_TIMEOUT(end);
> - u32 *vaddr;
> - int err = 0;
> + int err;
> +
> + file = mock_file(i915);
> + if (IS_ERR(file))
> + return PTR_ERR(file);
> +
> + ctx = live_context(i915, file);
> + if (IS_ERR(ctx)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(ctx);
> + goto out_file;
> + }
>
> - prandom_seed_state(&prng, i915_selftest.random_seed);
> + prio = prandom_u32_state(prng) % I915_PRIORITY_MAX;
> + ctx->sched.priority = I915_USER_PRIORITY(prio);
>
> - /*
> - * XXX: needs some threads to scale all these tests, also maybe throw
> - * in submission from higher priority context to see if we are
> - * preempted for very large objects...
> - */
> + ce = i915_gem_context_get_engine(ctx, BCS0);
> + GEM_BUG_ON(IS_ERR(ce));
>
> do {
> const u32 max_block_size = S16_MAX * PAGE_SIZE;
> - u32 sz = min_t(u64, ce->vm->total >> 4, prandom_u32_state(&prng));
> + u32 sz = min_t(u64, ce->vm->total >> 4, prandom_u32_state(prng));
> u32 phys_sz = sz % (max_block_size + 1);
> - u32 val = prandom_u32_state(&prng);
> + u32 val = prandom_u32_state(prng);
> + u32 *vaddr;
> u32 i;
>
> sz = round_up(sz, PAGE_SIZE);
> @@ -98,26 +117,47 @@ static int igt_fill_blt(void *arg)
> if (err == -ENOMEM)
> err = 0;
>
> + intel_context_put(ce);
> +out_file:
> + mock_file_free(i915, file);
> return err;
> }
>
> -static int igt_copy_blt(void *arg)
> +static int igt_copy_blt_thread(void *arg)
> {
> - struct drm_i915_private *i915 = arg;
> - struct intel_context *ce = i915->engine[BCS0]->kernel_context;
> + struct igt_thread_arg *thread = arg;
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = thread->i915;
> + struct rnd_state *prng = thread->prng;
> struct drm_i915_gem_object *src, *dst;
> - struct rnd_state prng;
> + struct i915_gem_context *ctx;
> + struct intel_context *ce;
> + struct drm_file *file;
> + unsigned int prio;
> IGT_TIMEOUT(end);
> - u32 *vaddr;
> - int err = 0;
> + int err;
> +
> + file = mock_file(i915);
> + if (IS_ERR(file))
> + return PTR_ERR(file);
> +
> + ctx = live_context(i915, file);
> + if (IS_ERR(ctx)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(ctx);
> + goto out_file;
> + }
>
> - prandom_seed_state(&prng, i915_selftest.random_seed);
> + prio = prandom_u32_state(prng) % I915_PRIORITY_MAX;
prio = i915_prandom_u32_max_state(prng, I915_PRIORITY_MAX);
Usual prng dilemma of high bits being more random than low bits, and it
avoids the divide. (Nice trick to remember :)
> + ctx->sched.priority = I915_USER_PRIORITY(prio);
> +
> + ce = i915_gem_context_get_engine(ctx, BCS0);
> + GEM_BUG_ON(IS_ERR(ce));
>
> do {
> const u32 max_block_size = S16_MAX * PAGE_SIZE;
> - u32 sz = min_t(u64, ce->vm->total >> 4, prandom_u32_state(&prng));
> + u32 sz = min_t(u64, ce->vm->total >> 4, prandom_u32_state(prng));
> u32 phys_sz = sz % (max_block_size + 1);
> - u32 val = prandom_u32_state(&prng);
> + u32 val = prandom_u32_state(prng);
> + u32 *vaddr;
> u32 i;
>
> sz = round_up(sz, PAGE_SIZE);
> @@ -201,9 +241,67 @@ static int igt_copy_blt(void *arg)
> if (err == -ENOMEM)
> err = 0;
>
> + intel_context_put(ce);
> +out_file:
> + mock_file_free(i915, file);
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +static int igt_threaded_blt(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> + int (*blt_fn)(void *arg))
> +{
> +
> + I915_RND_STATE(prng);
> + struct igt_thread_arg thread = { i915, &prng, };
Each thread is using the same prng state then?
Bah. It's not thread safe so would lead to non-deterministic
behaviour. At least it's not every thread using the exact same sequence.
thread = kmalloc_array(n_cpus, sizeof(*thread), GFP_KERNEL);
for(...) {
thread[i]->prng = I915_RND_STATE_INITIALIZER(prandom_u32_state(&prng));
I suspect we may end up pretifying that as I expect we'll do more and
more parallelised smoketesting.
> + struct task_struct **tsk;
> + unsigned int n_cpus;
> + unsigned int i;
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + n_cpus = num_online_cpus() + 1;
> +
> + tsk = kzalloc(n_cpus * sizeof(struct task_struct *), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!tsk)
> + return 0;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < n_cpus; ++i) {
> + tsk[i] = kthread_run(blt_fn, &thread, "igt/blt-%d", i);
> + if (IS_ERR(tsk[i])) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(tsk[i]);
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + get_task_struct(tsk[i]);
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < n_cpus; ++i) {
> + int status;
> +
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(tsk[i]))
> + continue;
> +
> + status = kthread_stop(tsk[i]);
> + if (status && !err)
> + err = status;
Looks good.
> + put_task_struct(tsk[i]);
> + }
> +
I think per-thread deterministic "random" behaviour is critical. But
that's the only drawback spotted, so with that resolved one way or
another,
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/selftests/blt: add some kthreads into the mix
@ 2019-10-25 16:14 ` Patchwork
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2019-10-25 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matthew Auld; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915/selftests/blt: add some kthreads into the mix
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/68563/
State : warning
== Summary ==
$ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip
f43a0146b3fc drm/i915/selftests/blt: add some kthreads into the mix
-:159: CHECK:BRACES: Blank lines aren't necessary after an open brace '{'
#159: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_object_blt.c:253:
+{
+
-:169: WARNING:ALLOC_WITH_MULTIPLY: Prefer kcalloc over kzalloc with multiply
#169: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_object_blt.c:263:
+ tsk = kzalloc(n_cpus * sizeof(struct task_struct *), GFP_KERNEL);
total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 1 checks, 190 lines checked
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/selftests/blt: add some kthreads into the mix
@ 2019-10-25 16:14 ` Patchwork
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2019-10-25 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matthew Auld; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915/selftests/blt: add some kthreads into the mix
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/68563/
State : warning
== Summary ==
$ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip
f43a0146b3fc drm/i915/selftests/blt: add some kthreads into the mix
-:159: CHECK:BRACES: Blank lines aren't necessary after an open brace '{'
#159: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_object_blt.c:253:
+{
+
-:169: WARNING:ALLOC_WITH_MULTIPLY: Prefer kcalloc over kzalloc with multiply
#169: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_object_blt.c:263:
+ tsk = kzalloc(n_cpus * sizeof(struct task_struct *), GFP_KERNEL);
total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 1 checks, 190 lines checked
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/selftests/blt: add some kthreads into the mix
@ 2019-10-25 16:36 ` Patchwork
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2019-10-25 16:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matthew Auld; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915/selftests/blt: add some kthreads into the mix
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/68563/
State : failure
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7186 -> Patchwork_14981
====================================================
Summary
-------
**FAILURE**
Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_14981 absolutely need to be
verified manually.
If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in Patchwork_14981, please notify your bug team to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14981/index.html
Possible new issues
-------------------
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_14981:
### IGT changes ###
#### Possible regressions ####
* igt@i915_selftest@live_blt:
- fi-bsw-n3050: [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-FAIL][2]
[1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7186/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@i915_selftest@live_blt.html
[2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14981/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@i915_selftest@live_blt.html
* igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts:
- fi-bsw-kefka: [PASS][3] -> [INCOMPLETE][4]
[3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7186/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
[4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14981/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
Known issues
------------
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_14981 that come from known issues:
### IGT changes ###
#### Issues hit ####
* igt@gem_flink_basic@flink-lifetime:
- fi-icl-u3: [PASS][5] -> [DMESG-WARN][6] ([fdo#107724]) +1 similar issue
[5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7186/fi-icl-u3/igt@gem_flink_basic@flink-lifetime.html
[6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14981/fi-icl-u3/igt@gem_flink_basic@flink-lifetime.html
* igt@kms_chamelium@dp-edid-read:
- fi-kbl-7500u: [PASS][7] -> [WARN][8] ([fdo#109483])
[7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7186/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@dp-edid-read.html
[8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14981/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@dp-edid-read.html
* igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic:
- fi-hsw-peppy: [PASS][9] -> [DMESG-WARN][10] ([fdo#102614])
[9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7186/fi-hsw-peppy/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic.html
[10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14981/fi-hsw-peppy/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic.html
#### Possible fixes ####
* {igt@i915_selftest@live_gt_heartbeat}:
- fi-byt-n2820: [DMESG-FAIL][11] ([fdo#112096]) -> [PASS][12]
[11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7186/fi-byt-n2820/igt@i915_selftest@live_gt_heartbeat.html
[12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14981/fi-byt-n2820/igt@i915_selftest@live_gt_heartbeat.html
* igt@kms_busy@basic-flip-a:
- {fi-tgl-u2}: [DMESG-WARN][13] ([fdo#111600]) -> [PASS][14]
[13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7186/fi-tgl-u2/igt@kms_busy@basic-flip-a.html
[14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14981/fi-tgl-u2/igt@kms_busy@basic-flip-a.html
* igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast:
- fi-kbl-7500u: [FAIL][15] ([fdo#111407]) -> [PASS][16]
[15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7186/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html
[16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14981/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html
* igt@prime_vgem@basic-wait-default:
- fi-icl-u3: [DMESG-WARN][17] ([fdo#107724]) -> [PASS][18] +1 similar issue
[17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7186/fi-icl-u3/igt@prime_vgem@basic-wait-default.html
[18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14981/fi-icl-u3/igt@prime_vgem@basic-wait-default.html
{name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).
[fdo#102614]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102614
[fdo#107713]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107713
[fdo#107724]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107724
[fdo#108569]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108569
[fdo#109483]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109483
[fdo#111407]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111407
[fdo#111600]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111600
[fdo#111747]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111747
[fdo#112096]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112096
Participating hosts (49 -> 43)
------------------------------
Missing (6): fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-byt-squawks fi-bsw-cyan fi-icl-y fi-byt-clapper
Build changes
-------------
* CI: CI-20190529 -> None
* Linux: CI_DRM_7186 -> Patchwork_14981
CI-20190529: 20190529
CI_DRM_7186: ce03ec86789ef8fc41a56176e5f2a9251182183c @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGT_5241: 17b87c378fa155390b13a43f141371fd899d567b @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
Patchwork_14981: f43a0146b3fc17ede2a7d765ced368f493ae2585 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
== Linux commits ==
f43a0146b3fc drm/i915/selftests/blt: add some kthreads into the mix
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14981/index.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/selftests/blt: add some kthreads into the mix
@ 2019-10-25 16:36 ` Patchwork
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2019-10-25 16:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matthew Auld; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915/selftests/blt: add some kthreads into the mix
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/68563/
State : failure
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7186 -> Patchwork_14981
====================================================
Summary
-------
**FAILURE**
Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_14981 absolutely need to be
verified manually.
If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in Patchwork_14981, please notify your bug team to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14981/index.html
Possible new issues
-------------------
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_14981:
### IGT changes ###
#### Possible regressions ####
* igt@i915_selftest@live_blt:
- fi-bsw-n3050: [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-FAIL][2]
[1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7186/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@i915_selftest@live_blt.html
[2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14981/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@i915_selftest@live_blt.html
* igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts:
- fi-bsw-kefka: [PASS][3] -> [INCOMPLETE][4]
[3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7186/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
[4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14981/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
Known issues
------------
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_14981 that come from known issues:
### IGT changes ###
#### Issues hit ####
* igt@gem_flink_basic@flink-lifetime:
- fi-icl-u3: [PASS][5] -> [DMESG-WARN][6] ([fdo#107724]) +1 similar issue
[5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7186/fi-icl-u3/igt@gem_flink_basic@flink-lifetime.html
[6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14981/fi-icl-u3/igt@gem_flink_basic@flink-lifetime.html
* igt@kms_chamelium@dp-edid-read:
- fi-kbl-7500u: [PASS][7] -> [WARN][8] ([fdo#109483])
[7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7186/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@dp-edid-read.html
[8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14981/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@dp-edid-read.html
* igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic:
- fi-hsw-peppy: [PASS][9] -> [DMESG-WARN][10] ([fdo#102614])
[9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7186/fi-hsw-peppy/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic.html
[10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14981/fi-hsw-peppy/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic.html
#### Possible fixes ####
* {igt@i915_selftest@live_gt_heartbeat}:
- fi-byt-n2820: [DMESG-FAIL][11] ([fdo#112096]) -> [PASS][12]
[11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7186/fi-byt-n2820/igt@i915_selftest@live_gt_heartbeat.html
[12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14981/fi-byt-n2820/igt@i915_selftest@live_gt_heartbeat.html
* igt@kms_busy@basic-flip-a:
- {fi-tgl-u2}: [DMESG-WARN][13] ([fdo#111600]) -> [PASS][14]
[13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7186/fi-tgl-u2/igt@kms_busy@basic-flip-a.html
[14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14981/fi-tgl-u2/igt@kms_busy@basic-flip-a.html
* igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast:
- fi-kbl-7500u: [FAIL][15] ([fdo#111407]) -> [PASS][16]
[15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7186/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html
[16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14981/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html
* igt@prime_vgem@basic-wait-default:
- fi-icl-u3: [DMESG-WARN][17] ([fdo#107724]) -> [PASS][18] +1 similar issue
[17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7186/fi-icl-u3/igt@prime_vgem@basic-wait-default.html
[18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14981/fi-icl-u3/igt@prime_vgem@basic-wait-default.html
{name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).
[fdo#102614]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102614
[fdo#107713]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107713
[fdo#107724]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107724
[fdo#108569]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108569
[fdo#109483]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109483
[fdo#111407]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111407
[fdo#111600]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111600
[fdo#111747]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111747
[fdo#112096]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112096
Participating hosts (49 -> 43)
------------------------------
Missing (6): fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-byt-squawks fi-bsw-cyan fi-icl-y fi-byt-clapper
Build changes
-------------
* CI: CI-20190529 -> None
* Linux: CI_DRM_7186 -> Patchwork_14981
CI-20190529: 20190529
CI_DRM_7186: ce03ec86789ef8fc41a56176e5f2a9251182183c @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGT_5241: 17b87c378fa155390b13a43f141371fd899d567b @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
Patchwork_14981: f43a0146b3fc17ede2a7d765ced368f493ae2585 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
== Linux commits ==
f43a0146b3fc drm/i915/selftests/blt: add some kthreads into the mix
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14981/index.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-10-25 16:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-10-25 11:24 [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests/blt: add some kthreads into the mix Matthew Auld
2019-10-25 11:24 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Auld
2019-10-25 11:36 ` Chris Wilson
2019-10-25 11:36 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-10-25 16:14 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2019-10-25 16:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
2019-10-25 16:36 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2019-10-25 16:36 ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.