From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Ondrej Jirman <megous@megous.com>
Cc: linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
"open list:SUN4I LOW RES ADC ATTACHED TABLET KEYS DRIVER"
<linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Allwinner sunXi SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] input: sun4i-lradc-keys: Add wakup support
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 16:38:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191028233828.GA57214@dtor-ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191028221502.3503543-1-megous@megous.com>
Hi Ondrej,
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 11:15:02PM +0100, Ondrej Jirman wrote:
> Allow the driver to wakeup the system on key press.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ondrej Jirman <megous@megous.com>
> ---
> drivers/input/keyboard/sun4i-lradc-keys.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/sun4i-lradc-keys.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/sun4i-lradc-keys.c
> index 4a796bed48ac..bba679d7b54b 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/sun4i-lradc-keys.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/sun4i-lradc-keys.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_wakeirq.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_wakeup.h>
> #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
>
> @@ -226,8 +228,7 @@ static int sun4i_lradc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct sun4i_lradc_data *lradc;
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> - int i;
> - int error;
> + int i, error, irq;
>
> lradc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct sun4i_lradc_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!lradc)
> @@ -272,8 +273,13 @@ static int sun4i_lradc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (IS_ERR(lradc->base))
> return PTR_ERR(lradc->base);
>
> - error = devm_request_irq(dev, platform_get_irq(pdev, 0),
> - sun4i_lradc_irq, 0,
> + irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> + if (irq < 0) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get IRQ\n");
> + return irq;
> + }
> +
> + error = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, sun4i_lradc_irq, 0,
> "sun4i-a10-lradc-keys", lradc);
> if (error)
> return error;
> @@ -282,6 +288,14 @@ static int sun4i_lradc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (error)
> return error;
>
> + device_init_wakeup(dev, true);
I do not think we want to do this unconditionally. Can we maybe key off
"wakeup-source" device property.
> +
> + error = dev_pm_set_wake_irq(dev, irq);
> + if (error) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Could not set wake IRQ\n");
> + return error;
> + }
> +
I wonder if we could teach platform driver core to handle this for us.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Ondrej Jirman <megous@megous.com>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com,
"open list:SUN4I LOW RES ADC ATTACHED TABLET KEYS DRIVER"
<linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Allwinner sunXi SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] input: sun4i-lradc-keys: Add wakup support
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 16:38:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191028233828.GA57214@dtor-ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191028221502.3503543-1-megous@megous.com>
Hi Ondrej,
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 11:15:02PM +0100, Ondrej Jirman wrote:
> Allow the driver to wakeup the system on key press.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ondrej Jirman <megous@megous.com>
> ---
> drivers/input/keyboard/sun4i-lradc-keys.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/sun4i-lradc-keys.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/sun4i-lradc-keys.c
> index 4a796bed48ac..bba679d7b54b 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/sun4i-lradc-keys.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/sun4i-lradc-keys.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_wakeirq.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_wakeup.h>
> #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
>
> @@ -226,8 +228,7 @@ static int sun4i_lradc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct sun4i_lradc_data *lradc;
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> - int i;
> - int error;
> + int i, error, irq;
>
> lradc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct sun4i_lradc_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!lradc)
> @@ -272,8 +273,13 @@ static int sun4i_lradc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (IS_ERR(lradc->base))
> return PTR_ERR(lradc->base);
>
> - error = devm_request_irq(dev, platform_get_irq(pdev, 0),
> - sun4i_lradc_irq, 0,
> + irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> + if (irq < 0) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get IRQ\n");
> + return irq;
> + }
> +
> + error = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, sun4i_lradc_irq, 0,
> "sun4i-a10-lradc-keys", lradc);
> if (error)
> return error;
> @@ -282,6 +288,14 @@ static int sun4i_lradc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (error)
> return error;
>
> + device_init_wakeup(dev, true);
I do not think we want to do this unconditionally. Can we maybe key off
"wakeup-source" device property.
> +
> + error = dev_pm_set_wake_irq(dev, irq);
> + if (error) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Could not set wake IRQ\n");
> + return error;
> + }
> +
I wonder if we could teach platform driver core to handle this for us.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-28 23:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-28 22:15 [PATCH] input: sun4i-lradc-keys: Add wakup support Ondrej Jirman
2019-10-28 22:15 ` Ondrej Jirman
2019-10-28 23:38 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2019-10-28 23:38 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2019-10-28 23:56 ` Ondřej Jirman
2019-10-28 23:56 ` Ondřej Jirman
2019-10-29 0:12 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2019-10-29 0:12 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2019-10-29 1:45 ` [linux-sunxi] " Ondřej Jirman
2019-10-29 1:45 ` Ondřej Jirman
2019-10-29 4:18 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2019-10-29 4:18 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2019-10-29 12:43 ` Ondřej Jirman
2019-10-29 12:43 ` Ondřej Jirman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191028233828.GA57214@dtor-ws \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com \
--cc=megous@megous.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.