All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [KVM] 671ddc700f: kvm-unit-tests.vmx.fail
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 07:18:22 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191106151822.GC16249@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191106144548.GA32541@xsang-OptiPlex-9020>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 950 bytes --]

On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 10:45:48PM +0800, Oliver Sang wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 09:56:16AM -0700, Jim Mattson wrote:
> > It's unclear to me what the delta is, but I do see that the 'vmx'
> > suite has failed. That is to be expected if you're getting your
> > kvm-unit-tests from the 'master' branch of the kvm-unit-tests repo.
> > You will need commit 591b5b54bba1 ("x86: Skip APIC-access address
> > tests beyond mapped RAM"), which is in the 'next' branch of the
> > kvm-unit-tests repo, but which has not yet made it to the 'master'
> > branch.
> 
> Thanks for information! We will wait for master upgrade to update our test
> binary.

This reminds me, are we still planning on creating "stable" branches for
kvm-unit-tests[*]?  This topic of came up in a discussion at KVM Forum as
well, though I can't remember any of the details.

Paolo?

[*] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/dc5ff4ed-c6dd-74ea-03ae-4f65c5d58073(a)redhat.com

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Dan Cross <dcross@google.com>, Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [KVM] 671ddc700f: kvm-unit-tests.vmx.fail
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 07:18:22 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191106151822.GC16249@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191106144548.GA32541@xsang-OptiPlex-9020>

On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 10:45:48PM +0800, Oliver Sang wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 09:56:16AM -0700, Jim Mattson wrote:
> > It's unclear to me what the delta is, but I do see that the 'vmx'
> > suite has failed. That is to be expected if you're getting your
> > kvm-unit-tests from the 'master' branch of the kvm-unit-tests repo.
> > You will need commit 591b5b54bba1 ("x86: Skip APIC-access address
> > tests beyond mapped RAM"), which is in the 'next' branch of the
> > kvm-unit-tests repo, but which has not yet made it to the 'master'
> > branch.
> 
> Thanks for information! We will wait for master upgrade to update our test
> binary.

This reminds me, are we still planning on creating "stable" branches for
kvm-unit-tests[*]?  This topic of came up in a discussion at KVM Forum as
well, though I can't remember any of the details.

Paolo?

[*] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/dc5ff4ed-c6dd-74ea-03ae-4f65c5d58073@redhat.com

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-06 15:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-30 14:23 [KVM] 671ddc700f: kvm-unit-tests.vmx.fail kernel test robot
2019-10-30 14:23 ` kernel test robot
2019-10-30 16:56 ` Jim Mattson
2019-10-30 16:56   ` Jim Mattson
2019-11-06 14:45   ` Oliver Sang
2019-11-06 14:45     ` Oliver Sang
2019-11-06 15:18     ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2019-11-06 15:18       ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191106151822.GC16249@linux.intel.com \
    --to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.