From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
To: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Cc: <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <joro@8bytes.org>,
<robh+dt@kernel.org>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
<lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>, <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
<sudeep.holla@arm.com>, <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, <lenb@kernel.org>,
<will@kernel.org>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
<zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>, <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Improve add_device() error handling
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 15:58:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191111155830.00000a56@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191108152508.4039168-8-jean-philippe@linaro.org>
On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 16:25:07 +0100
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org> wrote:
> Let add_device() clean up after itself. The iommu_bus_init() function
> does call remove_device() on error, but other sites (e.g. of_iommu) do
> not.
>
> Don't free level-2 stream tables because we'd have to track if we
> allocated each of them or if they are used by other endpoints. It's not
> worth the hassle since they are managed resources.
>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Potentially some fun around reordering of last few actions, but
doesn't seem there is any real connection between them so should be
fine.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index 82eac89ee187..88ec0bf33492 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -2826,14 +2826,16 @@ static int arm_smmu_add_device(struct device *dev)
> for (i = 0; i < master->num_sids; i++) {
> u32 sid = master->sids[i];
>
> - if (!arm_smmu_sid_in_range(smmu, sid))
> - return -ERANGE;
> + if (!arm_smmu_sid_in_range(smmu, sid)) {
> + ret = -ERANGE;
> + goto err_free_master;
> + }
>
> /* Ensure l2 strtab is initialised */
> if (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_2_LVL_STRTAB) {
> ret = arm_smmu_init_l2_strtab(smmu, sid);
> if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + goto err_free_master;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -2843,13 +2845,25 @@ static int arm_smmu_add_device(struct device *dev)
> master->ssid_bits = min_t(u8, master->ssid_bits,
> CTXDESC_LINEAR_CDMAX);
>
> + ret = iommu_device_link(&smmu->iommu, dev);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_free_master;
> +
> group = iommu_group_get_for_dev(dev);
> - if (!IS_ERR(group)) {
> - iommu_group_put(group);
> - iommu_device_link(&smmu->iommu, dev);
> + if (IS_ERR(group)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(group);
> + goto err_unlink;
> }
>
> - return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(group);
> + iommu_group_put(group);
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_unlink:
> + iommu_device_unlink(&smmu->iommu, dev);
> +err_free_master:
> + kfree(master);
> + fwspec->iommu_priv = NULL;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static void arm_smmu_remove_device(struct device *dev)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
To: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
robin.murphy@arm.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
robh+dt@kernel.org, guohanjun@huawei.com,
zhangfei.gao@linaro.org, will@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, lenb@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Improve add_device() error handling
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 15:58:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191111155830.00000a56@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191108152508.4039168-8-jean-philippe@linaro.org>
On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 16:25:07 +0100
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org> wrote:
> Let add_device() clean up after itself. The iommu_bus_init() function
> does call remove_device() on error, but other sites (e.g. of_iommu) do
> not.
>
> Don't free level-2 stream tables because we'd have to track if we
> allocated each of them or if they are used by other endpoints. It's not
> worth the hassle since they are managed resources.
>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Potentially some fun around reordering of last few actions, but
doesn't seem there is any real connection between them so should be
fine.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index 82eac89ee187..88ec0bf33492 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -2826,14 +2826,16 @@ static int arm_smmu_add_device(struct device *dev)
> for (i = 0; i < master->num_sids; i++) {
> u32 sid = master->sids[i];
>
> - if (!arm_smmu_sid_in_range(smmu, sid))
> - return -ERANGE;
> + if (!arm_smmu_sid_in_range(smmu, sid)) {
> + ret = -ERANGE;
> + goto err_free_master;
> + }
>
> /* Ensure l2 strtab is initialised */
> if (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_2_LVL_STRTAB) {
> ret = arm_smmu_init_l2_strtab(smmu, sid);
> if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + goto err_free_master;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -2843,13 +2845,25 @@ static int arm_smmu_add_device(struct device *dev)
> master->ssid_bits = min_t(u8, master->ssid_bits,
> CTXDESC_LINEAR_CDMAX);
>
> + ret = iommu_device_link(&smmu->iommu, dev);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_free_master;
> +
> group = iommu_group_get_for_dev(dev);
> - if (!IS_ERR(group)) {
> - iommu_group_put(group);
> - iommu_device_link(&smmu->iommu, dev);
> + if (IS_ERR(group)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(group);
> + goto err_unlink;
> }
>
> - return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(group);
> + iommu_group_put(group);
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_unlink:
> + iommu_device_unlink(&smmu->iommu, dev);
> +err_free_master:
> + kfree(master);
> + fwspec->iommu_priv = NULL;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static void arm_smmu_remove_device(struct device *dev)
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
To: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, eric.auger@redhat.com,
robin.murphy@arm.com, joro@8bytes.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
guohanjun@huawei.com, zhangfei.gao@linaro.org, will@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, lenb@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Improve add_device() error handling
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 15:58:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191111155830.00000a56@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191108152508.4039168-8-jean-philippe@linaro.org>
On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 16:25:07 +0100
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org> wrote:
> Let add_device() clean up after itself. The iommu_bus_init() function
> does call remove_device() on error, but other sites (e.g. of_iommu) do
> not.
>
> Don't free level-2 stream tables because we'd have to track if we
> allocated each of them or if they are used by other endpoints. It's not
> worth the hassle since they are managed resources.
>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Potentially some fun around reordering of last few actions, but
doesn't seem there is any real connection between them so should be
fine.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index 82eac89ee187..88ec0bf33492 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -2826,14 +2826,16 @@ static int arm_smmu_add_device(struct device *dev)
> for (i = 0; i < master->num_sids; i++) {
> u32 sid = master->sids[i];
>
> - if (!arm_smmu_sid_in_range(smmu, sid))
> - return -ERANGE;
> + if (!arm_smmu_sid_in_range(smmu, sid)) {
> + ret = -ERANGE;
> + goto err_free_master;
> + }
>
> /* Ensure l2 strtab is initialised */
> if (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_2_LVL_STRTAB) {
> ret = arm_smmu_init_l2_strtab(smmu, sid);
> if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + goto err_free_master;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -2843,13 +2845,25 @@ static int arm_smmu_add_device(struct device *dev)
> master->ssid_bits = min_t(u8, master->ssid_bits,
> CTXDESC_LINEAR_CDMAX);
>
> + ret = iommu_device_link(&smmu->iommu, dev);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_free_master;
> +
> group = iommu_group_get_for_dev(dev);
> - if (!IS_ERR(group)) {
> - iommu_group_put(group);
> - iommu_device_link(&smmu->iommu, dev);
> + if (IS_ERR(group)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(group);
> + goto err_unlink;
> }
>
> - return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(group);
> + iommu_group_put(group);
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_unlink:
> + iommu_device_unlink(&smmu->iommu, dev);
> +err_free_master:
> + kfree(master);
> + fwspec->iommu_priv = NULL;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static void arm_smmu_remove_device(struct device *dev)
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-11 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-08 15:25 [PATCH v2 0/8] iommu: Add PASID support to Arm SMMUv3 Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-11-08 15:25 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-11-08 15:25 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-11-08 15:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] dt-bindings: document PASID property for IOMMU masters Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-11-08 15:25 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-11-08 15:25 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-11-08 15:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Support platform SSID Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-11-08 15:25 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-11-08 15:25 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-11-08 15:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] ACPI/IORT: Support PASID for platform devices Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-11-08 15:25 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-11-08 15:25 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-11-14 6:42 ` Hanjun Guo
2019-11-14 6:42 ` Hanjun Guo
2019-11-14 6:42 ` Hanjun Guo
2019-11-08 15:25 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Prepare for SSID support Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-11-08 15:25 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-11-08 15:25 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-11-11 14:38 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-11-11 14:38 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-11-11 14:38 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-11-22 15:28 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-11-22 15:28 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-11-22 15:28 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-11-08 15:25 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add support for Substream IDs Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-11-08 15:25 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-11-08 15:25 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-11-11 15:12 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-11-11 15:12 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-11-11 15:12 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-11-08 15:25 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add second level of context descriptor table Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-11-08 15:25 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-11-08 15:25 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-11-11 15:50 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-11-11 15:50 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-11-11 15:50 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-11-22 15:32 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-11-22 15:32 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-11-22 15:32 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-11-08 15:25 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Improve add_device() error handling Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-11-08 15:25 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-11-08 15:25 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-11-11 15:58 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2019-11-11 15:58 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-11-11 15:58 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-11-08 15:25 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add support for PCI PASID Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-11-08 15:25 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-11-08 15:25 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-11-11 16:05 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-11-11 16:05 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-11-11 16:05 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-11-22 15:33 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-11-22 15:33 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-11-22 15:33 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-11-12 10:02 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] iommu: Add PASID support to Arm SMMUv3 zhangfei
2019-11-12 10:02 ` zhangfei
2019-11-12 10:02 ` zhangfei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191111155830.00000a56@huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zhangfei.gao@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.