From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: [PATCH 11/22] arm/arm64: Make use of the SMCCC 1.1 wrapper
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 16:42:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191120164236.29359-12-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191120164236.29359-1-maz@kernel.org>
From: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Rather than directly choosing which function to use based on
psci_ops.conduit, use the new arm_smccc_1_1 wrapper instead.
In some cases we still need to do some operations based on the
conduit, but the code duplication is removed.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.c | 13 +++---
arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c | 81 ++++++++++++----------------------
2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.c b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.c
index 54d87506d3b5..7c90b4c615a5 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.c
@@ -74,12 +74,13 @@ static void cpu_v7_spectre_init(void)
case ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A72: {
struct arm_smccc_res res;
+ arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
+ ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
+ if ((int)res.a0 != 0)
+ return;
+
switch (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit()) {
case SMCCC_CONDUIT_HVC:
- arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
- ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
- if ((int)res.a0 != 0)
- break;
per_cpu(harden_branch_predictor_fn, cpu) =
call_hvc_arch_workaround_1;
cpu_do_switch_mm = cpu_v7_hvc_switch_mm;
@@ -87,10 +88,6 @@ static void cpu_v7_spectre_init(void)
break;
case SMCCC_CONDUIT_SMC:
- arm_smccc_1_1_smc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
- ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
- if ((int)res.a0 != 0)
- break;
per_cpu(harden_branch_predictor_fn, cpu) =
call_smc_arch_workaround_1;
cpu_do_switch_mm = cpu_v7_smc_switch_mm;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
index 9c0b011eee20..401246e095e7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
@@ -209,40 +209,31 @@ static int detect_harden_bp_fw(void)
struct arm_smccc_res res;
u32 midr = read_cpuid_id();
+ arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
+ ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
+
+ switch ((int)res.a0) {
+ case 1:
+ /* Firmware says we're just fine */
+ return 0;
+ case 0:
+ break;
+ default:
+ return -1;
+ }
+
switch (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit()) {
case SMCCC_CONDUIT_HVC:
- arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
- ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
- switch ((int)res.a0) {
- case 1:
- /* Firmware says we're just fine */
- return 0;
- case 0:
- cb = call_hvc_arch_workaround_1;
- /* This is a guest, no need to patch KVM vectors */
- smccc_start = NULL;
- smccc_end = NULL;
- break;
- default:
- return -1;
- }
+ cb = call_hvc_arch_workaround_1;
+ /* This is a guest, no need to patch KVM vectors */
+ smccc_start = NULL;
+ smccc_end = NULL;
break;
case SMCCC_CONDUIT_SMC:
- arm_smccc_1_1_smc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
- ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
- switch ((int)res.a0) {
- case 1:
- /* Firmware says we're just fine */
- return 0;
- case 0:
- cb = call_smc_arch_workaround_1;
- smccc_start = __smccc_workaround_1_smc_start;
- smccc_end = __smccc_workaround_1_smc_end;
- break;
- default:
- return -1;
- }
+ cb = call_smc_arch_workaround_1;
+ smccc_start = __smccc_workaround_1_smc_start;
+ smccc_end = __smccc_workaround_1_smc_end;
break;
default:
@@ -332,6 +323,8 @@ void __init arm64_enable_wa2_handling(struct alt_instr *alt,
void arm64_set_ssbd_mitigation(bool state)
{
+ int conduit;
+
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_SSBD)) {
pr_info_once("SSBD disabled by kernel configuration\n");
return;
@@ -345,19 +338,10 @@ void arm64_set_ssbd_mitigation(bool state)
return;
}
- switch (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit()) {
- case SMCCC_CONDUIT_HVC:
- arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, state, NULL);
- break;
-
- case SMCCC_CONDUIT_SMC:
- arm_smccc_1_1_smc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, state, NULL);
- break;
+ conduit = arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, state,
+ NULL);
- default:
- WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
- break;
- }
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(conduit == SMCCC_CONDUIT_NONE);
}
static bool has_ssbd_mitigation(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry,
@@ -367,6 +351,7 @@ static bool has_ssbd_mitigation(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry,
bool required = true;
s32 val;
bool this_cpu_safe = false;
+ int conduit;
WARN_ON(scope != SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU || preemptible());
@@ -384,18 +369,10 @@ static bool has_ssbd_mitigation(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry,
goto out_printmsg;
}
- switch (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit()) {
- case SMCCC_CONDUIT_HVC:
- arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
- ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, &res);
- break;
+ conduit = arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
+ ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, &res);
- case SMCCC_CONDUIT_SMC:
- arm_smccc_1_1_smc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
- ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, &res);
- break;
-
- default:
+ if (conduit == SMCCC_CONDUIT_NONE) {
ssbd_state = ARM64_SSBD_UNKNOWN;
if (!this_cpu_safe)
__ssb_safe = false;
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>,
Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 11/22] arm/arm64: Make use of the SMCCC 1.1 wrapper
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 16:42:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191120164236.29359-12-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191120164236.29359-1-maz@kernel.org>
From: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Rather than directly choosing which function to use based on
psci_ops.conduit, use the new arm_smccc_1_1 wrapper instead.
In some cases we still need to do some operations based on the
conduit, but the code duplication is removed.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.c | 13 +++---
arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c | 81 ++++++++++++----------------------
2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.c b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.c
index 54d87506d3b5..7c90b4c615a5 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.c
@@ -74,12 +74,13 @@ static void cpu_v7_spectre_init(void)
case ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A72: {
struct arm_smccc_res res;
+ arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
+ ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
+ if ((int)res.a0 != 0)
+ return;
+
switch (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit()) {
case SMCCC_CONDUIT_HVC:
- arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
- ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
- if ((int)res.a0 != 0)
- break;
per_cpu(harden_branch_predictor_fn, cpu) =
call_hvc_arch_workaround_1;
cpu_do_switch_mm = cpu_v7_hvc_switch_mm;
@@ -87,10 +88,6 @@ static void cpu_v7_spectre_init(void)
break;
case SMCCC_CONDUIT_SMC:
- arm_smccc_1_1_smc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
- ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
- if ((int)res.a0 != 0)
- break;
per_cpu(harden_branch_predictor_fn, cpu) =
call_smc_arch_workaround_1;
cpu_do_switch_mm = cpu_v7_smc_switch_mm;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
index 9c0b011eee20..401246e095e7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
@@ -209,40 +209,31 @@ static int detect_harden_bp_fw(void)
struct arm_smccc_res res;
u32 midr = read_cpuid_id();
+ arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
+ ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
+
+ switch ((int)res.a0) {
+ case 1:
+ /* Firmware says we're just fine */
+ return 0;
+ case 0:
+ break;
+ default:
+ return -1;
+ }
+
switch (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit()) {
case SMCCC_CONDUIT_HVC:
- arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
- ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
- switch ((int)res.a0) {
- case 1:
- /* Firmware says we're just fine */
- return 0;
- case 0:
- cb = call_hvc_arch_workaround_1;
- /* This is a guest, no need to patch KVM vectors */
- smccc_start = NULL;
- smccc_end = NULL;
- break;
- default:
- return -1;
- }
+ cb = call_hvc_arch_workaround_1;
+ /* This is a guest, no need to patch KVM vectors */
+ smccc_start = NULL;
+ smccc_end = NULL;
break;
case SMCCC_CONDUIT_SMC:
- arm_smccc_1_1_smc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
- ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
- switch ((int)res.a0) {
- case 1:
- /* Firmware says we're just fine */
- return 0;
- case 0:
- cb = call_smc_arch_workaround_1;
- smccc_start = __smccc_workaround_1_smc_start;
- smccc_end = __smccc_workaround_1_smc_end;
- break;
- default:
- return -1;
- }
+ cb = call_smc_arch_workaround_1;
+ smccc_start = __smccc_workaround_1_smc_start;
+ smccc_end = __smccc_workaround_1_smc_end;
break;
default:
@@ -332,6 +323,8 @@ void __init arm64_enable_wa2_handling(struct alt_instr *alt,
void arm64_set_ssbd_mitigation(bool state)
{
+ int conduit;
+
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_SSBD)) {
pr_info_once("SSBD disabled by kernel configuration\n");
return;
@@ -345,19 +338,10 @@ void arm64_set_ssbd_mitigation(bool state)
return;
}
- switch (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit()) {
- case SMCCC_CONDUIT_HVC:
- arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, state, NULL);
- break;
-
- case SMCCC_CONDUIT_SMC:
- arm_smccc_1_1_smc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, state, NULL);
- break;
+ conduit = arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, state,
+ NULL);
- default:
- WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
- break;
- }
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(conduit == SMCCC_CONDUIT_NONE);
}
static bool has_ssbd_mitigation(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry,
@@ -367,6 +351,7 @@ static bool has_ssbd_mitigation(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry,
bool required = true;
s32 val;
bool this_cpu_safe = false;
+ int conduit;
WARN_ON(scope != SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU || preemptible());
@@ -384,18 +369,10 @@ static bool has_ssbd_mitigation(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry,
goto out_printmsg;
}
- switch (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit()) {
- case SMCCC_CONDUIT_HVC:
- arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
- ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, &res);
- break;
+ conduit = arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
+ ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, &res);
- case SMCCC_CONDUIT_SMC:
- arm_smccc_1_1_smc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
- ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, &res);
- break;
-
- default:
+ if (conduit == SMCCC_CONDUIT_NONE) {
ssbd_state = ARM64_SSBD_UNKNOWN;
if (!this_cpu_safe)
__ssb_safe = false;
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>,
Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: [PATCH 11/22] arm/arm64: Make use of the SMCCC 1.1 wrapper
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 16:42:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191120164236.29359-12-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191120164236.29359-1-maz@kernel.org>
From: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Rather than directly choosing which function to use based on
psci_ops.conduit, use the new arm_smccc_1_1 wrapper instead.
In some cases we still need to do some operations based on the
conduit, but the code duplication is removed.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.c | 13 +++---
arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c | 81 ++++++++++++----------------------
2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.c b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.c
index 54d87506d3b5..7c90b4c615a5 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.c
@@ -74,12 +74,13 @@ static void cpu_v7_spectre_init(void)
case ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A72: {
struct arm_smccc_res res;
+ arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
+ ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
+ if ((int)res.a0 != 0)
+ return;
+
switch (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit()) {
case SMCCC_CONDUIT_HVC:
- arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
- ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
- if ((int)res.a0 != 0)
- break;
per_cpu(harden_branch_predictor_fn, cpu) =
call_hvc_arch_workaround_1;
cpu_do_switch_mm = cpu_v7_hvc_switch_mm;
@@ -87,10 +88,6 @@ static void cpu_v7_spectre_init(void)
break;
case SMCCC_CONDUIT_SMC:
- arm_smccc_1_1_smc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
- ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
- if ((int)res.a0 != 0)
- break;
per_cpu(harden_branch_predictor_fn, cpu) =
call_smc_arch_workaround_1;
cpu_do_switch_mm = cpu_v7_smc_switch_mm;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
index 9c0b011eee20..401246e095e7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
@@ -209,40 +209,31 @@ static int detect_harden_bp_fw(void)
struct arm_smccc_res res;
u32 midr = read_cpuid_id();
+ arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
+ ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
+
+ switch ((int)res.a0) {
+ case 1:
+ /* Firmware says we're just fine */
+ return 0;
+ case 0:
+ break;
+ default:
+ return -1;
+ }
+
switch (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit()) {
case SMCCC_CONDUIT_HVC:
- arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
- ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
- switch ((int)res.a0) {
- case 1:
- /* Firmware says we're just fine */
- return 0;
- case 0:
- cb = call_hvc_arch_workaround_1;
- /* This is a guest, no need to patch KVM vectors */
- smccc_start = NULL;
- smccc_end = NULL;
- break;
- default:
- return -1;
- }
+ cb = call_hvc_arch_workaround_1;
+ /* This is a guest, no need to patch KVM vectors */
+ smccc_start = NULL;
+ smccc_end = NULL;
break;
case SMCCC_CONDUIT_SMC:
- arm_smccc_1_1_smc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
- ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
- switch ((int)res.a0) {
- case 1:
- /* Firmware says we're just fine */
- return 0;
- case 0:
- cb = call_smc_arch_workaround_1;
- smccc_start = __smccc_workaround_1_smc_start;
- smccc_end = __smccc_workaround_1_smc_end;
- break;
- default:
- return -1;
- }
+ cb = call_smc_arch_workaround_1;
+ smccc_start = __smccc_workaround_1_smc_start;
+ smccc_end = __smccc_workaround_1_smc_end;
break;
default:
@@ -332,6 +323,8 @@ void __init arm64_enable_wa2_handling(struct alt_instr *alt,
void arm64_set_ssbd_mitigation(bool state)
{
+ int conduit;
+
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_SSBD)) {
pr_info_once("SSBD disabled by kernel configuration\n");
return;
@@ -345,19 +338,10 @@ void arm64_set_ssbd_mitigation(bool state)
return;
}
- switch (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit()) {
- case SMCCC_CONDUIT_HVC:
- arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, state, NULL);
- break;
-
- case SMCCC_CONDUIT_SMC:
- arm_smccc_1_1_smc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, state, NULL);
- break;
+ conduit = arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, state,
+ NULL);
- default:
- WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
- break;
- }
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(conduit == SMCCC_CONDUIT_NONE);
}
static bool has_ssbd_mitigation(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry,
@@ -367,6 +351,7 @@ static bool has_ssbd_mitigation(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry,
bool required = true;
s32 val;
bool this_cpu_safe = false;
+ int conduit;
WARN_ON(scope != SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU || preemptible());
@@ -384,18 +369,10 @@ static bool has_ssbd_mitigation(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry,
goto out_printmsg;
}
- switch (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit()) {
- case SMCCC_CONDUIT_HVC:
- arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
- ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, &res);
- break;
+ conduit = arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
+ ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, &res);
- case SMCCC_CONDUIT_SMC:
- arm_smccc_1_1_smc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
- ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, &res);
- break;
-
- default:
+ if (conduit == SMCCC_CONDUIT_NONE) {
ssbd_state = ARM64_SSBD_UNKNOWN;
if (!this_cpu_safe)
__ssb_safe = false;
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-20 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-20 16:42 [GIT PULL] KVM/arm updates for 5.5 Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 01/22] KVM: arm/arm64: Allow reporting non-ISV data aborts to userspace Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 02/22] KVM: arm/arm64: Allow user injection of external data aborts Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 03/22] KVM: arm64: Document PV-time interface Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 04/22] KVM: arm/arm64: Factor out hypercall handling from PSCI code Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 05/22] KVM: arm64: Implement PV_TIME_FEATURES call Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 06/22] KVM: Implement kvm_put_guest() Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 07/22] KVM: arm64: Support stolen time reporting via shared structure Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 08/22] KVM: Allow kvm_device_ops to be const Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 09/22] KVM: arm64: Provide VCPU attributes for stolen time Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 10/22] arm/arm64: Provide a wrapper for SMCCC 1.1 calls Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 11/22] arm/arm64: Make use of the SMCCC 1.1 wrapper Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 12/22] arm64: Retrieve stolen time as paravirtualized guest Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 13/22] KVM: arm64: Select TASK_DELAY_ACCT+TASKSTATS rather than SCHEDSTATS Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 14/22] KVM: arm/arm64: Show halt poll counters in debugfs Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 15/22] KVM: arm64: Don't set HCR_EL2.TVM when S2FWB is supported Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 16/22] KVM: arm64: vgic-v4: Move the GICv4 residency flow to be driven by vcpu_load/put Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 17/22] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Remove the declaration of kvm_send_userspace_msi() Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 18/22] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Fix some comments typo Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 19/22] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Don't rely on the wrong pending table Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 20/22] KVM: arm/arm64: Let the timer expire in hardirq context on RT Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 21/22] KVM: vgic-v4: Track the number of VLPIs per vcpu Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` [PATCH 22/22] KVM: arm64: Opportunistically turn off WFI trapping when using direct LPI injection Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-20 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-21 8:58 ` [GIT PULL] KVM/arm updates for 5.5 Paolo Bonzini
2019-11-21 8:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-11-21 8:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-11-21 9:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-21 9:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-21 9:06 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191120164236.29359-12-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xypron.glpk@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.