From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, stefan@agner.ch,
yamada.masahiro@socionext.com, will@kernel.org,
boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, sashal@kernel.org,
sstabellini@kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, vladimir.murzin@arm.com,
marc.zyngier@arm.com, alexios.zavras@intel.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, allison@lohutok.net, jgross@suse.com,
steve.capper@arm.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com,
info@metux.net
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] arm/arm64/xen: use C inlines for privcmd_call
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 00:22:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191122002258.GD25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191121184805.414758-2-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 01:48:03PM -0500, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> privcmd_call requires to enable access to userspace for the
> duration of the hypercall.
>
> Currently, this is done via assembly macros. Change it to C
> inlines instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/assembler.h | 2 +-
> arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm/xen/hypercall.S | 15 ++-------------
> arch/arm64/xen/hypercall.S | 19 ++-----------------
> include/xen/arm/hypercall.h | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++---
> 6 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/assembler.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/assembler.h
> index 99929122dad7..8e9262a0f016 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/assembler.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/assembler.h
> @@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ THUMB( orr \reg , \reg , #PSR_T_BIT )
> .macro uaccess_disable, tmp, isb=1
> #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SW_DOMAIN_PAN
> /*
> - * Whenever we re-enter userspace, the domains should always be
> + * Whenever we re-enter kernel, the domains should always be
> * set appropriately.
> */
> mov \tmp, #DACR_UACCESS_DISABLE
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h
> index 98c6b91be4a8..79d4efa3eb62 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h
> @@ -16,6 +16,23 @@
>
> #include <asm/extable.h>
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SW_DOMAIN_PAN
> +static __always_inline void uaccess_enable(void)
> +{
> + unsigned long val = DACR_UACCESS_ENABLE;
> +
> + asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c3, c0, 0" : : "r" (val));
> + isb();
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline void uaccess_disable(void)
> +{
> + unsigned long val = DACR_UACCESS_ENABLE;
> +
> + asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c3, c0, 0" : : "r" (val));
> + isb();
> +}
Rather than inventing these, why not use uaccess_save_and_enable()..
uaccess_restore() around the Xen call?
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, stefan@agner.ch,
yamada.masahiro@socionext.com, will@kernel.org,
boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, sashal@kernel.org,
sstabellini@kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, vladimir.murzin@arm.com,
marc.zyngier@arm.com, alexios.zavras@intel.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, allison@lohutok.net, jgross@suse.com,
steve.capper@arm.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com,
info@metux.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm/arm64/xen: use C inlines for privcmd_call
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 00:22:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191122002258.GD25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191121184805.414758-2-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 01:48:03PM -0500, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> privcmd_call requires to enable access to userspace for the
> duration of the hypercall.
>
> Currently, this is done via assembly macros. Change it to C
> inlines instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/assembler.h | 2 +-
> arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm/xen/hypercall.S | 15 ++-------------
> arch/arm64/xen/hypercall.S | 19 ++-----------------
> include/xen/arm/hypercall.h | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++---
> 6 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/assembler.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/assembler.h
> index 99929122dad7..8e9262a0f016 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/assembler.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/assembler.h
> @@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ THUMB( orr \reg , \reg , #PSR_T_BIT )
> .macro uaccess_disable, tmp, isb=1
> #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SW_DOMAIN_PAN
> /*
> - * Whenever we re-enter userspace, the domains should always be
> + * Whenever we re-enter kernel, the domains should always be
> * set appropriately.
> */
> mov \tmp, #DACR_UACCESS_DISABLE
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h
> index 98c6b91be4a8..79d4efa3eb62 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h
> @@ -16,6 +16,23 @@
>
> #include <asm/extable.h>
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SW_DOMAIN_PAN
> +static __always_inline void uaccess_enable(void)
> +{
> + unsigned long val = DACR_UACCESS_ENABLE;
> +
> + asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c3, c0, 0" : : "r" (val));
> + isb();
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline void uaccess_disable(void)
> +{
> + unsigned long val = DACR_UACCESS_ENABLE;
> +
> + asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c3, c0, 0" : : "r" (val));
> + isb();
> +}
Rather than inventing these, why not use uaccess_save_and_enable()..
uaccess_restore() around the Xen call?
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: jmorris@namei.org, sashal@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
will@kernel.org, steve.capper@arm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
james.morse@arm.com, vladimir.murzin@arm.com,
mark.rutland@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, allison@lohutok.net, info@metux.net,
alexios.zavras@intel.com, sstabellini@kernel.org,
boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, jgross@suse.com, stefan@agner.ch,
yamada.masahiro@socionext.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm/arm64/xen: use C inlines for privcmd_call
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 00:22:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191122002258.GD25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191121184805.414758-2-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 01:48:03PM -0500, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> privcmd_call requires to enable access to userspace for the
> duration of the hypercall.
>
> Currently, this is done via assembly macros. Change it to C
> inlines instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/assembler.h | 2 +-
> arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm/xen/hypercall.S | 15 ++-------------
> arch/arm64/xen/hypercall.S | 19 ++-----------------
> include/xen/arm/hypercall.h | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++---
> 6 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/assembler.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/assembler.h
> index 99929122dad7..8e9262a0f016 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/assembler.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/assembler.h
> @@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ THUMB( orr \reg , \reg , #PSR_T_BIT )
> .macro uaccess_disable, tmp, isb=1
> #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SW_DOMAIN_PAN
> /*
> - * Whenever we re-enter userspace, the domains should always be
> + * Whenever we re-enter kernel, the domains should always be
> * set appropriately.
> */
> mov \tmp, #DACR_UACCESS_DISABLE
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h
> index 98c6b91be4a8..79d4efa3eb62 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h
> @@ -16,6 +16,23 @@
>
> #include <asm/extable.h>
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SW_DOMAIN_PAN
> +static __always_inline void uaccess_enable(void)
> +{
> + unsigned long val = DACR_UACCESS_ENABLE;
> +
> + asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c3, c0, 0" : : "r" (val));
> + isb();
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline void uaccess_disable(void)
> +{
> + unsigned long val = DACR_UACCESS_ENABLE;
> +
> + asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c3, c0, 0" : : "r" (val));
> + isb();
> +}
Rather than inventing these, why not use uaccess_save_and_enable()..
uaccess_restore() around the Xen call?
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-22 0:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-21 18:48 [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Use C inlines for uaccess Pavel Tatashin
2019-11-21 18:48 ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-11-21 18:48 ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-11-21 18:48 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] arm/arm64/xen: use C inlines for privcmd_call Pavel Tatashin
2019-11-21 18:48 ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-11-21 18:48 ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-11-22 0:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin [this message]
2019-11-22 0:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-11-22 0:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-11-22 0:30 ` [Xen-devel] " Pavel Tatashin
2019-11-22 0:30 ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-11-22 0:30 ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-11-22 0:34 ` [Xen-devel] " Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-11-22 0:34 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-11-22 0:34 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-11-22 0:35 ` [Xen-devel] " Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-11-22 0:35 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-11-22 0:35 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-11-22 0:39 ` [Xen-devel] " Pavel Tatashin
2019-11-22 0:39 ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-11-22 0:39 ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-11-22 0:53 ` [Xen-devel] " Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-11-22 0:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-11-22 0:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-11-21 18:48 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/3] arm64: remove uaccess_ttbr0 asm macros from cache functions Pavel Tatashin
2019-11-21 18:48 ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-11-21 18:48 ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-11-21 18:48 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] arm64: remove the rest of asm-uaccess.h Pavel Tatashin
2019-11-21 18:48 ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-11-21 18:48 ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-11-22 1:26 ` [Xen-devel] " Max Filippov
2019-11-22 1:26 ` Max Filippov
2019-11-22 1:26 ` Max Filippov
2019-11-22 2:20 ` [Xen-devel] " Pavel Tatashin
2019-11-22 2:20 ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-11-22 2:20 ` Pavel Tatashin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-11-27 18:44 [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Use C inlines for uaccess Pavel Tatashin
2019-11-27 18:44 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] arm/arm64/xen: use C inlines for privcmd_call Pavel Tatashin
2019-11-29 15:05 ` Julien Grall
2019-11-29 15:09 ` Andrew Cooper
2019-11-29 15:09 ` Andrew Cooper
2019-11-29 15:09 ` Andrew Cooper
2019-12-04 17:55 ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-12-04 17:55 ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-12-04 17:55 ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-12-04 17:58 ` Pavel Tatashin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191122002258.GD25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=alexios.zavras@intel.com \
--cc=allison@lohutok.net \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=info@metux.net \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=stefan@agner.ch \
--cc=steve.capper@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.