All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/bios: fold pci rom map/unmap into copy function
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 15:49:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191122134949.GK1208@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191120234608.17775-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com>

On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 03:46:07PM -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> We don't need to keep the pci rom mapped during the entire
> intel_bios_init() anymore. Move it to the previous copy_vbt() function
> and rename it to oprom_get_vbt() since now it's responsible to to all
> operations related to get the vbt from the oprom.
> 
> v2: fix double __iomem attribute detected by sparse
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c | 40 +++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> index 8bdfc1d55040..aa9b182efee5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> @@ -1896,12 +1896,17 @@ bool intel_bios_is_valid_vbt(const void *buf, size_t size)
>  	return vbt;
>  }
>  
> -static struct vbt_header *copy_vbt(void __iomem *oprom, size_t size)
> +static struct vbt_header *oprom_get_vbt(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
> -	void __iomem *p = NULL;
> +	struct pci_dev *pdev = dev_priv->drm.pdev;
> +	void __iomem *p = NULL, *oprom;
>  	struct vbt_header *vbt;
>  	u16 vbt_size;
> -	size_t i;
> +	size_t i, size;
> +
> +	oprom = pci_map_rom(pdev, &size);
> +	if (!oprom)
> +		return NULL;
>  
>  	/* Scour memory looking for the VBT signature. */
>  	for (i = 0; i + 4 < size; i++) {
> @@ -1914,23 +1919,23 @@ static struct vbt_header *copy_vbt(void __iomem *oprom, size_t size)
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!p)
> -		return NULL;
> +		goto err_unmap_oprom;
>  
>  	if (sizeof(struct vbt_header) > size) {
>  		DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("VBT header incomplete\n");
> -		return NULL;
> +		goto err_unmap_oprom;
>  	}
>  
>  	vbt_size = ioread16(p + offsetof(struct vbt_header, vbt_size));
>  	if (vbt_size > size) {
>  		DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("VBT incomplete (vbt_size overflows)\n");
> -		return NULL;
> +		goto err_unmap_oprom;
>  	}
>  
>  	/* The rest will be validated by intel_bios_is_valid_vbt() */
>  	vbt = kmalloc(vbt_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!vbt)
> -		return NULL;
> +		goto err_unmap_oprom;
>  
>  	memcpy_fromio(vbt, p, vbt_size);
>  

Where is the unmap for the non-error path?

> @@ -1941,6 +1946,8 @@ static struct vbt_header *copy_vbt(void __iomem *oprom, size_t size)
>  
>  err_free_vbt:
>  	kfree(vbt);
> +err_unmap_oprom:
> +	pci_unmap_rom(pdev, oprom);
>  
>  	return NULL;
>  }
> @@ -1955,10 +1962,9 @@ static struct vbt_header *copy_vbt(void __iomem *oprom, size_t size)
>   */
>  void intel_bios_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
> -	struct pci_dev *pdev = dev_priv->drm.pdev;
>  	const struct vbt_header *vbt = dev_priv->opregion.vbt;
> +	struct vbt_header *oprom_vbt = NULL;
>  	const struct bdb_header *bdb;
> -	u8 __iomem *oprom = NULL;
>  
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev_priv->vbt.display_devices);
>  
> @@ -1971,15 +1977,11 @@ void intel_bios_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  
>  	/* If the OpRegion does not have VBT, look in PCI ROM. */
>  	if (!vbt) {
> -		size_t size;
> -
> -		oprom = pci_map_rom(pdev, &size);
> -		if (!oprom)
> +		oprom_vbt = oprom_get_vbt(dev_priv);
> +		if (!oprom_vbt)
>  			goto out;
>  
> -		vbt = copy_vbt(oprom, size);
> -		if (!vbt)
> -			goto out;
> +		vbt = oprom_vbt;
>  
>  		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Found valid VBT in PCI ROM\n");
>  	}
> @@ -2012,11 +2014,7 @@ void intel_bios_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  		init_vbt_missing_defaults(dev_priv);
>  	}
>  
> -	if (oprom)
> -		pci_unmap_rom(pdev, oprom);
> -
> -	if (vbt != dev_priv->opregion.vbt)
> -		kfree(vbt);
> +	kfree(oprom_vbt);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> -- 
> 2.24.0

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/bios: fold pci rom map/unmap into copy function
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 15:49:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191122134949.GK1208@intel.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20191122134949.VFviYOHLbj8zeggf2ZCeMkpbdRNwGxAxcFYtlrTBrJ8@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191120234608.17775-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com>

On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 03:46:07PM -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> We don't need to keep the pci rom mapped during the entire
> intel_bios_init() anymore. Move it to the previous copy_vbt() function
> and rename it to oprom_get_vbt() since now it's responsible to to all
> operations related to get the vbt from the oprom.
> 
> v2: fix double __iomem attribute detected by sparse
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c | 40 +++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> index 8bdfc1d55040..aa9b182efee5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> @@ -1896,12 +1896,17 @@ bool intel_bios_is_valid_vbt(const void *buf, size_t size)
>  	return vbt;
>  }
>  
> -static struct vbt_header *copy_vbt(void __iomem *oprom, size_t size)
> +static struct vbt_header *oprom_get_vbt(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
> -	void __iomem *p = NULL;
> +	struct pci_dev *pdev = dev_priv->drm.pdev;
> +	void __iomem *p = NULL, *oprom;
>  	struct vbt_header *vbt;
>  	u16 vbt_size;
> -	size_t i;
> +	size_t i, size;
> +
> +	oprom = pci_map_rom(pdev, &size);
> +	if (!oprom)
> +		return NULL;
>  
>  	/* Scour memory looking for the VBT signature. */
>  	for (i = 0; i + 4 < size; i++) {
> @@ -1914,23 +1919,23 @@ static struct vbt_header *copy_vbt(void __iomem *oprom, size_t size)
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!p)
> -		return NULL;
> +		goto err_unmap_oprom;
>  
>  	if (sizeof(struct vbt_header) > size) {
>  		DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("VBT header incomplete\n");
> -		return NULL;
> +		goto err_unmap_oprom;
>  	}
>  
>  	vbt_size = ioread16(p + offsetof(struct vbt_header, vbt_size));
>  	if (vbt_size > size) {
>  		DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("VBT incomplete (vbt_size overflows)\n");
> -		return NULL;
> +		goto err_unmap_oprom;
>  	}
>  
>  	/* The rest will be validated by intel_bios_is_valid_vbt() */
>  	vbt = kmalloc(vbt_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!vbt)
> -		return NULL;
> +		goto err_unmap_oprom;
>  
>  	memcpy_fromio(vbt, p, vbt_size);
>  

Where is the unmap for the non-error path?

> @@ -1941,6 +1946,8 @@ static struct vbt_header *copy_vbt(void __iomem *oprom, size_t size)
>  
>  err_free_vbt:
>  	kfree(vbt);
> +err_unmap_oprom:
> +	pci_unmap_rom(pdev, oprom);
>  
>  	return NULL;
>  }
> @@ -1955,10 +1962,9 @@ static struct vbt_header *copy_vbt(void __iomem *oprom, size_t size)
>   */
>  void intel_bios_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
> -	struct pci_dev *pdev = dev_priv->drm.pdev;
>  	const struct vbt_header *vbt = dev_priv->opregion.vbt;
> +	struct vbt_header *oprom_vbt = NULL;
>  	const struct bdb_header *bdb;
> -	u8 __iomem *oprom = NULL;
>  
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev_priv->vbt.display_devices);
>  
> @@ -1971,15 +1977,11 @@ void intel_bios_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  
>  	/* If the OpRegion does not have VBT, look in PCI ROM. */
>  	if (!vbt) {
> -		size_t size;
> -
> -		oprom = pci_map_rom(pdev, &size);
> -		if (!oprom)
> +		oprom_vbt = oprom_get_vbt(dev_priv);
> +		if (!oprom_vbt)
>  			goto out;
>  
> -		vbt = copy_vbt(oprom, size);
> -		if (!vbt)
> -			goto out;
> +		vbt = oprom_vbt;
>  
>  		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Found valid VBT in PCI ROM\n");
>  	}
> @@ -2012,11 +2014,7 @@ void intel_bios_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  		init_vbt_missing_defaults(dev_priv);
>  	}
>  
> -	if (oprom)
> -		pci_unmap_rom(pdev, oprom);
> -
> -	if (vbt != dev_priv->opregion.vbt)
> -		kfree(vbt);
> +	kfree(oprom_vbt);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> -- 
> 2.24.0

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-11-22 13:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-20 23:46 [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/bios: do not discard address space Lucas De Marchi
2019-11-20 23:46 ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2019-11-20 23:46 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/bios: fold pci rom map/unmap into copy function Lucas De Marchi
2019-11-20 23:46   ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2019-11-21 13:02   ` Jani Nikula
2019-11-21 13:02     ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2019-11-22 13:49   ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2019-11-22 13:49     ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-11-20 23:46 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/i915: assume vbt is 4-byte aligned into oprom Lucas De Marchi
2019-11-20 23:46   ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2019-11-21 13:09   ` Jani Nikula
2019-11-21 13:09     ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2019-11-21 18:54     ` Lucas De Marchi
2019-11-21 18:54       ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2019-11-22 13:55       ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-11-22 13:55         ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2019-11-25 17:43         ` Lucas De Marchi
2019-11-25 17:43           ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2019-11-21  3:44 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/3] drm/i915/bios: do not discard address space Patchwork
2019-11-21  3:44   ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
2019-11-22  5:42 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2019-11-22  5:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-11-26 22:51 [PATCH 0/3] bios: dot " Lucas De Marchi
2019-11-26 22:51 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/bios: fold pci rom map/unmap into copy function Lucas De Marchi
2019-11-15 23:35 [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/bios: do not discard address space Lucas De Marchi
2019-11-15 23:35 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/bios: fold pci rom map/unmap into copy function Lucas De Marchi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191122134949.GK1208@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.