From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
linux-tegra <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / runtime: Allow drivers to override runtime PM behaviour on sleep
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 17:50:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191128163623.GA2382107@ulmo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0haOB1vc8aKk11RR-OnfLHChcqa+z7QkeKyN66s6xM3OA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1398 bytes --]
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 05:14:51PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 5:03 PM Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> >
> > Currently the driver PM core will automatically acquire a runtime PM
> > reference for devices before system sleep is entered. This is needed
> > to avoid potential issues related to devices' parents getting put to
> > runtime suspend at the wrong time and causing problems with their
> > children.
>
> Not only for that.
>
> > In some cases drivers are carefully written to avoid such issues and
> > the default behaviour can be changed to allow runtime PM to operate
> > regularly during system sleep.
>
> But this change breaks quite a few assumptions in the core too, so no,
> it can't be made.
Anything in particular that I can look at? I'm not seeing any issues
when I test this, which could of course mean that I'm just getting
lucky.
One thing that irritated me is that I think this used to work. I do
recall testing suspend/resume a few years ago and devices would get
properly runtime suspended/resumed. I did some digging but couldn't
find anything that would have had an impact on this.
Given that this is completely opt-in feature, why are you categorically
NAK'ing this?
Is there some other alternative that I can look into?
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
linux-tegra <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / runtime: Allow drivers to override runtime PM behaviour on sleep
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 17:50:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191128163623.GA2382107@ulmo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0haOB1vc8aKk11RR-OnfLHChcqa+z7QkeKyN66s6xM3OA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1398 bytes --]
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 05:14:51PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 5:03 PM Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> >
> > Currently the driver PM core will automatically acquire a runtime PM
> > reference for devices before system sleep is entered. This is needed
> > to avoid potential issues related to devices' parents getting put to
> > runtime suspend at the wrong time and causing problems with their
> > children.
>
> Not only for that.
>
> > In some cases drivers are carefully written to avoid such issues and
> > the default behaviour can be changed to allow runtime PM to operate
> > regularly during system sleep.
>
> But this change breaks quite a few assumptions in the core too, so no,
> it can't be made.
Anything in particular that I can look at? I'm not seeing any issues
when I test this, which could of course mean that I'm just getting
lucky.
One thing that irritated me is that I think this used to work. I do
recall testing suspend/resume a few years ago and devices would get
properly runtime suspended/resumed. I did some digging but couldn't
find anything that would have had an impact on this.
Given that this is completely opt-in feature, why are you categorically
NAK'ing this?
Is there some other alternative that I can look into?
Thierry
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-28 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-28 16:03 [PATCH 0/2] PM / runtime: Allow drivers to override runtime PM behaviour on sleep Thierry Reding
2019-11-28 16:03 ` Thierry Reding
2019-11-28 16:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Thierry Reding
2019-11-28 16:03 ` Thierry Reding
2019-11-28 16:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-28 16:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-28 16:50 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2019-11-28 16:50 ` Thierry Reding
2019-11-28 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-28 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-28 22:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-28 22:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-29 10:08 ` Thierry Reding
2019-11-29 10:08 ` Thierry Reding
2019-11-29 10:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-29 10:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-29 12:07 ` Thierry Reding
2019-11-29 12:07 ` Thierry Reding
2019-11-29 20:27 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-11-29 20:27 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-12-04 0:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-12-04 0:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-29 9:33 ` Thierry Reding
2019-11-29 9:33 ` Thierry Reding
2019-11-29 10:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-29 10:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-29 11:44 ` Thierry Reding
2019-11-29 11:44 ` Thierry Reding
2019-11-28 16:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/tegra: Allow runtime suspend on system sleep Thierry Reding
2019-11-28 16:03 ` Thierry Reding
2019-11-28 16:47 ` [PATCH 0/2] PM / runtime: Allow drivers to override runtime PM behaviour on sleep Daniel Vetter
2019-11-28 16:47 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-11-28 17:04 ` Thierry Reding
2019-11-28 17:04 ` Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191128163623.GA2382107@ulmo \
--to=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=digetx@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.