All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: virtio-fs@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: mszeredi@redhat.com
Subject: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v2 5/5] virtiofsd: Implement blocking posix locks
Date: Wed,  4 Dec 2019 14:08:36 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191204190836.31324-6-vgoyal@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191204190836.31324-1-vgoyal@redhat.com>

As of now we don't support fcntl(F_SETLKW) and if we see one, we return
-EOPNOTSUPP.

Change that by accepting these requests and returning a reply immediately
asking caller to wait. Once lock is available, send a notification to
the waiter indicating lock is available.

Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
---
 contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_kernel.h    |  7 +++
 contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.c  | 23 ++++++-
 contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.h  | 25 ++++++++
 contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c    | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 contrib/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c | 49 ++++++++++++---
 5 files changed, 185 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_kernel.h b/contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_kernel.h
index 2bdc8b1c88..432eb14d14 100644
--- a/contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_kernel.h
+++ b/contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_kernel.h
@@ -444,6 +444,7 @@ enum fuse_notify_code {
 	FUSE_NOTIFY_STORE = 4,
 	FUSE_NOTIFY_RETRIEVE = 5,
 	FUSE_NOTIFY_DELETE = 6,
+	FUSE_NOTIFY_LOCK = 7,
 	FUSE_NOTIFY_CODE_MAX,
 };
 
@@ -836,6 +837,12 @@ struct fuse_notify_retrieve_in {
 	uint64_t	dummy4;
 };
 
+struct fuse_notify_lock_out {
+	uint64_t	unique;
+	int32_t		error;
+	int32_t		padding;
+};
+
 /* Device ioctls: */
 #define FUSE_DEV_IOC_CLONE	_IOR(229, 0, uint32_t)
 
diff --git a/contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.c b/contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.c
index d4a42d9804..3d9c289510 100644
--- a/contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.c
+++ b/contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.c
@@ -183,7 +183,8 @@ int fuse_send_reply_iov_nofree(fuse_req_t req, int error, struct iovec *iov,
 {
 	struct fuse_out_header out;
 
-	if (error <= -1000 || error > 0) {
+	/* error = 1 has been used to signal client to wait for notificaiton */
+	if (error <= -1000 || error > 1) {
 		fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_ERR, "fuse: bad error value: %i\n",	error);
 		error = -ERANGE;
 	}
@@ -291,6 +292,12 @@ int fuse_reply_err(fuse_req_t req, int err)
 	return send_reply(req, -err, NULL, 0);
 }
 
+int fuse_reply_wait(fuse_req_t req)
+{
+	/* TODO: This is a hack. Fix it */
+	return send_reply(req, 1, NULL, 0);
+}
+
 void fuse_reply_none(fuse_req_t req)
 {
 	fuse_free_req(req);
@@ -2207,6 +2214,20 @@ static int send_notify_iov(struct fuse_session *se, int notify_code,
 	return fuse_send_msg(se, NULL, iov, count);
 }
 
+int fuse_lowlevel_notify_lock(struct fuse_session *se, uint64_t unique,
+			      int32_t error)
+{
+	struct fuse_notify_lock_out outarg = {0};
+	struct iovec iov[2];
+
+	outarg.unique = unique;
+	outarg.error = -error;
+
+	iov[1].iov_base = &outarg;
+	iov[1].iov_len = sizeof(outarg);
+	return send_notify_iov(se, FUSE_NOTIFY_LOCK, iov, 2);
+}
+
 int fuse_lowlevel_notify_poll(struct fuse_pollhandle *ph)
 {
 	if (ph != NULL) {
diff --git a/contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.h b/contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.h
index e664d2d12d..4126b4f967 100644
--- a/contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.h
+++ b/contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.h
@@ -1251,6 +1251,22 @@ struct fuse_lowlevel_ops {
  */
 int fuse_reply_err(fuse_req_t req, int err);
 
+/**
+ * Ask caller to wait for lock.
+ *
+ * Possible requests:
+ *   setlkw
+ *
+ * If caller sends a blocking lock request (setlkw), then reply to caller
+ * that wait for lock to be available. Once lock is available caller will
+ * receive a notification with request's unique id. Notification will
+ * carry info whether lock was successfully obtained or not.
+ *
+ * @param req request handle
+ * @return zero for success, -errno for failure to send reply
+ */
+int fuse_reply_wait(fuse_req_t req);
+
 /**
  * Don't send reply
  *
@@ -1704,6 +1720,15 @@ int fuse_lowlevel_notify_delete(struct fuse_session *se,
 int fuse_lowlevel_notify_store(struct fuse_session *se, fuse_ino_t ino,
 			       off_t offset, struct fuse_bufvec *bufv,
 			       enum fuse_buf_copy_flags flags);
+/**
+ * Notify event related to previous lock request
+ *
+ * @param se the session object
+ * @param unique the unique id of the request which requested setlkw
+ * @param error zero for success, -errno for the failure
+ */
+int fuse_lowlevel_notify_lock(struct fuse_session *se, uint64_t unique,
+			      int32_t error);
 
 /* ----------------------------------------------------------- *
  * Utility functions					       *
diff --git a/contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c b/contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c
index 94cf9b3791..129dd329f6 100644
--- a/contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c
+++ b/contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c
@@ -208,6 +208,83 @@ static void copy_iov(struct iovec *src_iov, int src_count,
     }
 }
 
+static int virtio_send_notify_msg(struct fuse_session *se, struct iovec *iov,
+				  int count)
+{
+    struct fv_QueueInfo *qi;
+    VuDev *dev = &se->virtio_dev->dev;
+    VuVirtq *q;
+    FVRequest *req;
+    VuVirtqElement *elem;
+    unsigned int in_num;
+    struct fuse_out_header *out = iov[0].iov_base;
+    size_t in_len, tosend_len = iov_size(iov, count);
+    struct iovec *in_sg;
+    int ret = 0;
+
+    /* Notifications have unique == 0 */
+    assert (!out->unique);
+
+    if (!se->notify_enabled)
+        return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+    /* If notifications are enabled, queue index 1 is notification queue */
+    qi = se->virtio_dev->qi[1];
+    q = vu_get_queue(dev, qi->qidx);
+
+    pthread_rwlock_rdlock(&qi->virtio_dev->vu_dispatch_rwlock);
+    pthread_mutex_lock(&qi->vq_lock);
+    /* Pop an element from queue */
+    req = vu_queue_pop(dev, q, sizeof(FVRequest), NULL, NULL);
+    if (!req) {
+        /* TODO: Implement some sort of ring buffer and queue notifications
+	 * on that and send these later when notification queue has space
+	 * available.
+	 */
+        ret = -ENOSPC;
+    }
+    pthread_mutex_unlock(&qi->vq_lock);
+    pthread_rwlock_unlock(&qi->virtio_dev->vu_dispatch_rwlock);
+
+    if (ret)
+        return ret;
+
+    out->len = tosend_len;
+    elem = &req->elem;
+    in_num = elem->in_num;
+    in_sg = elem->in_sg;
+    in_len = iov_size(in_sg, in_num);
+    fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "%s: elem %d: with %d in desc of length %zd\n",
+             __func__, elem->index, in_num,  in_len);
+
+    if (in_len < sizeof(struct fuse_out_header)) {
+        fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_ERR, "%s: elem %d too short for out_header\n",
+                 __func__, elem->index);
+        ret = -E2BIG;
+        goto out;
+    }
+
+    if (in_len < tosend_len) {
+        fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_ERR, "%s: elem %d too small for data len"
+                 " %zd\n", __func__, elem->index, tosend_len);
+        ret = -E2BIG;
+        goto out;
+    }
+
+    /* First copy the header data from iov->in_sg */
+    copy_iov(iov, count, in_sg, in_num, tosend_len);
+
+    pthread_rwlock_rdlock(&qi->virtio_dev->vu_dispatch_rwlock);
+    pthread_mutex_lock(&qi->vq_lock);
+    vu_queue_push(dev, q, elem, tosend_len);
+    vu_queue_notify(dev, q);
+    pthread_mutex_unlock(&qi->vq_lock);
+    pthread_rwlock_unlock(&qi->virtio_dev->vu_dispatch_rwlock);
+out:
+    free(req);
+    return ret;
+}
+
 /*
  * Called back by ll whenever it wants to send a reply/message back
  * The 1st element of the iov starts with the fuse_out_header
@@ -216,11 +293,11 @@ static void copy_iov(struct iovec *src_iov, int src_count,
 int virtio_send_msg(struct fuse_session *se, struct fuse_chan *ch,
                     struct iovec *iov, int count)
 {
-    FVRequest *req = container_of(ch, FVRequest, ch);
-    struct fv_QueueInfo *qi = ch->qi;
+    FVRequest *req;
+    struct fv_QueueInfo *qi;
     VuDev *dev = &se->virtio_dev->dev;
-    VuVirtq *q = vu_get_queue(dev, qi->qidx);
-    VuVirtqElement *elem = &req->elem;
+    VuVirtq *q;
+    VuVirtqElement *elem;
     int ret = 0;
 
     assert(count >= 1);
@@ -231,8 +308,15 @@ int virtio_send_msg(struct fuse_session *se, struct fuse_chan *ch,
 
     size_t tosend_len = iov_size(iov, count);
 
-    /* unique == 0 is notification, which we don't support */
-    assert(out->unique);
+    /* unique == 0 is notification */
+    if (!out->unique)
+        return virtio_send_notify_msg(se, iov, count);
+
+    assert(ch);
+    req = container_of(ch, FVRequest, ch);
+    elem = &req->elem;
+    qi = ch->qi;
+    q = vu_get_queue(dev, qi->qidx);
     assert(!req->reply_sent);
 
     /* The 'in' part of the elem is to qemu */
@@ -885,6 +969,7 @@ static int fv_get_config(VuDev *dev, uint8_t *config, uint32_t len)
 		struct fuse_notify_delete_out		delete_out;
 		struct fuse_notify_store_out		store_out;
 		struct fuse_notify_retrieve_out		retrieve_out;
+		struct fuse_notify_lock_out		lock_out;
 	};
 
 	notify_size = sizeof(struct fuse_out_header) +
diff --git a/contrib/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c b/contrib/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
index 6aa56882e8..308fc76530 100644
--- a/contrib/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
+++ b/contrib/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
@@ -1926,7 +1926,10 @@ static void lo_setlk(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino,
 	struct lo_data *lo = lo_data(req);
 	struct lo_inode *inode;
 	struct lo_inode_plock *plock;
-	int ret, saverr = 0;
+	int ret, saverr = 0, ofd;
+	uint64_t unique;
+	struct fuse_session *se = req->se;
+	bool async_lock = false;
 
 	fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "lo_setlk(ino=%" PRIu64 ", flags=%d)"
 		 " cmd=%d pid=%d owner=0x%lx sleep=%d l_whence=%d"
@@ -1934,11 +1937,6 @@ static void lo_setlk(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino,
 		 lock->l_type, lock->l_pid, fi->lock_owner, sleep,
 		 lock->l_whence, lock->l_start, lock->l_len);
 
-	if (sleep) {
-		fuse_reply_err(req, EOPNOTSUPP);
-		return;
-	}
-
 	inode = lo_inode(req, ino);
 	if (!inode) {
 		fuse_reply_err(req, EBADF);
@@ -1951,21 +1949,54 @@ static void lo_setlk(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino,
 
 	if (!plock) {
 		saverr = ret;
+		pthread_mutex_unlock(&inode->plock_mutex);
 		goto out;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * plock is now released when inode is going away. We already have
+	 * a reference on inode, so it is guaranteed that plock->fd is
+	 * still around even after dropping inode->plock_mutex lock
+	 */
+	ofd = plock->fd;
+	pthread_mutex_unlock(&inode->plock_mutex);
+
+	/*
+	 * If this lock request can block, request caller to wait for
+	 * notification. Do not access req after this. Once lock is
+	 * available, send a notification instead.
+	 */
+	if (sleep && lock->l_type != F_UNLCK) {
+		/*
+		 * If notification queue is not enabled, can't support async
+		 * locks.
+		 */
+		if (!se->notify_enabled) {
+			saverr = EOPNOTSUPP;
+			goto out;
+		}
+		async_lock = true;
+		unique = req->unique;
+		fuse_reply_wait(req);
+	}
 	/* TODO: Is it alright to modify flock? */
 	lock->l_pid = 0;
-	ret = fcntl(plock->fd, F_OFD_SETLK, lock);
+	if (async_lock)
+		ret = fcntl(ofd, F_OFD_SETLKW, lock);
+	else
+		ret = fcntl(ofd, F_OFD_SETLK, lock);
 	if (ret == -1) {
 		saverr = errno;
 	}
 
 out:
-	pthread_mutex_unlock(&inode->plock_mutex);
 	lo_inode_put(lo, &inode);
 
-	fuse_reply_err(req, saverr);
+	if (!async_lock)
+		fuse_reply_err(req, saverr);
+	else {
+		fuse_lowlevel_notify_lock(se, unique, saverr);
+	}
 }
 
 static void lo_fsyncdir(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, int datasync,
-- 
2.20.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: virtio-fs@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: mszeredi@redhat.com, dgilbert@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/5] virtiofsd: Implement blocking posix locks
Date: Wed,  4 Dec 2019 14:08:36 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191204190836.31324-6-vgoyal@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191204190836.31324-1-vgoyal@redhat.com>

As of now we don't support fcntl(F_SETLKW) and if we see one, we return
-EOPNOTSUPP.

Change that by accepting these requests and returning a reply immediately
asking caller to wait. Once lock is available, send a notification to
the waiter indicating lock is available.

Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
---
 contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_kernel.h    |  7 +++
 contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.c  | 23 ++++++-
 contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.h  | 25 ++++++++
 contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c    | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 contrib/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c | 49 ++++++++++++---
 5 files changed, 185 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_kernel.h b/contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_kernel.h
index 2bdc8b1c88..432eb14d14 100644
--- a/contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_kernel.h
+++ b/contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_kernel.h
@@ -444,6 +444,7 @@ enum fuse_notify_code {
 	FUSE_NOTIFY_STORE = 4,
 	FUSE_NOTIFY_RETRIEVE = 5,
 	FUSE_NOTIFY_DELETE = 6,
+	FUSE_NOTIFY_LOCK = 7,
 	FUSE_NOTIFY_CODE_MAX,
 };
 
@@ -836,6 +837,12 @@ struct fuse_notify_retrieve_in {
 	uint64_t	dummy4;
 };
 
+struct fuse_notify_lock_out {
+	uint64_t	unique;
+	int32_t		error;
+	int32_t		padding;
+};
+
 /* Device ioctls: */
 #define FUSE_DEV_IOC_CLONE	_IOR(229, 0, uint32_t)
 
diff --git a/contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.c b/contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.c
index d4a42d9804..3d9c289510 100644
--- a/contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.c
+++ b/contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.c
@@ -183,7 +183,8 @@ int fuse_send_reply_iov_nofree(fuse_req_t req, int error, struct iovec *iov,
 {
 	struct fuse_out_header out;
 
-	if (error <= -1000 || error > 0) {
+	/* error = 1 has been used to signal client to wait for notificaiton */
+	if (error <= -1000 || error > 1) {
 		fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_ERR, "fuse: bad error value: %i\n",	error);
 		error = -ERANGE;
 	}
@@ -291,6 +292,12 @@ int fuse_reply_err(fuse_req_t req, int err)
 	return send_reply(req, -err, NULL, 0);
 }
 
+int fuse_reply_wait(fuse_req_t req)
+{
+	/* TODO: This is a hack. Fix it */
+	return send_reply(req, 1, NULL, 0);
+}
+
 void fuse_reply_none(fuse_req_t req)
 {
 	fuse_free_req(req);
@@ -2207,6 +2214,20 @@ static int send_notify_iov(struct fuse_session *se, int notify_code,
 	return fuse_send_msg(se, NULL, iov, count);
 }
 
+int fuse_lowlevel_notify_lock(struct fuse_session *se, uint64_t unique,
+			      int32_t error)
+{
+	struct fuse_notify_lock_out outarg = {0};
+	struct iovec iov[2];
+
+	outarg.unique = unique;
+	outarg.error = -error;
+
+	iov[1].iov_base = &outarg;
+	iov[1].iov_len = sizeof(outarg);
+	return send_notify_iov(se, FUSE_NOTIFY_LOCK, iov, 2);
+}
+
 int fuse_lowlevel_notify_poll(struct fuse_pollhandle *ph)
 {
 	if (ph != NULL) {
diff --git a/contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.h b/contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.h
index e664d2d12d..4126b4f967 100644
--- a/contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.h
+++ b/contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.h
@@ -1251,6 +1251,22 @@ struct fuse_lowlevel_ops {
  */
 int fuse_reply_err(fuse_req_t req, int err);
 
+/**
+ * Ask caller to wait for lock.
+ *
+ * Possible requests:
+ *   setlkw
+ *
+ * If caller sends a blocking lock request (setlkw), then reply to caller
+ * that wait for lock to be available. Once lock is available caller will
+ * receive a notification with request's unique id. Notification will
+ * carry info whether lock was successfully obtained or not.
+ *
+ * @param req request handle
+ * @return zero for success, -errno for failure to send reply
+ */
+int fuse_reply_wait(fuse_req_t req);
+
 /**
  * Don't send reply
  *
@@ -1704,6 +1720,15 @@ int fuse_lowlevel_notify_delete(struct fuse_session *se,
 int fuse_lowlevel_notify_store(struct fuse_session *se, fuse_ino_t ino,
 			       off_t offset, struct fuse_bufvec *bufv,
 			       enum fuse_buf_copy_flags flags);
+/**
+ * Notify event related to previous lock request
+ *
+ * @param se the session object
+ * @param unique the unique id of the request which requested setlkw
+ * @param error zero for success, -errno for the failure
+ */
+int fuse_lowlevel_notify_lock(struct fuse_session *se, uint64_t unique,
+			      int32_t error);
 
 /* ----------------------------------------------------------- *
  * Utility functions					       *
diff --git a/contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c b/contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c
index 94cf9b3791..129dd329f6 100644
--- a/contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c
+++ b/contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c
@@ -208,6 +208,83 @@ static void copy_iov(struct iovec *src_iov, int src_count,
     }
 }
 
+static int virtio_send_notify_msg(struct fuse_session *se, struct iovec *iov,
+				  int count)
+{
+    struct fv_QueueInfo *qi;
+    VuDev *dev = &se->virtio_dev->dev;
+    VuVirtq *q;
+    FVRequest *req;
+    VuVirtqElement *elem;
+    unsigned int in_num;
+    struct fuse_out_header *out = iov[0].iov_base;
+    size_t in_len, tosend_len = iov_size(iov, count);
+    struct iovec *in_sg;
+    int ret = 0;
+
+    /* Notifications have unique == 0 */
+    assert (!out->unique);
+
+    if (!se->notify_enabled)
+        return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+    /* If notifications are enabled, queue index 1 is notification queue */
+    qi = se->virtio_dev->qi[1];
+    q = vu_get_queue(dev, qi->qidx);
+
+    pthread_rwlock_rdlock(&qi->virtio_dev->vu_dispatch_rwlock);
+    pthread_mutex_lock(&qi->vq_lock);
+    /* Pop an element from queue */
+    req = vu_queue_pop(dev, q, sizeof(FVRequest), NULL, NULL);
+    if (!req) {
+        /* TODO: Implement some sort of ring buffer and queue notifications
+	 * on that and send these later when notification queue has space
+	 * available.
+	 */
+        ret = -ENOSPC;
+    }
+    pthread_mutex_unlock(&qi->vq_lock);
+    pthread_rwlock_unlock(&qi->virtio_dev->vu_dispatch_rwlock);
+
+    if (ret)
+        return ret;
+
+    out->len = tosend_len;
+    elem = &req->elem;
+    in_num = elem->in_num;
+    in_sg = elem->in_sg;
+    in_len = iov_size(in_sg, in_num);
+    fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "%s: elem %d: with %d in desc of length %zd\n",
+             __func__, elem->index, in_num,  in_len);
+
+    if (in_len < sizeof(struct fuse_out_header)) {
+        fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_ERR, "%s: elem %d too short for out_header\n",
+                 __func__, elem->index);
+        ret = -E2BIG;
+        goto out;
+    }
+
+    if (in_len < tosend_len) {
+        fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_ERR, "%s: elem %d too small for data len"
+                 " %zd\n", __func__, elem->index, tosend_len);
+        ret = -E2BIG;
+        goto out;
+    }
+
+    /* First copy the header data from iov->in_sg */
+    copy_iov(iov, count, in_sg, in_num, tosend_len);
+
+    pthread_rwlock_rdlock(&qi->virtio_dev->vu_dispatch_rwlock);
+    pthread_mutex_lock(&qi->vq_lock);
+    vu_queue_push(dev, q, elem, tosend_len);
+    vu_queue_notify(dev, q);
+    pthread_mutex_unlock(&qi->vq_lock);
+    pthread_rwlock_unlock(&qi->virtio_dev->vu_dispatch_rwlock);
+out:
+    free(req);
+    return ret;
+}
+
 /*
  * Called back by ll whenever it wants to send a reply/message back
  * The 1st element of the iov starts with the fuse_out_header
@@ -216,11 +293,11 @@ static void copy_iov(struct iovec *src_iov, int src_count,
 int virtio_send_msg(struct fuse_session *se, struct fuse_chan *ch,
                     struct iovec *iov, int count)
 {
-    FVRequest *req = container_of(ch, FVRequest, ch);
-    struct fv_QueueInfo *qi = ch->qi;
+    FVRequest *req;
+    struct fv_QueueInfo *qi;
     VuDev *dev = &se->virtio_dev->dev;
-    VuVirtq *q = vu_get_queue(dev, qi->qidx);
-    VuVirtqElement *elem = &req->elem;
+    VuVirtq *q;
+    VuVirtqElement *elem;
     int ret = 0;
 
     assert(count >= 1);
@@ -231,8 +308,15 @@ int virtio_send_msg(struct fuse_session *se, struct fuse_chan *ch,
 
     size_t tosend_len = iov_size(iov, count);
 
-    /* unique == 0 is notification, which we don't support */
-    assert(out->unique);
+    /* unique == 0 is notification */
+    if (!out->unique)
+        return virtio_send_notify_msg(se, iov, count);
+
+    assert(ch);
+    req = container_of(ch, FVRequest, ch);
+    elem = &req->elem;
+    qi = ch->qi;
+    q = vu_get_queue(dev, qi->qidx);
     assert(!req->reply_sent);
 
     /* The 'in' part of the elem is to qemu */
@@ -885,6 +969,7 @@ static int fv_get_config(VuDev *dev, uint8_t *config, uint32_t len)
 		struct fuse_notify_delete_out		delete_out;
 		struct fuse_notify_store_out		store_out;
 		struct fuse_notify_retrieve_out		retrieve_out;
+		struct fuse_notify_lock_out		lock_out;
 	};
 
 	notify_size = sizeof(struct fuse_out_header) +
diff --git a/contrib/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c b/contrib/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
index 6aa56882e8..308fc76530 100644
--- a/contrib/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
+++ b/contrib/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
@@ -1926,7 +1926,10 @@ static void lo_setlk(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino,
 	struct lo_data *lo = lo_data(req);
 	struct lo_inode *inode;
 	struct lo_inode_plock *plock;
-	int ret, saverr = 0;
+	int ret, saverr = 0, ofd;
+	uint64_t unique;
+	struct fuse_session *se = req->se;
+	bool async_lock = false;
 
 	fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "lo_setlk(ino=%" PRIu64 ", flags=%d)"
 		 " cmd=%d pid=%d owner=0x%lx sleep=%d l_whence=%d"
@@ -1934,11 +1937,6 @@ static void lo_setlk(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino,
 		 lock->l_type, lock->l_pid, fi->lock_owner, sleep,
 		 lock->l_whence, lock->l_start, lock->l_len);
 
-	if (sleep) {
-		fuse_reply_err(req, EOPNOTSUPP);
-		return;
-	}
-
 	inode = lo_inode(req, ino);
 	if (!inode) {
 		fuse_reply_err(req, EBADF);
@@ -1951,21 +1949,54 @@ static void lo_setlk(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino,
 
 	if (!plock) {
 		saverr = ret;
+		pthread_mutex_unlock(&inode->plock_mutex);
 		goto out;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * plock is now released when inode is going away. We already have
+	 * a reference on inode, so it is guaranteed that plock->fd is
+	 * still around even after dropping inode->plock_mutex lock
+	 */
+	ofd = plock->fd;
+	pthread_mutex_unlock(&inode->plock_mutex);
+
+	/*
+	 * If this lock request can block, request caller to wait for
+	 * notification. Do not access req after this. Once lock is
+	 * available, send a notification instead.
+	 */
+	if (sleep && lock->l_type != F_UNLCK) {
+		/*
+		 * If notification queue is not enabled, can't support async
+		 * locks.
+		 */
+		if (!se->notify_enabled) {
+			saverr = EOPNOTSUPP;
+			goto out;
+		}
+		async_lock = true;
+		unique = req->unique;
+		fuse_reply_wait(req);
+	}
 	/* TODO: Is it alright to modify flock? */
 	lock->l_pid = 0;
-	ret = fcntl(plock->fd, F_OFD_SETLK, lock);
+	if (async_lock)
+		ret = fcntl(ofd, F_OFD_SETLKW, lock);
+	else
+		ret = fcntl(ofd, F_OFD_SETLK, lock);
 	if (ret == -1) {
 		saverr = errno;
 	}
 
 out:
-	pthread_mutex_unlock(&inode->plock_mutex);
 	lo_inode_put(lo, &inode);
 
-	fuse_reply_err(req, saverr);
+	if (!async_lock)
+		fuse_reply_err(req, saverr);
+	else {
+		fuse_lowlevel_notify_lock(se, unique, saverr);
+	}
 }
 
 static void lo_fsyncdir(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, int datasync,
-- 
2.20.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-12-04 19:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-04 19:08 [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v2 0/5] [RFC] virtiofsd, vhost-user-fs: Add support for notification queue Vivek Goyal
2019-12-04 19:08 ` Vivek Goyal
2019-12-04 19:08 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v2 1/5] virtiofsd: Get rid of unused fields in fv_QueueInfo Vivek Goyal
2019-12-04 19:08   ` Vivek Goyal
2019-12-04 19:42   ` [Virtio-fs] " Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-12-04 19:42     ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-12-06 15:55     ` [Virtio-fs] " Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-12-04 19:08 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v2 2/5] virtiofsd: Release file locks using F_UNLCK Vivek Goyal
2019-12-04 19:08   ` Vivek Goyal
2019-12-04 19:08 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v2 3/5] virtiofd: Create a notification queue Vivek Goyal
2019-12-04 19:08   ` Vivek Goyal
2019-12-04 19:08 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v2 4/5] virtiofsd: Specify size of notification buffer using config space Vivek Goyal
2019-12-04 19:08   ` Vivek Goyal
2019-12-04 19:08 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2019-12-04 19:08   ` [PATCH v2 5/5] virtiofsd: Implement blocking posix locks Vivek Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191204190836.31324-6-vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=mszeredi@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=virtio-fs@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.