From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Cc: arnd@arndb.de, richard@nod.at, jdike@addtoit.com,
linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
davidgow@google.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] lkdtm/bugs: fix build error in lkdtm_UNSET_SMEP
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 16:14:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201912171613.454319D@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191213003522.66450-1-brendanhiggins@google.com>
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 04:35:22PM -0800, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> When building ARCH=um with CONFIG_UML_X86=y and CONFIG_64BIT=y we get
> the build errors:
>
> drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c: In function ‘lkdtm_UNSET_SMEP’:
> drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c:288:8: error: implicit declaration of function ‘native_read_cr4’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> cr4 = native_read_cr4();
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c:290:13: error: ‘X86_CR4_SMEP’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘X86_FEATURE_SMEP’?
> if ((cr4 & X86_CR4_SMEP) != X86_CR4_SMEP) {
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> X86_FEATURE_SMEP
> drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c:290:13: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c:297:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘native_write_cr4’; did you mean ‘direct_write_cr4’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> native_write_cr4(cr4);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> direct_write_cr4
>
> So specify that this block of code should only build when
> CONFIG_X86_64=y *AND* CONFIG_UML is unset.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Thanks for catching this! Is a similar marking needed for the recently
added lkdtm_DOUBLE_FAULT() when using UML on 32-bit?
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
-Kees
> ---
>
> This patch is part of my larger effort to get allyesconfig closer to
> working for ARCH=um. For more information about that, checkout the cover
> letter for a related patchset here:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191211192742.95699-1-brendanhiggins@google.com/
>
> ---
> drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c
> index a4fdad04809a9..6c1aab177fced 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c
> @@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ void lkdtm_STACK_GUARD_PAGE_TRAILING(void)
>
> void lkdtm_UNSET_SMEP(void)
> {
> -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_64) && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_UML)
> #define MOV_CR4_DEPTH 64
> void (*direct_write_cr4)(unsigned long val);
> unsigned char *insn;
> --
> 2.24.1.735.g03f4e72817-goog
>
--
Kees Cook
_______________________________________________
linux-um mailing list
linux-um@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Cc: jdike@addtoit.com, richard@nod.at,
anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com, linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davidgow@google.com, arnd@arndb.de,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] lkdtm/bugs: fix build error in lkdtm_UNSET_SMEP
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 16:14:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201912171613.454319D@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191213003522.66450-1-brendanhiggins@google.com>
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 04:35:22PM -0800, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> When building ARCH=um with CONFIG_UML_X86=y and CONFIG_64BIT=y we get
> the build errors:
>
> drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c: In function ‘lkdtm_UNSET_SMEP’:
> drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c:288:8: error: implicit declaration of function ‘native_read_cr4’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> cr4 = native_read_cr4();
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c:290:13: error: ‘X86_CR4_SMEP’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘X86_FEATURE_SMEP’?
> if ((cr4 & X86_CR4_SMEP) != X86_CR4_SMEP) {
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> X86_FEATURE_SMEP
> drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c:290:13: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c:297:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘native_write_cr4’; did you mean ‘direct_write_cr4’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> native_write_cr4(cr4);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> direct_write_cr4
>
> So specify that this block of code should only build when
> CONFIG_X86_64=y *AND* CONFIG_UML is unset.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Thanks for catching this! Is a similar marking needed for the recently
added lkdtm_DOUBLE_FAULT() when using UML on 32-bit?
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
-Kees
> ---
>
> This patch is part of my larger effort to get allyesconfig closer to
> working for ARCH=um. For more information about that, checkout the cover
> letter for a related patchset here:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191211192742.95699-1-brendanhiggins@google.com/
>
> ---
> drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c
> index a4fdad04809a9..6c1aab177fced 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c
> @@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ void lkdtm_STACK_GUARD_PAGE_TRAILING(void)
>
> void lkdtm_UNSET_SMEP(void)
> {
> -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_64) && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_UML)
> #define MOV_CR4_DEPTH 64
> void (*direct_write_cr4)(unsigned long val);
> unsigned char *insn;
> --
> 2.24.1.735.g03f4e72817-goog
>
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-18 0:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-13 0:35 [PATCH v1] lkdtm/bugs: fix build error in lkdtm_UNSET_SMEP Brendan Higgins
2019-12-13 0:35 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-12-18 0:14 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2019-12-18 0:14 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201912171613.454319D@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.