All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 13/14] cpuidle: psci: Add support for PM domains by using genpd
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 14:34:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191219143427.GF20746@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191211154343.29765-14-ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 04:43:42PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> When the hierarchical CPU topology layout is used in DT and the PSCI OSI
> mode is supported by the PSCI FW, let's initialize a corresponding PM
> domain topology by using genpd. This enables a CPU and a group of CPUs,
> when attached to the topology, to be power-managed accordingly.
>
> To trigger the attempt to initialize the genpd data structures let's use a
> subsys_initcall, which should be early enough to allow CPUs, but also other
> devices to be attached.
>
> The initialization consists of parsing the PSCI OF node for the topology
> and the "domain idle states" DT bindings. In case the idle states are
> compatible with "domain-idle-state", the initialized genpd becomes
> responsible of selecting an idle state for the PM domain, via assigning it
> a genpd governor.
>
> Note that, a successful initialization of the genpd data structures, is
> followed by a call to psci_set_osi_mode(), as to try to enable the OSI mode
> in the PSCI FW. In case this fails, we fall back into a degraded mode
> rather than bailing out and returning an error code.
>
> Co-developed-by: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> ---
>
> Changes in v4:
> 	- None.
>
> ---
>  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c | 267 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c        |   4 +-
>  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.h        |   5 +
>  3 files changed, 274 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c
> index 656ef3d59149..c2f94ba42222 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c
> @@ -7,14 +7,281 @@
>   *
>   */
>
> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "CPUidle PSCI: " fmt
> +
>  #include <linux/cpu.h>
>  #include <linux/device.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/pm_domain.h>
>  #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> +#include <linux/psci.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/string.h>
>
>  #include "cpuidle-psci.h"
>
> +struct psci_pd_provider {
> +	struct list_head link;
> +	struct device_node *node;
> +};
> +
> +static LIST_HEAD(psci_pd_providers);
> +static bool osi_mode_enabled;
> +
> +static int psci_pd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *pd)
> +{
> +	struct genpd_power_state *state = &pd->states[pd->state_idx];
> +	u32 *pd_state;
> +
> +	/* If we have failed to enable OSI mode, then abort power off. */
> +	if (!osi_mode_enabled)
> +		return -EBUSY;
> +

Why is above check needed ? Shouldn't we have disable/remove pd of
OSI is not enabled ?

> +	if (!state->data)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/* OSI mode is enabled, set the corresponding domain state. */
> +	pd_state = state->data;
> +	psci_set_domain_state(*pd_state);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +

[...]

> +static const struct of_device_id psci_of_match[] __initconst = {
> +	{ .compatible = "arm,psci" },

I think we can drop the above one as it's for v0.1 which didn't support
OSI.

> +	{ .compatible = "arm,psci-0.2" },
> +	{ .compatible = "arm,psci-1.0" },
> +	{}
> +};
> +
> +static int __init psci_idle_init_domains(void)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, psci_of_match);
> +	struct device_node *node;
> +	int ret = 0, pd_count = 0;
> +
> +	if (!np)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	/* Currently limit the hierarchical topology to be used in OSI mode. */
> +	if (!psci_has_osi_support())
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Parse child nodes for the "#power-domain-cells" property and
> +	 * initialize a genpd/genpd-of-provider pair when it's found.
> +	 */
> +	for_each_child_of_node(np, node) {
> +		if (!of_find_property(node, "#power-domain-cells", NULL))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		ret = psci_pd_init(node);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto put_node;
> +
> +		pd_count++;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Bail out if not using the hierarchical CPU topology. */
> +	if (!pd_count)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	/* Link genpd masters/subdomains to model the CPU topology. */
> +	ret = psci_pd_init_topology(np);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto remove_pd;
> +
> +	/* Try to enable OSI mode. */
> +	ret = psci_set_osi_mode();
> +	if (ret)
> +		pr_warn("failed to enable OSI mode: %d\n", ret);

Same question as above: shouldn't we disable and goto remove_pd ?

--
Regards,
Sudeep

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>, Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 13/14] cpuidle: psci: Add support for PM domains by using genpd
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 14:34:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191219143427.GF20746@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191211154343.29765-14-ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 04:43:42PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> When the hierarchical CPU topology layout is used in DT and the PSCI OSI
> mode is supported by the PSCI FW, let's initialize a corresponding PM
> domain topology by using genpd. This enables a CPU and a group of CPUs,
> when attached to the topology, to be power-managed accordingly.
>
> To trigger the attempt to initialize the genpd data structures let's use a
> subsys_initcall, which should be early enough to allow CPUs, but also other
> devices to be attached.
>
> The initialization consists of parsing the PSCI OF node for the topology
> and the "domain idle states" DT bindings. In case the idle states are
> compatible with "domain-idle-state", the initialized genpd becomes
> responsible of selecting an idle state for the PM domain, via assigning it
> a genpd governor.
>
> Note that, a successful initialization of the genpd data structures, is
> followed by a call to psci_set_osi_mode(), as to try to enable the OSI mode
> in the PSCI FW. In case this fails, we fall back into a degraded mode
> rather than bailing out and returning an error code.
>
> Co-developed-by: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> ---
>
> Changes in v4:
> 	- None.
>
> ---
>  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c | 267 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c        |   4 +-
>  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.h        |   5 +
>  3 files changed, 274 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c
> index 656ef3d59149..c2f94ba42222 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c
> @@ -7,14 +7,281 @@
>   *
>   */
>
> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "CPUidle PSCI: " fmt
> +
>  #include <linux/cpu.h>
>  #include <linux/device.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/pm_domain.h>
>  #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> +#include <linux/psci.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/string.h>
>
>  #include "cpuidle-psci.h"
>
> +struct psci_pd_provider {
> +	struct list_head link;
> +	struct device_node *node;
> +};
> +
> +static LIST_HEAD(psci_pd_providers);
> +static bool osi_mode_enabled;
> +
> +static int psci_pd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *pd)
> +{
> +	struct genpd_power_state *state = &pd->states[pd->state_idx];
> +	u32 *pd_state;
> +
> +	/* If we have failed to enable OSI mode, then abort power off. */
> +	if (!osi_mode_enabled)
> +		return -EBUSY;
> +

Why is above check needed ? Shouldn't we have disable/remove pd of
OSI is not enabled ?

> +	if (!state->data)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/* OSI mode is enabled, set the corresponding domain state. */
> +	pd_state = state->data;
> +	psci_set_domain_state(*pd_state);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +

[...]

> +static const struct of_device_id psci_of_match[] __initconst = {
> +	{ .compatible = "arm,psci" },

I think we can drop the above one as it's for v0.1 which didn't support
OSI.

> +	{ .compatible = "arm,psci-0.2" },
> +	{ .compatible = "arm,psci-1.0" },
> +	{}
> +};
> +
> +static int __init psci_idle_init_domains(void)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, psci_of_match);
> +	struct device_node *node;
> +	int ret = 0, pd_count = 0;
> +
> +	if (!np)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	/* Currently limit the hierarchical topology to be used in OSI mode. */
> +	if (!psci_has_osi_support())
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Parse child nodes for the "#power-domain-cells" property and
> +	 * initialize a genpd/genpd-of-provider pair when it's found.
> +	 */
> +	for_each_child_of_node(np, node) {
> +		if (!of_find_property(node, "#power-domain-cells", NULL))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		ret = psci_pd_init(node);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto put_node;
> +
> +		pd_count++;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Bail out if not using the hierarchical CPU topology. */
> +	if (!pd_count)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	/* Link genpd masters/subdomains to model the CPU topology. */
> +	ret = psci_pd_init_topology(np);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto remove_pd;
> +
> +	/* Try to enable OSI mode. */
> +	ret = psci_set_osi_mode();
> +	if (ret)
> +		pr_warn("failed to enable OSI mode: %d\n", ret);

Same question as above: shouldn't we disable and goto remove_pd ?

--
Regards,
Sudeep

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-19 14:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-11 15:43 [PATCH v4 00/14] cpuidle: psci: Support hierarchical CPU arrangement Ulf Hansson
2019-12-11 15:43 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-12-11 15:43 ` [PATCH v4 01/14] cpuidle: psci: Align psci_power_state count with idle state count Ulf Hansson
2019-12-11 15:43   ` Ulf Hansson
2019-12-11 15:43 ` [PATCH v4 02/14] dt: psci: Update DT bindings to support hierarchical PSCI states Ulf Hansson
2019-12-11 15:43   ` Ulf Hansson
2019-12-11 15:43 ` [PATCH v4 03/14] firmware: psci: Export functions to manage the OSI mode Ulf Hansson
2019-12-11 15:43   ` Ulf Hansson
2019-12-11 15:43 ` [PATCH v4 04/14] of: base: Add of_get_cpu_state_node() to get idle states for a CPU node Ulf Hansson
2019-12-11 15:43   ` Ulf Hansson
2019-12-11 15:43 ` [PATCH v4 05/14] cpuidle: dt: Support hierarchical CPU idle states Ulf Hansson
2019-12-11 15:43   ` Ulf Hansson
2019-12-11 15:43 ` [PATCH v4 06/14] cpuidle: psci: Simplify OF parsing of CPU idle state nodes Ulf Hansson
2019-12-11 15:43   ` Ulf Hansson
2019-12-11 15:43 ` [PATCH v4 07/14] cpuidle: psci: Support hierarchical CPU idle states Ulf Hansson
2019-12-11 15:43   ` Ulf Hansson
2019-12-11 15:43 ` [PATCH v4 08/14] cpuidle: psci: Add a helper to attach a CPU to its PM domain Ulf Hansson
2019-12-11 15:43   ` Ulf Hansson
2019-12-19 14:30   ` Sudeep Holla
2019-12-19 14:30     ` Sudeep Holla
2019-12-11 15:43 ` [PATCH v4 09/14] cpuidle: psci: Attach CPU devices to their PM domains Ulf Hansson
2019-12-11 15:43   ` Ulf Hansson
2019-12-19 14:30   ` Sudeep Holla
2019-12-19 14:30     ` Sudeep Holla
2019-12-11 15:43 ` [PATCH v4 10/14] cpuidle: psci: Prepare to use OS initiated suspend mode via " Ulf Hansson
2019-12-11 15:43   ` Ulf Hansson
2019-12-19 14:31   ` Sudeep Holla
2019-12-19 14:31     ` Sudeep Holla
2019-12-19 15:48     ` Ulf Hansson
2019-12-19 15:48       ` Ulf Hansson
2019-12-19 18:01       ` Sudeep Holla
2019-12-19 18:01         ` Sudeep Holla
2019-12-19 21:33         ` Ulf Hansson
2019-12-19 21:33           ` Ulf Hansson
2019-12-20 10:01           ` Sudeep Holla
2019-12-20 10:01             ` Sudeep Holla
2019-12-20 11:33             ` Ulf Hansson
2019-12-20 11:33               ` Ulf Hansson
2019-12-11 15:43 ` [PATCH v4 11/14] cpuidle: psci: Manage runtime PM in the idle path Ulf Hansson
2019-12-11 15:43   ` Ulf Hansson
2019-12-19 14:32   ` Sudeep Holla
2019-12-19 14:32     ` Sudeep Holla
2019-12-11 15:43 ` [PATCH v4 12/14] cpuidle: psci: Support CPU hotplug for the hierarchical model Ulf Hansson
2019-12-11 15:43   ` Ulf Hansson
2019-12-19 14:33   ` Sudeep Holla
2019-12-19 14:33     ` Sudeep Holla
2019-12-19 15:48     ` Ulf Hansson
2019-12-19 15:48       ` Ulf Hansson
2019-12-11 15:43 ` [PATCH v4 13/14] cpuidle: psci: Add support for PM domains by using genpd Ulf Hansson
2019-12-11 15:43   ` Ulf Hansson
2019-12-19 14:34   ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2019-12-19 14:34     ` Sudeep Holla
2019-12-19 15:48     ` Ulf Hansson
2019-12-19 15:48       ` Ulf Hansson
2019-12-19 18:06       ` Sudeep Holla
2019-12-19 18:06         ` Sudeep Holla
2019-12-19 22:02         ` Ulf Hansson
2019-12-19 22:02           ` Ulf Hansson
2019-12-20 10:07           ` Sudeep Holla
2019-12-20 10:07             ` Sudeep Holla
2019-12-20 11:27             ` Ulf Hansson
2019-12-20 11:27               ` Ulf Hansson
2019-12-20 12:01               ` Sudeep Holla
2019-12-20 12:01                 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-12-11 15:43 ` [PATCH v4 14/14] arm64: dts: Convert to the hierarchical CPU topology layout for MSM8916 Ulf Hansson
2019-12-11 15:43   ` Ulf Hansson
2019-12-19 14:34   ` Sudeep Holla
2019-12-19 14:34     ` Sudeep Holla
2019-12-19 15:48     ` Ulf Hansson
2019-12-19 15:48       ` Ulf Hansson
2019-12-19 17:58       ` Sudeep Holla
2019-12-19 17:58         ` Sudeep Holla
2019-12-18  7:36 ` [PATCH v4 00/14] cpuidle: psci: Support hierarchical CPU arrangement Ulf Hansson
2019-12-18  7:36   ` Ulf Hansson
2019-12-18 10:25   ` Sudeep Holla
2019-12-18 10:25     ` Sudeep Holla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191219143427.GF20746@bogus \
    --to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=ilina@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=khilman@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.