From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-hams@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/rose: remove redundant assignment to variable failed
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2020 16:18:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200107161827.GO3911@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200107152415.106353-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 03:24:15PM +0000, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> The variable failed is being assigned a value that is never read, the
> following goto statement jumps to the end of the function and variable
> failed is not referenced at all. Remove the redundant assignment.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
> net/rose/rose_route.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/rose/rose_route.c b/net/rose/rose_route.c
> index c53307623236..5277631fa14c 100644
> --- a/net/rose/rose_route.c
> +++ b/net/rose/rose_route.c
> @@ -696,7 +696,6 @@ struct rose_neigh *rose_get_neigh(rose_address *addr, unsigned char *cause,
> for (i = 0; i < node->count; i++) {
> if (!rose_ftimer_running(node->neighbour[i])) {
> res = node->neighbour[i];
> - failed = 0;
> goto out;
> }
> failed = 1;
I don't know the code, but I would have expected the out label to come
earlier:
}
if (!route_frame) { /* connect request */
for (node = rose_node_list; node != NULL; node = node->next) {
if (rosecmpm(addr, &node->address, node->mask) = 0) {
for (i = 0; i < node->count; i++) {
if (!rose_ftimer_running(node->neighbour[i])) {
res = node->neighbour[i];
failed = 0;
goto out;
}
failed = 1;
}
}
}
}
<--------*********** I would have expected it to be right here.
if (failed) {
*cause = ROSE_OUT_OF_ORDER;
*diagnostic = 0;
} else {
*cause = ROSE_NOT_OBTAINABLE;
*diagnostic = 0;
}
out:
if (!route_frame) spin_unlock_bh(&rose_node_list_lock);
return res;
regards,
dan carpenter
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-hams@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/rose: remove redundant assignment to variable failed
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 19:18:27 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200107161827.GO3911@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200107152415.106353-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 03:24:15PM +0000, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> The variable failed is being assigned a value that is never read, the
> following goto statement jumps to the end of the function and variable
> failed is not referenced at all. Remove the redundant assignment.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
> net/rose/rose_route.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/rose/rose_route.c b/net/rose/rose_route.c
> index c53307623236..5277631fa14c 100644
> --- a/net/rose/rose_route.c
> +++ b/net/rose/rose_route.c
> @@ -696,7 +696,6 @@ struct rose_neigh *rose_get_neigh(rose_address *addr, unsigned char *cause,
> for (i = 0; i < node->count; i++) {
> if (!rose_ftimer_running(node->neighbour[i])) {
> res = node->neighbour[i];
> - failed = 0;
> goto out;
> }
> failed = 1;
I don't know the code, but I would have expected the out label to come
earlier:
}
if (!route_frame) { /* connect request */
for (node = rose_node_list; node != NULL; node = node->next) {
if (rosecmpm(addr, &node->address, node->mask) == 0) {
for (i = 0; i < node->count; i++) {
if (!rose_ftimer_running(node->neighbour[i])) {
res = node->neighbour[i];
failed = 0;
goto out;
}
failed = 1;
}
}
}
}
<--------*********** I would have expected it to be right here.
if (failed) {
*cause = ROSE_OUT_OF_ORDER;
*diagnostic = 0;
} else {
*cause = ROSE_NOT_OBTAINABLE;
*diagnostic = 0;
}
out:
if (!route_frame) spin_unlock_bh(&rose_node_list_lock);
return res;
regards,
dan carpenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-07 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-07 15:24 [PATCH] net/rose: remove redundant assignment to variable failed Colin King
2020-01-07 15:24 ` Colin King
2020-01-07 16:18 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2020-01-07 16:18 ` Dan Carpenter
2020-01-07 16:32 ` Dan Carpenter
2020-01-07 16:32 ` Dan Carpenter
2020-01-07 21:52 ` David Miller
2020-01-07 21:52 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200107161827.GO3911@kadam \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hams@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.