From: Amol Grover <frextrite@gmail.com>
To: Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>
Cc: "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH] kernel: module: Pass lockdep expression to RCU lists
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 18:17:46 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200121124745.14864-1-frextrite@gmail.com> (raw)
modules is traversed using list_for_each_entry_rcu outside an
RCU read-side critical section but under the protection
of module_mutex or with preemption disabled.
Hence, add corresponding lockdep expression to silence false-positive
lockdep warnings, and harden RCU lists.
list_for_each_entry_rcu when traversed inside a preempt disabled
section, doesn't need an explicit lockdep expression since it is
implicitly checked for.
Add macro for the corresponding lockdep expression.
Signed-off-by: Amol Grover <frextrite@gmail.com>
---
kernel/module.c | 12 +++++++-----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
index b56f3224b161..2425f58159dd 100644
--- a/kernel/module.c
+++ b/kernel/module.c
@@ -84,6 +84,8 @@
* 3) module_addr_min/module_addr_max.
* (delete and add uses RCU list operations). */
DEFINE_MUTEX(module_mutex);
+#define module_mutex_held() \
+ lockdep_is_held(&module_mutex)
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(module_mutex);
static LIST_HEAD(modules);
@@ -214,7 +216,7 @@ static struct module *mod_find(unsigned long addr)
{
struct module *mod;
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(mod, &modules, list) {
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(mod, &modules, list, module_mutex_held()) {
if (within_module(addr, mod))
return mod;
}
@@ -448,7 +450,7 @@ bool each_symbol_section(bool (*fn)(const struct symsearch *arr,
if (each_symbol_in_section(arr, ARRAY_SIZE(arr), NULL, fn, data))
return true;
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(mod, &modules, list) {
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(mod, &modules, list, module_mutex_held()) {
struct symsearch arr[] = {
{ mod->syms, mod->syms + mod->num_syms, mod->crcs,
NOT_GPL_ONLY, false },
@@ -616,7 +618,7 @@ static struct module *find_module_all(const char *name, size_t len,
module_assert_mutex_or_preempt();
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(mod, &modules, list) {
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(mod, &modules, list, module_mutex_held()) {
if (!even_unformed && mod->state == MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED)
continue;
if (strlen(mod->name) == len && !memcmp(mod->name, name, len))
@@ -2040,7 +2042,7 @@ void set_all_modules_text_rw(void)
return;
mutex_lock(&module_mutex);
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(mod, &modules, list) {
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(mod, &modules, list, module_mutex_held()) {
if (mod->state == MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED)
continue;
@@ -2059,7 +2061,7 @@ void set_all_modules_text_ro(void)
return;
mutex_lock(&module_mutex);
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(mod, &modules, list) {
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(mod, &modules, list, module_mutex_held()) {
/*
* Ignore going modules since it's possible that ro
* protection has already been disabled, otherwise we'll
--
2.24.1
_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Amol Grover <frextrite@gmail.com>
To: Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmik04@gmail.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Amol Grover <frextrite@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] kernel: module: Pass lockdep expression to RCU lists
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 18:17:46 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200121124745.14864-1-frextrite@gmail.com> (raw)
modules is traversed using list_for_each_entry_rcu outside an
RCU read-side critical section but under the protection
of module_mutex or with preemption disabled.
Hence, add corresponding lockdep expression to silence false-positive
lockdep warnings, and harden RCU lists.
list_for_each_entry_rcu when traversed inside a preempt disabled
section, doesn't need an explicit lockdep expression since it is
implicitly checked for.
Add macro for the corresponding lockdep expression.
Signed-off-by: Amol Grover <frextrite@gmail.com>
---
kernel/module.c | 12 +++++++-----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
index b56f3224b161..2425f58159dd 100644
--- a/kernel/module.c
+++ b/kernel/module.c
@@ -84,6 +84,8 @@
* 3) module_addr_min/module_addr_max.
* (delete and add uses RCU list operations). */
DEFINE_MUTEX(module_mutex);
+#define module_mutex_held() \
+ lockdep_is_held(&module_mutex)
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(module_mutex);
static LIST_HEAD(modules);
@@ -214,7 +216,7 @@ static struct module *mod_find(unsigned long addr)
{
struct module *mod;
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(mod, &modules, list) {
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(mod, &modules, list, module_mutex_held()) {
if (within_module(addr, mod))
return mod;
}
@@ -448,7 +450,7 @@ bool each_symbol_section(bool (*fn)(const struct symsearch *arr,
if (each_symbol_in_section(arr, ARRAY_SIZE(arr), NULL, fn, data))
return true;
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(mod, &modules, list) {
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(mod, &modules, list, module_mutex_held()) {
struct symsearch arr[] = {
{ mod->syms, mod->syms + mod->num_syms, mod->crcs,
NOT_GPL_ONLY, false },
@@ -616,7 +618,7 @@ static struct module *find_module_all(const char *name, size_t len,
module_assert_mutex_or_preempt();
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(mod, &modules, list) {
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(mod, &modules, list, module_mutex_held()) {
if (!even_unformed && mod->state == MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED)
continue;
if (strlen(mod->name) == len && !memcmp(mod->name, name, len))
@@ -2040,7 +2042,7 @@ void set_all_modules_text_rw(void)
return;
mutex_lock(&module_mutex);
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(mod, &modules, list) {
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(mod, &modules, list, module_mutex_held()) {
if (mod->state == MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED)
continue;
@@ -2059,7 +2061,7 @@ void set_all_modules_text_ro(void)
return;
mutex_lock(&module_mutex);
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(mod, &modules, list) {
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(mod, &modules, list, module_mutex_held()) {
/*
* Ignore going modules since it's possible that ro
* protection has already been disabled, otherwise we'll
--
2.24.1
next reply other threads:[~2020-01-21 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-21 12:47 Amol Grover [this message]
2020-01-21 12:47 ` [PATCH] kernel: module: Pass lockdep expression to RCU lists Amol Grover
2020-01-23 12:10 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Jessica Yu
2020-01-23 12:10 ` Jessica Yu
2020-01-23 16:52 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Amol Grover
2020-01-23 16:52 ` Amol Grover
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200121124745.14864-1-frextrite@gmail.com \
--to=frextrite@gmail.com \
--cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.